Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

US Berkeley 2/12/2013 linking population-based data to child welfare records: a public health approach to surveillance Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
California Child Welfare Indicators Project Q Slides Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California, Berkeley.
Children Ever in Care Terry V. Shaw, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare This research is funded by the.
The Achievement Gap: Lessons from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) Tamara Halle, Nicole Forry, Elizabeth Hair & Kate Perper.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
White Earth Indian Child Welfare Initiative 2010
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
California’s Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System: Using Performance Measures to Encourage Improvement Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for.
Children Ever in Care Joseph Magruder, MSW Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare This research is funded by the.
An overview of basic California foster care data Joe Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California.
Substance Abuse and Child Welfare Services: Research Update and Needs Presented at the National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare Researcher’s.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Contents n Definitions n Goals n Target Populations n Categories n Activities.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Building a Better Child Welfare System for Fresno's Children: Using Data as Our Foundation (and Friend!) Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social Services.
Reunification for Siblings in Out-of-Home Care Using a Statistical Technique for Examining Non-independent Observations Presented by: Joseph Magruder,
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Reunification – Old and New Information Diana J. English PhD Child Welfare League of America May 30, 2007.
The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.
Foster Care Reunification: The use of hierarchical modeling to account for sibling and county correlation Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center for Social.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Foster Care in California: What the Data Tells Us Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White and Black/Hispanic Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Controlling.
Data Driven Practice for Program Managers: Riverside County Melissa Correia Adam Darnell Casey Family Programs Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social.
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Why are White Nursing Home Residents Twice as Likely as African Americans to Have an Advance Directive? Understanding Ethnic Differences in Advance Care.
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF RACE AND POVERTY AS RISK FACTORS FOR MALTREATMENT Barbara Needell, PhD Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Bryn King, MSW January.
Child Welfare Administrative Data: The UCB Performance Indicators Project cssr.berkeley.edu/CWSCMSReports Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services.
Frank D. Lanterman Regional Center Expenditure Data for Fiscal Year Public Stakeholders Meeting Presented on June 26, 2013.
Foster Care Re-entry Study A Hennepin County Project conducted in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the University of Minnesota.
When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.
Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.
C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Return to Care: What are the Factors Involved.
What’s Race Got To Do With It? An Honest Conversation About the Impact of Racism on the Child Welfare System.
Edward F. Garrido, Ph.D. and Heather N. Taussig, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of.
California Child Welfare Indicators Project YOUTH IN EXTENDED FOSTER CARE Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California,
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron.
Overview of California’s Child Welfare Indicator Data Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Data Trends & Child Outcomes Center for Social.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Longitudinal Dynamics of Youth in Foster Care Joseph Magruder Emily Putnam-Hornstein.
AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.
Increasing Permanency Options in Child Welfare: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) Program Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University.
RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Applying Data for System Improvement: Probation Agency Staff Daniel Webster,
Performance and Progress 2012/2013. Why We Do an Annual Data Presentation To assess the Levy’s performance in various categories against goals. To highlight.
Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University of California, Berkeley
Kinship Foster Care in California Testimony to Assembly Select Committee on Foster Care Sacramento, CA 2/15/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social.
Society for Social Work & Research New Orleans 1/14/2017
BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD
Presentation transcript:

Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare This research is funded by the California Department of Social Services and the Stuart Foundation Presented at the 46th Annual National Association for Welfare Research and Statistics (NAWRS) Workshop. August 23, 2006

For an Electronic Copy of Presentation:

Research on Reentry to Care Length of Time in Care prior to Reunification. Type of placement a child experiences in foster care. Number of placements while in foster care. Race/Ethnicity of the Child. Age of child at entry into foster care. Reason for removal or entry into the foster care system. Caregiver Drug/Alcohol use. Poverty status (children receiving AFDC). Marital status (single or multi-parent homes). Geographic location (urban/rural). Child health factors.

Study Population First Entries to Child Welfare Supervised Foster Care in California ( ). Initial stays greater than 5 days. Children reunifying within 12 months of initial entry into foster care. Missing placement types excluded. Question: Are there differences between the children reentering care within 12 months and those reentering care from 12 to 24 months?

Full Model Used for Analysis included… Ethnicity, Gender, Entry Year, Age at Entry, Length of time in Care, Reason for removal, County Size, Presence of siblings, AFDC eligible, Predominant placement type, Child’s Health/Behavior conditions, Whether the parents have a referral to a drug/alcohol treatment program, Whether the child was removed from a single or multi-parent household, Primary language spoken at home.

Frequencies – Reunifications and Reentries

Cumulative Probability of Reentry (1-Survival) Children Reunifying within 12 months 12.28% 16.65%

Cumulative Probability of Reentry (1-Survival) by LOS Children Reunifying within 12 months Probability of reentry within 24 months post-reunification

Cumulative Probability of Reentry (1-Survival) by Ethnicity Children Reunifying within 12 months Probability of reentry within 24 months post-reunification

Cumulative Probability of Reentry (1-Survival) by Age Group Children Reunifying within 12 months Probability of reentry within 24 months post-reunification

ns ns 0.38 White Black Hispanic Asian Native American Other/Missing Reentry within 12 mos. Reentry 12 to 24 mos. Odds of Reentry - Ethnicity

Odds of Reentry – Length of time in Care 0 to 3 Months 3 to 6 Months 6 to 9 Months 9 to 12 Months Reentry within 12 mos. Reentry 12 to 24 mos ns 0.68

Odds of Reentry – Age at Entry Reentry within 12 mos. Reentry 12 to 24 mos. Less than 1 Year 1 to 2 Years 3 to 5 Years 6 to 10 Years 11 to 13 Years 14 to 15 Years 1.00 ns ns 1.00 ns 0.83 ns 0.80* * Significant at the 0.1 level

Odds of Reentry – Other Factors Reentry within 12 mos. Reentry 12 to 24 mos Drug/Alc. Serv. Title IVE Eligible. Condition MH Condition Physical Condition Behavioral * 1.52* * Significant at the 0.1 level ns Single Parent 1.15

Conclusions Before finalizing models, we will explore issue of potential bias introduced by stages of incidental selectivity (Berk & Ray, 1982). Some differences exist in the children that reenter care between 0-12 months and months. African American children are 1.23 times more likely to reenter care within 12 months and 1.32 times more likely to reenter care between 12 and 24 months compared to white children. A longer stay in care initially is protective for reentries within 12 months (The shorter the initial stay in care the higher the likelihood of reentry). Only children in care for 9 or more months have a significantly lower odds of reentry for reentries between 12 and 24 months.

Conclusions (continued) Children between the ages of 3 and 10 have lower odds of reentry within 12 months compared to infants. This is somewhat different when looking at reentries between 12 and 24 months, only ages 3-5 have lower odds of reentry compared to infants. If drug/alcohol services are indicated then there is almost 2X the odds of reentry within 12 months. These odds are even higher 2.55 between 12 and 24 months. Children with existing health/behavioral/mental health issues have higher odds of reentering foster care in both periods, but the odds are greater in the 12 to 24 month group.

The End! Center for Social Services Research Web Page Terry V. Shaw – (510) Daniel Webster –