McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. C H A P T E R Industry Analysis 3 Key Issue: Analyzing a Market’s Trends.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Industry Analysis – Firm performance is closely tied to industry performance – a firm’s profitability is circumscribed by industry profitability and the.
Advertisements

COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS AN INTRODUCTION. FORCES DRIVING INDUSTRY COMPETITION.
PORTERS FIVE FORCES: A guide to industry analysis
Analyzing the External Environment of the Firm
Industry and Competitive Analysis
Industry Analysis - Porter's Five Forces
External Analysis: The Identification of Opportunities and Threats
A Framework for Industry Analysis
Industry Analysis Chapter 03. Industry Analysis Chapter 03.
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY - Dolly Dhamodiwala.
Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model.
Chapter 2 The External Environment:
The External Environment for Strategy Strategic Management Lecture 2 義守大學企管系四年級 B 班
Porter’s Five Forces Michael Porter
Lecture 2 External Environment Analysis & Globalisation.
Tutorial 5 Five forces and PEST analysis
Portor’s Five-Forces Analysis
NBS Strategic Management Division 2004/5 1 SM352 Strategy External Analysis 3 Near Environment.
Components of the General Environment
External Analysis BUSI 7130/7136 Dr. Shook. What’s an Environment? What’s an Environment? Analyzing the Industry Analyzing the Industry v Five Forces.
Competition. Direct Competitors - Firms likely to gain or lose a substantial share of customers from each other over time because they serve the same.
Figure 11.3: Sales and Profit Life Cycles
Conducting an Industry Analysis. Seven Questions for Industry Analysis 1. What are the industry dominant economic traits? 2. What competitive forces are.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Yum! Brands, Pizza Hut, and KFC Jeffrey A. Krug
Chapter 2: The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition and Competitor Analysis Overview: The firm’s external environment.
Macroeconomic and Industry Analysis Chapter 12 Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
External and Internal Analyses General Environment GeneralEnvironmentGeneral Environment Sociocultural Global Technological Political/Legal Demographic.
Agenda Review Michael Porter’s 5 forces model –Rivalry –Non-price competition –Firm size / market share –Interdependence Bargaining power Sustainability.
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved C H A P T E R SIX Targeting Attractive Market Segments 6.
Chapters Four & Five Identifying & Analyzing Attractive Markets.
Ch2-1 Chapter 4: Competitor Analysis “What are they going to do?”
Industry Analysis Porter’s 5 Forces Model
Business Strategy and Policy
Chapters Four & Five Identifying & Analyzing Market Opportunities.
Copyright © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning All rights reserved. Power Point Presentation by Dr. Leslie A. Korb Georgian Court University.
Social Biz Nuts and Bolts Environment Analysis General / External / Internal.
© 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Marketing Management, 8e Chapter Eleven Pricing Strategy Key Words / Outline.
Marketing Revision– Unit 4
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Evaluating a Company’s External Environment.
The Marketing Environment and Competitor Analysis
Aggregate Category Factors Category size Category growth Stage in product life cycle Sales cyclicity Seasonality Profits.
P ORTERS F IVE F ORCES. I NTRODUCTION Devised by Harvard Professor Michael Porter The five forces analysis is a framework used by strategist’s and consultants.
Ch2-1 Chapter 2 The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis The External Environment: Opportunities,
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE UNIT – II. EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT Any organization before they begin the work of strategy formulations, it must scan the external.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT II Porter’s five forces module.
Porters 5 Forces Model. What is it? Porter’s 5 forces is a model that identifies and analyses 5 competitive forces that shape an industry. It help determines.
F Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section B: Key environmental influences & constraints on business & accounting B1. Political.
M.Com. Part-II Security Analysis and Portfolio Management Mitrendu Narayan Roy Assistant Professor Department of Commerce.
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
Porter’s Five Forces Model
PORTER’S FIVE FORCES MODEL
The External Environment
EXTERNAL (TASK) ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING 1
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
Porter’s Competitive Forces dan Value chain
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
Student Version Chapter 2
Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model.
The External Environment
Chapter 2, Part II The External Environment:
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS.
Chapter 2, Part II The External Environment:
STRATEGIC ANALYIS OF BUSINESS
Industry and Market Analysis
Chapter 2, Part II The External Environment:
11:00 am Miller Peaden, Richard Kelly, Andy Rogers, Bowie Wynne
Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model.
POWER OF SUPPLIERS IS HIGH WHEN:
Porter’s Five Forces A framework for analysing the nature of competition within an industry and potential for profit.
Presentation transcript:

