Business Venture Analysis McDonald’s vs. Burger King.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applications of Money-Time Relationships
Advertisements

Buying a House vs. a Condominium as a Rental Property Group 2 EGR 403 Section 02 Team Members: Samuel Mebasser Tim Craig Bryan Hannah Michael Lai Henry.
Incremental Analysis Lecture No. 21 Professor C. S. Park
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Incremental Analysis Lecture No. 28 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2006.
Lecture No. 23 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
Other Analysis Techniques Chapter 9: Newnan, Eschenbach, and Lavelle Dr. Hurley’s AGB 555 Course.
Other Analysis Techniques
Investment Analysis Lecture: 9 Course Code: MBF702.
Project #2 Buying a House Urban - Old vs. Suburban - Brand New Team Members : Scott Tatman Bo Xu David Sacilotto Carmen Ivanescu Veronica Holliday.
Group 2: e-Commerce vs. Storefront Kevin Sell Minh Si Kimsenjaya Tjendana Xibin Wu.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Variations of Present Worth Analysis Lecture No.17 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
Team 8 Being Self-Employed Vs. Being Employed. Team Members & Roles Terence Krall: Leader Wellman Yu: Organizer Wellman Yu: Organizer Olaide Olambiwonnu:
Engineering Economics in Canada
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Choice of MARR Lecture No. 62 Chapter 15 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2006.
EGR 403 PROJECT PROPOSAL BUSINESS VENTURE ANALYSIS PRESENTED BY TEAM 2.
EGR 403 Team 1 Morteza Azarmnia Jaime Fregoso Zaw Myint Business Venture Analysis.
Team 1- Personal Investing Low-Income vs. High- Income Real Estate Andrew Dunn Jeff Weintraub Silvio Tovar Adrian Hernandez.
Group 6: Buying vs Building a house Group members: Organizer Anna Bullara Techies Tri Truong Richard Morrow Summarizers Almautaz Rahman Eugene Pyu.
Project #2 Team 1 Proposal. Team Members & Duty Delegation Nancy Macias Organization Brian Myers Summarization Eliseo Sanchez Research & Organization.
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis Describing Project Cash Flows Initial Project Screening Method Present Worth.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
03 July 2015Course Overview1 Energy Project Evaluation RES Course ESP606 Goal: To build up knowledge to so that participants will be able to assess if.
TEAM 1 Brenda Watkins – Leader/Organizer Justin Legere – Leader/Organizer Chweya Masongo – Summarizer Jeffrey McCarthy – Techie BUSINESS VENTURE.
Economic Comparison Fr Clinic II. Overview n Economics and Engineers n Time Value of Money n Different types of Economic Analyses n Comparing our filters.
FINAL EXAM REVIEW Spring Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Payment Period  Compounding Period Mortgages and Car Loans MARR and WACC Present.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 9-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
INVESTMENT APPRAISAL TOPIC 4.3.2a. Investment appraisal is the process of making decisions about possible future investment projects using quantitative.
Annual Cash Flow Analysis Chapter 6: Newnan, Eschenbach, and Lavelle Dr. Hurley’s AGB 555 Course.
Rate of Return Analysis: Multiple Alternatives Consider the following: You have $20,000 to invest in either alternative A or alternative B. Your MARR is.
Choosing the Best Alternative Chapter 8: Newnan, Eschenbach, and Lavelle Dr. Hurley’s AGB 555 Course.
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
Engineering Economics. John Ayers September 17, 2004.
Lecture No. 26 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Variations in Present Worth Analysis.
Lecture No.20 Chapter 6 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
Exam 3 Practice Problems For Engineering Economy By Douglas Rittmann.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Applying Annual Worth Analysis Lecture.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Applying Annual Worth Analysis Lecture No.20 Chapter 6 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright.
Rate of Return Analysis Chapter 7: Newnan, Eschenbach, and Lavelle Dr. Hurley’s AGB 555 Course.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Incremental Analysis Lecture No.
Team 4 Personal Retirement 401K vs Profit Sharing Bryant Borbon - Techie Bryant Borbon - Techie Katherine Kelley - Organizer Katherine Kelley - Organizer.
Ch 10-1 © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ Ostwald and McLaren / Cost Analysis and Estimating.
1 Benefit Cost Analysis Typically used for public projects The goal is to determine if benefits exceed costs: Benefit / Cost Ratio > 1 The goal is NOT.
1 1. Order alternatives from lowest to highest initial investment. 2. Let Alternative A 0 (do nothing) be considered the current best. 3. Consider next.
EGR Break-Even Analysis Break-even Analysis – performed to determine the value of a variable that makes two elements equal. In economic terms:
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Variations in Present Worth Analysis
Rate of Return Analysis
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Benefit Cost Analysis and Public Sector Economics
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis
Construction Engineering 221 Economic Analysis
Team 5: East Coast vs. West Coast business venture
8 FEASIBILITY STUDY Financial Projections
Rate of Return Analysis: Multiple Alternatives
Engineering 361 Engineering Economics
Engineering Economic Analysis
Interest and Equivalence
Present Worth Analysis
Engineering Economic Analysis
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Steps of the Incr. Analysis Process
Equivalence for Repeated Cash Flows
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Presentation transcript:

Business Venture Analysis McDonald’s vs. Burger King

Nancy Macias Organization Brian Myers Summarization Eliseo Sanchez Research & Organization Masis Haroian Techie Team 1 Members & Delegation

Scenario A 30 year old person with a business degree has just inherited $300, and is considering opening a fast food franchise. The two franchises that are being considered are: McDonald’s Burger King

Analysis Assumptions Life Span of 20 years (n = 20 years) Same Resale Value at the end of 20 years Equivalent Cost for Land and Building Equivalent Average Annual Sales and Profit Location, Volume, Size of Real Estate not taken in Consideration (no impact on the analysis) MARR = 15% Interest Rate = 10%

McDonald’s Fact Sheet Initial Franchise Fee $45K Equipment & Pre-Opening Costs $900K Land & Building $1.0 million (only if a new building has to be built) Franchise Fee12.5% Annual Sales$1.3 million Annual Net Profit $500K (after taxes, fees and other operating costs)

Burger King Fact Sheet Initial Franchise Fee $50K Equipment & Pre-Opening Costs $750K Land & Building $1.0 million (only if a new building has to be built) Franchise Fee8.5% Annual Sales$1.3 million Annual Net Profit $500K (after taxes, fees and other operating costs)

Quick Comparison McDonald’s 12.5% Franchise Fee 12.5% Franchise Fee $900, pre-opening costs $900, pre-opening costs Annual Costs $162, Annual Costs $162, Burger King 8.5% Franchise Fee $750, pre-opening costs Annual Costs $110,500.00

Analysis Results & Conclusion Analysis Methods Incremental Rate of Return Analysis  ROR Benefit to Cost Ratio Annual Worth Analysis (note: all these methods will result in the same answer if used properly) (we primarily used  ROR primarily to find the better choice) Results:  ROR = 35.8% Since  ROR>MARR, higher cost alternative is chosen, Burger King B/C & AW Analysis confirm results

Sensitivity Analysis (1) Varying the Franchise Fee from 9.0% to 14.0%, Burger King still is a better alternative

Sensitivity Analysis (2) Varying annual profit from $300K to $700K

Resources (official website) (official website) (official website) (official website) Wall Street Journal Wall Street Journal Essentials of Engineering Economic Analysis (textbook), Donald Newnan, Jerome Lavelle and Ted Eschenbach,2 nd edition, 2002 Essentials of Engineering Economic Analysis (textbook), Donald Newnan, Jerome Lavelle and Ted Eschenbach,2 nd edition, 2002

Course Related Useful Websites Provides several calculator for retirement,taxation,savings,investments,etc. Provides Cash Flow Diagram explanations and several examples (PV,FV and others)