CMS Calorimetry in the Very Forward Direction E. Norbeck, P. Debbins, and Y. Onel University of Iowa For the 23 rd Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cphys351 c4:1 Chapter 4: Atomic Structure The Nuclear Atom The Atom as the smallest division of an element quantization of electric charge oil drop experiments.
Advertisements

Cutnell/Johnson Physics 7th edition
CMS Heavy Ion Physics Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa.
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
Roberta Arnaldi AFTER meeting, Grenoble 10 May 2012
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
Lecture 24 Physics 2102 Jonathan Dowling EM waves Geometrical optics.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
A Silicon Disk Tracker in forward direction for STAR News since November 2000 Physics Capabilities capabilities Requirements / Potential Technologies Possible.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Directional Detectors and Digital Calorimeters Ed Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For the 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky,
Particle Detection and Identification
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
Timing Properties of T0 Detectors At PHOBOS Saba Zuberi, Erik Johnson, Nazim Khan, Frank Wolfs, Wojtek Skulski University of Rochester.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Far forward angle physics at the LHC E. Norbeck and Y. Onel University of Iowa For the 24th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics South Padre Island
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
Lecture 11  Production of Positron Emitters, Continued  The Positron Tomograph.
By Owen Lee.  CERN stands for Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire.  The name eventually changed to Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche.
Electric Field. Force at a Distance  Electric charges act on each other at a distance. Empty space between charges Net force on a charge  Force has.
The world of the atom In the 1920s and 1930s physicists discovered that the world of the atom was very different than our common sense world. To understand.
Internal target option for RHIC Drell-Yan experiment Wolfram Fischer and Dejan Trbojevic 31 October 2010 Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop.
The Design of a Detector for the Electron Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Anders Ingo Kirleis 1, William Foreman 1, Elke-Caroline Aschenauer 2, and Matthew.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
CMS Hadronic Endcap Calorimeter Upgrade Studies
Artificial Radioactivity
Lead Fluoride Calorimeter for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory October 31 st 2008.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
April 23, 2008 Workshop on “High energy photon collisions at the LHC 1 Cem Güçlü İstanbul Technical University Physics Department Physics of Ultra-Peripheral.
The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
How Are Electric And Magnetic Fields Used To Steer Particles In The Large Hadron Collider?
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
LHC The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is an accelerator with 27 km circumference. Being built on the France- Switzerland border west of Geneva. It will start.
LHC Heavy-Ion Program a CMS Perspective Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa for the CMS Collaboration 20 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics CMS HI groups:
Quartz Plates R&D Status By F. Duru, S. Ayan, U. Akgun, J. Olson, Y. Onel The University Of Iowa V.Podrasky, C. Sanzeni, D.R.Winn Fairfield University.
Ion signals with R134a and R134 in a parallel plate proportional counter Y. Onel, E. Norbeck, J. E. Olson University of Iowa For HCAL meeting at Fermilab.
APS April2000 Meeting Ahmet Sedat Ayan Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Iowa.
PPAC in ZDC for Trigger and Luminosity Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa Luminosity Workshop November 5, 2004.
Unit 12: Part 2 Quantum Physics. Overview Quantization: Planck’s Hypothesis Quanta of Light: Photons and the Photoelectric Effect Quantum “Particles”:
Christopher Cowden Advisor: Mario Spezziga Project: CMS HF (Forward Calorimeter)
Know How at LLR Ultra-granular calorimetry AFTER vs CHIC 1F. Fleuret - LLR11/05/ LPSC.
1 ZDCs in CMS Michael Murray,U Kansas pp Lum EMHad PMTs Lead/ plastic Fiber 1.5cm tungsten plates 2mm plates Beam LED Spare space for flow upgrade Light.
Edouard Kistenev for the PHENIX Collaboration Calorimetry based upgrade to PHENIX at RHIC CALOR 2012 Santa Fe, NM, June 4-8, 2012.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Gas detectors in a ZDC (at LHC) Edwin Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For7 th CMS Heavy-Ion meeting at Delphi June 2003.
Small, fast, low-pressure gas detector E. Norbeck, J. E. Olson, and Y. Onel University of Iowa For DNP04 at Chicago October 2004.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
1 Status of Zero Degree Calorimeter for CMS Experiment O.Grachov, M.Murray University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS A.S.Ayan, P.Debbins, E.Norbeck, Y.Onel University.
Very Forward Instrumentation: BeamCal Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration ILD Workshop, Zeuthen Tuesday 15/01/2008.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
PPAC Parallel Plate Avalanche Counter Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa For meeting at SLAC June 2, 2004.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa HCAL November 11-13, 2004.
Status of Zero Degree Calorimeter for CMS Experiment
Large Booster and Collider Ring
4. Two protons in an atomic nucleus are typically separated by a distance of 2 × 10–15 m. The electric repulsion force between the protons is huge, but.
Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Experimental Particle Physics
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

