Effects of Wildfire in the Mountainous Terrain of Southeast Arizona Empirical Formulas to Estimate from 1-Year through 10-Year Peak Discharge from Small.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall - Runoff Modeling (I)
Advertisements

WinTR-20 Course February Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
Hydrologic Analysis Dr. Bedient CEVE 101 Fall 2013.
Questions concerning the Halloween Flood in Onion Creek Presentation by David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Soil Conservation Service Runoff Equation
R AINFALL -R UNOFF M ODELING O F W ADI Z IMAR. Prepared by Ahmad Tallal Abu-Hamed Mohamed Nemir Mohsen Osama Omar Nazzal Under the direction of Dr. Sameer.
Applications of Scaling to Regional Flood Analysis Brent M. Troutman U.S. Geological Survey.
Transforming the Runoff
Ch  Know how to determine peak flow using the rational method 2.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
Hydrologic Theory One of the principal objectives in hydrology is to transform rainfall that has fallen over a watershed area into flows to be expected.
ESTIMATING THE 100-YEAR FLOOD FORDECORAH USING THE RAINFALL EVENTS OF THE RIVER'S CATCHMENT By Kai TsurutaFaculty Advisor: Richard Bernatz Abstract:This.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
Reading: Applied Hydrology, Sec 15-1 to 15-5
Start Audio Lecture! FOR462: Watershed Science & Management 1 Streamflow Analysis Module 8.7.
The hydrograph for Ten Mile Creek is shown to the right. Hydrographs are calculated for each of the 30 Subcatchments. Radar data is used to create rainfall.
A Distributed Flash Flood Forecasting Rainfall- Runoff Model Applied to Watersheds in the Northeast United States Michael Schaffner NOAA National Weather.
Surface Drainage CE 453 Lecture 25.
CE 3372 – Lecture 10. Outline  Hydrology Review  Rational Method  Regression Equations  Hydrographs.
Estimating Qmax Using the Rational Method
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744
NOAA, National Weather Service Middle Atlantic River Forecast Center Briefing 5:00 pm June 26, 2015.
6/3/2010 ER FFG Conference An Overview of Gridded Flash Flood Guidance; A Spatially Distributed Runoff and Threshold-Runoff Based Approach Erick Boehmler.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
KINEROS (KINematic runoff and EROSion model) Michael Schaffner Senior Service Hydrologist NOAA National Weather Service WFO Binghamton, NY Eastern Region.
Mountain Flash Flooding and Its Impacts Across The Blacksburg Weather Forecast Office County Warning Area Anthony Phillips Department of Geography Virginia.
El Vado Dam Hydrologic Evaluation Joseph Wright, P.E. Bureau of Reclamation Technical Services Center Flood Hydrology and Meteorology Group.
WinTR-20 SensitivityMarch WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
Discharge (Q) Define (cfs; m 3 /s or “cumecs”) Why is Q Important? How is it measured?
Precipitation Types Important for Real Time Input and Forecasting
James River in Richmond, Virginia looking upriver from the Robert E. Lee bridge. Belle Isle is on the right, November What is happening in this.
Urban Storm Drain Design: Rainfall-Runoff relations.
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS.
National Weather Service - Southeast River Forecast Center Southeast River Forecast Center North Florida Visit July 17-20, 2006 Southeast River Forecast.
March 2009WinTR-20 Course1 Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
Evaluation of Potential Impacts of Uranium Mining on Drinking Water Sources in the Roanoke River Basin Assessment Approach Presentation to Roanoke River.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Flash Flood A rapid and extreme flow of high water into a normally dry area, or a rapid water level rise in a stream or creek above a predetermined flood.
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
A Subtle Heavy Rainfall Signature (SHARS) Event in Southeast Arizona: Ramifications of Major Flash Flooding in an Urbanized Desert Environment Michael.
WinTR-20 SensitivityFebruary WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
1 Continuing the Scourges of Mankind Fires Pests Droughts Today----Floods Southwest Flooding --in the desert??? Rain-streamflow cycle Hydrographs Recurrence.
Model Calibration in MarylandJune Model Calibration in Maryland June 12, 2015.
Basic Hydrology: Rainfall-Runoff – I
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
CE 3354 ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY Lecture 6: Probability Estimation Modeling.
1 TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. 2 Simplified methods for estimating runoff and peak discharge for small urban/urbanizing watersheds Ch 1.
Hydrological Forecasting. Introduction: How to use knowledge to predict from existing data, what will happen in future?. This is a fundamental problem.
Rainfall-Runoff modeling Forecasting and predictingForecasting and predicting –Flood peaks –Runoff volumes Due to Large rain and snowmelt events ***especially.
HYDROGRAPH is a graph showing the rate of flow (discharge) versus time past a specific point in a river, or other channel or conduit carrying flow. It.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
UNIT – III FLOODS Types of floods Following are the various types of floods: 1.Probable Maximum Flood (PMF):This is the flood resulting from the most sever.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology October 09, 2015.
Rainfall-Runoff modeling
TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds
Cristina Nelson, Term Project, CEE 6440, Fall 2007
FLOOD ROUTING Topic 5 River/Stream Routing Muskingum Method.
Hydrology.
Highway Drainage: Determining Flow Rates
Using Remote Sensing to Monitor Plant Phenology Response to Rain Events in the Santa Catalina Mountains Katheryn Landau Arizona Remote Sensing Center Mentors:
Brian McInerney Hydrologist National Weather Service
Flood Frequency Analysis
Hyetographs & Hydrographs
Hydrology CIVL341.
Floods and Flood Routing
Preciptation.
WRE-1 BY MOHD ABDUL AQUIL CIVIL ENGINEERING.
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Flood Inundation Mapping
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Wildfire in the Mountainous Terrain of Southeast Arizona Empirical Formulas to Estimate from 1-Year through 10-Year Peak Discharge from Small Post-Burn Watersheds  The Hyper-Effective Drainage Area Concept…

