Richardson/DIS 2002 Are They Willing to Wait and What If They Do? An Analysis of Virtual Reference Service Dr. John V. Richardson Jr. UCLA Professor of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Splash Screen. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 11–1) CCSS Then/Now New Vocabulary Key Concept: Symmetric and Skewed Distributions Example 1:
Advertisements

Children’s subjective well-being Findings from national surveys in England International Society for Child Indicators Conference, 27 th July 2011.
LiveHelp over the web: a Local Collaborative Approach Rachel Cheng University Librarian Eastern Michigan University Steve Bischof Resource Assessment &
Glasgow An early-adopter’s perspective. Background Interest in RFID began in 2001 Deal with 3M to showcase RFID at IFLA Local pilot site – big.
MARKETING THE SCHOOL LIBRARY /MEDIA CENTER Ways to promote the use of the library media center, connect with faculty members and improve student achievement.
Evaluation of NCknows, a Statewide Collaborative Chat Reference Service: What Users and Others Told Us Charles R. McClure, Francis Eppes Professor, and.
Richardson/DIS 2002 Symphony of Synchronicity? Evaluating Chat Reference Dr. John V. Richardson Jr. UCLA Professor of Information Studies LSSI Presidential.
Online Virtual Chat Library Reference Service: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Dr. Dave Harmeyer Associate Professor Chair, Marshburn Memorial.
Improving Accuracy and User Satisfaction in the Digital Reference Environment: The 2002 LITA National Forum, Houston Dr. John V. Richardson Jr. UCLA Professor.
Reference Assessment Programs: Evaluating Current and Future Reference Services Dr. John V. Richardson Jr. Professor of Information Studies UCLA Department.
What is Ask Us 24/7? Live Chat Reference – patrons can chat one-on-one with a librarian in real time......
October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Analysis of WOREP Results for Mabee Library.
INFO 624 Week 3 Retrieval System Evaluation
How Assessment Will Inform Our Future 1. Administration of on-going user surveys and focus groups to enhance reference services 2. Analysis of LibStats.
Correlation “A statistician is someone who loves to work with numbers but doesn't have the personality to be an accountant.”
1 Multiple class queueing networks Mean Value Analysis - Open queueing networks - Closed queueing networks.
State of the Library Technology1 Digital Reference at UCLA May 14, 2002.
1 Doing Statistics for Business Doing Statistics for Business Data, Inference, and Decision Making Marilyn K. Pelosi Theresa M. Sandifer Chapter 7 Sampling.
Richardson/DIS 2002 Training and Coordination for Chat Reference: UCLA’s DIS 245 Virtual Reference Training Experience Dr. John V. Richardson Jr. UCLA.
Presented by Beverly Choltco-Devlin Reference and Electronic Resources Consultant Mid-York Library System September 25, 2009 REVVED UP FOR REFERENCE CONFERENCE.
Determining the Size of
Why We Need It In a Small Residential College The Plan The Reality What We Hope to Accomplish What We Have Learned So Far Unexpected Benefits Statistics.
Call Center to Contact Center 1 Contact Center Organizational Chart 2 Donna Stone Buchanan Chief Operating Officer Outreach Marketing Manager Database.
PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT ON MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE (A CASE STUDY ON HEALTH CENTERS) 8/16/20151 Dr. Anna Nswilla CDHSMoHSW.
Call Center Terminologies
TNS Proprietary: © Linking Employee Compensation to Survey Metrics High-Level Considerations and Best Practices January, 2006.
Trends in Online Publishing New Pricing Models for 2003 as Online Dominates Print John Ben DeVette Asst. Vice President EBSCO Information Services November.
. Is it statistical? Dot plots and mean Median, Mode, and Best Measure of Central Tendency Range, Quartiles, and IQR Outlier and Mean Absolute Deviation.
Determining Sample Size
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
Chapter 8 – Further Applications of Integration 8.5 Probability 1Erickson.
EmEx-Compare Emergency Department Benchmarking Improve ED Performance Benchmark your ED to similar EDs and best practices Measure your performance on.
