Optical Springs at the 40m 1 QND Workshop, Hannover Dec 14, 2005 Robert Ward for the 40m Team Osamu Miyakawa, Rana Adhikari, Matthew Evans, Benjamin Abbott,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) HOMODYNE AND HETERODYNE READOUT OF A SIGNAL- RECYCLED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTOR.
Advertisements

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
Caltech 40m Current Issues University of Florida Kentaro Somiya.
Optickle 1 The Optickle Optical Modeling Tool QND Workshop, Hannover Dec 15, 2005 Robert Ward & Matthew Evans.
LIGO- G05XXXX-00-R 40m meeting, May Experimental update from the 40m team 40m TAC meeting May 13, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech and the 40m collaboration.
40m TAC, 10/13/05 1 Lock acquisition procedure towards detuned RSE Start with no DOFs controlled, all optics aligned. Re-align each 1.5 hours. ITMy ITMx.
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
40m Modeling and Experiment 1 Modeling the 40m QND Workshop, Hannover Dec 15, 2005 Robert Ward Seiji Kawamura, Osamu Miyakawa, Hiro Yamamoto, Matthew Evans,
40m TAC, 10/13/05 1 Report to the 40m Technical Advisory Committee October 13, 2005 The 40m Team Ben Abbott, Rana Adhikari, Dan Busby, Jay Heefner, Osamu.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Jan 29, 2007 LIGO Excomm, G R 1 Status and Future of the Caltech 40m Lab Jan 29, 2007 the 40m team: Rana Adhikari, Ben Abbott, Rich Abbott, Rolf.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
Towards dual recycling with the aid of time and frequency domain simulations M. Malec for the GEO 600 team Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Albert-Einstein-Institut.
40m Laboratory Progress Report LSC meeting at LIGO Hanford Observatory
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G R Aspen Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype Seiji Kawamura 2004 Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves Gravitational.
Stefan Hild October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Interferometers with detuned arm cavaties.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 3/031 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
Advanced LIGO Sensing and Control Readout schemes for Advanced LIGO K.A. Strain University of Glasgow G & G
RSE Experiment in Japan Feb. 20 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting LIGO-G Z K.Somiya, O.Miyakawa, P.Beyersdorf, and S.Kawamura.
LIGO- G R Aspen winter conference, January Toward the Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype Aspen winter.
Robert Ward NAOJ seminar, March 1, The Caltech 40m Prototype Detuned RSE Interferometer Robert Ward NAOJ seminar March 1, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Rana.
LIGO- G R LIGO seminar, November Optical spring and optical resonance in the 40m Detuned RSE interferometer LIGO seminar November 1, 2005.
LIGO-G R DC Detection at the 40m Lab Plans for DC Readout Experiment at the 40m Lab Alan Weinstein for the 40m Lab July 19, 2005 Ben Abbott, Rana.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
LIGO- G R LSC meeting at LSU, August Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC meeting at LSU Aug 16, 2006 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m team: Rana.
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research Univ. of Tokyo Development of an RSE Interferometer Using the Third Harmonic Demodulation LIGO-G Z Osamu Miyakawa,
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
LIGO- G R 40m weekly meeting, Jan 05, Explore demodulation phase for DDM on 40m RSE prototype Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech LIGO-G R.
Jan 17th 2006Ward Candicacy1 Length Sensing and Control for an Advanced Gravitational Wave Detector Robert Ward PhD Candidacy Caltech, 17 Jan 2006.
Concept and Current Status of Japan 4m RSE March Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
LIGO- G Z LSC meeting at Baton Rouge, March Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC Meeting Baton Rouge Mar 21, 2007 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO- G R 40m/AdLIGO, LSC, August Issues in sensing and control of the 40m and Advanced LIGO optical configuration LSC meeting, August.
LIGO-G R DC Detection at the 40m Lab DC Detection Experiment at the 40m Lab Robert Ward for the 40m Lab to the AIC group Livingston LSC meeting.
LIGO-G Z 3) Current Status & Plan for Japan RSE -- Stabilization and Installation of PRC & Detuning -- LSC Livingston 2002 Kentaro Somiya.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 Prototyping for eLIGO: Power Recycled Fabry Perot Michelson DARM RF ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Effect of sideband of sideband on 40m and Advanced LIGO
“Traditional” treatment of quantum noise
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Estimation of each loop shot noise limit for AdLIGO
Progress report from 40m team for the Advanced LIGO
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Presentation transcript:

Optical Springs at the 40m 1 QND Workshop, Hannover Dec 14, 2005 Robert Ward for the 40m Team Osamu Miyakawa, Rana Adhikari, Matthew Evans, Benjamin Abbott, Rolf Bork, Daniel Busby, Hartmut Grote, Jay Heefner, Alexander Ivanov, Seiji Kawamura, Michael Smith, Robert Taylor, Monica Varvella, Stephen Vass, and Alan Weinstein

Optical Springs at the 40m 2 An interferometer as close as possible to the Advanced LIGO optical configuration and control system Caltech 40 meter prototype interferometer  Detuned Resonant Sideband Extraction (DRSE)  Power Recycling  Suspended mass  Single pendula  Digital controls system  Same cavity finesse as AdLIGO baseline design  100x shorter storage times.

Optical Springs at the 40m 3 AdLIGO signal extraction scheme  Arm cavity signals are extracted from beat between carrier and f 1 or f 2.  Central part (Michelson, PRC, SRC) signals are extracted from beat between f 1 and f 2, not including arm cavity information. f1f1 -f 1 f2f2 -f 2 Carrier (Resonant on arms) Single demodulation Arm information Double demodulation Central part information  Mach-Zehnder will be installed to eliminate sidebands of sidebands.  Only + f 2 is resonant on SRC.  Unbalanced sidebands of +/-f 2 due to detuned SRC produce good error signal for Central part. ETMy ETMx ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM 4km f2f2 f1f1

Optical Springs at the 40m 4 The Story So Far To understand why we saw the optical springs in the way we have, it helps to know the story of Lock Acquisition at the 40m.

Optical Springs at the 40m 5 Transmitted light is used as 40m Lock Acquisition part I: Off-resonant lock scheme for a single cavity Off-resonant Lock point Resonant Lock

Optical Springs at the 40m 6 40m Lock acquisition procedure Start with no DOFs controlled, all optics aligned. ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM SP DDM 13m MC 33MHz 166MHz SP33 SP166 AP DDM AP166 PO DDM

Optical Springs at the 40m 7 40m Lock acquisition procedure DRMI + 2arms with offset ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM SP DDM 13m MC 33MHz 166MHz SP33 SP166 AP DDM AP166 PO DDM Average wait : 3 minute (at night, with tickler) T =7% I Q 1/sqrt(TrY) 1/sqrt(TrX)

Optical Springs at the 40m 8 40m Lock acquisition procedure ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM SP DDM 13m MC 33MHz 166MHz SP33 SP166 AP DDM AP166 To DARM PO DDM AP166 / (TrX+TrY) CARM DARM + + Short DOFs -> DDM DARM -> RF signal CARM -> DC signal 1/sqrt(TrX)+ 1/sqrt( TrY) CARM -> Digital CM_MCL servo AlternativeAlternative path

Optical Springs at the 40m 9 40m Lock acquisition procedure Reduce CARM offset: 1. Go to higher ARM power 2. Switch on AC-coupled analog CM_AO servo, using REFL DC as error signal. 3. Switch to RF error signal (POX) at half-max power. 4. Reduce offset/increase gain of CM_AO. ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM SP DDM 13m MC 33MHz 166MHz SP33 SP166 AP DDM AP166 To DARM REFL DARM PO DDM AP166 / (TrX+TrY) G PR =5 5. Packup MOPA and send it to LLO for S5

Optical Springs at the 40m 10 Optical spring in detuned RSE a :input vacuum b :output D : M : h :strain A. Buonanno, Y.Chen, Phys. Rev. D 64, (2001) h SQL :standard quantum limit t: transmissivity of SRM k: coupling constant F: GW sideband phase shift in SRC b: GW sideband phase shift in IFO z: homodyne phase Optical spring in detuned RSE was first predicted using two-photon formalism. a b D laser Signal recycling mirror h h

Optical Springs at the 40m 11 Detune Cartoon Carrier frequency frequency offset from carrier [Hz] Sideband amplitude [a.u.] FWHM USB LSB f sig Responses of GW USB and GW LSB are different due to the detuning of the signal recycling cavity. IFO Differential Arm mode is detuned from resonance at operating point SRCDARM IFO DARM/CARM slope related to spring constant? IFO Common Arm mode is detuned from resonance at intial locking point PRCCARM

Optical Springs at the 40m 12 DARM TFs as CARM offset is reduced

Optical Springs at the 40m 13 CARM optical springs Solid lines are from TCST Stars are 40m data Max Arm Power is ~80 Also saw CARM anti-springs, but don’t have that data

Optical Springs at the 40m 14 Optical spring and Optical resonance in differential arm mode of detuned RSE Optical gain of L- loop DARM_IN1/DARM_OUT divided by pendulum transfer function Optical spring and optical resonance of detuned RSE were measured. Frequency of optical spring depends on cavity power, mass, detuning phase of SRC. Frequency of optical resonance depends on detuning phase of SRC. Theoretical line was calculated using A. Buonanno and Y.Chen’s equations.