 S outheast Arizona has recently been impacted by several wildfires.   I n the desert southwest of the United States, wildfire alters the hydrologic response of watersheds greatly increasing the magnitudes and frequency of flash floods.   T he NOAA National Weather Service is tasked with the issuance of flash flood warnings to save life and property.   T ools that allow the weather forecast offices to quickly access the peak flow magnitude and flood potential from burned areas is highly desirable. WHY  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years…

  S outheast Arizona has recently been impacted by several wildfires.  I n the desert southwest of the United States, wildfire alters the hydrologic response of watersheds greatly increasing the magnitudes and frequency of flash floods.   T he NOAA National Weather Service is tasked with the issuance of flash flood warnings to save life and property.   T ools that allow the weather forecast offices to quickly access the peak flow magnitude and flood potential from burned areas is highly desirable. WHY  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years…

  S outheast Arizona has recently been impacted by several wildfires.   I n the desert southwest of the United States, wildfire alters the hydrologic response of watersheds greatly increasing the magnitudes and frequency of flash floods.  T he NOAA National Weather Service is tasked with the issuance of flash flood warnings to save life and property.   T ools that allow the weather forecast offices to quickly access the peak flow magnitude and flood potential from burned areas is highly desirable. WHY  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years…

  S outheast Arizona has recently been impacted by several wildfires.   I n the desert southwest of the United States, wildfire alters the hydrologic response of watersheds greatly increasing the magnitudes and frequency of flash floods.   T he NOAA National Weather Service is tasked with the issuance of flash flood warnings to save life and property.  T ools that allow the weather forecast offices to quickly access the peak flow magnitude and flood potential from burned areas is highly desirable. WHY  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years…

HOW ten watersheds  H ydrologic response within the first two years after the occurrence of wildfire of ten watersheds in Southeast Arizona documented :  F rye Canyon (USGS gage)  D eadman Canyon (private consultant)  M arijilda Canyon (USGS & NWS)  N oon Creek (Schaffner & Reed)  W et Canyon (Schaffner & Reed)  U pper Campo Bonito (USGS)  S abino Creek near Mount Lemmon (Pima Co. gage)  A lder Canyon at Ventana Windmill (Schaffner & Reed)  M adera Canyon (Schaffner & Reed)  R omero Canyon (AZ Geological Survey)  Indirect measurement of peak flows…

