Classical Conditioning. Associative Learning Nonassociative HabituationSensitization A single type of stimulus The relationship between two stimuli Classical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 31 Cerebellum Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Introduction to Neurobiology Lecture 13: Classical conditioning 1.
Facebook Group: The group is called: Psych281 Spring08 Available only to University of Alberta network Sorry to be rude but… Please don’t add me as a friend.
Lectures 5&6: Pavlovian Conditioning (Basic Concepts & Generality)
Classical Conditioning. A. Definitions 1.Classical conditioning: learning that takes place when originally neutral stimulus comes to produce a conditioned.
Neuroscience & Behavior Program Robert J. Polewan & John W. Moore* University of Massachusetts Amherst COMPOUND CONDITIONING UNDER TEMPORAL UNCERTAINTY.
Computational Analysis of Motor Learning. Three paradigms Force field adaptation Visuomotor transformations Sequence learning Does one term (motor learning)
Inhibitory Pavlovian Conditioning Stimuli can become conditioned to signal the absence of a US— such learning is called Inhibitory Conditioning CS+ = excitatory.
Blue Gouramis Highly Territorial But Needs to Mate 3. What are the CS and US?
Classical Conditioning. Learning: What does it mean to learn? Learning is the single largest area of Psychology second only to clinical psychology.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning
Motor systems III: Cerebellum April 16, 2007 Mu-ming Poo Population coding in the motor cortex Overview and structure of cerebellum Microcircuitry of cerebellum.
Jacques Wadiche, PhD Assistant Professor Neurobiology Department 1/25/08 Cerebellum.
Classical Conditioning
Classical Conditioning: The Elements of Associative Learning
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 3 – Nuts and Bolts of Conditioning (Mechanisms of Classical Conditioning)
Inhibitory Cerebello-Olivary Projections and Blocking Effect in Classical Conditioning J J Kim, D J Krupa, R F Thompson Science, vol. 279, (1998)
Classical Conditioning
Principles of Behavior Change Classical Conditioning.
CHAPTER 4 Pavlovian Conditioning: Causal Factors.
Learning Ms. Simon Do Now: Define Learning. Definition Learning is a relatively permanent change in an organism’s behavior due to experience.
How do we learn?  What are the manners by which you learn as a student?
Psychology 2250 Last Class Characteristics of Habituation and Sensitization -time course -stimulus-specificity -effects of strong extraneous stimuli (dishabituation)
The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Is Critically Involved in Enhancing Associative Learning After Stressfull Experience By Debra Bangasser, Jessica.
Psychology of Learning EXP4404 Chapter 3: Pavlovian (Classical) Conditioning Dr. Steve.
Classical conditioning Forging connections between formerly unrelated events.
LEARNING- a permanent change in behavior due to experience
Version 0.1 (c) CELEST Associative Learning.
Lecture 2: Classical Conditioning. Types of learning Habituation and sensitization Classical (Pavlovian) conditioning Instrumental (Operant) conditioning.
Factors Influencing Conditioning  CS and US Intensity, and Attention to the CS  Temporal relationship  Predictiveness  Preparedness  Redundancy 1.
Unit 7: Learning. Behaviorism Belief that behavior is learned –genetics has little to do with it. “nurture-only” belief, mainstream1960s and 70s.
Acquisition curve of Eyeblink CR
Learning Definition: The process of acquiring new and enduring information or behaviors Associative learning is the key Conditioning – the process of.
Learning Part I Learning Classical Conditioning
Blocking The phenomenon of blocking tells us that what happens to one CS depends not only on its relationship to the US but also on the strength of other.
Learning & Memory JEOPARDY. The Field CC Basics Important Variables Theories Grab Bag $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400 $500 $400.
Basic Learning Processes Robert C. Kennedy, PhD University of Central Florida
Introduction to Neurobiology Lecture 13: Classical conditioning 1 Inhibitory Cerebello-Olivary Projections and Blocking Effect in Classical Conditioning.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 3 – Nuts and Bolts of Conditioning (Mechanisms of Classical Conditioning)
LEARNING: PRINCIPLES & APPLICATIONS CLASSICAL CONDITIONING.
US location switch alone
Reevaluating the Role of LTD in Cerebellar Motor Learning
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
Classical Conditioning
Inferior Olivary TMEM16B Mediates Cerebellar Motor Learning
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Long-Term Depression of mGluR1 Signaling
Cerebellar Function in Consolidation of a Motor Memory
Learning and memory: Basic Mechanisms
Aryeh Hai Taub, Rita Perets, Eilat Kahana, Rony Paz  Neuron 
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
SK2 Channel Modulation Contributes to Compartment-Specific Dendritic Plasticity in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells  Gen Ohtsuki, Claire Piochon, John P. Adelman,
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Reevaluating the Role of LTD in Cerebellar Motor Learning
Learning: A mechanism of learning found?
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Interaction of Postsynaptic Receptor Saturation with Presynaptic Mechanisms Produces a Reliable Synapse  Kelly A. Foster, Anatol C. Kreitzer, Wade G.
Michael Häusser, Beverley A Clark  Neuron 
Victor Z Han, Kirsty Grant, Curtis C Bell  Neuron 
Jeffrey A. Dzubay, Thomas S. Otis  Neuron 
Stephan D. Brenowitz, Wade G. Regehr  Neuron 
Noradrenergic Control of Associative Synaptic Plasticity by Selective Modulation of Instructive Signals  Megan R. Carey, Wade G. Regehr  Neuron  Volume.
Encoding of Oscillations by Axonal Bursts in Inferior Olive Neurons
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Apparatus and equipment configuration used for trace eyeblink conditioning in head-fixed mice (A), analysis of high-speed video (B), and example behavioral.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
Christian Hansel, David J. Linden  Neuron 
Pseudo-colored raster plots of average increases in activity (number of spikes/100 ms bin × trial) during sessions for persistent (A) and trace interval.
Cerebellar Function in Consolidation of a Motor Memory
Presentation transcript:

Classical Conditioning

Associative Learning Nonassociative HabituationSensitization A single type of stimulus The relationship between two stimuli Classical conditioning Operant conditioning Extinction Blocking

Definitions An Unconditioned stimulus (US) is a stimulus which “naturally” elicits an (unconditioned) response (UR). For example: An airpuff to the eye is an unconditioned stimulus which elicits an eyeblink (nictitating membrane response). A conditioned stimulus (CS) is a “neutral” stimulus (e.g. a tone), which, by being associated with the US, leads after learning to a conditioned response (CR).

Basic paradigm Before learning,US -> UR CS -> nothing Training:CS+US -> UR CS -> increasing CR(=UR) Post-training:CS-> CR (=UR). Temporal relationship of CS,US: Simultaneous, delayed (partial overlap in time) or trace (separated in time). Usually strongest conditioning effects for ISI of 200ms-2s.

Circuitry for eyelid conditioning / nictitating membrane response

Single unit recording of complex spike responses of cerebellar Purkinje cells over the course of the behavioral training. The inferior olive’s ability to convey US to the cerebellum becomes functionally suppressed, as eyeblink conditioning occurs.

Blocking neuronal activity in cerebellar output Superior cerebellar peduncle blocked using perfusion of TTX Expression of eyeblink conditioning blocked, but not acquisition Krupa and Thompson, PNAS 1995

Cerebellar LTD and Learning-Dependent Timing of Conditioned Eyelid Responses S.K.E.Koekkoek,H.C.Hulscher,B.R.Dortland,R.A.Hensbroek, Y.Elgersma,T.J.H.Ruigrok,C.I.De Zeeuw* Science 2003 Inhibition of climbing fibers is a signal for the extinction of conditioned eyelid responses Medina, Nores and Mauk Nature 2002 Inhibitory Cerebello-olivary projections and blocking effect in classical conditioning. Kim, Krupa and Thompson Science 1998

CR-induced inhibition of the inferior olive activity is GABA-mediated US only CS-US With PTX

phase 1 : seven daily sessions of tone-airpuff conditioning. phase 2 : five sessions of tone-light-airpuff compound conditioning while either PTX or ACSF was infused. phase 3 : all animals were presented with light-airpuff pairing tests. controls experienced only the second phase of the blocking procedure. Blocking of conditioned eyelid responses

Both control and PTX animals exhibited significant learning to the light CS compared with the ACSF animals - blocking did not occur in the PTX group. PTX had no effect on the performance of CRs and URs during the compound conditioning, indicating that PTX selectively affected blocking. ACSF PTX CONTROL Phase 1 phase 2 phase 3

Infusion of picrotoxin into the inferior olive prevented extinction of conditioned responses Training: five daily sessions Extinction protocol with: no infusion ACSF PTX

Infusion of NBQX into the inferior olive caused extinction of conditioned responses Retraining: five daily sessions Tone plus unconditioned stimulus test sessions with: ACSF NBQX (AMPA receptor antagonist) Trial or time dependent influence?

olivepons PFCF PC’s LTD DCN CR Blocking: US inhibition USCS PTX: blocks inhibition prevents blocking prevents extinction Extinction: without US or with NBQX

The daily training consisted of 10 blocks of 10 trials. The trials were separated by a random intervals (20to 40 ms). The trials were separated by a random intervals (20 to 40 ms). Response of wild-type (wt) after 2 days and after 4 days. CR- conditioned response UR- unconditioned response

Wild-type: Conditioned responses (%)- 80 Average peak amplitude Average peak velocity mm/s LTD-deficient mice: Conditioned responses (%)- 30 Average peak amplitude Average peak velocity mm/s

Average CS-alone responses of a wild-type animal and a L7-PKCi mutant At T-4 (but not at T-2) the wt shows well-timed responses around the US onset time. The response peak of the mutant doesn’t change. At T-4 (but not at T-2) there are changes between wt and the mutant. Blue- wild type Red- mutants

Average CS-alone responses when the ISI is extended to 500 ms If the timing is LTD- dependent, the amplitude and velocity in the L7-PKCi mutant should not be influenced by the length of the ISI. indeed, the mutants ’ peak amplitude and peak velocity weren ’ t changed. In contrast, those wt values were changed. Blue- wild type Red- mutants

Red - pre-lesion Blue – post-lesion Green - post-sham lesion Mutants wt (After T-4) Conditioned responses still occur after lesions of the cerebellum in both mutants and wt, but the amplitudes were significantly reduced.