Locke vs Modern Biological Classification PHIL 2130.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Use This Presentation
Advertisements

Introduction Classification Phylogeny Cladograms Quiz
Chapter 2 Development of Evolutionary Theory Brief History of Evolutionary Thought Natural Selection in Action Constraints on Nineteenth-Century Evolutionary.
Exploring Change Unity and Diversity.
Online Counseling Resource YCMOU ELearning Drive…
Classification and Taxonomy Heather M Hawkins Office Hours: 11-2 LS 464.
Taxonomy “The Study of Classification”
18.1 Finding Order in Diversity
Chapter 25/26 Taxonomy and Biodiversity Evolutionary biology The major goal of evolutionary biology is to reconstruct the history of life on earth ►Process:
Organizing Life’s Diversity
Alberts, Bray, Hopkins, Johnson Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Professor: Dr. Barjis Room: P313 Phone: (718)
Until more recent times, scientists named Things with crazy long names that Just described the organism. Apis pubescens, thorace subgriseo, abdomine.
Chapter 15: Classification
18.1 Finding Order in Diversity
Locke and Natural Kinds PHIL What is a ‘natural kind’? A natural kind has a real existence independent of human cognition; And is not simply an.
Classification of Organisms. Categories of Biological Classification Scientists Assign Organisms Two-Word Names 2,000 yrs ago, Aristotle grouped plants.
Classification Chapter 17. History of Classification Early Systems of Classification Classification: grouping of objects or organisms based on a set of.
Chapter 18 – Classification
CLASSIFICATION Chapter 17.
Reconstructing and Using Phylogenies
Classification.
Chapter 9 Classification The Greek Philosopher Aristotle began classifying organisms more than 2000 years ago In the 1600’s, English scientist, John Ray,
Classifying Nature Linnaeus, Cuvier, Buffon. Linnaeus (Carl von Linnae, ) Swedish naturalist who studied medicine in the Netherlands. Main concern.
1.1 Identifying, Naming and Classifying Species
Species Concepts. Species in Theory and Practice Biologists have not been able to agree on exactly what a species is, or how species should be abstractly.
TAXONOMY Presentation made by: sakura023. Need to Classify.
The Classification of Life. Classification of Life Biology » The study of life Taxonomy » Classification and naming of organisms.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter 15 Lecture Slides.
1-3 Classifying Organisms
SB3C. Examine the evolutionary basis of modern classification systems.
BIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION. Taxonomy  Biological classification, or scientific classification in biology, is a method by which biologists group and categorize.
17.1 History of Classification
The Living World Fifth Edition George B. Johnson Jonathan B. Losos Chapter 18 Exploring Biological Diversity Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Taxonomic Units What is it that we are trying to do? Determine relationships among…? What do the terminal nodes represent? Often, they are supposed to.
How classification works
Chapter 17: Organizing Life’s Diversity
Classification and Taxonomy. THINK ABOUT IT –Scientists have been trying to identify, name, and find order in the diversity of life for a long time. The.
Classification and Taxonomy. THINK ABOUT IT –Scientists have been trying to identify, name, and find order in the diversity of life for a long time. The.
Underlying Principles of Zoology Laws of physics and chemistry apply. Principles of genetics and evolution important. What is learned from one animal group.
Classification. Why Classify? –To study the great diversity of organisms, biologists must give each organism a name. –Biologists must also attempt to.
Life in General Living matter is organized into complex structures based on organic molecules. They have cells. Homeostasis is maintained by Living.
C LASSIFYING O RGANISMS 7 th Grade Biology Mrs. Mudd.
Chapter 14 Table of Contents
Do Now What is a population? What is a community? What is a species?
Darwin’s only figure in “The Origin of Species” (1859)
Chapter 2 The Development of Evolutionary Theory.
The History of Classification Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education Early Systems of Classification Classification is the grouping of objects or organisms.
UNIT 5A Classification & Kingdoms. I. Classification a. Organize items so you can better understand and find them b. Based on Similarities c. Taxonomy:
CLASSIFICATION Why Classify?. INQUIRY ACTIVITY 1) Construct a table with six rows and six columns. Label each row with the name of a different fruit.
Identifying, Naming, and Classifying Species
McGraw-Hill © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
ORGANIZING BIODIVERSITY. A SPECIES How do we define a species? A reproductive population that occupies a specific niche (plays a role) in nature Individuals.
Biodiversity Unit 1 Classification and Diversity What you ought to know.
Do Now 11/19 1.How is your closet organized? ( or how would your dream closet be organized?) 2. What criteria did you use to help organize your closet?
Aristotle is sometimes said to have brought philosophy down to earth, because he combined the study of humanity and nature. He stands alone as an archetype.
CLASSIFICATION Chapter 17. Warm-up:  When scientists discover a new species, what is the first thing they need to do?  What is the scientific name for.
Speciation 17. Concept 17.1 Species Are Reproductively Isolated Lineages on the Tree of Life Speciation—divergence of biological lineages and emergence.
+ Taxonomy. + Biologist have identified and named 1.5 million species so far 2 – 100 million additional species have yet to be discovered.
An Introduction to Classification November 29, 2010.
Plant Names and Classification
Classification Of Organisms Chapter 14 Coach Fults.
Classification Biology I. Lesson Objectives Compare Aristotle’s and Linnaeus’s methods of classifying organisms. Explain how to write a scientific name.
1 Classification & Phylogeny of Animals Zoology Chapter 4 Homework: Read pages (up to Taxonomic char…) Do Questions 1, 2, 3, 4 page 86 Due: Tuesday.
Chapter 17 Classification of Organisms Section 1 Biodiversity Be Able To: Relate biodiversity to biological classification. Explain why naturalists replaced.
Depending on where you live, this might be a mountain lion, cougar, puma, or panther – all of these are “common” names for the “Felis concolor”
Classification: Organizing Life’s Diversity Taxonomy, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family. Warm-up: 1.What is it called when natural selection leads.
Darwin’s only figure in “The Origin of Species” (1859)
Lecture 79 – Lecture 80 The History of Classification Ozgur Unal
Section 1: The History of Classification
Darwin’s only figure in “The Origin of Species” (1859)
Presentation transcript:

Locke vs Modern Biological Classification PHIL 2130

Essences = our ideas Ordinary essences are merely sorts, our ordinary names for things: ‘The ranking of Things into Species, which is nothing but sorting them under several Titles, is done by us, according to the Ideas we have of them’ (III, vi, 13); Take an individual human for example: There is nothing essential to an individual human That cannot be altered: Color, Shape can change; memory loss, loss of locomotion can all result e.g. from illness.

What’s at stake in Naming in the 17 th century? Same names for different things (III, vi, 8): Locke cites example of Chemistry Different names for the same things: Example of Ice vs Water, liquid vs solid gold (III, vi, 13); A big issue in 17 th century natural history: Many different names for the same organisms: birds, plants (from 1,000 to 18,000 species between 1500 and 1700), animals.

Species not founded on essences We would need to know if Nature has established regular ‘Models of all Things to be produced’; Nature always attains that Essence Monsters (meaning?) are a distinct species Real Essence is knowable, which it is not (III, vi, 15-20).

Does propagation prove species? No Example of Hybrids Flowers (tulip at right) Mules (mating of Donkey and Mare; see III, vi, 23)

Locke’s Influence on Taxonomy Some claimed it was possible to create a system of classification that would reflect natural order; Locke = a founder of a skeptical tradition in biological systematics (taxonomy) of the reality of taxonomical divisions, e.g. of an alleged ‘natural’ system of classification; Also inspires programme of improving classification schemes, not on the basis of a purported natural classification, but rather on an orderly system of nomenclature, such that one name stands for one thing/group of things.

Why did Locke think Essences are unknowable? His mechanistic philosophy, the ‘New Philosophy’ of the 17 th century; Matter has a substance and ‘constitutes everything in creation’ (Ayers 1981, 250).; All matter is a continuum: ‘in all the corporeal World, we see no Chasms, or Gaps…the descent is by easy steps, and a continued series of Things, that in each remove, differ very little one from the other’ (III, vi, 12); ‘no need to postulate other universal natures’ (Ayers 1981, 250).