Santa Catalina, Santa Rita, and Pinaleno Mountains in Southeast Arizona…

DATA REQUIREMENTS Specifications short-term thunderstorm short-term thunderstorm with a duration approximately equal to or greater than the time of concentration for the burned basin at outlet equal to or less than the 10- year return interval return interval of rainfall equal to or less than the 10- year return interval hyper-effective drainage area storm core to have moved over at least a portion of the hyper-effective drainage area documented flood was “first major flush” since watershed burned mountainous terrain burn occurred in mountainous terrain small total basin size small total basin size (less than 15 square miles) no dams or other hydraulic structures uncontrolled basin (no dams or other hydraulic structures)  Flood occurred… Upper Campo Bonito

SOUTHEAST ARIZONA POST-BURN FLOOD DATABASE FOR TEN BASINS Prepared by Mike Schaffner and William B. Reed WatershedBasin Average Precipitation (inches) Storm Duration (hours) General Storm Motion Time of Concentration (hours) Rainfall Return Interval λ (t-years) Peak Flow of Flood y for t-year (cfs) Pre-Burn Peak Flow of Rainfall Return Interval (cfs) Frye Creek across0.6< 1-year Deadman Canyon across0.53-year Marijilda Canyon across0.85-year Noon Creek across0.42-year Wet Canyon across0.31-year Upper Campo Bonito stationary0.310-year Sabino Creek near Mount Lemmon 1.251stationary0.62-year Alder Canyon at Ventana Windmill 1.601down to up1.25-year Madera Canyon stationary0.4< 1-year Romero Canyon up to down1.110-year

SOUTHEAST ARIZONA POST-BURN FLOOD DATABASE FOR TEN BASINS Prepared by Mike Schaffner and William B. Reed WatershedBasin Average Precipitation (inches) Storm Duration (hours) General Storm Motion Time of Concentration (hours) Rainfall Return Interval λ (t-years) Peak Flow of Flood y for t-year (cfs) Pre-Burn Peak Flow of Rainfall Return Interval (cfs) Frye Creek across0.6< 1-year Deadman Canyon across0.53-year Marijilda Canyon across0.85-year Noon Creek across0.42-year Wet Canyon across0.31-year 1490 (approx 250- year flood) 7.2 Upper Campo Bonito stationary0.310-year Sabino Creek near Mount Lemmon 1.251stationary0.62-year Alder Canyon at Ventana Windmill 1.601down to up1.25-year Madera Canyon stationary0.4< 1-year Romero Canyon up to down1.110-year

ADDITIONAL SELECTED BASIN VALUES Prepared by Mike Schaffner and William B. Reed WatershedLocationModified channel relief ratio β (ft/ft) High severity burn + Moderate severity burn α (%) Average basin elevation above mean sea level Φ (ft/1000) Drainage Area ψ (sq mi) Frye CreekPinaleno Mountains Deadman CanyonPinaleno Mountains Marijilda CanyonPinaleno Mountains Noon CreekPinaleno Mountains Wet CanyonPinaleno Mountains Upper Campo BonitoSanta Catalina Mountains Sabino Creek near Mount Lemmon Santa Catalina Mountains Alder Canyon at Ventana Windmill Santa Catalina Mountains Madera CanyonSanta Rita Mountains Romero CanyonSanta Catalina Mountains

ADDITIONAL SELECTED BASIN VALUES Prepared by Mike Schaffner and William B. Reed WatershedLocationModified channel relief ratio β (ft/ft) High severity burn + Moderate severity burn α (%) Average basin elevation above mean sea level Φ (ft/1000) Drainage Area ψ (sq mi) Frye CreekPinaleno Mountains Deadman CanyonPinaleno Mountains Marijilda CanyonPinaleno Mountains Noon CreekPinaleno Mountains Wet Canyon Pinaleno Mountains Upper Campo BonitoSanta Catalina Mountains Sabino Creek near Mount Lemmon Santa Catalina Mountains Alder Canyon at Ventana Windmill Santa Catalina Mountains Madera CanyonSanta Rita Mountains Romero CanyonSanta Catalina Mountains

1) 1)calculate the basin average precipitation for events known to have caused floods from the burned basins (an attempt was made to use the first major flush after a burn) and document storm duration, 2) 2)determine the return period of these rain events, 3) 3)determine the peak flow of the flood event, 4) 4)calculate the pre-burn peak flow for the corresponding return period of the precipitation event, 5) 5)calculate the pre-burn 5-year peak flow, 6)ratio of pre-burn peak flow to post-burn peak flow 1 6)calculate the ratio of pre-burn peak flow to post-burn peak flow 1 and 7) 7)multiply the pre-burn 5-year peak flow for a basin (determined in step 5) by the corresponding ratio (determined in step 6). Steps for Calculating 5-Year Post-Burn Flows This ratio is calculated by dividing the result of step 3 by the result of step 4 and is basin specific… 1 This ratio is calculated by dividing the result of step 3 by the result of step 4 and is basin specific…

