Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop September 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bayesian Belief Propagation
Advertisements

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4
1 Transmission Fundamentals Chapter 2 (Stallings Book)
Ray Norris, Jamie Stevens, et al. Deep CABB observations of ECDFS ( Extended Chandra Deep Field South )
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Whoever North American.
SKADS: Array Configuration Studies Implementation of Figures-of-Merit on Spatial-Dynamic-Range Progress made & Current status Dharam V. Lal & Andrei P.
Foreground Modeling The Shape of Things that Came Nathan Jacobs Advisor: Robert Pless Computer Science Washington University in St. Louis.
Interferometric Spectral Line Imaging Martin Zwaan (Chapters of synthesis imaging book)
Uncertainty Representation. Gaussian Distribution variance Standard deviation.
A rough guide to radio astronomy and its use in lensing studies Simple stuff other lecturers may assume you know (and probably do)
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop May 2003.
Motion Tracking. Image Processing and Computer Vision: 82 Introduction Finding how objects have moved in an image sequence Movement in space Movement.
BLAH BLAH BLAH nvvbnvbnvbncvncn. Abstract A complete sample of point source emissions in the spiral type galaxies NGC300 and M31 have been catalogued.
Segmentation Divide the image into segments. Each segment:
Interference Daniel Mitchell, ATNF and Sydney University.
Image Morphing : Rendering and Image Processing Alexei Efros.
Highlights Lecture on the image part (10) Automatic Perception 16
ATNF Synthesis Workshop Mosaic(k)ing Erwin de Blok.
BLAH BLAH BLAH nvvbnvbnvbncvncn. Abstract A complete sample of point source emissions in the spiral type galaxies NGC300 and M31 have been catalogued.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 14 May 2003.
Introduction to Image Processing Grass Sky Tree ? ? Review.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
J.M. Wrobel - 19 June 2002 SENSITIVITY 1 SENSITIVITY Outline What is Sensitivity & Why Should You Care? What Are Measures of Antenna Performance? What.
Non-imaging Analysis and Self- calibration Steven Tingay ATNF Astronomical Synthesis Imaging Workshop Narrabri, 24 – 28 September, 2001.
October 14, 2014Computer Vision Lecture 11: Image Segmentation I 1Contours How should we represent contours? A good contour representation should meet.
Random Media in Radio Astronomy Atmospherepath length ~ 6 Km Ionospherepath length ~100 Km Interstellar Plasma path length ~ pc (3 x Km)
Wideband Imaging and Measurements ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Jamie Stevens | ATCA Senior Systems Scientist / ATCA Lead Scientist 2 October 2014.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Sensitivity Joan Wrobel.
Spectral Line VLBI Chris Phillips JIVE The Netherlands Chris Phillips JIVE The Netherlands.
Data Weighting and Imaging Tom Muxlow General introduction Initial data processing Data gridding and weighting schemes De-convolution Wide-field imaging.
Topic 10 - Image Analysis DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING Course 3624 Department of Physics and Astronomy Professor Bob Warwick.
Kinematics of parsec-scale radio jet in 3C48 Tao An 1, In collaboration with X.Y.Hong 1, M.J.Hardcastle 2, T.Venturi 3, D.Worrall 2,T.J.Pearson 4, Z.-Q.Shen.
PACS NHSC SPIRE Point Source Spectroscopy Webinar 21 March 2012 David Shupe, Bernhard Schulz, Kevin Xu on behalf of the SPIRE ICC Extracting Photometry.
27-Sept. 2001ATNF Synthesis Workshop Spectral Line Image Analysis and Visualization Bärbel Koribalski (ATNF, CSIRO)
Observing strategies Max Voronkov Software Scientist – ASKAP 28 th September 2010.
(Spectral Line) VLBI Chris Phillips CSIRO ATNF Chris Phillips CSIRO ATNF.
8 th EVN Symposium: Exploring the universe with the real-time VLBI. 26 – 29 September 2006.Giuseppe Cimò – JIVE Interstellar Scintillation and IDV Twinkle,
15 May 2003ATNF Synthesis Workshop1 Mosaicing Naomi McClure-Griffiths ATNF-CSIRO 2003 ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Spectral Line II John Hibbard.
March 2010 RFI 2010 RFI Mitigation in AIPS. The New Task UVRFI L. Kogan, F. Owen National Radio AstronomyObservatory Socorro, NM USA.
1 ATNF Synthesis Workshop 2001 Basic Interferometry - II David McConnell.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 10 th - 14 th Sep 2012 Measuring Photometry from SPIRE Observations Presenter: David Shupe (NHSC/IPAC) on.
02/6/ jdr1 Interference in VLBI Observations Jon Romney NRAO, Socorro ===================================== 2002 June 12.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 14 Reprise: dirty beam, dirty image. Sensitivity Wide-band imaging Weighting –Uniform vs Natural.
The Australia Telescope National Facility Ray Norris CSIRO ATNF.
ABSTRACT April 2000 CMVA observations of the sources 3C273 and 3C279 resulted in the first VLBI total intensity and linear polarization images of any source.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Sept 24-28, 2001, ATCA Narrabri Calibration & Flagging Mark Wieringa  Theory of calibration  Practice - RFI & malfunctions.
Lecture 14. Radio Interferometry Talk at Nagoya University IMS Oct /43.
Dependence of the Integrated Faraday Rotations on Total Flux Density in Radio Sources Chen Y.J, Shen Z.-Q.
1 ATNF Synthesis Workshop 2003 Basics of Interferometry David McConnell.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Instructor: Mircea Nicolescu Lecture 7
XBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson Review of the optics elements: Pinhole (“GAP”), FZP, Coded Aperture Extracting information from the GAP what is the GAP width?
WIDE-FIELD IMAGING IN CLASSIC AIPS Eric W. Greisen National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro, NM, USA.
William Peterson & Robert Mutel University of Iowa Miller Goss NRAO M. Gudel ETH, Zurich 1.
1 Combining Single Dish and Interferometer Data Naomi McClure-Griffiths ATNF ATNF Astronomical Synthesis Imaging Workshop September 24-28, 2001 or Seeing.
Introduction to Multichannel Image Reconstruction, Image Analysis and Display (MIRIAD)
Correlators ( Backend System )
Data Analysis “I have got some data, so what now?”
Fringe-Fitting: Correcting for delays and rates
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
Deconvolution and Multi frequency synthesis
Early indications of performance
Basic theory Some choices Example Closing remarks
Introduction to Difmap
Non-imaging Analysis and Self-calibration
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Hard X-ray Albedo: A Spatial Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop September 2001

