Answering Cosmological Questions with The Next Generation of Galaxy Surveys Will Percival (University of Portsmouth)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:
Advertisements

Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University Shaun Cole for Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Cosmological simulations.
Cosmological Constraints from Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
Utane Sawangwit National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand Collaborators: T. Shanks (Durham), M. Irwin (Cambridge) M.J. Drinkwater, D. Parkinson.
The Physics of Large Scale Structure and New Results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Beth Reid ICC Barcelona arXiv: arXiv: * Colloborators:
Optimization of large-scale surveys to probe the DE David Parkinson University of Sussex Prospects and Principles for Probing the Problematic Propulsion.
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
Massive Spectroscopy for Dark Energy in the South Josh Frieman MS-DESI Meeting, LBNL, March 2013 Some details in DESpec White Paper arXiv: (Abdalla,
Christian Wagner - September Potsdam Nonlinear Power Spectrum Emulator Christian Wagner in collaboration with Katrin Heitmann, Salman Habib,
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Dark Energy J. Frieman: Overview 30 A. Kim: Supernovae 30 B. Jain: Weak Lensing 30 M. White: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 30 P5, SLAC, Feb. 22, 2008.
Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009.
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
The Dark Energy Survey and The Dark Energy Spectrograph Josh Frieman DES Project Director Portsmouth, June 2011.
Answering Cosmological Questions with Galaxy Surveys Will Percival (University of Portsmouth)
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
30/6/09 Unity of the Universe 1. Michael Drinkwater for the team Australia: Blake, Brough, Colless, Couch, Croom, Davis, Glazebrook, Jelliffe, Jurek,
Clustering of Luminous Red Galaxies and Applications to Cosmology NicRoss (Penn State) Research Progress Meeting LBNL 8th November 2007 Ross et al., 2007,
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Cosmology & Large Scale Structure Case, Matthew Colless, GSMT SWG, 4-5 Dec 2002 11 GSMT Science - Case Studies Large Scale Structure and Cosmology Matthew.
Robust cosmological constraints from SDSS-III/BOSS galaxy clustering Chia-Hsun Chuang (Albert) IFT- CSIC/UAM, Spain.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Constraining the Dark Side of the Universe J AIYUL Y OO D EPARTMENT OF A STRONOMY, T HE O HIO S TATE U NIVERSITY Berkeley Cosmology Group, U. C. Berkeley,
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
Dark Energy & LSS SDSS & DES teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth) Marie Curie (EC)
Next generation redshift surveys with the ESO-VLT
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 2 perturbations Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Yun Wang, 3/2011 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and DE Figure of Merit Yun Wang Yun Wang WFIRST SDT #2, March 2011 WFIRST SDT #2, March 2011 BAO as a robust.
Large-Scale Structure beyond the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey Gavin Dalton Kyoto FMOS Workshop January 2004 (Oxford & RAL)
WFMOS KAOS concept identified via the Gemini Aspen Process and completed a Feasibility Study (Barden et al.) Proposed MOS on Subaru via an international.
DARK ENERGY IN SPACE: WFIRST AND EUCLID RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) ON BEHALF OF THE PHYSPAG DARK ENERGY COMMUNITY Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit:
David Weinberg, Ohio State University Dept. of Astronomy and CCAPP The Cosmological Content of Galaxy Redshift Surveys or Why are FoMs all over the map?
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Ignacy Sawicki Université de Genève Understanding Dark Energy.
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
A. Ealet, S. Escoffier, D. Fouchez, F. Henry-Couannier, S. Kermiche, C. Tao, A. Tilquin September 2012.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
DMD Spectroscopy Yun Wang Yun Wang (with DMD slides from Massimo Robberto) WFIRST SDT #2, March, 2011.
Dark Energy and Cosmic Sound Daniel Eisenstein Steward Observatory Eisenstein 2003 (astro-ph/ ) Seo & Eisenstein, ApJ, 598, 720 (2003) Blake & Glazebrook.
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
Will Percival The University of Portsmouth
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.
1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Prospects of Measuring Dark Energy Equation of State with LAMOST Xuelei Chen ( 陳學雷 ) National Astronomical Observatory of.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
Study of Proto-clusters by Cosmological Simulation Tamon SUWA, Asao HABE (Hokkaido Univ.) Kohji YOSHIKAWA (Tokyo Univ.)
NIRSS: the Near-Infrared Sky Surveyor WFIRST Meeting 2011 February 3 Daniel Stern (JPL/Caltech)
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: overview Will Sutherland (QMUL)
Cosmological Structure with the Lyman Alpha Forest. Jordi Miralda Escudé ICREA, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos University of Barcelona, Catalonia Edinburgh,
Inh Jee University of Texas at Austin Eiichiro Komatsu & Karl Gebhardt
Astronomy toolkits and data structures Andrew Jenkins Durham University.
Constraining Dark Energy with Redshift Surveys Matthias Steinmetz (AIP)
Complementarity of Dark Energy Probes
Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Cosmology with Galaxy Correlations from Photometric Redshift Surveys
Presentation transcript:

Answering Cosmological Questions with The Next Generation of Galaxy Surveys Will Percival (University of Portsmouth)

The standard “model” for cosmology

Remaining questions  What are the constituents of matter? – undiscovered particles – neutrino masses  Why do we see an accelerating Universe? – vacuum energy density (Einstein’s cosmological constant) – new scalar field / other phenomenon  How does structure form within this background? – large-scale General Relativity deviations?  Why is the Universe homogeneous on large scales? – inflation or other model? – inflation parameters  How do galaxies form and evolve?  What are the constituents of matter? – undiscovered particles – neutrino masses  Why do we see an accelerating Universe? – vacuum energy density (Einstein’s cosmological constant) – new scalar field / other phenomenon  How does structure form within this background? – large-scale General Relativity deviations?  Why is the Universe homogeneous on large scales? – inflation or other model? – inflation parameters  How do galaxies form and evolve?

Current / future surveys

 New wide-field camera for the 4m Blanco telescope  Currently being moved from Fermilab to site, Survey due to start autumn 2011  Ω = 5,000deg2  multi-colour optical imaging (g,r,i,z) with link to IR data from VISTA hemisphere survey  300,000,000 galaxies  Aim is to constrain dark energy using 4 probes LSS/BAO, weak lensing, supernovae cluster number density  Redshifts based on photometry weak radial measurements weak redshift-space distortions  See also: Pan-STARRS, VST-VISTA, SkyMapper  New wide-field camera for the 4m Blanco telescope  Currently being moved from Fermilab to site, Survey due to start autumn 2011  Ω = 5,000deg2  multi-colour optical imaging (g,r,i,z) with link to IR data from VISTA hemisphere survey  300,000,000 galaxies  Aim is to constrain dark energy using 4 probes LSS/BAO, weak lensing, supernovae cluster number density  Redshifts based on photometry weak radial measurements weak redshift-space distortions  See also: Pan-STARRS, VST-VISTA, SkyMapper Dark Energy Survey (DES)

VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)  Uses upgraded VIMOS on VLT  Ω = 24deg 2  100,000 galaxies  emission line galaxies: 0.5<z<1.0  insufficient volume for BAO measurement  Unique redshift-space distortion science  18,500 redshifts from pre-upgrade data  expect ~10,000 redshifts this season  see also: FMOS surveys  Uses upgraded VIMOS on VLT  Ω = 24deg 2  100,000 galaxies  emission line galaxies: 0.5<z<1.0  insufficient volume for BAO measurement  Unique redshift-space distortion science  18,500 redshifts from pre-upgrade data  expect ~10,000 redshifts this season  see also: FMOS surveys

Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS)  New fibre-fed spectroscope now on the 2.5m SDSS telescope  Ω = 10,000deg 2  1,500,000 galaxies  150,000 quasars  LRGs : z ~ 0.1 – 0.7 (direct BAO)  QSOs : z ~ 2.1 – 3.0 (BAO from Ly-α forest) 0.1<z<0.3: 1% d A, 1.8% H 0.4<z<0.7: 1% d A, 1.8% H z~2.5: 1.5% d A, 1.2% H  Cosmic variance limited to z ~ 0.6 : as good as LSS mapping will get with a single ground based telescope  Leverage existing SDSS hardware & software where possible: part of SDSS-III  Sufficient funding is in place and project is 1 year into 5 year duration  All imaging data now public (DR8 12/01/11)  See also: WiggleZ  New fibre-fed spectroscope now on the 2.5m SDSS telescope  Ω = 10,000deg 2  1,500,000 galaxies  150,000 quasars  LRGs : z ~ 0.1 – 0.7 (direct BAO)  QSOs : z ~ 2.1 – 3.0 (BAO from Ly-α forest) 0.1<z<0.3: 1% d A, 1.8% H 0.4<z<0.7: 1% d A, 1.8% H z~2.5: 1.5% d A, 1.2% H  Cosmic variance limited to z ~ 0.6 : as good as LSS mapping will get with a single ground based telescope  Leverage existing SDSS hardware & software where possible: part of SDSS-III  Sufficient funding is in place and project is 1 year into 5 year duration  All imaging data now public (DR8 12/01/11)  See also: WiggleZ