PRE-BURN AND POST-BURN 2-YEAR, 5-YEAR, AND 10-YEAR PEAK FLOWS Prepared by William B. Reed WatershedLocationPre-burn 2-year peak discharge (cfs) Post-burn 2- year discharge y for 2-year (cfs) Pre-burn 5-year peak discharge (cfs) Post-burn 5- year discharge y for 5-year (cfs) Pre-burn 10-year peak discharge (cfs) Post-burn 10- year discharge y for 10-year (cfs) Frye CreekPinaleno Mountains Deadman CanyonPinaleno Mountains Marijilda CanyonPinaleno Mountains Noon CreekPinaleno Mountains [1] [1] Wet CanyonPinaleno Mountains [2] [2] Upper Campo Bonito Santa Catalina Mountains Sabino Creek near Mount Lemmon Santa Catalina Mountains Alder Canyon at Ventana Windmill Santa Catalina Mountains Madera CanyonSanta Rita Mountains Romero CanyonSanta Catalina Mountains [1] [1] Above Crippen and Bue (1977) value of 23,700. [2] [2] Above Crippen and Bue (1977) value of 13,500. These y values are referred to as target values.

PRE-BURN AND POST-BURN 2-YEAR, 5-YEAR, AND 10-YEAR PEAK FLOWS Prepared by William B. Reed WatershedLocationPre-burn 2-year peak discharge (cfs) Post-burn 2-year discharge y for 2-year (cfs) Pre-burn 5-year peak discharge (cfs) Post-burn 5- year discharge y for 5-year (cfs) Pre-burn 10-year peak discharge (cfs) Post-burn 10- year discharge y for 10-year (cfs) Frye CreekPinaleno Mountains Deadman CanyonPinaleno Mountains Marijilda CanyonPinaleno Mountains Noon CreekPinaleno Mountains [1] [1] Wet CanyonPinaleno Mountains (approx 500-year flood) [2] [2] Upper Campo Bonito Santa Catalina Mountains Sabino Creek near Mount Lemmon Santa Catalina Mountains Alder Canyon at Ventana Windmill Santa Catalina Mountains Madera CanyonSanta Rita Mountains Romero CanyonSanta Catalina Mountains [1] [1] Above Crippen and Bue (1977) value of 23,700. [2] [2] Above Crippen and Bue (1977) value of 13,500.

 Post-Burn Response up to 207 times greater than Pre-Burn… Prepared by William B. Reed

MULTIVARIATE RUNOFF INDEX(mvi) MULTIVARIATE RUNOFF INDEX (mvi)   V ariables:   H yper-Effective Drainage Area (determined from burn severity)   A verage Basin Elevation   O bjective Southeast Arizona Specific — Modified Channel Relief Ratio   R eturn Interval of the Forecasted Rainfall Event  Basin and storm properties chosen after several tries… Noon Creek

hyper-effective drainage area  is the area of the high severity burn plus the area of the moderate severity burn (variable  in square miles)  the remaining drainage area is not used in the calculations  therefore, the results of the post-burn envelope curve and a pre-burn equation should be compared and the higher result used  If in doubt, compare results with standard equations…

modified channel relief ratio  is the average slope of the basin along the first order channel measured from 1,250 feet (381 meters) below the ridge to the basin outlet --- (variable  in feet/feet)  Excludes reach without channels ~ Includes reach at outlet… Marijilda Canyon

   two types of equations   Fixed Flow Return Interval   Rainfall Return Interval a Variable and Flow Return Interval Not Assigned  mvi AlphaPsiBetaPhiLambda

Fixed Flow Return Interval –Post-Burn 2-Year Flood (97%) * –Post-Burn 5-Year Flood (67%) –Post-Burn 5-Year Flood (67%) * –Post-Burn 10-Year Flood (41%) *  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years  Hydrologic recovery to near pre-burn conditions takes 3 to 5 years… Chance of one or more events in 5 years * Chance of one or more events in 5 years

