Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Super B-Factory Workshop, Hawaii, April 20-22, 2005 Lattice studies for low momentum compaction in LER M.E. Biagini LNF-INFN, Frascati.
1 IR Vacuum M. Sullivan MAC Review Jan , 2006 M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee Review January 18-20, 2006 IR Vacuum.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
MAC Review December 13-15, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee meeting December 13-15,
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Beam pipes M. Sullivan 1 Detector Beam Pipe Diameter Discussion M. Sullivan Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Accelerator Summary 1/22/2004 K. Oide (KEK). Accelerator Session: PEP-II IR Upgrade M. Sullivan (SLAC) Super KEKB Optics & IR Y. Ohnishi(KEK) Super-PEP-II.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Issues for Optimization of a Super-B Factory John T. Seeman SBF Workshop SLAC June 14, 2006.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
1 Optics and IR design for SuperKEKB Y.Ohnishi 1/19-22, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Synchrotron Radiation (SR) in Super-KEKB / Belle Osamu Tajima ( Tohoku univ )
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
New Ideas for Super B Factories for Flavour Physics Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh, Future Directions, BEACH 2006 Lancaster, July 2006.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
August 4-5, 2004 PEP-II Post Run 4 Review 1 M. Sullivan PEP-II Post Run 4 Review August 4-5, 2004 IR Summary and Issues.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
Joint Belle SuperB Background Meeting Feb 9 – 10, 2012 SuperB SR bkgds 1 SR Backgrounds in SuperB M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni,
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
SuperB Meeting XVII May 28 – June 2, 2011 IR design status 1 IR Design Status and Update M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Further SR Studies for the Electron Polarimeter M. Sullivan for the JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2016.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
2nd Workshop on a Super B-Factory INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
IR Design Update M. Sullivan For
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Presentation transcript:

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii April 20-23, 2005

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 2 Outline General B-factory parameters IR parameters Synchrotron Radiation Issues Present IR design Summary and conclusions

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 3 PEP-III Super B parameters for a 1  Luminosity Super B LER energy 3.5 GeV HER energy 8.0 GeV LER current 23.0 A HER current 10.1 A  y * 1.5 mm  x * 15 cm X emittance 40 nm-rad Estimated  y * 1.7  m Bunch spacing m Number of bunches 6900 Collision angle  14 mrads Beam pipe radius 2.5 cm Luminosity 1  cm  sec 

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 4  Detector acceptance down to 300 mrad angle – forward and backward  Beam pipe radius of 2.5 cm  Translates to ±10 cm of active beam pipe  The Q2 septum is at 2.5 m IR design parameters

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 5  PEP-II IR design ended up with ~10  /crossing – which is 2.39 Ghz – rate on the detector beam pipe (11 krad/yr)  Background levels from SR can be no more than factor of 100 to 1000 times higher than PEP-II before radiation doses get too high (occupancy may be OK for pixelated detector)  Make all of the SR radiation from local bends in the beam miss nearby surfaces (power from the high current beams is too high for local absorption) SR constraints and limits…

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 6 Current baseline design

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 7

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 8 Version  /X  /sWatts PEP-II design102.39e91.4e-511 krad/yr Baseline design HER4.65e44.37e LER5.71e45.37e Offset Q4 10 mm & offset Q2 12 mm HER e113.1e-4 LER e111.1e-3 8  instead of 10  HER e112.8e-4 Tail #1 HER e91.3e-5 LER e94.2e-5 Tail#2 HER e72.2e-7 LER e86.8e-7 No tails HER6.9e e-51.5e-19 LER1.3e e-17 SR backgrounds photons > 4keV on the physics window beampipe

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 9 Vertical plane is not as hard Horizontal plane is more difficult so try to steer the Q5 radiation away from the beam pipe

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 10

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 11 Bending power vs quadrupole power Magnet Bending pwr Quadrupole pwr HER beam (10A) Up Q W Up Q W~3000 W LER beam (23 A) Up Q23433 W46 W

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 12 What is the correct beam tail distribution? The present PEP-II design is insensitive to the tail distribution since the SR background is dominated by local bending fans. This allowed us to assume a conservative (high) tail particle density The PEP SuperB design minimizes local beam bending and hence the beam tail distribution becomes more important Note: the background from SR comes only from the x plane

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 13

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 14 We have made progress on a PEP SuperB interaction region design with a luminosity of 1  Synchrotron radiation backgrounds look managable. Much more work needs to be done…. Minimal beam bending leads to a design that is sensitive to the beam tail distributions, … Perhaps we can learn more about the correct beam tail distributions from the present B factories. Summary and Conclusions

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 15 Backup slides

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 16

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 17

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 18

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 19

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 20 KEKB Upgrade Plans Now Upgrades SuperKEKB LER energy GeV HER energy GeV LER current A HER current A  y * mm  x * cm X emittance nm-rad Estimated  y *  m Bunch spacing m Number of bunches Collision angle  11 crab  15 (crab)mrads Beam pipe radius cm Luminosity 1.06    cm  sec 

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 21

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 22

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 23

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 24