Optical Springs at the 40m 15 Positive spring constant SRM is locked at opposite position from anti-resonant carrier point(BRSE). Optical spring disappeared due to positive spring constant. Broadband RSE Broadband SR

Optical Springs at the 40m 16 Simple picture of optical spring in detuned RSE Let’s move arm differentially, X arm longer, Y arm shorter from full RSE  Power X arm down, Y arm up X arm down, Y arm down X arm up, Y arm down  Radiation pressure X arm down, Y arm up X arm down, Y arm down X arm up, Y arm down  Spring constant Negative(optical spring) N/A Positive(no optical spring) DARM (Lx-Ly) Power(W) BRSE Correct SRM position Wrong SRM position X arm Y arm

Optical Springs at the 40m 17 Relationship between the CARM and DARM springs at the 40m  With the 40m Lock Acquisition scheme, we only see a CARM spring if there’s also a DARM spring.  Details tomorrowtomorrow XarmYarmDARMCARM ++xx xx -++- Using the DC-locking scheme for the arms, there are, prima facie, four locking points corresponding to the four possible gain combinations, but only two will acquire lock. XarmYarmDARMCARM xx xx Correct SRM position Incorrect SRM position

Optical Springs at the 40m 18 Will it lock? NO YES x-axis: EY position y-axis: signal blue:X err green: Y err black: DARM red: CARM modeled with FINESSE

Optical Springs at the 40m 19 Carrier 33MHz 166MHz ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM OSA DDM PD DRMI lock using double demodulation with unbalanced RF sideband in SRC Carrier 33MHz Unbalanced 166MHz Belongs to next carrier Belongs to next carrier Belongs to next carrier OSA

Optical Springs at the 40m 20 Unbalanced Sideband Detection  Kentaro Somiya “ Photodetection method using unbalanced sidebands for squeezed quantum noise in a gravitational wave interferometer ” PHYSICAL REVIEW D 67,  A. Buonanno, Y. Chen, N. Mavalvala, “Quantum noise in laser-interferometer gravitational-wave detectors with a heterodyne readout scheme” PHYSICAL REVIEW D 67,  Can not be used to circumvent the standard quantum limit, due to heterodyne noise  Can be used to change the measurement quadrature, and thus reshape the GW response +166MHz sideband demodulation phase b1 b2

Optical Springs at the 40m 21 Changing the DARM quadrature Story: 1.Lock IFO with CARM offset 2.Handoff DARM to RF 3.Adjust RF demodulation phase 4.Reduce CARM offset 5.This changes the quadrature of the signal. As we are not compensating for this by adjusting the demod phase, the shape of the response changes. May also be some overall gain change due to imperfect normalization

Optical Springs at the 40m 22 Optickle Results GW response in a single, chosen quadrature at multiple CARM offsets

Optical Springs at the 40m 23 Why is the correct SRM position harder to lock?  The correctly detuned SRC doesn’t lock as easily as the oppositely tuned SRC  True for both full IFO and just the DRMI (though less noticeable on DRMI)  For full IFO, lock time goes from 1 to 5 minutes.  Have we just not tuned-it- up it right yet?

Optical Springs at the 40m 24 Mode healing/injuring at Dark Port Negative spring constant with optical spring Positive spring constant with no optical spring Repeatable The same alignment quality Carrier power at DP is 10x smaller

Optical Springs at the 40m 25 Compensating the resonances 4kHz >> UGF no compensation AdLIGO: 180 Hz ~ UGF 40Hz < UGF no compensation AdLIGO: 70Hz? 1kHz -> 100Hz ~ UGF dynamic compensationcompensation 0->100Hz ~ UGF not coherently compensated Compensation Filters for the various resonances: Optical Opto-mechanical DARM CARM UGFs ~ 250Hz

Optical Springs at the 40m 26 DARM loop: Calibration questions D C S P pendulum DARM Cavity response Sensing A Actuator F Feedback filter DARM_IN1 DARM_OUT DARM_IN2 EXC Use DARM_IN1 Measure DARM_IN2/EXC= Estimate S Measure (or estimate) C Use DARM_OUT Measure DARM_IN1/EXC= Estimate A Estimate P