What Do You Want to Measure? (What you want to do and how to do it.)  Flux density of components  Absolute positions  Relative positions and motions  Flux density variability  Spectral index, rotation measure etc (image combination).  Overlay with other wavelength images

 Aips++ has excellent image analysis capabilities. Can do almost everything that Miriad, AIPS and Difmap can plus more.  Paths of least resistance (i.e hassle):  ATCA data:  Calibrate in Miriad  Imaging or model fitting in Difmap. If mosaicing or bandwidth smearing effects are important use Miriad.  VLBI/SVLBI data:  Calibration and fringe-fitting in AIPS  Imaging/model fitting in Difmap. Wide-field imaging with IMAGR in AIPS.  Detailed image analysis in Miriad or AIPS Personal Bias/Ignorance

Errors  Errors given by fitting software should be treated with scepticism  Generally assumed errors are stochastic  No accounting for on-source errors etc  Components are not necessarily independent. e.g. Usually a strong correlation between intensity and diameter. Extreme example is one (u,v) point: (u,v) dist Amp

Component Fluxes 1Discrete Components: Model Fitting  Model fitting is suitable for relatively discrete, isolated features.  Usually not a unique solution, so choose the simplest possible model (fewest components, simplest shapes)  Point source -> circular Gaussian -> elliptical Gaussian.  Model components tend to be too simple for more complex structures.

Component Fluxes cont.  Extended Sources  Reducing the dimensionality can help. Killeen, Bicknell & Ekers 1986 PKS

Reducing the dimensionality  Fit to jet width vs distance RA (arcsec) Width (arcsec)

Component Fluxes cont.  Extended Sources  Reducing the dimensionality can help.  Integrated intensity.  Sum the intensity within a given region  Sum the clean components making up the region of interest.

Absolute Positions  Depends on the quality of calibration:  Precision of the position of the phase- cal  Separation of source from phase-cal (closer the better)  Weather, phase stability  Signal to noise Relative positions and motions  Limited by signal-to-noise

Flux Density Variability  Between epochs: easy.  Within epochs: difficult. NOTE: Check your secondary cal isn't an Intra-Day Variable!  Imaging algorithms assume the source stays constant during the observation 1 Split data into N segments and image each one separately 2 Measure S(t) of variable component(s) 3 Subtract variable component from the visibility data. 4 Image whole dataset  A similar procedure may be required before combining data from different arrays or array configs.

Image Combination  Often desirable to combine images to  Measure polarisation,  Measure spectral index,  Measure rotation measure,  Look for differences,  Compare with optical, X-ray etc.  When combining radio images, restore all images with the same beam first.

Polarisation  Alignment should not be a problem as any self-cal solutions from imaging I can be passed directly to Q and U.  Polarised intensity:  Linear polarisation position angle: +

Low S/N, Misalignment  Beware of edge effects due to low S/N or image misalignment.  In spectral index mesurements you can end up with a fake gradient. A B A/B A B

Low S/N, Misalignment  Beware of edge effects due to low S/N or image misalignment.  Extreme rotation measures are possible A B A-B A B

Image Overlays  Can be tricky if X-ray/optical/radio have different astrometric precision.  Two approaches: 1 Accept the uncertainties 2 If there are multiple components in each image, look for an alignment with the best correlation.

Example: PKS 0637  752 Quasar, z=0.651 Space VLBI (VSOP) ATCA 8.6 GHz (contours) Chandra (pixels) ATCA/HST overlay (Montage from Difmap image and overlays in Miriad)

PKS 0637  752 cont. ATCA 8.6 Ghz Contours: total intensity Pixels: fractional polarisation Lines: polarisation E-vectors (Imaged in Difmap, polarisation and overlays in Miriad)

PKS 0637  752 cont. (Slice along radio jet in AIPS)

PKS 0637  752 cont. (Model fit to VSOP and ground-only VLBI data in Difmap) VLBI Component motion (separation vs time).

Tasks, commands

Resources  Follow the links from the ATNF Software And Tools page:  Aips++: see the Getting Results documentation for an overview of image analysis.  Miriad: see Chapter 18 of the Users Guide  Difmap: see the Difmap Cookbook  AIPS: see chapter 7 of the AIPS Cookbook