MOS plans for 4m telescopes  New fibre-fed spectroscope proposed for many 4m telescopes  Ω = 5,000deg 2 – 14,000deg 2  ~10,000,000 galaxies  auxillary science from “spare fibres” including – QSO targets – stellar / Milky-Way / galaxy evolution programs  LRGs : z ~ 0.1 – 1.0  ELGs: z~  alternative option: mag limit I<22.5 requiring longer exposures  Follow-up of current and future imaging surveys  Options include BigBOSS, DESpec, WEAVE, VXMS, …  New fibre-fed spectroscope proposed for many 4m telescopes  Ω = 5,000deg 2 – 14,000deg 2  ~10,000,000 galaxies  auxillary science from “spare fibres” including – QSO targets – stellar / Milky-Way / galaxy evolution programs  LRGs : z ~ 0.1 – 1.0  ELGs: z~  alternative option: mag limit I<22.5 requiring longer exposures  Follow-up of current and future imaging surveys  Options include BigBOSS, DESpec, WEAVE, VXMS, … From BigBOSS NOAO proposal

MOS plans for 8-10m telescopes  HETDEX  9.2m Hobby-Eberly Telescope with 22 arcminute FoV,  new integral field spectrograph (VIRUS) to simultaneously observe 34,000 spatial elements – Ω = 420deg 2 – 1,000,000 Lyman break galaxies – 1.9 < z < 3.5  SUMIRE  8.2m SUBARU Telescope with 1.5deg FoV  Imaging survey with HSC  Spectroscopic survey with PFS (ex-WFMOS, more cosmology focused) – Ω ~ 2,000deg 2 – ~4,000,000 redshifts – ~0.7 < z < 1.7 (OII or Lyman break galaxies)  HETDEX  9.2m Hobby-Eberly Telescope with 22 arcminute FoV,  new integral field spectrograph (VIRUS) to simultaneously observe 34,000 spatial elements – Ω = 420deg 2 – 1,000,000 Lyman break galaxies – 1.9 < z < 3.5  SUMIRE  8.2m SUBARU Telescope with 1.5deg FoV  Imaging survey with HSC  Spectroscopic survey with PFS (ex-WFMOS, more cosmology focused) – Ω ~ 2,000deg 2 – ~4,000,000 redshifts – ~0.7 < z < 1.7 (OII or Lyman break galaxies)

Euclid  ESA Cosmic Vision satellite proposal (600M€, M-class mission)  5 year mission, L2 orbit  1.2m primary mirror, 0.5 sq. deg FOV  Ω = 20,000deg 2 imaging and spectroscopy  slitless spectroscopy: – 100,000,000 galaxies (direct BAO) – ELGs (H-alpha emitters): z~  imaging: – deep broad-band optical + 3 NIR images – 2,900,000,000 galaxies (for WL analysis) – photometric redshifts  Space-base gives robustness to systematics  Final down-selection due mid 2011  nominal 2017 launch date  See also: LSST, WFIRST  ESA Cosmic Vision satellite proposal (600M€, M-class mission)  5 year mission, L2 orbit  1.2m primary mirror, 0.5 sq. deg FOV  Ω = 20,000deg 2 imaging and spectroscopy  slitless spectroscopy: – 100,000,000 galaxies (direct BAO) – ELGs (H-alpha emitters): z~  imaging: – deep broad-band optical + 3 NIR images – 2,900,000,000 galaxies (for WL analysis) – photometric redshifts  Space-base gives robustness to systematics  Final down-selection due mid 2011  nominal 2017 launch date  See also: LSST, WFIRST

How does dark energy affect the geometry?

Using clustering to measure geometry Sunyaev & Zel’dovich (1970); Peebles & Yu (1970); Doroshkevitch, Sunyaev & Zel’dovich (1978); Cooray, Hu, Huterer & Joffre (2001); Eisenstein (2003); Seo & Eisenstein (2003); Blake & Glazebrook (2003); Hu & Haiman (2003); … Sunyaev & Zel’dovich (1970); Peebles & Yu (1970); Doroshkevitch, Sunyaev & Zel’dovich (1978); Cooray, Hu, Huterer & Joffre (2001); Eisenstein (2003); Seo & Eisenstein (2003); Blake & Glazebrook (2003); Hu & Haiman (2003); … CMB High-z galaxy sample Low-z galaxy sample

