Group analyses Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London Will Penny.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Group analyses Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London Will Penny.
Advertisements

Hierarchical Models and
Camilla Clark, Catherine Slattery
Group analysis Kherif Ferath Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, Oct 2010.
1 st Level Analysis: design matrix, contrasts, GLM Clare Palmer & Misun Kim Methods for Dummies
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis in neuroeconomics November 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 28 April 2009 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 26 November 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
1st Level Analysis Design Matrix, Contrasts & Inference
General Linear Model & Classical Inference
General Linear Model & Classical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM M/EEGCourse London, May.
2nd Level Analysis Jennifer Marchant & Tessa Dekker
Methods for Dummies Second level analysis
7/16/2014Wednesday Yingying Wang
SPM Course Zurich, February 2015 Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to.
Corinne Introduction/Overview & Examples (behavioral) Giorgia functional Brain Imaging Examples, Fixed Effects Analysis vs. Random Effects Analysis Models.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis November 2012 With many thanks for slides & images to: FIL Methods group, particularly.
Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Himn Sabir 1. Topics 1 st level analysis 2 nd level analysis Space-Time SPMs Time-frequency analysis Conclusion 2.
Bayesian Inference and Posterior Probability Maps Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, UK SPM Course,
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston 18.
Methods for Dummies Second level Analysis (for fMRI) Chris Hardy, Alex Fellows Expert: Guillaume Flandin.
FMRI Modelling & Statistical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Chicago, Oct.
Idiot's guide to... General Linear Model & fMRI Elliot Freeman, ICN. fMRI model, Linear Time Series, Design Matrices, Parameter estimation,
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, May 2012.
Group Analysis ‘Ōiwi Parker Jones SPM Course, London May 2015.
Variance components Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience Institute of Neurology, UCL, London Stefan Kiebel.
Bayesian Inference in SPM2 Will Penny K. Friston, J. Ashburner, J.-B. Poline, R. Henson, S. Kiebel, D. Glaser Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience,
The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips SPM Short Course London, May 2013.
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, October 2012.
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course London, October 2016
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
The General Linear Model
2nd Level Analysis Methods for Dummies 2010/11 - 2nd Feb 2011
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
A very dumb dummy thinks about modelling, contrasts, and basis functions. ?
Random Effects Analysis
Group analyses Thanks to Will Penny for slides and content
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Spatio-Temporal Clustering
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
The General Linear Model
Linear Hierarchical Modelling
Group analyses Thanks to Will Penny for slides and content
Statistical Parametric Mapping
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
SPM2: Modelling and Inference
The General Linear Model
Hierarchical Models and
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Variance components and Non-sphericity
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Bayesian Inference in SPM2
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
Linear Hierarchical Models
The General Linear Model
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors
WellcomeTrust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
The General Linear Model
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
The General Linear Model
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
Presentation transcript:

Group analyses Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London Will Penny

Data fMRI, single subject fMRI, multi-subject ERP/ERF, multi-subject EEG/MEG, single subject Hierarchical model for all imaging data! Time

Intensity Time single voxel time series single voxel time series Reminder: voxel by voxel model specification model specification parameter estimation parameter estimation hypothesis statistic SPM

General Linear Model = + Model is specified by 1.Design matrix X 2.Assumptions about  Model is specified by 1.Design matrix X 2.Assumptions about  N: number of scans p: number of regressors N: number of scans p: number of regressors Error Covariance

Estimation 1. ReML-algorithm Friston et al. 2002, Neuroimage L g 2. Weighted Least Squares

Hierarchical model Multiple variance components at each level At each level, distribution of parameters is given by level above. What we don’t know: distribution of parameters and variance parameters.

= Example: Two level model + = + Second level First level

Estimation Hierarchical model Hierarchical model Single-level model Single-level model

Group analysis in practice Many 2-level models are just too big to compute. And even if, it takes a long time! Is there a fast approximation?

Data Design Matrix Contrast Images SPM(t) Summary Statistics approach Second level First level One-sample 2 nd level One-sample 2 nd level

Validity of approach The summary stats approach is exact if for each session/subject: All other cases: Summary stats approach seems to be robust against typical violations. Within-session covariance the same First-level design the same

Friston et al. (2004) Mixed effects and fMRI studies, Neuroimage Summary statistics Summary statistics Hierarchical Model Hierarchical Model Auditory Data

Multiple contrasts per subject Stimuli: Auditory Presentation (SOA = 4 secs) of words Subjects: fMRI, 250 scans per subject, block design fMRI, 250 scans per subject, block design Scanning: U. Noppeney et al. (i) 12 control subjects MotionSoundVisualAction “jump”“click”“pink”“turn” Question: What regions are affected by the semantic content of the words? What regions are affected by the semantic content of the words?

ANOVA 1 st level: 2 nd level: 3.Visual 4.Action ?=?= ?=?= ?=?= 1.Motion 2.Sound

1 st level: 2 nd level: Visual Action ?=?= ?=?= ?=?= Motion Sound ANOVA

Summary Linear hierarchical models are general enough for typical multi-subject imaging data (PET, fMRI, EEG/MEG). Summary statistics are robust approximation for group analysis. Also accomodates multiple contrasts per subject.