LCGT Program Advisory Board (June 21 2011, Kashiwa, Chiba) On behalf of LCGT special working group Masaki Ando (Department of Physics, Kyoto University)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vibration Isolation Group R. Takahashi (ICRR)Chief T. Uchiyama (ICRR)Payload design H. Ishizaki (NAOJ)Prototype test R. DeSalvo (Caltech)SAS design A.
Advertisements

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
CLIO Current Status of Japanese Detectors Daisuke Tatsumi National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
BS and Mirrors for the LCGT Norikatsu Mio, PSC Univ. of Tokyo Eiichi Hirose, ICRR Univ. of Tokyo December 13, 2011 CSIRO, Lindfield Australia.
SEO report _SAITO 1. Overall schedule of iKAGRA installation/commissioning change to Michelson Interferometer 2. Scheduling of daily works for installation.
Status of LCGT and CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and LCGT, CLIO collaborators TAUP2007 Sendai, Japan 2007/9/12.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule
Takanori Sekiguchi Anual Meeting of Physics Society of Japan Sep. 22nd, 2013) Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule 1.
Commissioning work on the low temperature interferometer 5/17/2010 GWADW at Kyoto Osamu Miyakawa (ICRR, U-Tokyo) and CLIO collaboration 5/17/2010 GWADW.
Takanori Sekiguchi ALPS Report, Dec. 26th, 2013 Prototype Test of Type-B 1 Takanori Sekiguchi KAGRA F2F MEETING Feb
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
Australia-Italy Australia 6, October 2005 LCGT project Kazuaki Kuroda LCGT Collaboration Cryogenics for LCGT.
LCGT Cryogenics Status Report KEK T.Suzuki.
KAGRA Roadmap and Progress Evaluation Assessment S.Miyoki  M.Ando 2012/7/30.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
T Akutsu 1, S Telada 2, T Uchiyama 1, S Miyoki 1, K Yamamoto 1, M Ohashi 1, K Kuroda 1, N Kanda 3 and CLIO Collaboration. 1 ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo, 2 AIST,
Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation (August 25, 2002, Hawaii USA) Observation run of TAMA GW detector Masaki Ando Department of Science, University.
GWADW2010 (May 17, 2010, Kyoto, Japan) On behalf of LCGT BW special working group Masaki Ando (Department of Physics, Kyoto University) Design of the LCGT.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
XII-th International School on Particles and Cosmology (April 24, 2003, Baksan Valley, Russia) Observation Runs of TAMA300 Gravitational Wave Detector.
Large-scale Cryogenic Gravitational- wave Telescope, LCGT Keiko Kokeyama University of Birmingham 23 rd July 2010 Friday Science.
Low frequency anti-vibration system of LCGT Vibration Isolation Group R. Takahashi (ICRR), K. Yamamoto (ICRR), T. Uchiyama (ICRR), T. Sekiguchi (ICRR),
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
Aug. 2, 2010 Proposal for Creating New Task Force - To Develop 7-year Scenario for LCGT - Ichiro Nakatani Project Manager, LCGT 1.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
Advanced Virgo: Optical Simulation and Design Advanced Virgo review Andreas Freise for the OSD Subsystem.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
2009/6/25Amaldi 8 in NewYork City1 Thermal-noise-limited underground interferometer CLIO Kazuhiro Agatsuma and CLIO Collaborators Institute for Cosmic.
Vibration Isolation Subsystem KAGRA face to face meeting (31 July, 2012) R. Takahashi (ICRR), K. Yamamoto (ICRR), T. Uchiyama (ICRR), T. Sekiguchi (ICRR),
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research The University of Tokyo KAGRA external review (Cryogenic payload) 18 April 2012.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research The university of Tokyo LCGT internal review (Cryogenic payload) 30 January 2012.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research The university of Tokyo LCGT internal review (Cryogenic payload) 30 January 2012.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Lessons from CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and CLIO collaborators GWADW2012 Hawaii 2012/5/16.
Overview of iLCGT & bLCGT Kazuaki Kuroda LCGT Collaboration F2f meeting 27 September, 2010.
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Input Mode Matching of LCGT 2012/1/5, Yoichi Aso.
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Kazuhiro Yamamoto on behalf of KAGRA collaboration
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Summary of Issues for KAGRA+
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Development of vibration isolation systems for LCGT VII
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Presentation transcript:

LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) On behalf of LCGT special working group Masaki Ando (Department of Physics, Kyoto University) Special working group for LCGT Roadmap

LCGT Roadmap Special working group LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Original Scope - To recommend the roadmap to realize bLCGT (after iLCGT), including design, research, development, performance test, installation, and shakedown procedures. Current Scope - To recommend the roadmap to realize LCGT. - Summarize the master schedule, considering basic concepts and schedule constrains. After the external review and establishment of the system engineering office (SEO). Roadmap special working group - Special working group to make recommendation on the LCGT commissioning schedule. - Open for all collaborators, nominally ~20 participants. - Brainstorm-type meeting with free discussions meetings since Oct. 25, 2010.