CMS Calorimetry in the Very Forward Direction E. Norbeck, P. Debbins, and Y. Onel University of Iowa For the 23 rd Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky Montana February 2007

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa2 Outline New thoughts about magnetic monopoles (The huge magnetic field of CMS would make a monopole appear at a very forward angle with a large energy. I now claim they can’t be produced.) Detector in TAS to extend calorimeter coverage to η = 7.7

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa3 Magnetic Monopoles (Dirac) Pole strength for (Coulomb’s law) en/2α = 68.5 en n=integer (1) Make N-S pair at point where wave functions overlap Separation about one Bohr radius Assume the pair is made in a 1S H-atom type state E Sep /mc 2 = (α/2) 2 =1.33 x ~e 4 for unit charge (positronium) For magnetic atom (polium?) E Sep /mc 2 = (1/2α) 4 (α/2) 2 =(1/8α) 2 =293 NS NS NS Make NS pair from vacuum using up kinetic energy

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa4 Will never see a single pole! Bound (NS) would annihilate, but into what? Photons like e + e - ? A jet if produced in a central Pb-Pb collision? Photon jet? Hadron jet? Perhaps common in RHIC data! An excited bound (NS)* could emit (NS).

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa5 Other types of magnetic monopoles have been proposed. These considerations have been only for one (the most popular) type.

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa6 Detector in TAS Why need η coverage to 7.7? Much valuable p-p physics from diffractive processes Single diffraction—one proton scatters, the other makes reaction products Rapidity gaps—angular regions with no reaction products Different diffractive processes have rapidity gaps in different places Requires largest possible rapidity coverage

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa7

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa8 TAS 20 cm x 20 cm slot (through the TAS) IP IP5 Iron Nose

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa9 TAS 5.0 < η < 7.7 HF 3.0 < η < 5.2 CASTOR 5.2 < η < 6.3 Net TAS 6.3 < η < 7.7

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa10 For detectors in slot at shower maximum in TAS: Generate Čerenkov light in quartz fibers Run fibers to back of TAS along 18 x 46 mm instrument slot on side of TAS Place PMTs behind TAS Use same electronics as in HF Instrument only uninstalled TAS

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa11

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa12

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa13

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa14

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa15

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa16

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa17 Quartz Fibers Fibers fanned out in slot to 20 cm vertical width of slot In slot fibers will be ~ 45º to beam to maximize light. Four fiber bundles, upper and lower halves on both sides Fibers will be quartz-quartz with a polyimide buffer to be able to withstand 250 ºC 24 hr bakeout. Can stand up to 1 Grad (measured last summer by Iowa group). (Bake out may anneal out radiation damage) Ample room in 18 x 46 mm slot on side of TAS for the fibers

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa18 Photomultiplier tubes Use same PMTs as HF Or for fast timing use new Hamamatsu fast tubes with only 250 ps transit-time spread PMTs will be perpendicular to beam line at back end of TAS. Distance from TAS to allow 90º bend of fibers and provide thermal isolation PMTs will be kept cool (even during bakeout) and free of helium with a stream of air (or N 2 ) Will fringing field from magnet affect PMTs?

23rd WW 02/16/07Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa19 To see rapidity gaps there must be no more than one collision per beam crossing. Only early p-p running will have so little beam. Will ramp up to 20 collisions per beam crossing. Will a detector with η out to 7.7 be useful for heavy ions? (extremely small x- values ~10 -7 ) Welcome any suggestions. This detector could have a long lifetime, but how useful will it be after initial p-p runs?