Day: Wednesday 9 th November Session: 14.30am Coordinators: Ian Williamson & Stig Enemark Topic:Components of the vision- break out groups

Day 1 – Wednesday Nov 9 th Welcome & Research Vision Presentations - European Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Paul van der Molen Report Back - Discussion European Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Steve Jacoby Evaluate – Components of the vision

Presentations - Australian Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Daniel Steudler Report Back - Discussion Australian Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Grahame Searle Evaluate – Components of the vision Day 2 – Thursday Nov 10 th

Report Back - Discussion Group 1 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Warwick Watkins Evaluate – Issues in Designing a New Generation of LAS Day 3 – Friday Nov 11 th Presentation – Spatially Enabling Government Final Presentation Next Generation of LAS Ian Williamson, Stig Enemark, Jude Wallace Group 2 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Holger Magel

The Paradigm 1.What is the vision for an ICT enabled LAS to support sustainable development? 2.Is a common understanding possible? 3.Is this “land management” or “land information management”?

The Paradigm 1.Summary -Good governance in a complex world now requires integrated data approach -How do you get the information to meet new political challenges such as disaster management, security -In order to achieve this there is a need to spatially reference/enable information -Process is important – not entities -Without the cadastre and land registry, land use planning, land tax and legal security in property, conflict resolution (sustainable development) is not possible

The Paradigm 1.Summary -Question is “what will assist government deliver sustainable development” -Land use planning, land development and land taxation are confusing the model. The key is a unique, integrated and coordinated cadastre and land registry. This must be spatially enabled and support interoperability. Most land related activities rely on this (ie. Planning, valuation, land development) -The model is a land management model, not a land administration model.

Key Drivers 1.Rank in importance the key drivers 2.Is tax (in all its forms) a driver?

Key Drivers 1.Summary -Environment was the key political driver for INSPIRE -Agricultural subsidies -Information technology -Government fraud

Key Components and Tools 1.Authentic registers? 2.The IT architecture to deliver the vision? 3.The spatial dimension- SDI? 4.Infrastructure to support trading in complex commodities?

Key Components and Tools 1.Summary -Authentic registers that are spatially enabled -A common data model in the cadastral domain, especially in federated systems, is essential for interoperability -The fundamental objective is to serve the needs of society at this point in time -European trend to legislate spatial enablement and codify self regulation -Public private partnerships are increasing -Spatial cadastre is fundamental and accepted by government and society -Spatial professions (especially surveyors) are the key driver in government reform -Key component in building capacity are education at universities, CPD and research activity

Future Challengers, Issues & Improvements 1.Achieving a national system in a federated country 2.Achieving spatially enabled government 3.Should the land registry system contribute to SD? How? 4.Relationship between the land registry and spatial cadastre 5.Can international comparative monitoring be established? 6.Administration of restrictions and responsibilities 7.Is the land parcel still central to LA? 8.The role of buildings in land administration

Future Challengers, Issues & Improvements 1.Summary