System-wide issues Before we get to the telescope System integration and verification at the telescope Operations Maintenance and support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOFTWARE TESTING. Software Testing Principles Types of software tests Test planning Test Development Test Execution and Reporting Test tools and Methods.
Advertisements

LBT Q Eng/SW Review SFWG – Software Group General Norm Cushing.
CMSC 2006 Orlando Active Alignment System for the LSST William J. Gressler LSST Project National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Scott Sandwith New.
VISTA: The Telescope challenge Systems Engineering the Solution?
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
“Riding the Hub”: The MMT Adaptive Secondary Douglas Miller University of Arizona The AO System Current Performance of the MMT AO System Ongoing Development.
Sodium monitoring experiment in Chile Céline d’Orgeville.
National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada Observing Efficiency and Reliability of Gemini South MCAO Glen Herriot Herzberg.
George Angeli 11 September, 2001 Current Concepts and Status of GSMT Control Systems.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
Laser Guide Stars by Roberto Ragazzoni INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Padova (Italy)
Systems Development Life Cycle:
Software Testing and Quality Assurance
1 Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Mini-Review 6/15/2015Richard Dekany 12/07/2009.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
Demonstration of Science Observing Modes AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 D. Le Mignant, A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team.
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO System Design Phase Management Report - Replan NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
Observing efficiency for NGAO 1.Definitions 2.Lessons learned a)Keck LGS AO “efficiency” b)Keck AO brute conclusion 3.Observing efficiency budget 4. Observing.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
PSWG March Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor.
Agenda (Fri., June 7) 8:00AO UI Demonstration 9:00Introductions to AO team 9:05AOWG Chair Selection 9:15Review Agenda (make changes?) 9:20Review Planned.
NGAO System Design Phase System & Functional Requirements Documents NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
NGAO Instrumentation Preliminary Design Phase Planning September 2008 Sean Adkins.
Functional Requirements for NGAO Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory NGAO Team Meeting #9 August 24, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
Testing - an Overview September 10, What is it, Why do it? Testing is a set of activities aimed at validating that an attribute or capability.
The Gemini MCAO System (EPICS Meeting, SLAC, April 2005) 1 The Gemini MCAO System Andy Foster Observatory Sciences Ltd.
NGAO Controls Team Kickoff Meeting August 5, 2008 Erik Johansson.
Introduction to Software Testing
Issues on Software Testing for Safety-Critical Real-Time Automation Systems Shahdat Hossain Troy Mockenhaupt.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
J. Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) Operational Readiness
LGS AO Readiness for 05B AOWG meeting February 4, 2004 Keck LGS AO team.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
FLAO commissioning with InfraRed Test Camera (IRTC) S. Esposito, G. Brusa, A. Riccardi FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
System Analysis (Part 2) The System Development Life Cycle Problem Selection and Feasibility Study.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
OC, June 3, SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Observing Modes from a Software viewpoint Robert Lucas and Philippe Salomé (SSR)
1 JWST Functional Flow Diagrams and Schematic Block Diagrams.
D. Measurement Approach Phil Hinz Principal Investigator.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
AURA New Initiatives Office. GSMT SWG Meeting L. Stepp, July 30, 2002 NSF Science Working Group Support Available from AURA NIO Available Personnel Current.
Telescopes Telescopes only have a few jobs: 1)Point to a particular point on the sky 2)Collect lots of light and focus it onto a detector 3)Follow the.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Installation and Commisioning SE view point Romuald Duperrier ESS SE manager.
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
Telescope Assembly, Integration and Verification (AIV) WBS 04C. 14 J
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Laser(s) for Keck Observatory’s Next Generation AO (NGAO) System
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.
Software Engineering Software Engineering is the science and art of
Systems Engineering for Mission-Driven Modeling
Software Engineering Software Engineering is the science and art of
Managing the Test Process CS 4501 / 6501 Software Testing
Strategy for development of new software
PSS verification and validation
Atefeh Sadeghzadeh Control engineer – Target safety and control
Presentation transcript:

System-wide issues Before we get to the telescope System integration and verification at the telescope Operations Maintenance and support

Before we get to the telescope Design validation – By analysis, experiment, or simulation, we have to convince ourselves that the planned design will actually work to support the efficient generation of science Calibration of the ASM – We will need an optical setup to allow tests of the ASM as a complete subsystem (high order correction, phasing, chopping…) Vibration – We should press for specified limits on the vibration internal to each instrument (depends on its science niche) and on transmission to other telescope systems (including other instruments) * Laser power – Whatever design we decide on, the return flux per watt must be verified on sky first

Before we get to the telescope II Control systems analysis – How are the control loops, overlapping in spatial and temporal regimes, to be implemented? SOFTWARE!! – There will be a HUGE software development effort required to make the AO integrate efficiently with the telescope control system and instruments. – We need to be designing that architecture NOW! Figure 17. Spatial and temporal domains for LBT control components. Active optics Pointing control system LLT fast steering mirror GLAO (ASM) Na LGS (ASM)

System integration and verification Written integration plan that answers: – How will the system be installed on the telescope? – What are the prerequisites for installation? – How are the optical systems, including the lasers, to be aligned with each other and the telescope? – How is each subsystem tested once on the telescope, and what are the criteria for a successful test? – What full system tests are required to commission the AO? – What will it cost in telescope time and personnel?

Operations What sort of expertise do we anticipate will be needed on the GMTO staff to run the AO every night? – Will definitely need a laser safety officer Aircraft and satellite avoidance will require one-time approval from the US FAA and ongoing clearances from US Space Command respectively

Maintenance and support Must be done mostly by non-expert observatory staff Need on-axis point sources simulating guide stars that can be installed at prime focus – Also want an on-axis WFS for truth sensing with the simulator – guarantees shape of M2 Should describe a hardware sparing strategy

One other thing… Painful as it may be, we should understand and lay out for PDR the options for descoping and phasing in the AO systems over time.