Locke’s Idea of Matter There are just different configurations (shapes) of that matter, so that gold differs from a tree not in substance but in structure; All matter is subject to laws of motion (same era as Newton) Some philosophers like Descartes asserted they knew the structure of matter; ‘Locke believed that Boyle’s version of corpuscularianism–solid particles clashing in the void— was the best inadequate theory available and that the unknown truth must be something like it’ (Ayers 1981, 250)

‘A certain Chinese encyclopædia’ Borges quoted by Foucault, The Order of Things: ‘…animals are divided into: (a) belonging to the Emperor, (b) embalmed, (c) tame, (d) sucking pigs, (e) sirens, (f) fabulous, (g) stray dogs, (h) included in the present classification, (i) frenzied, (j) innumerable, (k) drawn with a very fine camelhair brush, (l) et cetera, (m) having just broken the water pitcher, (n) that from a long way off look like “flies”. In the wonderment of this taxonomy, the thing we apprehend…as the exotic charm of another system of thought, is the limitation of our own, the stark impossibility of thinking that’.

What is Borges’s/Foucault’s point? There are many possible classifications of things: animals, library books, pens, etc. They may differ culturally, as suggested by the descriptive phrase—’a chinese encyclopædia’ May be based on very different criteria of differentiation: are there any clear criteria of differentiation in the quote? Is modern biological classification based on the species concept (Mayr) a special case? Is it universally accepted and understood?

Essentialism/Typology Aristotelian definition: essence (man=rational animal), definition, name (man) explicitly informed biological classification up to the nineteenth century when Darwin and Mendel made their discoveries; Hull (1992) argues Aristotelian definition still informs some taxonomists’ species definitions today.

Modern Typology Three essentialist tenets of biological typology: -ontological assertion that forms exist; -methodological assertion that taxonomy should discern the essences of species; -logical assertion concerning definition. According to Hull (1992), these all add up to typology still being basically an Aristotelian exercise.

Aristotelian definition in modern terms Properties severally necessary And jointly sufficient ‘For example, being a three-sided closed plane figure is necessary and sufficient for a triangle.’ This was the only kind of species definition permitted until recently by the international codes agreed by taxonomists; Yet, ‘seldom is a property of any taxonomic value distributed both universally and exclusively among the members of a taxon [a biological grouping]’.

Eighteenth-century Taxonomy Carolus Linnaeus of Sweden ( ) reformed taxonomy, providing Binomial nomenclature (2-word Latin name), and An artificial sexual system of classification (see next slide) for plants, one of his major contributions; Based on morphological and reproductive characteristics: – The number and position of stamens (male) and pistils (female), the reproductive organs in flowers. The goal for 18 th c. naturalists, was a natural basis for classification that was not achievable at the time.

Linnaean Plant Taxonomy

Biological species concept Darwin (evolution) and Mendel (genetics) formulated their theories in the mid-nineteenth century This led to the development of the modern biological species concept described by Mayr: Species consist of populations Have ‘reality’ and ‘an internal genetic program’ ‘The development of the biological concept of the species is one of the earliest manifestations of the emancipation of biology from an inappropriate philosophy…’ (Mayr, 17).

Philosophical Holdovers But, argues Hull (1992), a static species concept is still adhered to by many biologists; Why? Even some evolutionary taxonomists (called ‘classificationists’) prefer typology Because taxonomists’ job is easier if they call certain properties or characteristics ‘essential’ and treat them as fixed in time and space; Why easier? Evolutionary taxonomy entails making the unit of evolution the unit of classification (HINT: ‘evolution’ refers to change over time) How is this done, according to Mayr?

Biological Species Concept Members of species = reproductive community (Do you recall what Locke said about this? Example of the mule; is Locke wrong?) An ecological unit, interacting as a unit w/ other species in same environment, but protected from these other units by ‘isolating mechanisms’; A genetic unit, comprising an intercommunicating gene pool of coadapted genes; The evolutionary taxonomist seeks to assign populations to the correct rank or category in the taxonomic hierarchy, most difficult when populations exchange genes.

Taxonomic Hierarchy

Assignment of taxa Higher taxa (phylum, genus, etc.) are defined by intrinsic characteristics (e.g bird = feathered vertebrate; any feathered vertebrate fits class of birds) Species are unique in the hierarchy: they are defined by relational properties, i.e. interbreeding or lack of it; See Mayr, p. 19 on species-specific bird songs as indications of relation. Is this a universally applicable/acceptable concept?

Summary Table of Species Concepts EssentialistNominalistBiological Forms/Ideas/ universals? YesNoNo or N/A Why? Cause of Variation Imperfect realization of the idea N/AAdaptation to Environment/ Nat. Selec. Role of Morphology Very Important N/AUsed w/ genetic info

Further reading: D.L. Hull, ‘The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis’, in M. Ereshefsky, ed.,The Units of Evolution (1992), pp (book on reserve in Main Library).