S4D WorkshopParis, France Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio A High-Resolution David H. Bromwich.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Advertisements

Overview of AMPS-Polar MM5 real-time forecasting for Antarctica and plans for the assimilation of EOS data David H. Bromwich Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd.
Observing System Simulation Experiments to Evaluate the Potential Impact of Proposed Observing Systems on Hurricane Prediction: R. Atlas, T. Vukicevic,
The 2014 Warn-on-Forecast and High-Impact Weather Workshop
Improved Simulations of Clouds and Precipitation Using WRF-GSI Zhengqing Ye and Zhijin Li NASA-JPL/UCLA June, 2011.
2012: Hurricane Sandy 125 dead, 60+ billion dollars damage.
Polar WRF Simulations of the McMurdo Dry Valleys Daniel F. Steinhoff 1, David H. Bromwich 1, and Andrew J. Monaghan 2 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
THORPEX-Pacific Workshop Kauai, Hawaii Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich.
Huang et al: MTG-IRS OSSEMMT, June MTG-IRS OSSE on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen and Xin Zhang National Center.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
The Effects of Grid Nudging on Polar WRF Forecasts in Antarctica Daniel F. Steinhoff 1 and David H. Bromwich 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research.
Verification of Numerical Weather Prediction systems employed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology over East Antarctica during the summer season.
Effects of Siberian forest fires on regional air quality and meteorology in May 2003 Rokjin J. Park with Daeok Youn, Jaein Jeong, Byung-Kwon Moon Seoul.
Validating the moisture predictions of AMPS at McMurdo using ground- based GPS measurements of precipitable water Julien P. Nicolas 1, David H. Bromwich.
Global Forecast System (GFS) Model Previous called the Aviation (AVN) and Medium Range Forecast (MRF) models. Global model and 64 levels Relatively primitive.
Recent Progress on High Impact Weather Forecast with GOES ‐ R and Advanced IR Soundings Jun Li 1, Jinlong Li 1, Jing Zheng 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Hui Liu.
Henry Fuelberg Nick Heath Sean Freeman FSU WRF-Chem During SEAC 4 RS.
Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
Arctic System Model WorkshopBoulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich.
Model & Satellite Data Dr Ian Brooks. ENVI 1400 : Meteorology and Forecasting2.
The Polar Atmosphere: Forecasts from weather and climate models David H. Bromwich Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University Research Urgencies.
Details for Today: DATE:18 th November 2004 BY:Mark Cresswell FOLLOWED BY:Literature exercise Model Assimilation 69EG3137 – Impacts & Models of Climate.
1 Tropical cyclone (TC) trajectory and storm precipitation forecast improvement using SFOV AIRS soundings Jun Tim Schmit &, Hui Liu #, Jinlong Li.
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Jordan G. Powers and Kevin W. Manning Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
3DVAR Retrieval of 3D Moisture Field from Slant- path Water Vapor Observations of a High-resolution Hypothetical GPS Network Haixia Liu and Ming Xue Center.
In this study, HWRF model simulations for two events were evaluated by analyzing the mean sea level pressure, precipitation, wind fields and hydrometeors.
Improvement of Short-term Severe Weather Forecasting Using high-resolution MODIS Satellite Data Study of MODIS Retrieved Total Precipitable Water (TPW)
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich,
Slide 1 Wind Lidar working group February 2010 Slide 1 Spaceborne Doppler Wind Lidars - Scientific motivation and impact studies for ADM/Aeolus Erland.
Science Discipline Overview: Atmosphere (large-scale perspective)  How might large-scale atmospheric challenges add to the scientific arguments for MOSAIC?
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Polar Winds from Satellite Imagers and Sounders MODIS Winds Group: Jeff Key 1, David Santek 2, Christopher Velden 2, Lars Peter Riishojgaard 3, Paul Menzel.
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 3rd.
26 th EWGLAM & 11 th SRNWP meetings, Oslo, Norway, 4 th - 7 th October 2004 Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan RC LACE Data Manager Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
1 Using water vapor measurements from hyperspectral advanced IR sounder (AIRS) for tropical cyclone forecast Jun Hui Liu #, Jinlong and Tim.
Arctic System Reanalysis David H. Bromwich 1,2 and Keith M. Hines 1 1- Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University Columbus,
Overview of NOAA’s Arctic Climate Science Activities Current or Proposed Activities Expected to Persist in FY
Regional Modeling of Antarctic Clouds Keith M. Hines 1 and David H. Bromwich 1,2 1 Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University.
Application of COSMIC refractivity in Improving Tropical Analyses and Forecasts H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, and Y. Chen NCAR IMAGe/COSMIC/MMM.
Impact of FORMOSAT-3 GPS Data Assimilation on WRF model during 2007 Mei-yu season in Taiwan Shyuan-Ru Miaw, Pay-Liam Lin Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
Autonomous Polar Atmospheric Observations John J. Cassano University of Colorado.
International Workshop on Antarctic Clouds Columbus, OH Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
WWRP, THORPEX, WCRP Polar Prediction Workshop Oslo, Norway Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Global Modeling Status Thomas Lachlan-Cope 1 and Keith M. Hines 2 1 British Antarctic Survey Cambridge, UK 2 Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar Research.
AMPS— Moving into the Next Phase  Background  AMPS’s Next Phase— Plans  Future Possibilities AMPS Users’ Workshop June.
The Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) and Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
RIME A possible experiment for Advancing Antarctic Weather Prediction David H. Bromwich 1, John J. Cassano 1, Thomas R. Parish 2, Keith M. Hines 1 1 -
Module 17 MM5: Climate Simulation BREAK. Regional Climate Simulation for the Pan-Arctic using MM5 William J. Gutowski, Jr., Helin Wei, Charles Vörösmarty,
Real-time forecasting for the Antarctic: An evaluation of the Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System (AMPS) David H. Bromwich 1, Andrew J. Monaghan 1, Kevin.
High impact weather nowcasting and short-range forecasting using advanced IR soundings Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
David H. Bromwich 1, 2 and Francis O. Otieno 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 2 Atmospheric.
WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.
IASC Workshop Potsdamr, Germany Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA The Arctic System Reanalysis.
AMPS Update – July 2010 Kevin W. Manning Jordan G. Powers Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for.
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
ASM Project Update: Atmospheric Modeling
The ACCIMA Project - Coupled Modeling of the High Southern Latitudes
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Hui Liu, Jeff Anderson, and Bill Kuo
Assimilation of Global Positioning System Radio Occultation Observations Using an Ensemble Filter in Atmospheric Prediction Models Hui Liu, Jefferey Anderson,
2007 Mei-yu season Chien and Kuo (2009), GPS Solutions
The Impact of Airborne Doppler Wind Lidar Profiles on Numerical
Vladimir S. Platonov, Mikhail I. Varentsov
Presentation transcript:

S4D WorkshopParis, France Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio A High-Resolution David H. Bromwich 1,2 and Keith M. Hines 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USA 2 Atmospheric Sciences Program Department of Geography The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USA Arctic System Reanalysis

Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) 1.Rapid climate change appears to be happening in the Arctic. A more comprehensive picture of the coupled atmosphere/land surface/ ocean interactions is needed. 2. Global reanalyses encounter many problems at high latitudes. The ASR would use the best available description for Arctic processes and would enhance the existing database of Arctic observations. The ASR will be produced at improved temporal resolution and much higher spatial resolution. 3. The ASR would provide fields for which direct observation are sparse or problematic (precipitation, radiation, cloud,...) at higher resolution than from existing reanalyses. 4. The system-oriented approach would provide a community focus including the atmosphere, land surface and sea ice communities. 5. The ASR would provide a convenient synthesis of Arctic field programs (SHEBA, LAII/ATLAS, ARM,...)

S4D WorkshopParis, France Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Outline A physically-consistent integration of Arctic data enhanced observations of the Sustained Arctic Observing Network (SAON) Participants: Ohio State University - Byrd Polar Research Center (BPRC) - and Ohio Supercomputer Center (OSC) National Center Atmospheric Research (NCAR) University of Colorado University of Illinois University of Alaska Fairbanks High resolution in space (20 km) and time (3 hours) Begin with years (EOS coverage) Supported by NSF as an IPY project

Issues with Observations and Reanalyses

The storm of 19 October 2004 as depicted by the NCEP/NCAR global reanalysis. Contours represent isobars of sea level pressure at increments of 3 hPa. [from visualization package of NOAA Climate Diagnostics Center] The Figure shows an intense storm depicted in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis for 19 October This storm, which led to flooding of downtown Nome, Alaska, has a central pressure of 949 hPa in the reanalysis. The actual central pressure deduced by the National Weather Service was as low as 941 hPa.

Arctic Clouds / Radiation

 solar and cloud fraction at Barrow (June 2001): ERA40 (red) vs ARM/NSA (black) Radiation and Cloud Differences in the Arctic

 longwave and cloud fraction at Barrow (June 2001): ERA40 (red) vs ARM/NSA (black) Radiation and Cloud Differences in the Arctic

New data sources : Important developments in Data Assimilation WRF is well represented MODIS winds –Tests underway AIRS COSMIC –Radio occultation soundings from GPS satellites ATOVS

Typical distribution of COSMIC GPS radio occultation soundings (green dots) over a 24-hour period over the Arctic.

Mesoscale Modeling High Resolution Depictions

Observed annual mean precipitation (mm) derived from station data, contour interval = 200 mm Annual mean precipitation, derived from polar MM5 V3.5 (cm). Contour interval = 20 cm. MM5 is driven at the boundaries by ECMWF operational analyses. Precipitation over Iceland from Polar MM5 Importance of high-resolution simulations and skill of numerical models in high latitudes

WRF – Weather Research and Forecasting model Base model for ASR Polar WRF – Polar-optimized version has been developed (Ohio State) –Tested for Greenland –Tested for Antarctica –Testing for Sheba –Testing for Arctic land Data Assimilation (NCAR) Land surface processes (NCAR)

On the Impact of MODIS Winds on AMPS WRF Forecasts Jordan G. Powers, Syed R.H. Rizvi, and Michael G. Duda Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, USA

MODIS Wind Retrieval Filtering Unfiltered— ALLFiltered— MOD UTC 15 May 2004 Init

WRF Experiments Init: 0000 UTC 15 May 2004 – First-guess and BCs: 1  GFS – Standard AMPS data: Sfc repts, AWS, upper-air, ships, buoys, cloud-track winds CTRL No data assimilation ALL 3DVAR w/std AMPS data + all MODIS MODQC 3DVAR w/std AMPS data + MODIS FILTER/QC subset EXMOD 3DVAR w/std AMPS data only MM5 Simulation AMPS MM5 3DVAR w/std AMPS data only III. Simulations and Results

Experiment Results— WRF Sfc Winds 2300 UTC 15 May (Hr 23) MOD1 25 ms -1 L STD ALLCTRL 34 Sfc Winds (ms -1 ) SLP (hPa) 34 L L L

ASR High Resolution Domain Outer Grid: ~45 km resolution Inner Grid: ~15 km resolution Vertical Grid: ~60 levels Inner Grid includes Arctic river basins