Project ASSIST: A Comprehensive, Systemic Change Initiative for Middle Level Schools A merican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting San Francisco.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Purpose of Instruction
PORTFOLIO.
Parents as Partners in Education
Cultural Competency Inside JCPS September 25 & 26, 2008.
Studying and Shaping Culture as a Key Component for School Improvement Glenna Heinlein, WVDE Mary Lu MacCorkle, WVDE State School Improvement Specialist.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
The Characteristics and Conditions Associated with Exemplary Middle Schools.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
University of Missouri-Columbia Middle Level Leadership Center Mary E. Douglass Doctoral Student Educational Leadership & Policy Analysis University of.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
NASSP Las Vegas, 2007 Jerry Valentine Bernard Solomon Kris Matthews Greg Mees University of Missouri – Columbia Focus on Leadership, Climate, Culture and.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Presented By: Nora Jaramillo, MJ Boyter, Kristin Carter. Reem Kievit, Crystal Rivera, Matt Craft, Robert Garcia.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools Connecting Action and Research.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
The Direction of the Baldwin-Woodville Area School District August 2010.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
The Direction of the Baldwin-Woodville Area School District September 2011.
What is IPI? Instructional Practices Inventory Keystone AEA January 28, 2009.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.
RESEARCH BINGO!. Compared to teachers in a flexible block schedule, teachers in a traditional, fixed-period schedule are more likely to implement a variety.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Pioneer Career and Technology Center, Shelby, Ohio Targeted Training For Master Teacher Criteria.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
A Developmentally Responsive Middle Level Education Kimberly Frazier November 20 th, 2009.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Comprehensive Planning
English Learner Parent Academy
February 21-22, 2018.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Project ASSIST: A Comprehensive, Systemic Change Initiative for Middle Level Schools A merican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting San Francisco April 9,2006 Jerry Valentine Dan Cockrell Brian Herndon Bernard Solomon University of Missouri – Columbia

Project ASSIST Background ASSIST: Achieving Success through School Improvement Site Teams ASSIST: Achieving Success through School Improvement Site Teams Developed— as a service project to Missouri schools Developed— as a service project to Missouri schools —First Cohort —First Cohort –8 Elementary Schools –8 Middle Level Schools –9 High Schools —Second Cohort —Second Cohort –12 Middle Level Schools —Third Cohort —Third Cohort –4 Middle Level Schools

Project ASSIST Design Site-based, school-specific improvement initiative Site-based, school-specific improvement initiative Site-based leadership team of teacher leaders and principal Site-based leadership team of teacher leaders and principal Bi-monthly external support to build team capacity so team can lead school-specific change grounded in two “frameworks” Bi-monthly external support to build team capacity so team can lead school-specific change grounded in two “frameworks” –Student-centered content framework –Vision-driven process framework Mix of voluntary and leader-determined participation Mix of voluntary and leader-determined participation Cohorts 1 & 2—cross-section of schools Cohorts 1 & 2—cross-section of schools Cohort 3—high poverty, low-achieving schools Cohort 3—high poverty, low-achieving schools

SUCCESS for each STUDENT  Academic  Social  Emotional  Physical ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP  Principal/Administrative Team Leadership  Establish Distributive/Participative Leadership (Capacity)  Establish Transformational Leadership (Change)  Establish Instructional Leadership (Pedagogy)  Establish Managerial Leadership (Efficiency)  Staff Leadership  Accept Leader Roles (School Improvement Team)  Become a Community of Leaders (Staff)  Commit to Success for Each Student (Staff)  Parent Leadership  Accept Leader Roles (Committees)  Provide Instructional Support (Volunteers)  Student Leadership  Accept Leader Roles (Committees)  Develop Leadership (Student Governance)  Community Leadership  Accept Leader Roles (Committees)  Provide Instructional Support (Volunteers)  District Leadership  Understand Site-Level Needs  Support Site-Level Needs ORGANIZATIONAL PEDAGOGY  Standards-Based, Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum  Align with State Standards  Align with Curricula of other Grade Levels  Align with Instruction and Assessment  Integrate across disciplines  Relevant and Authentic for Young Adolescents  Standards-Based, Developmentally Appropriate Instruction  Align with State Standards  Align with Curriculum and Assessment  Engage Learners Actively (Mentally and Physically)  Relevant and Authentic for Young Adolescents  Standards-Based, Developmentally Appropriate Assessment  Align with State Standards  Align with Curriculum and Instruction  Align with State/National Testing Methods  Relevant and Authentic for Young Adolescents  Grounded in Knowledge of Learner  Match Academic Readiness and Capacity  Promote Socialization with Peers and Adults  Foster Emotional Self-Image and Self-Control  Foster Self-Esteem (General & Academic)  Match Physical Needs & Development CARING, COLLABORATIVE CULTURE TRUSTING, RESPECTFUL CLIMATE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE  Change Processes  Establish Comprehensive and Systemic Processes  Establish Vision-Driven not Deficit-Driven Change  Inform Change via Formative and Summative Data  Program Delivery  Embed Basic Skills and Enrichment Programs  Require Core and Exploratory Curriculum  Provide Co-Curricular/Extracurricular Opportunities  Implement Student Grading and Homework Policies  Create Small Learning Communities/Teaming Structures  Implement Multi-Year/Extended Learning Relationships  Implement a Flexible Instructional Schedule  Implement Student-Adult Advisement Opportunities  Implement Multiple Transition Practices to/from School  Provide Service Learning/Volunteerism/Health Services  Personnel Policies  Recruit, Select, Retain, Develop, Dismiss Aggressively  Engage Staff in the Design/Implementation of Continuous Authentic and Relevant Professional Development  Align Teaching Assignments to Teacher Ability and Program Needs  Organize Staff by Teams and Content Areas  Provide Teacher and Team Planning Times  Student Policies  Assign/Group Students Heterogeneously  Establish Attendance and Behavior Policies  Resource Allocation  Align with Vision/Goals

