MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Integration Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
Advertisements

Muon Front End Buncher, Phase Rotation, Cooling Schematics & CAD model based on MICE Cavities Alan Grant Daresbury (April 10, 2012)
MICE- AFC Unit Mechanical Design of the Cold Mass Support System Oxford University Rohan Senanayake.
MICE Collaboration meeting at RAL 26 th Oct ~ 29 th Oct, 2004 Wrap up on Radiation Shielding Module Design Stephanie Yang 26 th October, 2004.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
MICE RF Cavity Design and Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
Integration of Cavities and Coupling Coil Modules Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting March 28 – April 1, 2004.
Trip Report on the visit to ICST of HIT, Harbin, China Derun Li Mike Green Steve Virostek Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (from December.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 114 September 18, 2008.
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Status of the 201 MHz Cavity and Coupling Coil Module Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Video Conference March 10, 2004.
Installation Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM23 at ICST, Harbin January 13, 2009.
Module Vessel Connection Concept Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory AFC Module Meeting April 23, 2004.
1 Issues concerning the Design of the Tracker Solenoids Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 August 2005.
MICE RF Module Safety Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting February 12, 2005.
MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Module Connection and Support Arrangement Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory AFC Module Meeting May 21, 2004.
Progress on the MICE 201 MHz Cavity Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RF Working Group Fermilab August 22, 2007  automatic.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM23 at ICST, Harbin January 14, 2009.
9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Progress on the Coupling Coil & Focus Coil Interface Engineering
MICE modules interface proposal FAC module Phone meeting Edgar Black IIT 2/13/2004.
Update on Be Wall Cavity Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MTA RF Workshop November 15, 2010.
MICE Collaboration Meeting March 29 - April 1, CERN MICE Integration Edgar Black/IIT March Room.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM26 at Riverside California March 26, 2010.
Status of 201 MHz Prototype and RFCC Module Derun Li, S. Virostek, M. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory In collaboration.
MICE Collaboration Meeting March 29 - April 1, CERN MICE alignment, tolerances and supports Tuesday March 30 Room Edgar Black/IIT March17-
Design of the MICE RF Cavity Module :Status of the module designModule flange sealing options Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE
RFCC Module Tech Board Schedule Discussion Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM25 at RAL November 4, 2009.
Status of the MuCool Cavity Prototype Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 21, 2005.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RFCC Module Design Review October 21, 2008 RFCC Module and Subcomponents Mechanical Design.
Assembly, Installation and Interfaces Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RFCC Module Design Review October 21, 2008.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.
Status and Integration of the Spectrometer Solenoid Magnets Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL June 15, 2007.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Mechanical.
RFCC Module Design Update  automatic tuners  cavity suspension  cavity installation Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration.
IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.
1 LHC-DFBX Shipping Specification Steve Virostek LBNL Presented at the DFBX RFP Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab - Berkeley US LHC.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
MICE Cooling Channel Magnets: Spectrometer Solenoid Procurement RF Module Coupling Coil Proposal Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC 07.
Magnet vacuum vessel w/radiation shield and cold mass in place Magnet leads (left) and the three cryocoolers on the top of the spectrometer solenoid service.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007.
MICE RFCC Module Status Derun Li Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC-MCTF Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Berkeley, CA January 25, 2009.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module Plan and Progress Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC at LBNL January 25, 2009.
RFQ Subcomponents PXIE RFQ Fabrication Readiness Review LBNL – June 26, 2013 Steve Virostek - Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
Update on 201-MHz RF Cavity Construction (Plan) for MICE
MICE Prototype Coupling Coil Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM38 - Napa California February 25, 2014 February.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM25 at RAL, UK November 6, 2009.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Oxford, UK July 7, 2011 July 7, 2011.
Progress on MICE RFCC Module for the MICE Experiment * Allan DeMello, Nord Andresen, Michael Green, Derun Li, Heng Pan, Steve Virostek, Michael Zisman.
MICE RFCC Module Update Steve Virostek Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM27 at RAL, UK July 8, 2010.
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
MICE Coupling Coil Fabrication Steps to Complete Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
PXIE RFQ Engineering Design Steve Virostek Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 10, 2012 Project X Collaboration
MICE Coupling Coil Vacuum Vessel Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
Fabrication of Remaining Components Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE RF Workshop Fermilab June 2, 2014.
Integration of the Spectrometer Solenoid Magnets
Overview of the RFCC Module and 201-MHz Cavity Design
MICE Partial Return Yoke Mechanical Design
Design of Distribution Feedbox at LHC P7
Isotropic View Conceptual Design for MONALISA setup at CERN Magnet
Senad Kudumovic Design engineer
Presentation transcript:

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Integration Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004

RF/CC Module Integration Steve Virostek - LBNLPage 2 Module Integration Topics Module-to-module joint Conceptual design Configuration Load and stress analysis Module support structure Conceptual design Structural analysis Modal and seismic analysis Interface with experimental hall (rails)

RF/CC Module Integration Steve Virostek - LBNLPage 3 Joint Conceptual Design Recent module-to-module joint design incorporates a commercially available (Hyspan) formed bellows Flexible bellows provides necessary space (up to 20 mm) for module installation/removal while allowing for relaxed tolerances Vacuum sealing can be accomplished with metal wire or O-ring Bolts across joint provide a strong and stiff bridge across the bellows to transmit magnetic forces between modules

RF/CC Module Integration Steve Virostek - LBNLPage 4 Joint Configuration RF/coupling coil vessels will have a bellows assembly welded to both ends Absorber/focusing coil modules will have mating flanges without bellows at ends Radiation shielding assemblies will have a bellows welded on the AFC module side Proposed configuration is compatible with all steps of MICE (adaptor flange needed for detector/detector setup) Bolts bridging joint also provide means for separating and maintaining gap between flanges during installation and removal

RF/CC Module Integration Steve Virostek - LBNLPage 5 Joint Load and Stress Analysis Magnetic forces are intended to be transmitted between the AFC and RF/CC modules through the vessel shells and across the bellows through the joint bridging bolts Loads will not be carried across AFC/detector joints Total number of bolts required around circumference of joint to be based on sealing requirements Not all of the sealing bolts will bridge the joint – quantity will be determined from the load and stress analysis Flange and weld sizes will result from a future detailed stress analysis of the module vacuum vessels

RF/CC Module Integration Steve Virostek - LBNLPage 6 Support Conceptual Design

RF/CC Module Integration Steve Virostek - LBNLPage 7 Support Conceptual Design Support concept incorporates thick side plates welded directly to the RF/CC module vessel Side plates provide for high strength and stiffness in the axial direction to carry magnet loads to the floor Cross supports provide lateral stability and stiffness Side plate cutouts provide clearance for coupling coil and access to vacuum system and cavity tuners Support is permanently joined to the vacuum vessel during fabrication and prior to module assembly

RF/CC Module Integration Steve Virostek - LBNLPage 8 Support Structural Analysis Module support structural analysis yet to be completed Material and weld stress calculations will be based on magnetic, vacuum, gravity and seismic loading conditions Support design expected to be dominated by the need to withstand and restrain magnetic forces Modal finite element analysis will be used to determine natural frequency of vibration and mode shapes for support system and subcomponents A design goal of 10 to 20 Hz natural frequency should be adequate to satisfy physics requirements and will result in minimal acceleration magnification during seismic activity

RF/CC Module Integration Steve Virostek - LBNLPage 9 Support Interface with System RF/CC module likely to be mounted on a rail system oriented transversely to the beamline Support stand height recently reduced to 1524 mm (beamline to base) to allow for 160 mm rail height Reduced height has minimal impact on system Interface points between module support base and rails yet to be determined