Panel 5: Simulations and Training Go for Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown March 5, 2008 - Tempe, AZ Henry Hoeh Northrop Grumman Corporation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
Advertisements

SPACECRAFT ACCIDENTS: EXAMINING THE PAST, IMPROVING THE FUTURE Apollo 13 Bryan Palaszewski working with the Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy 2. Constellation Overview Ken Davidian Lead, Commercial.
SLS Corporate Configuration (Mock-up ‘A’) Complete Main Rotor, Transmission Drive Metal Riveted Tailboom Complete Tail Rotor System Production Representative.
VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.
Training for Commercial Spaceflight. OCP Building training center –Classroom –Simulation –Actual flight time.
Lessons from Apollo * Data from NASA Apollo 11 Press Kit Shows spacecraft weight delivered to LEO (Low Earth Orbit) Shows weights for each portion of Apollo.
PRE-DECISIONAL DRAFT; For planning and discussion purposes only 1 1 March 4-5, 2008 Evolution of Lunar to Planetary Landing A.Miguel San Martin Mars Science.
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Presented by: David Mutters.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
1 Ames Research Center Karl Bilimoria 5 March 2008 Lunar Lander Handling Qualities – Terminal Descent to Touchdown Dr. Karl Bilimoria NASA Ames Research.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
1 Human Role in Lunar Landing Charles M. Oman, Ph.D. Director, Man Vehicle Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sensorimotor Adaptation Research.
Page No. 1 6/27/2015 On The Need for Lunar Lander Simulations: A Human Factors Perspective Robert S. McCann Human-Systems Integration Division NASA Ames.
Flags Courtesy of 3dflags.com Robotic Precursor Missions to the Moon and Mars Douglas. A. Craig Tetsuji Yoshida NASA- HQ Shimizu Corp. November 2008.
Space Transportation NASA is responsible for regulating and directing the entire US space program Space vehicles take us beyond the earth Currently consists.
CONSTELLATION National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ares Project Overview – Quality in Design Chris Cianciola Kenneth Crane.
Project Apollo. Apollo Mission of Apollo To establish the technology to meet other national interests in space To achieve preeminence in space for the.
How do we know so much about space as a society? Explain.
“Fly me to the Moon”. Few can argue there is a more exciting vehicle than the Saturn V One of the most successful craft ever built by NASA, no payload.
[Discovery] 1. 2 The F35-B STOVL Joint Strike Fighter Christopher Shoemaker Aerospace Engineering Pennsylvania State University.
1 Reconfigurable Environment For Analysis and Test of Software Systems (REATSS) Dan McCaugherty /19/2004.
THE FIRST LUNAR LANDING 1.Apollo 11 Crew 2.Time Table 3.Saturn V 4.Planning Ahead 5.Docking with Eagle 6.Science Experiments.
5-1 Constellation Space Suit System Government Capabilities and Facilities Crew and Thermal Systems Division.
1 Aeronautics Explorer Post Katherine ‘Katie’ Fallon Midview HS Goal: Aeronautics Explorer Post Katherine ‘Katie’ Fallon Midview HS Goal:To explorer the.
Wednesday October 31, 2012 (The Race to the Moon: Project Apollo: Apollo 9 – Apollo 11)
1 Commercial Crew Program The Next Step in U.S. Space Transportation Brent W. Jett October 11, 2012 Commercial Crew Program - Same Crew…New Ride.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA)
PROGRAM UPDATE March 2012.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
America will send a new generation of explorers to the moon aboard NASA’s Orion crew exploration vehicle. After that, on to MARS!!!
APOLLO SPACECRAFT Daniel McCaffery Jeff Robinson Kyle Smith Jason Tang Brad Thompson.
My project on space By football fan and Lego boy.
Structural Practices Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Structural Design Practices Payload interfaces to launch vehicles.
My Project on Space By Underdog Apollo 11  First footsteps on the Moon.
Apollo Flight Path Clayton Cantrall. Lunar Orbit Rendezvous Concept (LOR) One of three concepts considered for Apollo 11 mission One of three concepts.
Journey to the Moon Saturn V rocket powers Apollo 11's lift-off from Kennedy Space Centre Journey to the Moon.
The Lunar Rover Vehicle Wallace E
Learning Goals  I will be able to recognize the three main battles of the Space Race.  I will be able to explain the pathway to putting a man on the.
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
Integrated Training Course
MAE 155A Aerospace Engineering Design I
SPACE TAXI Marcel Milanes December 14 th, 2010
JWST Mission CDR Northrop Grumman Space Systems Redondo Beach (CA) April 10-16, 2010.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Rovers in Space Joseph T. Wunderlich, Ph.D.. Selected Rovers 1971: NASA “Lunar Roving Vehicle” (LRV) Mars Rovers: –1996: NASA Pathfinder “Sojourner” –2004:
Go For Lunar Conference
Aircraft Flight Instruments. Introductions How do you control a car? How do you control an aircraft? – How do you know it is doing what YOU want it to.
Understand how our view of the solar system has changed over time and how discoveries made have led to our changing our view of the solar system. Learn.
NASA Advisory Council Space Operations Committee July 10, 2008 Glenn Research Center.
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
Preliminary Cost Analysis Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Preliminary Cost Analysis Cost Sources Vehicle-level Costing.
Apollo was a three-part spacecraft: 1. Command Module (CM)- held the crew's quarters and flight control section 2. Service module (SM)- for the propulsion.
LunaRTT Lunar Real-Time Telerobotics Jeff Moring ASTE 527 Dec 15, 2008.
AAR Rendezvous Algorithm Progress Meeting 10 May 2005 REID A. LARSON, 2d Lt, USAF Control Systems Engineer MARK J. MEARS, Ph.D. Control Systems Engineer.
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
Human-Powered Transportation
Master of Engineering Automation Technology
High Power Test Facility Report David McClelland, Bram Slagmolen, John Jacobs ACIGA LSC Meeting, November 203. LIGO-G Z.
Space Transportation Space vehicles take us beyond the earth
Ares I System Requirements Review (SRR)
Lunar Descent Slide Suggestions & Questions
Lunar Descent Analysis
The space race Record RED info only!.
Ares Project Overview – Quality in Design
Process flow Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 What
Lunar Descent Trajectory
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
TITLE SLIDE SUGGESTIONS FOR MODERNIZING FLIGHT SIMULATION STANDARDS
Presentation transcript:

Panel 5: Simulations and Training Go for Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown March 5, Tempe, AZ Henry Hoeh Northrop Grumman Corporation Integrated System - Bethpage, NY

2 Apollo Lunar Module Design Evolution Proposal Design was a Starting Point for Additional Development Mockups, Simulations and Test Articles Helped Drive Design: Optimize Human Machine Interfaces (HMI) Optimize CONOPS Provide Crew Training Simulations: Validated GN&C Operational Performance Validated Crew Interaction with the GN&C Hardware/Software Provided Crew Mission Training Performed Stand-by Mission Support Performed Flight Anomaly Resolution Proposal Final Original LM Cabin with Seats

3 Apollo LM Mockups, Test Models, Test Articles, Sims & Flight Vehicles M-1 Controller tests TM-1 Interior TM-1 Lunar Access Tests LTA-8 Vacuum Test Flying Simulator 1/6 Descent Stage Landing Stability Drop Test Article M-5 Mobility Tests

4 Apollo LM Mockups, Test Models, Test Articles, Sims & Flight Vehicles (cont.)  6 Mockups (M)  15 Test Models (TM)  6+ Simulations (4+ Grumman,1+ NASA, 1+ Draper)  8 Lunar Module Test Articles (LTA)  5 LLRV/LLTVs LM Rendezvous & Docking Simulator NASA CSM & LM Simulators

5 Apollo Lunar Module Full Mission Engineering Simulator (FMES) Cockpit Mockup Flight Attitude Table Artist Paints Crater Details for Simulator Lunar Surface Optical Alignment of Lunar Surface Representations in Simulator

6 Apollo-era Outpost Concept Full-Scale Lunar Laboratory at Grumman Facility in Calverton, NY

7 Example of Modern Sim (& GN&C) Tech  F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) STOVL Config  Modern Design & Technology Implied to a Vertical Landing Vehicle  Simulators Very Representative of Flight Vehicle  GN&C Design Employs Dynamic Inversion & Multi-Variable Control  Not Suggesting the F-35 Be Used as a LLTV