1 Workshop 7.00 Welcoming Remarks 7.15 Barry Smith (Buffalo, NY) 7.40 Lindsay Cowell (Duke University, NC) 8.05 Nigam Shah (Stanford University, CA) 8.30.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Species-Neutral vs. Multi-Species Ontologies Barry Smith.
Advertisements

1 How Philosophy of Science Can Help Biomedical Research Barry Smith
On the Future of the NeuroBehavior Ontology and Its Relation to the Mental Functioning Ontology Barry Smith
1 The Future of Biomedical Informatics Barry Smith University at Buffalo
Goal and Status of the OBO Foundry Barry Smith. 2 Semantic Web, Moby, wikis, crowd sourcing, NLP, etc.  let a million flowers (and weeds) bloom  to.
The Environment Ontology Barry Smith 1.
1 Pax Terminologica Barry Smith Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science, Saarland University, Saarbrücken.
 Goals Unambiguous description of how the investigation was performed Consistent annotation, powerful queries and data integration  Details NOT model.
1 Introduction to Biomedical Ontology Barry Smith University at Buffalo
The Future of Health Information Barry Smith Ontology Research Group Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences University at Buffalo ontology.buffalo.edu/smith.
1 The OBO Foundry Towards Gold Standard Terminology Resources in the Biomedical Domain Thomas Bittner (based on a presentation by Barry Smith)
1 Intelligence Ontology: A Strategy for the Future Barry Smith University at Buffalo
1 How Ontologies Create Research Communities Barry Smith
1 The OBO Foundry Barry Smith University at Buffalo
1 How Ontologies Create Research Communities Barry Smith University at Buffalo
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith with thanks to Jane Lomax, Gene Ontology Consortium 1.
1 The OBO Foundry 2 A prospective standard designed to guarantee interoperability of ontologies from the very start (contrast.
The Problem of Reusability of Biomedical Data OBO Foundry & HL7 RIM Barry Smith.
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith with thanks to Jane Lomax, Gene Ontology Consortium 1.
National center for ontological research. Part One: The History of NCOR and ECOR Part Two: How to Establish JCOR: The Japanese Consortium.
Underlying Ontologies for Biomedical work - The Relation Ontology (RO) and Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) Thomas Bittner SUNY Buffalo
Using Ontologies to Represent Immunological Networks Lindsay G. Cowell, Anne Lieberman, Anna Maria Masci Duke University Center for Computational Immunology.
The Future of Ontology in Buffalo Barry Smith 1.
1 Introduction to Ontology Barry Smith
Room for Lunch: Arlington Room Room for Evening Reception: Grand Prairie Room.
Why a Credit Card Number is Not a Number Barry Smith 1.
OBO-Foundry. OBO was conceived and announced in in october 2001 Michael Ashburner and Suzanna Lewis with acknowledgements of others in the GO.
CTO - Clinical Trials/Research in the Ontology of Biomedical Investigation Richard H. Scheuermann U.T. Southwestern Medical Center.
The RNA Ontology RNAO Colin Batchelor Neocles Leontis May 2009 Eckart, Colin and Jane In Cambridge.
1 BIOLOGICAL DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES & BASIC FORMAL ONTOLOGY Barry Smith.
1 The OBO Foundry Barry Smith Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo IFOMIS, Saarland University
CoE Ontology Research Group (ORG) Barry Smith Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences Ontology Research Group Department of Philosophy.
How to Organize the World of Ontologies Barry Smith 1.
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences Biomedical Ontology in Buffalo Part I: The Gene Ontology Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters.
1 What an Ontology is For Barry Smith University at Buffalo Common Anatomy Reference Ontology Workshop.
Introduction to Ontologies for Environmental Biology Barry Smith
The OBO Foundry Chris Mungall Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory NCBO GO Consortium May 2007.
1 Part III.The OBO Foundry Project: Towards Scientific Standards and Principles-Based Coordination in Biomedical Ontology Development.
1 How Ontologies Create Research Communities Barry Smith
1 The Canonical Life Barry Smith
1 Ontology (Science) Barry Smith University at Buffalo
The OBO Foundry approach to ontologies and standards with special reference to cytokines Barry Smith ImmPort Science Talk / Discussion June 17, 2014.
Limning the CTS Ontology Landscape Barry Smith 1.
1 How to build an ontology 2 Barry Smith
Stefan Schulz Medical Informatics Research Group
Ontological realism as a strategy for integrating ontologies Ontology Summit February 7, 2013 Barry Smith 1.
Intelligence Ontology A Strategy for the Future Barry Smith University at Buffalo
Why we need the OBO Core Michael Ashburner, Suzanna Lewis and Barry Smith.
Resurrecting SOWG BS, Baltimore, CTS Ontology Workshop April
1 How Ontologies Create Research Communities Barry Smith University at Buffalo
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
1 The Canonical Life Barry Smith
1 Ontology (Science) vs. Ontology (Engineering) Barry Smith University at Buffalo
Sharing Ontologies in the Biomedical Domain Alexa T. McCray National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Department of Health & Human Services.
Biomedical Ontologies: The State of the Art Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters MIE, Sarajevo, August 30 1.
1 Introduction to Bio-Ontologies Barry Smith
2 3 where in the body ? where in the cell ?
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith 1.
Need for common standard upper ontology
Introduction to Biomedical Ontology for Imaging Informatics Barry Smith, PhD, FACMI University at Buffalo May 11, 2015.
1 An Introduction to Ontology for Scientists Barry Smith University at Buffalo
1 Ontology (Science) vs. Ontology (Engineering) Barry Smith University at Buffalo
OBO Foundry Principles BFO RO Barry Smith 1. OBO Foundry Principles  open  common formal language (OBO Format, OWL DL, CL)  commitment to collaboration.
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
Upper Ontology Summit The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center for Ontological Research National.
1 Using Ontologies for Annotation of Genomic Data Barry Smith University at Buffalo
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith 1.
What is an ontology and Why should you care?
Intelligence Ontology: A Strategy for the Future
OBO Foundry Update: April 2010
Presentation transcript:

1 Workshop 7.00 Welcoming Remarks 7.15 Barry Smith (Buffalo, NY) 7.40 Lindsay Cowell (Duke University, NC) 8.05 Nigam Shah (Stanford University, CA) 8.30 Break 8.40 Dave Parrish (Immune Tolerance Network, PA) 9.05 Yannick Legre (Healthgrid, France)

2 The OBO Foundry: From Basic Biology to Genomic Medicine Barry Smith University at Buffalo National Center for Biomedical Ontology

3

4 where in the body ? where in the cell ? what kind of disease process ?

5 UMLS, Semantic Web, Moby, wikis, etc.  let a million flowers bloom  integration relies on post hoc mappings how create broad-coverage semantic annotation systems for biomedicine?

6 for science create an evolutionary path towards evidence-based terminology a new approach

7 a shared portal for 60+ ontologies (low regimentation) First step (2001)

8

Second step (2004): logic-based reform efforts GO linked to other OBO ontologies id: CL: name: osteoblast def: "A bone-forming cell which secretes an extracellular matrix. Hydroxyapatite crystals are then deposited into the matrix to form bone." is_a: CL: relationship: develops_from CL: relationship: develops_from CL: GO Cell type New Definition + = Osteoblast differentiation: Processes whereby an osteoprogenitor cell or a cranial neural crest cell acquires the specialized features of an osteoblast, a bone-forming cell which secretes extracellular matrix.

10 The OBO Foundry Third step (2006)

11 a family of interoperable gold standard biomedical reference ontologies to serve the annotation of  model organism databases  scientific literature  clinical data  experimental resultshttp://obofoundry.org/

12 Foundry developers have agreed in advance to accept a common set of principles designed to ensure  compatibility  interoperability  formal robustnesshttp://obofoundry.org/

RELATION TO TIME GRANULARITY CONTINUANTOCCURRENT INDEPENDENTDEPENDENT ORGAN AND ORGANISM Organism (NCBI Taxonomy) Anatomical Entity (FMA, CARO) Organ Function (FMP, CPRO) Phenotypic Quality (PaTO) Biological Process (GO) CELL AND CELLULAR COMPONENT Cell (CL) Cellular Component (FMA, GO) Cellular Function (GO) MOLECULE Molecule (ChEBI, SO, RnaO, PrO) Molecular Function (GO) Molecular Process (GO) Building out fron the original GO

CONTINUANTOCCURRENT INDEPENDENTDEPENDENT ORGAN AND ORGANISM Organism (NCBI Taxonomy) Anatomical Entity (FMA, CARO) Organ Function (FMP, CPRO) Phenotypic Quality (PaTO) Organism-Level Process (GO) CELL AND CELLULAR COMPONENT Cell (CL) Cellular Component (FMA, GO) Cellular Function (GO) Cellular Process (GO) MOLECULE Molecule (ChEBI, SO, RnaO, PrO) Molecular Function (GO) Molecular Process (GO) OBO Foundry coverage GRANULARITY RELATION TO TIME

15 OntologyScopeURLCustodians Cell Ontology (CL) cell types from prokaryotes to mammals obo.sourceforge.net/cgi- bin/detail.cgi?cell Jonathan Bard, Michael Ashburner, Oliver Hofman Chemical Entities of Bio- logical Interest (ChEBI) molecular entitiesebi.ac.uk/chebi Paula Dematos, Rafael Alcantara Common Anatomy Refer- ence Ontology (CARO) anatomical structures in human and model organisms (under development) Melissa Haendel, Terry Hayamizu, Cornelius Rosse, David Sutherland, Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) structure of the human body fma.biostr.washington. edu JLV Mejino Jr., Cornelius Rosse Functional Genomics Investigation Ontology (FuGO) design, protocol, data instrumentation, and analysis fugo.sf.netFuGO Working Group Gene Ontology (GO) cellular components, molecular functions, biological processes Ontology Consortium Phenotypic Quality Ontology (PaTO) qualities of anatomical structures obo.sourceforge.net/cgi -bin/ detail.cgi? attribute_and_value Michael Ashburner, Suzanna Lewis, Georgios Gkoutos Protein Ontology (PrO) protein types and modifications (under development)Protein Ontology Consortium Relation Ontology (RO) relationsobo.sf.net/relationshipBarry Smith, Chris Mungall RNA Ontology (RnaO) three-dimensional RNA structures (under development)RNA Ontology Consortium Sequence Ontology (SO) properties and features of nucleic sequences song.sf.netKaren Eilbeck