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) To first approximation, comoving BAO wavelength is determined by the comoving sound horizon at recombination comoving sound horizon ~110h -1 Mpc, BAO wavelength 0.06hMpc -1 comoving sound horizon ~110h -1 Mpc, BAO wavelength 0.06hMpc -1 (images from Martin White) Varying r s /D V projection onto the observed galaxy distribution depends on

Predicted BAO constraints Uses public code to estimate errors from BAO measurements from Seo & Eisenstein (2007: astro-ph/ )

Current large-scale galaxy clustering measurements SDSS LRGs at z~0.35 The largest volume of the Universe currently mapped Total effective volume V eff = 0.26 Gpc 3 h -3 SDSS LRGs at z~0.35 The largest volume of the Universe currently mapped Total effective volume V eff = 0.26 Gpc 3 h -3 Percival et al. 2009; arXiv: Power spectrum gives amplitude of Fourier modes, quantifying clustering strength on different scales

Predicted galaxy clustering measurements by Euclid 20% of the Euclid data, assuming the slitless baseline at z~1 Total effective volume (of Euclid) V eff = 19.7 Gpc 3 h -3 20% of the Euclid data, assuming the slitless baseline at z~1 Total effective volume (of Euclid) V eff = 19.7 Gpc 3 h -3

ΛCDM models with curvature flat wCDM models Union supernovae WMAP 5year SDSS-II BAO Constraint on r s (z d )/D V (0.2) & r s (z d )/D V (0.35) Percival et al. (2009: arXiv: ) Current BAO constraints vs other data Percival et al. 2009; arXiv:

ΛCDM models with curvature flat wCDM models Union supernovae WMAP 5year SDSS-II BAO Constraint on r s (z d )/D V (0.2) & r s (z d )/D V (0.35) Percival et al. (2009: arXiv: ) How does Euclid BAO compare?

Effect of galaxy type & density

Effect of Volume

How does structure form within this background?

We cannot see growth of structure directly from galaxies satellite galaxies in larger mass objects central galaxies in smaller objects large scale clustering strength = number of pairs typical survey selection gives changing halo mass

Redshift-Space Distortions When we measure the position of a galaxy, we measure its position in redshift-space; this differs from the real-space because of its peculiar velocity: Where s and r are positions in redshift- and real-space and v r is the peculiar velocity in the radial direction

Galaxies act as test particles Galaxies act as test particles with the flow of matter On large-scales, the distribution of galaxy velocities is unbiased provided that the positions of galaxies fully sample the velocity field If fact, we can expect a small peak velocity-bias due to motion of peaks in Gaussian random fields Percival & Schafer, 2008, MNRAS 385, L78 Under-density Over-density Actualshape Apparentshape (viewed from below) Under-density Over-density

Standard measurements provide good test of models Blake et al, 2010: arXiv: Standard assumption: b v =1 (current simulations limit this to a 10% effect). assume: irrotational velocity field due to structure growth, plane-parallel approximation, linear deterministic density & velocity bias, first order in δ, θ Normalise RSD to σ v Normalise RSD to fσ 8 Normalise RSD to β=f/b assume continuity, scale-independent growth assume continuity, scale-independent growth

Expected errors for current / future surveys White, Song & Percival, 2008, MNRAS, 397, 1348 Code to estimate errors on fσ 8 is available from: Code to estimate errors on fσ 8 is available from:

Effect of galaxy type & density

Effect of galaxy Volume

Summary  Galaxy clustering will help to answer remaining questions for astrophysical and cosmological models  Shape of the power spectrum – measures galaxy properties (e.g. faint red galaxies) – neutrino masses (current systematic limit) – models of inflation  Baryon acoustic oscillations – measures cosmological geometry  Redshift-space distortions – measures structure formation  Future MOS instruments on 4m-class telescopes – niche between current experiments and satellite missions – getting sufficient volume is key (>5,000deg 2 ) – redshifts of ELGs will come from OII emission line – colour selection and target sample are key – exciting developments over the next 10—20 years  Galaxy clustering will help to answer remaining questions for astrophysical and cosmological models  Shape of the power spectrum – measures galaxy properties (e.g. faint red galaxies) – neutrino masses (current systematic limit) – models of inflation  Baryon acoustic oscillations – measures cosmological geometry  Redshift-space distortions – measures structure formation  Future MOS instruments on 4m-class telescopes – niche between current experiments and satellite missions – getting sufficient volume is key (>5,000deg 2 ) – redshifts of ELGs will come from OII emission line – colour selection and target sample are key – exciting developments over the next 10—20 years