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. C H A P T E R Industry Analysis 3 Key Issue: Analyzing a Market’s Trends and Attractiveness Assumption: Level of Competition is Set

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Continuing from Ch. 2 Choose the Level of Competition Ex) Product Category Level  Soft Drinks; Snack/Health Bar Industry Analysis  (Product) Category Analysis

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Bases for Category Analysis Market Factors (at the Aggregate Level) Competitive Factors Environmental Factors Michael Porter’s Framework

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. I. Market Factors for Industry Analysis Category Size: Volume or $$ Growth Rate Stage in Product Life Cycle* Cyclicity & Seasonality Marketing Mix (General Trends) Product differentiation: Macro ( and Microwww.census.gov (advertising $$ or number of product lines or skus) Profits & Financial Ratios

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Category Attractiveness over the Product Life Cycle Stage of product life cycle Category size Category growth Category attractiveness Introduction Small Low Growth Moderate High Maturity Large Low Low/high Decline Moderate Negative Low Sales Time

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. II. Competitive Factors for Industry Analysis Industry Concentration* Intensity of Rivalry* Power of Buyers & Suppliers* Pressure from Substitutes Capacity Utilization Threat of Entries and Exits

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Industry Concentration Measures Industry Concentration Measures 1.The share of the largest firm 2.The combined shares of the three largest firms 3.The number of firms with at least x percent of the market (e.g., 1 percent) 4.The share of the largest firm divided by the share of the next three largest competitors 5.Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI): -The Sum of Squared Shares of the Firms in the Industry -Use -Thresholds: below 1000; 1,000 to 1,800; above 1,800

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Characteristics of Intensive Rivalry Many or Balanced Competitors Slow Growth High Fixed Costs Lack of Product Differentiation Any Example?

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Buyer Power Is Higher When Buyer Power Is Higher When Buyer accounts for a large percentage of the industry’s output. Product is undifferentiated. Threat of backward integration. Buyer has full information. Example:

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Supplier Power Is Higher When Supplier Power Is Higher When Suppliers are concentrated. No or few Substitute for the product. Differentiated product/high switching cost. Limited Supply. Example:

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Industry Attractiveness based on Market Factors HighLow SizeLargeSmall GrowthHighSlow Stage in life cycleEarlyLate CyclicityLowHigh SeasonalityLowHigh Marketing spendingLowHigh ProfitsHighLow Financial ratiosHighLow Attractiveness Market Factors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Industry Attractiveness based on Competitive Factors HighLow ConcentrationLowHigh Power of buyersLowHigh Power of suppliersLowHigh RivalryLowHigh Pressure from substitutesLowHigh Capacity utilizationHighLow Threat of entryLowHigh Attractiveness Competitive Factors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. III. (Macro) Environmental Factors Technological* Economic* Social Political Regulatory*

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Typology of Technical Developments Welfare Diffusion Innovation Invention Information Materials Transportation Energy Genetic* Commercial Defense Technology Process Impetus * Includes agronomic and biomedical developments.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Projected Change in U.S. Population The coming bulge of TEENAGE “ECHO BOOMERS” will benefit the entertainment, casual apparel, and consumer electronics industries. AGING BOOMERS will give a lift to industries related to financial services, travel and leisure, nutrition, and home furnishings. ES:

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. U.S. Income Inequality

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Business Implications of Social Changes The Shrinking Day Connected Individual Body + Soul

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Examples for Evaluating Category Attractiveness Energy Bars (p. 70) Personal Digital Assistants (p. 73)

