OWL-AA: Enriching OWL with Instance Recognition Semantics for Automated Semantic Annotation 2006 Spring Research Conference Yihong Ding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
Advertisements

Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
1 Ontolog OOR Use Case Review Todd Schneider 1 April 2010 (v 1.2)
1 Ontolog Open Ontology Repository Review 19 February 2009.
Dr. Bruce A. Scharlau, AHDIT, ES2002 E-Business Workshop AHDIT: Ad Hoc Data Interoperability Tool Dr. Bruce A. Scharlau Dept. of Computing Science University.
CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
A Stepwise Modeling Approach for Individual Media Semantics Annett Mitschick, Klaus Meißner TU Dresden, Department of Computer Science, Multimedia Technology.
DELIVERING STORIES WITH PURSUIT Story-delivery presentation and demo Ben Tagger and Dirk Trossen (UCAM) Stuart Porter (CTVC)
By Ahmet Can Babaoğlu Abdurrahman Beşinci.  Suppose you want to buy a Star wars DVD having such properties;  wide-screen ( not full-screen )  the extra.
Of 27 lecture 7: owl - introduction. of 27 ece 627, winter ‘132 OWL a glimpse OWL – Web Ontology Language describes classes, properties and relations.
Multi-Phase Reasoning of temporal semantic knowledge Sakirulai O. Isiaq and Taha Osman School of Computer and Informatics Nottingham Trent University Nottingham.
Building and Analyzing Social Networks Web Data and Semantics in Social Network Applications Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham February 15, 2013.
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
Who am I Gianluca Correndo PhD student (end of PhD) Work in the group of medical informatics (Paolo Terenziani) PhD thesis on contextualization techniques.
Wrap up  Matching  Geometry  Semantics  Multiscale modelling / incremental update / generalization  Geometric algorithms  Web Services.
CS652 Spring 2004 Summary. Course Objectives  Learn how to extract, structure, and integrate Web information  Learn what the Semantic Web is  Learn.
Two-Level Semantic Annotation Model BYU Spring Conference 2007 Yihong Ding Sponsored by NSF.
Annotating Documents for the Semantic Web Using Data-Extraction Ontologies Dissertation Proposal Yihong Ding.
Semantics For the Semantic Web: The Implicit, the Formal and The Powerful Amit Sheth, Cartic Ramakrishnan, Christopher Thomas CS751 Spring 2005 Presenter:
A New Web Semantic Annotator Enabling A Machine Understandable Web BYU Spring Research Conference 2005 Yihong Ding Sponsored by NSF.
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
Ontology-Based Free-Form Query Processing for the Semantic Web Mark Vickers Brigham Young University MS Thesis Defense Supported by:
Enriching OWL with Instance Recognition Semantics for Automated Semantic Annotation Stephen W. Liddle Information Systems Department Yihong Ding & David.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
1 Cui Tao PhD Dissertation Defense Ontology Generation, Information Harvesting and Semantic Annotation For Machine-Generated Web Pages.
BYU A Synergistic Semantic Annotation Model December 2007 Yihong Ding,
OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web D. Fensel, F. van Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider Presenter: Cristina.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Amarnath Gupta Univ. of California San Diego. An Abstract Question There is no concrete answer …but …
Erasmus University Rotterdam Introduction With the vast amount of information available on the Web, there is an increasing need to structure Web data in.
Aidministrator nederland b.v. Adding formal semantics to the Web Jeen Broekstra, Michel Klein, Stefan Decker, Dieter Fensel,
Practical RDF Chapter 1. RDF: An Introduction
Mining the Semantic Web: Requirements for Machine Learning Fabio Ciravegna, Sam Chapman Presented by Steve Hookway 10/20/05.
Provenance Metadata for Shared Product Model Databases Etiel Petrinja, Vlado Stankovski & Žiga Turk University of Ljubljana Faculty of Civil and Geodetic.
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation
RDF and OWL Developing Semantic Web Services by H. Peter Alesso and Craig F. Smith CMPT 455/826 - Week 6, Day Sept-Dec 2009 – w6d21.
Building an Ontology of Semantic Web Techniques Utilizing RDF Schema and OWL 2.0 in Protégé 4.0 Presented by: Naveed Javed Nimat Umar Syed.
What is MOF? The Meta Object Facility (MOF) specification provides a set of CORBA interfaces that can be used to define and manipulate a set of interoperable.
Metadata. Generally speaking, metadata are data and information that describe and model data and information For example, a database schema is the metadata.
Aude Dufresne and Mohamed Rouatbi University of Montreal LICEF – CIRTA – MATI CANADA Learning Object Repositories Network (CRSNG) Ontologies, Applications.
Ontoprise: B 3 - Semantic B2B Broker whitepaper review Bernhard Schueler CSCI 8350, Spring 2002,UGA.
Developing “Geo” Ontology Layers for Web Query Faculty of Design & Technology Conference David George, Department of Computing.
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
© Geodise Project, University of Southampton, Knowledge Management in Geodise Geodise Knowledge Management Team Barry Tao, Colin Puleston, Liming.
The future of the Web: Semantic Web 9/30/2004 Xiangming Mu.
Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Lecture #4 Vision for Semantic Web.
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
Working with Ontologies Introduction to DOGMA and related research.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
6 Dec Rev. 14 Dec CmpE 583 Fall 2008OWL Intro 1 OWL Intro Notes off Lacy Ch. 4 Atilla Elçi.
Semantic web Bootstrapping & Annotation Hassan Sayyadi Semantic web research laboratory Computer department Sharif university of.
Extending the MDR for Semantic Web November 20, 2008 SC32/WG32 Interim Meeting Vilamoura, Portugal - Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology -
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 Plenary and WGs Meetings Jeju, Korea, June 25, 2009 Jeong-Dong Kim, Doo-Kwon Baik, Dongwon Jeong {kjd4u,
Knowledge Representation. Keywordsquick way for agents to locate potentially useful information Thesaurimore structured approach than keywords, arranging.
1 Ontolog OOR-BioPortal Comparative Analysis Todd Schneider 15 October 2009.
THE SEMANTIC WEB By Conrad Williams. Contents  What is the Semantic Web?  Technologies  XML  RDF  OWL  Implementations  Social Networking  Scholarly.
Trait ontology approach Marie-Angélique LAPORTE NCEAS June 7 th 2010.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Extending the Metadata Registry for Semantic Web - Enforcing the MDR for supporting ontology concept - May 28, 2008 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 WG 2 Meeting Sydney,
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
Semantic Interoperability in GIS N. L. Sarda Suman Somavarapu.
OWL (Ontology Web Language and Applications) Maw-Sheng Horng Department of Mathematics and Information Education National Taipei University of Education.
The Semantic Web By: Maulik Parikh.
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
Analyzing and Securing Social Networks
ece 720 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
NKOS workshop Alicante, 2006
Presentation transcript:

OWL-AA: Enriching OWL with Instance Recognition Semantics for Automated Semantic Annotation 2006 Spring Research Conference Yihong Ding

2 Semantic Web and Automated Semantic Annotation Semantic Web: the web containing machine- processable web data Semantic Annotation: adds formal metadata to web pages Metadata links data in a web page to defined concepts in an ontology Annotated data becomes machine-processable Annotation needs automation to be scalable

3 “Main Drawback” of Current Automated Semantic Annotation Problem: “post-processing and mapping of the IE [information extraction] results to an ontology” [Kiryakov 2004] Needs human intervention Decreases system automation and scalability Solution: “use ontolog[ies] more directly during the process of extraction” [Kiryakov 2004] Does work (as our ontology-based annotation shows) But …

4 A Hidden Problem: Compatible with Standards A solution should be compatible with semantic web standards OWL (Web Ontology Language): standard Solutions must be OWL-compatible Current Solution OSMX (Object-oriented Systems Model in XML): not a standard, not OWL-compatible Declarative instance recognition semantics Needed by automated annotation process Lacking in OWL

5 Instance Recognition Semantics in Extraction Ontologies Instance recognition semantics: machine- processable recognizers of instances that belong to the extention of a concept in a specified domain. Examples in extraction ontologies External Representation Price: \d+|\d?\d?\d,\d\d\d Make: CarMake.lexicon Contextual Representation Context phrases (left, right), e.g. \$? Context keywords: e.g. price | obo | neg(\.|otiable)

6 OWL: Lacks Instance Recognition Semantics In general, OWL Declares class, property, hierarchical relationship, restriction. Declares instantiations. Does not support declaration of “instance recognition” Consequently, Not enough declarative semantics in OWL directly useable by automated annotation Mixture of knowledge declaration and knowledge processing Domain experts must know program implementation; Or, program developers must be domain experts. No annotation integrity checking Taurus is legal, though it is incorrect; And, machines cannot catch this error.

7 OWL-AA (RDF Schema)

8

9 OWL-AA Declarations

10 Implementation Jena API converts OWL-AA ontologies to OSMX ontologies Use OSMX ontologies to do automated annotation

11 Conclusion OWL-AA is a way to extend OWL to provide for automated semantic annotation. OWL-AA overcomes the “main drawback” of automated semantic annotation. OWL-AA allows us to separate the creation of domain knowledge from the implementation of a processor to use domain knowledge for the purpose of annotating web pages. OWL-AA provides for annotation integrity checking.

12 Instantiation Declaration Declaration vs. Instantiation

13 Instance Recognition Semantics Machine-processable recognizers of instances that belong to the extention of a concept in a specified domain. IRecS of Left Concept: has line in eye IRecS of Right Concept: no line in eye