1 Analysis of MD on IR1 and IR5 aperture at 3.5 TeV – progress report C. Alabau Pons, R. Assmann, R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, G. Müller, S. Redaelli F. Schmidt,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli With essential input from G. Arduini, R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Fitterer, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, aperture team.
Advertisements

Collimation with retracted TCSGs R. Bruce, R. Kwee, S. Redaelli.
Simulation priorities for 2015 R. Bruce for task 5.2.
LHC Collimation Working Group – 19 December 2011 Modeling and Simulation of Beam Losses during Collimator Alignment (Preliminary Work) G. Valentino With.
Critical beam losses during Commissioning & Initial Operation Guillaume Robert-Demolaize (CERN and Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble) with R. Assmann, S.
LHC 18 & 19 April 2015 At 450 GeV with bumps, no increased MUFO activity. Beam screen 15R8 warming up to 80 K, ongoing for the day 09:00: Orbit studies.
Investigations of Unidentified Lying Objects in the LHC D. Mirarchi, R. Bruce, P. Hermes, S. Redaelli, B. Salvachua, G. Valentino On behalf of the LHC.
Collimation MDs LHC Study Working Group Daniel Wollmann for the Collimation-Team, BLM-Team, Impedance-Team, … LHC Study Working Group,
RF de-bunching problem  The Beam Phase module measures the phase of each individual bunch and makes an average that is passed to the Low Level for updating.
The ATS MD part III (Achromatic Telescopic Squeezing scheme) Participants: Any (active) volunteers Goal: 1)MD1 (S. Fartoukh & R. Assmann  10h): “Pre-squeeze’’
* IP5 IP1 IP2 IP8 vertical crossing angle at IP8 R. Bruce, W. Herr, B. Holzer Acknowledgement: S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli, J. Wenninger.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Magnetic Behavior of LHC Correctors: Issues for Machine Operation W. Venturini Delsolaro AT-MTM; Inputs from A. Lombardi, M. Giovannozzi, S. Fartoukh,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
External Review on LHC Machine Protection, CERN, Collimation of encountered losses D. Wollmann, R.W. Assmann, F. Burkart, R. Bruce, M. Cauchi,
LHC Technical Committee, 23/05/20071 LHC Commissioning Phases Squeeze presented by Massimo Giovannozzi on behalf of the LHCCWG Particular thanks to S.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and parameters Filling schemes Operational settings OP procedure and COLL setting Planning Shift breakdown To define the.
LHC Studies Working Group – 03 July 2012 Beam Scraping and Diffusion + Asynchronous Dump MD G. Valentino, R. W. Assmann, F. Burkart, L. Lari, S. Redaelli,
Friday to Saturday 02:00: Machine closed. 09:00: Cryogenics all OK. Preparing pre-cycle. 10:00: Pre-cycle started. 11:30: Pre-cycle finished. 14:00: Beam.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
LHC 8:30 meetingEBH 11 Thursday 24 November 2011.
Status from the collimator impedance MD in the LHC Collimation team:R. Assmann, R. Bruce, A. Rossi. Operation team:G.H. Hemelsoet, W. Venturini, V. Kain,
Simulations of TCT beam impacts for different scenarios R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. RedaelliAcknowledgement: L. Lari, C. Bracco, B. Goddard.
With a lot of help from Reine Versteegen, John Jowett, Richard Jacobson, Burkhard Schmidt, Gilda Scioli, Werner Herr CERN-LHC * IP5 IP1 IP8 Spectrometer.
Progress with beam Mike Lamont. BUNCH TRAINS AND CROSSING ANGLES AT INJECTION Werner Herr et al 2.
Aperture in case of an asynchronous beam dump with ATS optics R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. Redaelli With valueable input from: A. Bertarelli, C. Bracco, F.
Improving Collimator Setup Efficiency LHC Beam Operation Committee, G. Valentino, R.W. Assmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, S.
Work in progress: Improved models of collimation margins with TCT damage limit R. Bruce, L. Lari 1 Input and discussions: R. Assmann, A. Bertarelli, C.
Collimator settings for 2012 R. Bruce, R. Assmann for the collimation team
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
Optimization of beam envelop at the injection point of PS Chenghui Yu Jan. 30, 2012.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and MP concerns BI configuration Operational settings Collimators Planning Shift breakdown Thanks to: P.Baudrenghien, G.Bellodi,
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
LHC Collimation Working Group Monday, 21 March 2016 Analysis of collimator BPMs in the 2015 run A.Valloni, G. Valentino with input from R. Bruce, A. Mereghetti,
How low can we go? Getting below β*=3.5m R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann Acknowledgment: T. Baer, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard,W.
R. Assmann Collimator Functionality, Performance and First View on Set-up and Optimization R. Assmann AB/ABP, CERN External Review of the LHC Collimation.
R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli With essential input from G. Arduini, R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Fitterer, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, aperture team.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Friday Access in shadow of SPS interventions (RF, extraction septa power supply) Lead into problem on the cooling of the extraction septa in SPS Both beams.
Beam Energy & Intensity: One bunch during full cycle
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
MD Planning Fri – Sat (26. – 27.8.)
1st LHC MD Period Started
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Spectrometer Operation in IP2 & 8
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
Alice solenoid – orbit distortion
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
IR2 aperture measurements: results, actions and proposal
Planning at 5 o’clock meeting Friday
Yesterday morning Held 1647 for a while – SPS kicker problem
Collimation after LS1: cleaning and β* reach
Global aperture measurements at 450 GeV with 170 mrad crossing angle
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Collimation margins and *
Improving Collimator Setup Efficiency
Plan for 1 m b* J. Uythoven & J. Wenninger
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
Saturday 29th October Friday during IP2 1 m squeeze test
Presentation transcript:

1 Analysis of MD on IR1 and IR5 aperture at 3.5 TeV – progress report C. Alabau Pons, R. Assmann, R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, G. Müller, S. Redaelli F. Schmidt, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, D. Wollmann Introduction Method for 3.5TeV and summary of results Checks of assumptions with MAD-X Preliminary conclusions Acknowledgements: S. Fartoukh, M. Lamont R. Bruce - LBOC meeting11/10/2011

Proposal for 3.5 TeV measurements Unlike at injection, we cannot lose the full beam! We have to be very careful with damage and quenches, even with pilot beam! Idea: local bumps in the triplet with safe, blown-up pilot bunch and tertiary collimators to protect the triplet Even if we planned to work with safe beam, a detailed planning was submitted to rMPP for approval. Selective emittance blow-up tested in the MD with the ADT: looks very promising and opens the path for efficient measurements at top energy. TCTH.4L1 IP5 6 sigma envelope Thanks to ATLAS, CMS: special BCM settings R. Bruce - LBOC meeting 11/10/2011

Example of 3.5 TeV measurement Procedure for “gentle” measurements: 1. Open TCT by 0.5 sigma ( μm in H-V) 2. Increase bump by 0.25 sigma 3. Check relative height of BLM spikes: TCT vs MQX (Q2) Start from initial settings: TCTs at 11.8 sigmas. Orbit at TCT and Q2 TCT positions [mm]18.8 σ 18.3 σ 17.8 σ TCT losses [Gy/s] Q2 losses [Gy/s] Loss spikes while the orbit is increased, touching TCT or MQX R. Bruce - LBOC meeting 11/10/2011

4 Summary of IR1/5 scans (preliminary) Figures quoted in the eLog, from online estimate: IR1 - H (Sep) -> sigmas IR1 - V (Xing) -> sigmas IR5 - H (Xing) -> sigmas IR5 - V (Sep) -> > 20.3 sigmas Resolution: 0.5 sigmas from TCT step size The quoted results are the TCT opening! This means that we had to open the TCT by sigmas to “see” the triplet aperture. Present assumptions: 2 sigma retraction. R. Bruce - LBOC meeting11/10/2011 Results in logbook relying on assumption: (“TCT opening in  when triplet is touched corresponds to triplet aperture around reference orbit in  ”) Seems reasonable, since and(phase advance small). But the phase advance is not exactly zero. Check with MAD-X how well this assumption holds!

Checks with MAD-X Example: closed orbit in IR1 V from crossing angle only (blue), random kicks in IR6 (red), both (green) Orbit in  roughly constant as assumed when kicks are far away, but not for crossing bump 11/10/2011R. Bruce - LBOC meeting5 IP1

Closed orbits from random kicks Several cases simulated with kicks distributed around ring (no crossing angle) Orbit approximation very good in most cases, but not all Explanation: if is also small (modulo pi) it can give quite different contributions at TCT and triplet 11/10/2011R. Bruce - LBOC meeting6

MCBX contribution 11/10/2011R. Bruce - LBOC meeting7 In addition, kicks between TCT and triplet can change the retraction MCBX correctors powered (but constant) during measurements

Intermediate conclusions The assumption that the triplet aperture equals the TCT opening when triplet is touched is only true when phase advance to kicks is large In particular, this is introduces an uncertainty when applied to the crossing bump Furthermore, it assumes no kicks between TCT and triplet. This is not true – MCBXs used for global correction (although constant during measurement) Therefore, the TCT opening when triplet is touched could be slightly different with a different bump shape and/or MCBX settings. Safer to calculate the triplet aperture locally, using the orbit in the triplet and not the TCT 11/10/2011R. Bruce - LBOC meeting8

Comparison: a few numbers in mm ModelBPM (CO Xing + ΔCO bump ) 450 GeVIP5-H (crossing)CO Xing =8.0 mm (170 μrad)ΔCO bump =8.3 mm14. mm n σ x σ=16.0 mm16. mm A mm = 32.3 mm 30 mm ModelBPM (CO Xing + ΔCO bump ) 3.5 TeVIP5-H (crossing)CO Xing =5.8 mm (120 μrad)ΔCO bump =17.7 mm24.4 mm n σ x σ=4.8 mm4.8 mm (n σ = 4) A mm = 28.3 mm29.2 mm The aperture around the reference orbit is ~18.5 . In this case we lose ~1  compared to estimate from TCT opening. Ongoing work: detailed data analysis from C. Abalau Mechanical aperture: 28.9 mm (30 mm without tolerance) R. Bruce - LBOC meeting 11/10/2011

Preliminary conclusions We measured gently the aperture in the triplet region at 3.5 TeV. –Triplets in the shade of the TCT We introduce an uncertainty when inferring the triplet aperture from the TCT opening, except for the used bump shape and MCBX settings. Aperture better estimated from local data (orbit and beam envelope) in the triplet. Ongoing work (C. Abalau) Comparison with previous injection measurements show that figures in IR5 are consistent with a few millimeters. Other IRs under way. Triplet aperture compatible with a well-aligned machine, a well centered orbit and a ~ design mechanical aperture (small tolerance). 10R. Bruce - LBOC meeting11/10/2011