Task flow LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Working group task flow - Collect information Project: definition of LCGT, constrains form budget and schedule Science: observation targets Technical feasibility: technology readiness, development plan, risk factors - Decide basic policies - Determine a master schedule of LCGT construction - Break down to each subsystem schedule … several iteration …. - Summarize a recommendation document

LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Target, constraint, and basic policies

Target and constraints LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) LCGT baseline concept Purpose: detection of gravitational-wave signal Primary target --- NS binary inspiral 3km cryogenic RSE interferometer at underground site Constraints - Financial constraints: First 3-year construction has been approved. Excavation cost has been approved. - Uncertainties in the excavation schedule.

Basic policies LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Basic policies ・ First priority in schedule is to achieve the bLCGT observation. Additional tasks should be minimized. ・ Tight schedule to start observation run in Intensive preparations are required before installation, for efficient commissioning and for reduction of technical and schedule risks. - All the R&Ds should be completed before installation. LCGT should not be used as a R&D facility. ・ LCGT is a big project with responsibility. So best effort should be made to maximize scientific outcomes and to keep schedule. ・ First km-scale interferometer leaded by the Japanese group.  Step-by-step construction and commissioning.

LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Master Schedule

Master Schedule LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) ・ iLCGT : Stable operation with a large-scale IFO ( )  3km FPM interferometer at room temperature, with simplified vibration isolation system ~1 month (TBD) observation run ・ bLCGT : Operation with the final configuration ( – )  RSE, upgraded seismic isolator, cryogenic operation ・ OBS : Long-term observation and detector tuning ( ) bLCGT iLCGT OBS Delay in excavation start  schedule should be updated

bLCGT configuration LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Type-A system - Cryogenic test mass Sapphire, 30kg, 20K - Tall seismic isolator IP + GASF + Payload - Large cryostat Type-C system - Mode cleaner Silica, 1kg, 290K - Stack + Payload ETM ITM Y-arm X-arm ITMETM BS SEM PRM MC bLCGT configuration - Cryogenic test masses - 3 km arm cavities - RSE with power recycling Type-B system - Core optics (BS, RM,…) Silica, 10kg, 290K - IP + GASF + Payload - Stack for aux. optics

Commissioning Plan LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) ・ LCGT schedule is extremely tight.  We should reduce the amount of the on-site commissioning tasks. Intensive tests are required for each sub-system before installation. Avoid additional tasks only for intermediate steps. Basic policy ‘Do not use LCGT as an R&D facility’. ・ Roadmap to solve these concerns. - Install ETMs in front of the original positions (by ~30 m) for the room-temp. interferometer commissioning. - Full test of the real VIS and cryogenic system at the end rooms. - ‘Half-cryogenic’ configuration step before the final bLCGT configuration. ・ It is hard to test the full cryogenic test-mass system. - Type-A isolator test requires a large facility and a quiet site. - Cryogenic system requires long test time for a cool-down and warm-up cycle.  Hard to avoid technical and schedule risks.

iLCGT commissioning LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Cryogenic system test - Cryostat + Rad. shield duct - Cryo-cooler - Cryogenic payload Type-C’ system - Test mass and Core optics (BS, FM,..) Silica, 10kg, 290K - Seismic isolator Stack + Type-B Payload ETM ITM Y-arm X-arm ITMETM BS Dummy Plate MC iLCGT configuration - Room-temp. test masses suspended by Type-C’ isolators km arm cavities - Fabry-Perot Michelson - Low laser power Type-A isolator full-system test - Room-temp. test Sapphire (?), 30kg, 290K - Tall seismic isolator IP + GASF + Payload (No SEM) Cryostat + Type-C’ isolator Shorter arm length by 30m

bLCGT commissioning (1) LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) ETM ITM Y-arm X-arm ITMETM BS PRM MC bLCGT (RSE1, RSE2) - Room-temp. test masses km arm cavities - RSE with power recycling - VIS upgrade for core optics Cryogenic test mass full system test - Cryogenic test mass Sapphire, 30kg, 20K - Type-A isolator - Cryostat + cryo-cooler Type-C’ system - Test mass Silica, 10kg, 290K - Seismic isolator Stack + Type-B Payload SEM Type-B system - Core optics (BS, RM,…) Silica, 10kg, 290K - IP + GASF + Payload - Stack for aux. optics

