TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park. Reference (old plot, full minerva)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Last Day of Ch. 8 Before Test! Fen 27 & 28. HW Due11 questions – turn them in! Tonight’s HW Test on Ch. 8 is next class. Use the study guide! No mandatory.

Advertisements

Last Day of Ch. 8 Before Test! Fen 27 & 28. HW Due11 questions – turn them in! Tonight’s HW Test on Ch. 8 is next class. Use the study guide! 2 review.

To figure out which tubes are working fine… Compare 24 to 2.6 and 2.51 to 2.6 by taking the ratio of counts. In general, 2.4 had the most problems, and.

COMP 3221: Microprocessors and Embedded Systems Lectures 27: Virtual Memory - III Lecturer: Hui Wu Session 2, 2005 Modified.

CSC1016 Coursework Clarification Derek Mortimer March 2010.

Analysis on TP detector Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Dec 19, 2007.

Types of Data SimTracks: generated particles SimHits: energy depositions in a detector volume Digis: Single-channel pieces of the detector’s raw binary.

1 Calorimetry Study Update Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Apr 12, 2006.

Update on final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, June 27, 2007.

Photostatistics Error Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 5, 2006.

TP Calorimetry and particle ID Jaewon Park. 2 Calorimetry We assumed that (dE/dx) min is constant for differe nt particles. In previous study:  Hcal.

OD Calorimetry Study Update — Z vertex position dependence Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 17, 2006.

MINERvA Simulation - HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry Jaewon Park University of Rochester Jupiter/MINERvA Group Meeting, Oct 4, 2006.

High-Multiplicity Events Analysis Group March 28, 2005 Leon R.

Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 7, 2007.

Calorimetry Study Update Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 22, 2006.

E/  Final state Jaewon Park University of Rochester.

Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Jan 31, 2007.

Reconstruction in final state Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, June 13, 2007.

MINERvA Calorimetry Resolution function Jaewon Park University of Rochester Jupiter/MINERvA Group Meeting, Nov 22, 2006.

MINERvA Simulation - HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA Collaboration Meeting, Sep 29, 2006.

MINERvA Simulation - HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA Collaboration Meeting, Sep 29, 2006.

1 Calorimetry Study Update — Implementing Kinematic cut Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Apr 26, 2006.

Semaphores CSCI 444/544 Operating Systems Fall 2008.

OD Calorimetry Study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 8, 2006.

TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park. 2 Semi-infinite ID Proton shows much hi gher calibration const ant. Calibration const for p roton for medium/high energy is.

Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.

Maintainability Sp.772 April 29th Important Criteria Easy to understand –New web masters –Old web masters –The user Easy to update –Bug fixes –New.

1 Calorimetry Study Update — Dependence of energy and phi Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Apr 19, 2006.

MINERvA Calorimetry Calibration with infinite detector Jaewon Park University of Rochester Jupiter/MINERvA Group Meeting, Nov 15, 2006.

RawHits in Pixel/SCT Kohei Yorita The University of Chicago FTK Meeting on Feb. 21 st 2007.

TP EM Containment Jaewon Park University of Rochester Rochester Group Meeting Mar 26, 2008.

1 Calorimetry Study Update — Angle dependence with cut Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 03, 2006.

OD Calorimetry Study Update — Leakage Effect and relative calibration Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 31, 2006.

More on Testbeam Analysis FLZ. Stability Checks for TCMT Pedestal stability already shown by Kurt MIP calibration stability Response stability.

GLAST background review dec Simulating rates: the big picture Incoming rate into the 6 m 2 sphere: is it right? Corresponding trigger rate: implies.

Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 09, 2007.

TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park. 2 Full Minerva Detector.

EM Calorimetry Study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 5, 2006.

Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 14, 2007.

(c) MathScience Innovation Center 2007 Solving Linear Systems Trial and Error Substitution Linear Combinations (Algebra) Graphing.

IT253: Computer Organization Lecture 3: Memory and Bit Operations Tonga Institute of Higher Education.

IT253: Computer Organization

Oct. 22, G.Lima1 Delving Deeper into Geant4 Guilherme Lima DHCal Meeting October 22, 2003.

T-4 Entering Data, Setting a Window, and Histograms Calculator Steps and Instructions.

Preparing for Assignment 3. Setup Assignment 3 builds on Assignment 2, and we are using the same basic scenario. Save the spreadsheet you used for Assignment.

Binominal Expansions By: Barbara Giesteira. This is the binominal expansion method.

Title: Lesson 4 Full Electron Configuration Learning Objectives: Know how to write full electron configurations using ideas of subshells.

7 May 2009Paul Dauncey1 Tracker alignment issues Paul Dauncey.

Review °Apply Principle of Locality Recursively °Manage memory to disk? Treat as cache Included protection as bonus, now critical Use Page Table of mappings.

Conditional Statements.  Quiz  Hand in your jQuery exercises from last lecture  They don't have to be 100% perfect to get full credit  They do have.

CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.

Scientific Notation. 210,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles (22 zeros) This number is written in standard form. When numbers get this large, it is easier.

MIS 3200 – Unit 5.1 Iteration (looping) – while loops – for loops Working with List Items.

CSCI 156: Lab 11 Paging. Our Simple Architecture Logical memory space for a process consists of 16 pages of 4k bytes each. Your program thinks it has.

In 2008 the economical depression hit Finland and Satakuntas unemployment number got higher, mostly with the ones working in manufactories. Since the beginning.

Chapter 7 Continued Arrays & Strings. Arrays of Structures Arrays can contain structures as well as simple data types. Let’s look at an example of this,

W Prototype Simulations Linear Collider Physics & Detector Meeting December 15, 2009 Christian Grefe CERN, Bonn University.

1 Calice TB Review DESY 15/6/06D.R. Ward David Ward Post mortem on May’06 DESY running. What’s still needed for DESY analysis? What’s needed for CERN data.

Calling Conventions, Caching

CSC 4250 Computer Architectures

Jaewon Park University of Rochester

MINERvA Simulation -OD calibration

COMC Preparation.

Update on HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry

T. Markiewicz / SLAC MAP at SLAC Working Meeting 2 July 2014

Text Type: Tongue Twisters

Homework: pg. 142 #29, 30 pg. 147 # ) A B C D ) A B C D ) A B

CPU Structure CPU must:

MIS 3200 – Unit 5.1 Iteration (looping) Working with List Items

Presentation transcript:

TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park

Reference (old plot, full minerva)

MIP event without PE smearing? Why it shows spike? (not zero values)

Common common block mistake I though the spike might be a bug in the code In stead, I found the other bug –I used own common block to copy rawhit into buffer. –I thought 500 maxhit would be enough but tracker used higher limit (3500) –If rawhit is more than 500 (2-3% event), it overwrite other ntuple block.

Ntuples NT block –RawHit : geant true hit –CalObj : Probably PE smeared hit –DigHit : I don’t understand this. Energy entry holds integer. In old study, I used CalObj block and occasionally RawHit block for consistency check. Current code used RawHit to calculate energy. I don’t remember why I used RawHit. Probably the format is slightly easier to use and I thought PE smearing is not big effect.

Try to some event selection Low energy criteria works.

Leakage? Probably we can do very much about higher energy proton (KE>300MeV)

Require no proton hit in last layers Requiring no proton hit in last some DS- Ecal layer It helps a little bit.