LibQUAL+ Data for Learning Commons Focus Groups University Libraries Assessment Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIBQUAL+® AND THE EVOLUTION OF LIBRARY AS PLACE AT RADFORD UNIVERSITY, Eric Ackermann Radford University Library Assessment Conference University.
Advertisements

UVic Libraries 2008 LibQUAL+ Survey Prepared for the UVic Senate Committee on Libraries.
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Changes in Technology Use 1997 The first version of the survey didn’t even include a question about computer use. “Used MMC” (Multi Media Center) was added.
Studying Ourselves: Libraries and the User Experience at UNT Diane Wahl.
Queen’s Libraries User Surveys Selected information from the Faculty and Student surveys June 2002.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
LibQUAL+ The Arizona State University Libraries’ Experience.
Using Assessment Data to Improve Library Services Christopher Stewart Dean of Libraries, Illinois Institute of Technology Charles Uth, Head of Collection.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
2006 LibQUAL+ Survey Results Information Services Concept Review on Assessment November 9, 2006.
5 Roles for Empowering* School Librarians *ones who impact academic achievement.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
The AAHSL/ARL Partnership in Exploring Outcomes Assessment through LibQUAL+
January 22, 2007 ALA Midwinter, Seattle Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College LibQUAL+ Results: What Now? Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.
Project URL – TM Score Norms 17 th Greek Academic Libraries Conference 24 September, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson, M. Kyrillidou.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
Going Beyond The Numbers How We Are Benefiting From Our Experience With LibQUAL+® The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey Carolyn Gutierrez Associate.
LibQUAL+ and the Library Summit Concept London February 3, 2006 Fred Heath Vice Provost and Director, University of Texas Libraries
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS 357 completed surveys – Not all questions were answered by all respondents – Variation in the total respondents by question.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Measurement and Assessment of Library Programs and Services Eileen E. Hitchingham Dean, University Libraries Virginia Tech The Changing.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQUAL+® Lite in Hebrew By Dr. Lynne Porat University of Haifa Library LibQUAL+® Exchange, 8th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
TM Project web site New Ways of Listening to Users: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Consuella Askew Waller April 10-13, 2003 ACRL 11 th.
Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.
LibQUAL + ™ 2004 Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2004 survey with comparisons to past surveys.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
LibQual Survey. The CUC Group Resp.% Calvin College & Theological Seminary1, % Cedarville University Centennial Library % Geneva College %
A half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17,
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers
Program Review Presentation 4/18/12
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Reading Radar Charts.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2007
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making
Presentation transcript:

LibQUAL+ Data for Learning Commons Focus Groups University Libraries Assessment Committee

LibQUAL+ Data

Satisfaction Percentage Since LibQUAL+ provides six separate numbers for each measure, it is easier to translate it. Satisfaction Percentage = Adequacy Gap / Zone of Tolerance This score is thereby a function of all six scores

LibQUAL+ Data for Focus Groups Library as Place (5 questions) Affect of Service (9 questions) Information Control (9 questions) “Graduate dilemma” All benchmarked against Association of Research Libraries (ARL) averages

Norlin Users

Sample Comments This is a critique of Norlin. The facilities including the study areas, chairs and tables are incredibly outdated and the chairs are uncomfortable. The tables are nice and large, but the chairs are a hodgepodge of apperently all of the chairs that haven't completely broken down since the 1970's. Also, it's not really that quiet. Also, there need to be more outlets for laptops, and more quiet private study areas that don't smell bad. Those individual study areas near the coffee shop and upstairs are old and stink. Also, the coffee shop is great, it would be better if they served real lattes and not the yucky machine lattes, but the real problem is that it is never open. Also, why does the library close over breaks, I'm still here looking for a place to study. It would also be nice if there was some enforcement of the policy prohibiting talking loudly on cell phones, especially in the stair wells. I like the talking study area downstairs, but more private group study areas would be nice. The mac lab has computers that break down often, but other than that it is fine and the staff is helpful. The PC lab is dark and it makes it difficult to use. Lighting needs to be added.

Library as Place Summary Undergraduates – Want more “community space” Graduates – Want more “quiet space” Faculty – Want more of both, but primarily “quiet space”

Implications for Focus Groups: Place Explore the “communal” versus “individual” study space issue – How can the “neighborhoods” be leveraged to provide both?

Norlin Users

Sample Comments The worst service I've had is this year from the [student assistants]. It's like those kids are on drugs! Library employees are fantastic, espec. bibliographers and ILL staff. The WONDERFUL bibliographers do their absolute best with the limited budget resources.

Affect of Service Summary Undergraduates – Want more “individual attention” Graduates – Are fairly satisfied with Norlin service, but do want more knowledgeable staff Faculty – Want more knowledgeable staff

Implications for Focus Groups: Service What is “individual attention” to graduates and faculty? What sorts of staffing models can provide both “one desk” and “expert” services? How can item location be facilitated? – Stacks, print, electronic

The Graduate Dilemma Graduate enrollment has declined 11% in 9 years, and the campus wants to reverse direction General scores for undergrads have improved and are now just about on pace with ARL averages General scores for faculty are low, but trending in the right direction General scores for graduates were on pace, but declined significantly between 2004 and 2006— WHY???

Core Dimensions

WHY? What parts of the LibQUAL+ dimensions are most telling of what graduate students perceive as lacking?

Graduate Students

Okay Since there is such a strong tie between building and collection, you would expect this would be tied to print material It is, especially for humanists, but it is also true for electronic resources….

Graduate Students

Correlations Branch UsersNorlin Users The printed library materials I need for my work Pearson Correlation.146(*)-.146(*) Sig. (2-tailed).039 N 201 The electronic information resources I need Pearson Correlation.175(*)-.175(*) Sig. (2-tailed).010 N 214

Okay But these Norlin users are mostly humanists, right?

Norlin Users

Okay But these scientists are mostly chemists and biologists, right?

Norlin Scientists

So…. It’s true of all Norlin users.

Grad Students: Norlin Users

Graduate Dilemma Summary Regardless of discipline, graduate users of Norlin are displeased with the place and the collection, and there is something significant about this relationship. – This is mostly true for print and humanists (but also electronic) – And mostly true for electronic and scientists (but not really print) – For grad students, the Commons is not just about place, but about collections

Implications for Focus Groups: Graduate Dilemma How can the Commons be promoted to Graduates and Faculty? Explore relationship between place and collections – How can the Commons promote collections? Humanists and scientists?