National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement Teleconference Program THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 2006 Rereporting and Recurrence Data:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Recognition, Care, and Reporting of Child Maltreatment Presented by the: Oklahoma EMSC Resource Center.

Advertisements

Expedited Family Reunification Project

15 Community Supported Relief Nurseries Across Oregon.

Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.

Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,

Impact of foster care on sexual activity of maltreated youth Monica Faulkner, PhD, LMSW Center for Social Work Research The University of Texas at Austin.

California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.

RISK OF RE-REFERRAL AMONG INFANTS WHO REMAIN AT HOME FOLLOWING REPORTED MALTREATMENT Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD James Simon, MSW Joseph Magruder, PhD.

Alicia F. Lieberman Child Trauma Research Project University of California San Francisco San Francisco General Hospital Including and Serving Immigrant.

Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago International.

Decision Making in Child Protection. The Overlap of Welfare, CPS and Foster Care Welfare Families Families served by CPS Foster Care.

Considerations Regarding Fatality Data and Etiology John D. Fluke Kempe Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine Commission to Eliminate Child.

How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%

How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%

How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%

How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.

Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.

How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%

How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%

How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%

How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%

How do Logan County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Logan, Mason and Menard Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.

Disproportionality in Human Services

Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.

Research Synthesis on Child Welfare Disproportionality and Disparities: Child Welfare Entries

Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.

Taking Research to Practice: Rethinking Outcomes and Performance Measures for the Child and Family Service Reviews John D. Fluke, Child Protection Research.

Rogers, A.N. (2010), Human Behavior in Social Environment, 2 nd Ed., New York, Routledge/Taylor and Francis,.

1 NSCAW I and II Updates and New Field Work for a Child Welfare Landmark Study John Landsverk, Ph.D. Child & Adolescent Services Research Center Rady Children’s.

A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.

Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

Child Abuse: Preventive and Reactive Interventions.

Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July.

Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.

The Use of Data and the Role of Leadership An Iowa Example Presented By Wendy Rickman Administrator: Division of Adult Children And Family Services 1.

NC Child Welfare Data State Fiscal Year 2012 (7/1/11-6/30/12) 132,031 unique children were assessed for reports of child abuse, neglect & dependency Approximately.

1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.

Subjects of Maltreatment Reports April 2011 through March 2012.

The National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS): development and utility of an existing system for collecting data and monitoring child abuse.

Infants and Young Children at Risk… From Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa’s Community Profile 2007.

Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.

Constructing Safety Indicators from Child Welfare Events and Trajectories Fred Wulczyn, Bridgette Lery Center for State Foster Care and Adoption Data Chapin.

Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.

Kathy Hebbeler SRI International February 17, 2010 Characteristics of Children Served in Part C.

Using Data to Make the Case for Policy Change in Times of Fiscal Crisis National Association of Council for Children Conference October 21, 2010 Jane Burstain,

NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.

SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.

1. DFCS Performance Update Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council September 16, 2015.

The Prevalence of Children with Disabilities in the Child Welfare System: An Analysis of State Administrative Data Elizabeth Lightfoot, PhD Katharine Hill,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Longitudinal Dynamics of Youth in Foster Care Joseph Magruder Emily Putnam-Hornstein.

“A half-century of research demonstrates convincingly that children’s well-being builds upon meeting first their primary needs for a stable and lasting.

RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.

AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals.

SSDS Inc. Intentional injury in the U.S. Army: Is a college education the answer? Nicole S. Bell, ScD, MPH Thomas C. Harford, PhD Social Sectors Development.

In FY10, there were 66,897 confirmed cases of child abuse and neglect. 26,074 cases (39%) were children three years and younger. In Fort Bend County,

Child Welfare Improvement

Congregate Care in Ohio

2016 Annual Data Report, Vol 2, ESRD, Ch 4

Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect

Review of Cabinet Indicators

HOMELESSNESS IN WASHINGTON STATE

Developing trust with adolescents

GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING

Foster Care in California: What we Know from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.

Disproportionality in Child Welfare

Characteristics of All Students (N=20,822) Fall Census 2016

Characteristics of the children we place – what does the data say?

Presentation transcript:

National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement Teleconference Program THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 2006 Rereporting and Recurrence Data: Implications for Strategies John D. Fluke Walter R. McDonald & Associates, Inc.

Survival Analysis Plot for 2002 CM Data: Recurrence During a 12 Month Period, Over 75% Recurred Within 6 Months (n = 210,641 – 26 States)

Maltreatment Factors

Post-Investigation Service and Recurrence

Slide 5April 6, 2006 Child Maltreatment 2004: Overall Recurrence Trends Percent Recurrence in 6 Months Number of States National Average Number of States Meeting Standard* Percent of States Meeting Standard *National Standard is 6.1%

6 Month Recurrence Findings Over Time: Comparisons of Interest Year * *2004* Number of Children 142,72697,406186,220196,774146,509161,721 States Rate of Recurrence in 6 Months for These States 7.4%7.9%7.6%7.1%6.9% Risk Ratios Prior Victim Neglect/Medical Neglect Post-Investigation Services Child Disability Father Only Perpetrator *Does not include California

Slide 7April 6, 2006 Percentage of Children with Subsequent Reports Over Time (nine States) (R-R ) (R-V ) (V-V )

Slide 8April 6, 2006 Subsequent Events Within Three Years: Pattern Diagram for Children Reported N=803,320 (Nine States)

Slide 9April 6, 2006 Single Event Rereporting (R-R)

Slide 10April 6, 2006 Factors Associated with Increased Risk of Rereporting (R-R) Two year follow-up (N= 495,900, eight States) Reporting Source (Social Services)Caretaker Non-Professional and Other Sources1.14Alcohol1.12 ChildrenCPS Younger (decreases from 2 to 18) Initial Victim1.11 Female1.31Services1.35 White (rc African American)1.19Placement2.18 Multi Race (rc African American)1.53Interaction Disabled1.47Victim and Service0.93 Victim and Placement0.35

Slide 11April 6, 2006 Interaction of Services and Victimization for Rereporting

Slide 12April 6, 2006 Single Event Recurrence (V-V)

Slide 13April 6, 2006 Factors Associated with Increased Risk of Subsequent Victimization (V-V) Five year follow-up (N= 190,552 eight States) Reporting SourceMaltreatment Day Care and Foster Care Providers1.53Initial Neglect1.35 Non-Professional and Other Sources 1.27Other Abuse Only1.20 ChildrenCaretaker Younger (decreases from 1 to 18) Alcohol (trend)1.12 White (rc African American, trend)1.11CPS Native American (rc African American) 1.53Services1.57 Placement0.88