1 Timing in HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. 2 Timing We should try to maximize charge in time bin 5, for high energy (no time slew) We should try to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8.5 Factoring x 2 + bx + c. Factoring with Positives x 2 + 3x + 2 ◦Find two factors of 2 whose sum is 3. ◦Helps to make a list (x + 1)(x + 2) Factors.
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
ECAL and HCAL Simulation Status Rick Wilkinson Fabio Cossutti.
Upgrading the CMS simulation and reconstruction David J Lange LLNL April CHEP 2015D. Lange.
1 CALICE simulation results G.Villani 06 Cell size: 50 x 50  m 2 21 hits simulated, 5  m pitch 121 extrapolated hits / pixel 961 extrapolated hits /
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
US Test Beam Results Of Front End Timing T. Ferguson, N. Terentiev* (Carnegie Mellon University) CMS EMU Meeting University of California, Davis Feb 25.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
ECAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson May 25, ECAL Digitization CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) EcalElectronicsSim EBDataFrame EEDataFrame.
Standalone Muon Seeding Rick Wilkinson. 2 One Problem Solved: Bad Seed Efficiency in Cracks ORCA PTDR Standalone Muon CMSSW.
CSC Digitization Rick Wilkinson 1. CSC design and readout Large chambers Wires groups:5 cm wide Cathode strips: 8-16 mm wide 3.3 m wire-group hits every.
ECAL Digitization in CMSSW: Philosophy  Try to reuse code as much as possible between systems  ECAL, HCAL, Preshower? CASTOR?  Keep things as simple.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Rick Wilkinson Calo Framework & HCAL Digitization Status Calo Framework & HCAL Digitization Status u Optimization using igprof u Time Slewing for HCAL.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson 1. CMSSW HCAL Simulation Three gains are used as input –Calibration (GeV/fC) From DB gain, by channel –Electronics (fC/photoelectron)
SPD spill-over and the subtractor Míriam Calvo 23 June 2010.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
1 HCAL Upgrade TP simulation studies Jane Nachtman (Iowa) – for the HCAL group Trigger Upgrade meeting April 28, 2010.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Mark Thomson Timing, Tungsten and High Energy Jets.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/ Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
Mar 20, 2005 Iterative pe finder: IceTop data compression applied to In-ice D. Seckel, Univ. of Delaware.
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
12 October 2001, M. LefebvreHEC-Athena Tutorial: HEC beam test primer1 HEC Beam Test Primer Production modules of the HEC have been tested in particle.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.
Some quick news about X-Box1 data processing for BD location.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Feb 24, Abnormal Events in HF: TB04, Simulation, and Feb.08 Fermi Testbeam Anthony Moeller (U. Iowa) Shuichi Kunori (U. Maryland) Taylan Yetkin (U.
Lucia Bortko | Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design | | IFJ PAN Krakow | Page 1/16 Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design Lucia.
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
RPC Simulation software Raffaello Trentadue. RPC Digi producer RPC Digitizer RPC Synchronizer RPC Simulation model Average model Parametrized model Parametrized.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
L0 trigger update Bruno Angelucci INFN & University of Pisa.
The Results of 10 Additional PMT Tests 1.Timing of afterpulse 2.ADC readout 3. Conclusion TTU HEP Group Meeting, Apr. 14, 2004.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Higgs Recoil Mass Measurement and ZH Cross Section Tim Barklow, Awatif Belymam SLAC Feb 24, 2009.
INFN - PadovaBeauty Measurements in pp with the Central Detector 1 Beauty Measurements in p-p with the Central Detector F. Antinori, C. Bombonati, A. Dainese,
PreShower Characterisations
A Digital Pulse Processing System Dedicated to CdZnTe Detectors
Michael Lupberger Dorothea Pfeiffer
Calorimeter Occupancies University of Cambridge
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
Electron Cloud Meeting
Roberto Chierici - CERN
Ryan Badman Jim Crittenden July 20, 2011 Electron Cloud Meeting
HCAL Configuration Issues
Synchronization Policy: HCAL will follow ECAL as much as possible
Damping Ring Kicker Tests at AØ
CSC Digi & RecHit Validation
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
CSC Simulation Status Trigger very sensitive to wire timing!
 discrimination with converted photons
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
(2S) Measument with CMS 10 TeV Data
CALICE simulation results G.Villani 06
 discrimination with converted photons
Lecture 13: Sampling and Aliasing
Hit density at scoring planes at r=10, 30, and 50 cm.
Presentation transcript:

1 Timing in HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson

2 Timing We should try to maximize charge in time bin 5, for high energy (no time slew) We should try to maximize charge in time bin 5, for high energy (no time slew) Reconstruction uses time bins 5,6,7 & 8 Reconstruction uses time bins 5,6,7 & 8 Any energy in time bin 4 is lost! Any energy in time bin 4 is lost!

3 The Pulse Shape Peaks at 13.9 ns Integrated over bunch crossing Peaks at 5 ns That’s where we want time bin 5 to start

4 Jitter SimHit time minus time of flight to face of cell SimHit time minus time of flight to face of cell

5 Time Slew Smaller signals get delayed Smaller signals get delayed

6 Time Slew Implementation In current releases: In current releases: Each hit gets delayed based on its charge Each hit gets delayed based on its charge Future releases: Future releases: Hits are summed by cell and by estimated BX Hits are summed by cell and by estimated BX Will give smaller effect than current releases Will give smaller effect than current releases

7 Conclusion CMSSW has a “time phase” parameter CMSSW has a “time phase” parameter Should be 5 ns in ideal case Should be 5 ns in ideal case To maximize time bin 5 To maximize time bin 5 If we start too early, we lose the energy in bin 4 If we start too early, we lose the energy in bin 4 Jitter causes ~5-10 ns delay Jitter causes ~5-10 ns delay Time slew causes ~5-10 ns delay Time slew causes ~5-10 ns delay How to tune the number to use? How to tune the number to use? Optimize for infinite-energy limit? 100 GeV pions? Optimize for infinite-energy limit? 100 GeV pions?