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Category Attractiveness Summary Aggregate Market Analysis Category Size $504 mm energy bar category in 2001 Attractiveness ++ Energy bar category contains four primary brands, plus their sub- brands and over 100 smaller players

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Category Growth Average annual growth rate of 57% between 1997 and 2001 Attractiveness ++ U.S. energy bar category sales forecasted at $750 mm in 2003 for a continued expected growth of 22% Industry reports suggest current annual growth for the energy bar market 25%-30% Category expanding: new competitors are entering, existing brands are expanding with new products and flavors, market penetration and usage occasion is increasing

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Product Life Cycle Both the category and Odwalla Bars specifically are both securely in early stages of growth phase Attractiveness ++

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Sales Cyclicity While energy bars are premium- priced for their convenience and nutrient level, the base dollar point of $1-$3 per bar is low such that they are not directly impacted by GDP variations Attractiveness +

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Seasonality Year-round sales Attractiveness ++ Category overall may experience a slight sales increase in the spring and summer month during “race season” and as users are engaged in more outdoor activities and desire quick, portable energy.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Profits As most major competitors are within the product portfolios of larger consumer goods companies, it is difficult to benchmark profitability within the energy bar category specifically. Nevertheless, the recent acquisition of the leading competitors reflects an expectation for strong profit potential. Attractiveness + Increased category competitiveness may lead to lower pricing and profits

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Category Analysis Threat of New Entrants/Exits Strong potential for new competitors given that the category is profitable, fairly easy to enter, and increasingly relevant to consumers. Attractiveness - Further, with the “big three” brands strongly in place [PowerBar, Clif (including Luna), and Balance], it is most likely that small competitors will enter through the natural foods channel, creating more direct competition with Odwalla bars.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Category Analysis Economies of Scale Competitors within the broader category of snack bars would likely experience economies of scale with a relatively easy entry into the energy bar market Attractiveness -

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Category Analysis Capital Requirements Within the mainstream energy bars, differentiation is largely through brand, taste, and flavor variety. With the exception of targeted nutrition products like protein- or carbohydrate-specific products, nutritional levels are largely at parity. Attractiveness -

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Category Analysis Switching Costs Switching costs are very low, opening the door to potential competitors Attractiveness -

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Distribution As there are not specialty requirements for distribution (refrigeration, etc.), it would be very easy for any of the “center of the store” consumer food companies to enter the category and add on to their existing distribution structure. This is particularly true for companies that have an established relationship with the category buyer. Attractiveness - Shelf life

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Bargaining Power of Buyers Lots of competitors with relatively similar options distinguished by brand and taste keeps retailer power strong Attractiveness -

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Bargaining Power of Suppliers As the suppliers of raw inputs for energy bars are largely agricultural, the commodity nature of agriculture keeps prices and supplier power low. While still relatively low, supplier power will be higher for nutrient supplement suppliers Attractiveness +

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Pressure from Substitutes Considerable Attractiveness - Fresh fruit, cereal bars, smoothies, candy bars, etc. are all suitable portable substitutes for the mainstream energy bar consumer. True athletes are most likely to substitute with higher nutrient level energy bars

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Category Capacity Appears to be high given current scenario of more than 100 manufacturers and many more products. But, still, it is too early to determine true capacity Attractiveness +

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Aggregate Market Analysis Current Category Rivalry Very high. Differentiation largely by taste and flavor variety, and by targeting unique market segments Attractiveness -

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Environmental Analysis Technological Technology could play a significant role with respect to manufacturing efficiencies and taste profiles Attractiveness +

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Environmental Analysis Economic While premium priced, energy bars have so far seemed to fair the recession well. Still, however, if economic conditions persist, consumers may opt for less expensive alternatives like fresh fruit or non-energy snack bars Attractiveness +

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Environmental Analysis Political/ Regulatory The energy bar category is regulated by the FDA as are other food products. There are not to our knowledge, however, additional regulations directed toward the energy bar category. Attractiveness 0

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Energy Bars: Attractiveness Summary (cont) Environmental Analysis Social As lives get busier and mealtimes shrink, energy bars will continue to be an acceptable meal replacement. Attractiveness ++