Prepared by William B. Reed  Ten data points (2-year target values)…

 Ten data points (5-year target values)… Prepared by William B. Reed y = x y = x R 2 = Multivariate Runoff Index Envelope Curve Peak Flow (cfs) 2nd year Best Fit Equation R 2 adj = 0.96 Cross Validation Standard Error = 1757 cfs Cross Validation Adjusted Correlation Coefficient = 0.90 Cross Validation R 2 adj = 0.81 predictive equation: peak flow = 1993 times multivariate runoff index An Empirical 5-Year Post-Burn Runoff Equation for Southeast Arizona Watersheds

Prepared by William B. Reed  Ten data points (10-year target values)…

Fixed Flow Return Interval Concerns –Developed by Assuming T-Year of Rainfall was equal to T-Year of Flow –Same Basin Specific Ratio Used for 2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Flow Return Intervals  Not bad assumptions given the properties of the data set  Not bad assumptions given the properties of the data set…

Flow Return Interval Not Assigned Flow Return Interval Not Assigned ( T-Year Equation )  Rainfall Return Interval a Variable…

Prepared by William B. Reed Ten data points where Best Fit Curve is independent of target values…. Envelope Curve Defined to be Above Target Values Assuming T-Year of Flow is Equal to T-Year of Rainfall. ?

Prepared by William B. Reed  40 data points includes 30 target values… Looks better but is it? This Envelope Curve is Equation 10.

Question  Duration of storm equal to or greater than time of concentration… Can T-Year Equation and Return Interval Equations be Unified?

Paradigm Shift –Target Values Evaluated –Results Consistent with Expectations –Modified Values Used  Assuming t-year best fit equation is correct…

= post-burn runoff for the t-year return intervals between 1 and 10 years (cfs) Modified Target Values Envelope Curve  2-year unique target values were increased by 22%,  5-year values were unchanged, and  10-year unique target values were decreased by 38%. Preliminary Results (mvi 6 ) =

Prepared by William B. Reed  34 data points includes 24 modified target values… Preliminary Results This Envelope Curve is Equation 12.

Return interval increasing Preliminary Results

Conclusions T he use of Hyper-Effective Drainage Area Concept has been demonstrated. T he use of Hyper-Effective Drainage Area Concept has been demonstrated. T wo types of equations for Post-Burn Flows have been developed: T wo types of equations for Post-Burn Flows have been developed:   Fixed Flow Return Interval (2-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Equations)   Rainfall Return Interval a Variable and Flow Return Interval Not Assigned. T hese equations provide similar results. T hese equations provide similar results. Use of modified target values recommended… Use of modified target values recommended…

Acknowledgments Chris Smith, Dan Evans, and Saeid Tadayon of the U.S. Geological Survey Barry Scott of Arizona Division of Emergency Management Robert Lefevre of U.S. Forest Service Ann Youberg of the Arizona Geological Survey Mike Schaffner, Ed Clark, Kevin Werner and Erik Pytlak of NOAA National Weather Service Madera Canyon

Selected References C rippen, J. and C. Bue, Maximum Flood flows in the Conterminous United States. USGS Water Supply Paper R eed, W. and M. Schaffner, Effects of Wildfire in the Mountainous Terrain of Southeast Arizona: An Empirical Formula to Estimate 5-Year Peak Discharge from Small Post-Burn Watersheds. NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS WR-279. Available online: R eed, W. and M. Schaffner, in review. Effects of Wildfire in the Mountainous Terrain of Southeast Arizona: Empirical Formulas to Estimate from 1-Year through 10- Year Peak Discharge from Small Post-Burn Watersheds. S chaffner, M. and W. Reed, 2005a. Effects of Wildfire in the Mountainous Terrain of Southeast Arizona: Post-Burn Hydrologic Response of Nine Watersheds. NOAA National Weather Service Western Region Technical Attachment Available online: S chaffner, M. and W. Reed, 2005b. Evaluation of Post-Burn Hydrologic Recovery of a Small Mountainous Watershed: Upper Campo Bonito Wash in Southern Arizona. NOAA National Weather Service Western Region Technical Attachment Available online: T homas, B., et. al., Methods for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the Southwestern United States. USGS Water-Supply Paper Available online:

Thank You. Basin Conditions River Forecasts Water Supply