bLCGT commissioning (2) LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) ETM Y-arm X-arm ITMETM BS MC bLCGT (Half cryogenic) - ETM: Cryogenic (20K) - ITM: Room temperature - 3 km arm cavities - RSE with power recycling Cryogenic test mass - Cryogenic test mass Sapphire, 30kg, 20K - Type-A isolator - Cryostat + cryo-cooler Type-C’ system - Test mass Silica, 10kg, 290K - Seismic isolator Stack + Type-B Payload PRM SEM ITM Type-B system - Core optics (BS, RM,…) Silica, 10kg, 290K - IP + GASF + Payload - Stack for aux. optics

bLCGT configuration LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Type-A system - Cryogenic test mass Sapphire, 30kg, 20K - Tall seismic isolator IP + GASF + Payload Type-C system - Mode cleaner Silica, 1kg, 290K - Stack + Payload ETM ITM Y-arm X-arm ITMETM BS SEM PRM MC bLCGT configuration - Cryogenic test masses - 3 km arm cavities - RSE with power recycling Type-B system - Core optics (BS, RM,…) Silica, 10kg, 290K - IP + GASF + Payload - Stack for aux. optics

Master Schedule LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Type-A,B,C system development bLCGT iLCGT OBS System construction and test Type-C’ installation and shakedown Cryostat + Cryo-payload Prototype test Room-temperature IFO commissioning Half-cryogenic operation Full-cryogenic operation Cryogenic full system installation and shakedown Type-A,B construction and test Observation and tuning Type-A, B installation and shakedown

Observation runs LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) ・ Step-by-step commissioning plan  Observation or engineering run is planed at each step. - Test of full detector system including a data-processing. - Detector characterization on long-term stability. - Development of data-analysis pipelines. ・ Tight schedule - First priority is to operate LCGT with the final configuration. - Refrain from spending too much time for the intermediate runs. Observable range for NS binary inspiral iLCGT 29 Mpc FPM, Low power, 10kg Silica, Temp: 300K Half cryogenic 89 Mpc RSE, Low power, 10kg Silica, Temp: 20K + 300K Final bLCGT 273 Mpc RSE, High power, 30kg Sapphire, Temp: 20K (Source at optimal direction, Threshold : SNR 8) Fundamental noise limit

Sensitivity LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) By K.Somiya

LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Discussions

Before the External Review LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Plan before the external review ・ iLCGT - Installation of Type-A isolators for the test masses for the room-temp. interferometer operation. - Crumping of the isolator above the payload. ・ Early phase in bLCGT - Installation of RSE and upgrade of isolators. - Operation of the room-temp. interferometer as a full system. ・ Latter phase in bLCGT - Replacement of the test-mass payload and vacuum system to the cryogenic payload and cryostat. - Installation of the radiation shield ducts. - Operation of the cryogenic interferometer as a full system.

External Review Comments LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Recommendations by the external review committee ・ Use Type-B system in the iLCGT room-temp. operation - Reduce technical risks using the experiences by TAMA-SAS. - Earlier start of commissioning. ・ Avoid replacement of isolation systems after installation - Reduce the additional tasks. - Shorten the total commissioning time to realize the final LCGT. ・ Abandon the two-layer structure - Big hole will be convenient for the possible future upgrades. - Risk management for vibration isolation system. ・ Early start of full-system test for the Type-B isolator - Gain technical feasibility. ・ Consider about observation run with the room-temp. IFO. ・ Consider about a half cryogenic step before the full configuration.

Current Plan LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Advantages in the current plan ・ Earlier start of the interferometer commissioning - Type-C’ : a simple isolation system based on the experiences in TAMA. - Replacement after installation is minimized. ・ Full-system test of the isolator and cryogenic system - Real-system test at the site in parallel to the IFO commissioning. - Reduction of the technical risks and compression of the total schedule. - Smooth upgrade to the half-cryogenic configuration. Options ・ Earlier full system test of the Type-B isolator at the site - Test using some of the core optics. - Reduce the technical jump from the Type-C’ isolator. - Gain experiences for the Type-A isolator. ・ Flexibilities in the commissioning plan - More challenging plans depending on the development status. - Any ideas to accelerate the schedule.

Summary LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) Roadmap special working group - Summarized information on the project target and constraints. - Determined the basic policies. - Made a master schedule for the LCGT commissioning. Next steps - Will complete the working group after summarizing a recommendation document. - Detailed discussions on the commissioning plan will be led by the SEO (System Engineering Office).