16  Disease Ontology (DO)  Biomedical Image Ontology (BIO)  Upper Biomedical Ontology (OBO UBO)  Environment Ontology (EnvO)  Systems Biology Ontology (SBO) Under consideration:

17 CRITERIA  The ontology is open and available to be used by all.  The ontology is in, or can be instantiated in, a common formal language.  The developers of the ontology agree in advance to collaborate with developers of other OBO Foundry ontology where domains overlap. CRITERIA

18 CRITERIA  UPDATE: The developers of each ontology commit to its maintenance in light of scientific advance, and to soliciting community feedback for its improvement.  ORTHOGONALITY: They commit to ensuring that there is community convergence on a single controlled vocabulary for each domain

19 CRITERIA  IDENTIFIERS: The ontology possesses a unique identifier space within OBO.  VERSIONING: The ontology provider has procedures for identifying distinct successive versions.  The ontology includes textual definitions for all terms. CRITERIA

20  CLEARLY BOUNDED: The ontology has a clearly specified and clearly delineated content.  DOCUMENTATION: The ontology is well- documented.  USERS: The ontology has a plurality of independent users. CRITERIA

21  COMMON ARCHITECTURE: The ontology uses relations which are unambiguously defined following the pattern of definitions laid down in the OBO Relation Ontology.* * Smith et al., Genome Biology 2005, 6:R46 CRITERIA

22 Ontology of Biomedical Investigations with thanks to Trish Whetzel (FuGO Working Group) FuGO = Functional Genomics Investigation Ontology OBI née FuGO

23 controlled vocabulary for biomedical investigations including  protocols  instrumentation  material  data  types of analysis and statistical tools applied to the data OBI

24 OBI Collaborating Communities Crop sciences Generation Challenge Programme (GCP), Environmental genomics MGED RSBI Group, Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC), HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI), psidev.sourceforge.net Immunology Database and Analysis Portal, Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (IEDB), International Society for Analytical Cytology, Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI), Neurogenetics, Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN), Nutrigenomics MGED RSBI Group, Polymorphism Toxicogenomics MGED RSBI Group, Transcriptomics MGED Ontology Group

25 Clinical Trial Ontology To serve merger of data schemas To serve flexibility of collaborative clinical trial research To serve design and management of clinical trials To serve data access and reuse – send me all trials which...

26 Randomized controlled trials RCT Schema – a ‘frame-based ontology’ supporting TrialBank RCT

27 RCT Top-Level Class Hierarchy Root –Secondary-study –Trial-details –Trial –Concept Generic-concept Population-concept Protocol-concept Design-concept Outcome-concept Administrative-concept Intervention-concept

28 RCT: Trial Details Trial-details Erratum Publication-details Conclusion-details Background-details Stopping-details Retraction-details Correction-details Fraud-details

29 –Concept Generic-concept –Term-information –Time-entity –Rule-concept –Situation Population-concept –Subgroup –Population –Recruitment Protocol-concept –Follow-up-activity RCT: Concept

30

31 Ontology vs. Schema Separate development of medical ontologies and terminologies such as SNOMED and medical information models and database schemas Rector, et al., Binding Ontologies and Coding Systems to Electronic Health Records and Messages

32 Ontology vs. Schema diabetes => disease diabetes => string temperature => quality temperature => integer

33 Valid Specifications for data structures “Valid diabetic data structures have: a topic of code for diabetes, a diagnosis code that is diabetes or one of its subcodes, and a brittleness code that is one of the subcodes for diabetic brittlenes and nothing else” Ontology “All diabetes are metabolic diseases” “John has diabetes & it is brittle and long- standing”

34 –Concept Administrative-concept –Publication-concept –Study-site –Person Intervention-concept –Blinding-concept –Intervention-step –Intervention RCT: Concept

35 Two kinds of entities occurrents (processes, events, happenings) continuants (objects, qualities, states...) You are a continuant Your life is an occurrent

36 An instrument is a continuant A protocol is a continuant A trial is an occurrent A selection process is an occurrent Two kinds of entities

37 OBI Top Level

38 OBO Occurrent

39 CTO

40 CTO Continuant

41 CTO Occurrent

42 Clinical Trial Ontology Working Group Workshop on May 16-17, 2007

43