Organizational Mission “What is our organization’s purpose?” Organizational Values/Beliefs “What do we value/believe about teaching, learning, professional development, and the process of change?” Knowledge of Best Practice “Do we understand best educational practice and systemic change?” Commitment to Best Practice “Are we dedicated to the study of best practices and to the systemic processes for change?” Organizational Vision “What do we want our organization to look like over the next few years?” Assess School Action Plan “How much of the plan have we accomplished?” Baseline Data About Current Practice “What do we look like as we begin the process?” Organizational Goals “How can we accomplish our organization’s vision?” Periodic Assessment of Current Practice “What data do we regularly collect and analyze?” Organizational Component Focus Teams What functions of our organization are necessary for effectiveness (e.g., Curriculum, Leadership, Facilities, Professional Development, etc.)?” Design Organizational Action Plan “What objectives, tasks, responsibilities, and timelines are necessary to accomplish our goals?” Implement School Action Plan “How do we collectively implement our action plan?”

Project ASSIST Today’s Paper Changes in Pre-Post Variables for Middle Level Schools in Cohorts 1 & 2 Changes in Pre-Post Variables for Middle Level Schools in Cohorts 1 & 2 –Culture and Climate –Leadership –Pedagogy Data Collected Using Factors from: Data Collected Using Factors from: –School Culture Survey (Gruenert/Valentine, 1996) –Organizational Climate Description Questionnaire Revised Middle (Hoy/Sabo, 1998) –Organizational Health Inventory, Middle (Hoy/Sabo, 1998) –Staff Assessment Questionnaire (Andrews/Soder, 1987) –School Empowerment Scale (Short/Rinehart, 1992) –Instructional Practices Inventory (Painter/Valentine, 1996)

Culture/Climate Variables Pre-Post Significant Differences Variable BothSource Teacher Collaboration ****SCS Learning Partnership ****SCS Unity of Purpose ****SCS Professional Development ****SCS Teacher Collegial Support ****SCS Teacher Committed Behavior NA**NAOCDQ Teacher Disengaged Behavior NA(**)NAOCDQ Teacher Affiliation NA**NAOHI Positive Learning Climate (*)SAQ High Expectations (*)SAQ Dedicated Staff **SAQ Teacher Decision-Making ****SPES T. Prof. Growth Opportunities **SPES Pre-Post Paired Sample T-Tests *=.05 **=01 NA: Not Available

Leadership Variables Pre-Post Significant Differences Variable BothSource Principal Collaborative Leadership ****SCS Strong Principal Leadership (**)**SAQ Principal Collegial Leadership NA*NAOHI Pre-Post Paired Sample T-Tests *=.05 **=01Pre-Post Paired Sample T-Tests *=.05 **=01 NA: Not Available

Pedagogical Variables Pre-Post Significant Differences Variable BothSource Academic Emphasis NA**NAOHI Curriculum Continuity **SAQ Early Ident Stu Special Needs **SAQ Freq. Monitor Stu. Prog/Inst (**)**SAQ Resource Support Classroom NA**NAOHI Stu. Engaged H-O Learning *****IPI Teacher-Led Instruction ***IPI Stu Seatwork T. Engaged (*)(*)IPI Stu Seatwork T. not Engaged (**)(**)IPI All Higher Order Learning ****IPI All H-O and Teacher-Led Inst. *****IPI All Student Seatwork (**)(**)IPI All Seatwork/Stu. Disengage. *(**)(**)IPI Seatwork wo T; Stu Disengag (**)(**)IPI Pre-Post Paired Sample T-Tests *=.05 **=01 NA: Not Available

Project ASSIST Summary of Findings Positive changes in school culture and climate evident, especially Positive changes in school culture and climate evident, especially –Increased focus on mission of school –Increased collaboration among P-T, T-T –Increased perceptions of empowerment Positive changes in school leadership were evident, especially Positive changes in school leadership were evident, especially –Increased skill in fostering collaborative relationships –Increased skill in fostering collegial relationships Positive changes in pedagogy were evident, especially Positive changes in pedagogy were evident, especially –Increased focus on academics –Increased curriculum continuity –Increased higher-order learning –Increased teacher-led instruction –Increased teacher engagement with students for instruction –Decreased student seatwork

Project ASSIST Final Thoughts Initiative positively impacted the culture/climate, leadership, and pedagogy of the participating schools Initiative positively impacted the culture/climate, leadership, and pedagogy of the participating schools External support to a school leadership team to address site-specific change grounded on best practice proved valuable for most participating schools External support to a school leadership team to address site-specific change grounded on best practice proved valuable for most participating schools Grade-level specific initiative produced stronger results than multi-grade level initiative Grade-level specific initiative produced stronger results than multi-grade level initiative Link between culture/climate, leadership, and pedagogy implies improved student achievement (but not confirmed in this study due to inconsistent achievement measures) Link between culture/climate, leadership, and pedagogy implies improved student achievement (but not confirmed in this study due to inconsistent achievement measures) Cohort 3 schools are receiving significantly more intensive support with a focus on improved student achievement. Cohort 3 schools are receiving significantly more intensive support with a focus on improved student achievement.

Contact Information Middle Level Leadership Center Middle Level Leadership Center – –(573) Jerry Valentine Jerry Valentine –(573)