Economics Basics Demand and Supply.
JDS Special Program: Pre-training1 Basic Statistics 01 Describing Data.
Seminar on MEASURES OF DISPERSION
Seeking Sustainability & Singularity: Evaluating Virtual Reference From User, Non-user, & Librarian Perspectives Presented by Marie L. Radford and Lynn.
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Research & Statistics Looking for Conclusions. Statistics Mathematics is used to organize, summarize, and interpret mathematical data 2 types of statistics.
"How Do I Assess That?“ Digital Reference Cynthia Johnson, UC Irvine Libraries California Academic Reference Librarians Discussion Interest Group-South.
CEDISC Thipsuda KITJAPIPAT Thailand, DBA Intake 4 9 April 2009 How well can SERVQUAL explain customer satisfaction, complaint behavior and commitment in.
Capacity Planning Tool Jeffery K. Cochran, PhD Kevin T. Roche, MS.
How to Request Materials Tutorial Order, Borrow, Renew made easy (expected running time: ~7 minutes) Oregon State Library.
OFII Guarantee Fees Survey Results & Findings The survey was conducted across our entire membership and we received thirty three responses. Any references.
Extending Access To Information Resource Discovery Service William E. Moen, Ph.D. Kathleen R. Murray, Ph.D. School of Library and Information Sciences.
Welcome Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Library.
A Moment of Time: Reliability in Route Choice using Stated Preference David M. Levinson Nebiyou Y. Tilahun Department of Civil Engineering University of.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 8 Capacity, Scheduling, and Location Planning.
Measuring the impact of Technology on Quality of Services and Operations in an Academic Library Ashok Kumar Sahu Senior Librarian, IIMT Gulam Rasul Asst.
Approximating the Performance of Call Centers with Queues using Loss Models Ph. Chevalier, J-Chr. Van den Schrieck Université catholique de Louvain.
L643: Evaluation of Information Systems Week 13: March, 2008.
2010 Survey of 9 th Grade GPHS Students Peter G. Mohn, LMS June 2010.
Getting Help and Doing Research: What do patrons want? An exploratory study comparing VR users with Desk users OLA Super Conference, 2005 Diane Granfield,
Khristine vera alcance Melissa ann d. callejo MODELS OF REFERENCE SERVICE.
Chapter. 3: Retrieval Evaluation 1/2/2016Dr. Almetwally Mostafa 1.
Cañada Noel-Levitz Results Spring 2010 Semester. What is the Noel-Levitz Survey? National survey of students conducted by hundreds of colleges every year.
1 Malawi Public Expenditure Review: Road Sector 21 November 2007.
Presentation on “Technology used by university student”
Managerial Decision Making Chapter 13 Queuing Models.
Instructions for CATS Independence Tool
CARL-N Mini-conference Students and Faculty Perspectives: Are We Engaged Yet? Presented by Yuhfen Diana Wu Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library San Jose.
Chapter Measures of Variation 3.3 Measures of Variation Bank waiting times In the first bank, the manager carefully controls waiting times by changing.
Customer Flow ManagementCustomer Flow Management helps organizations adopt a consumer-centric perspective that begins when a customer enters the door.
Cheryl Ng Ling Hui Hee Jee Mei, Ph.D Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Grad OS Course Project Kevin Kastner Xueheng Hu
Connecting with Remote Patrons Using 2.o Widget and Wiki
RFID TECHNOLOGY AT MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: A CASE STUDY
Sreenidhi Institute of Science & Technology, Hyderabad
Co-Curricular Hours vs. Homework Hours
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Presentation transcript:

Richardson/DIS 2002 Are They Willing to Wait and What If They Do? An Analysis of Virtual Reference Service Dr. John V. Richardson Jr. UCLA Professor of Information Studies LSSI Presidential Scholar VRD Chicago, 12 November 2002

Richardson/DIS 2002 Presentation Outline LSSI’s Virtual Reference Toolkit Wait Queues and Standards Service Duration and Standards Subsequent User Satisfaction Further Readings

Richardson/DIS 2002 LSSI’s Virtual Reference Toolkit LSSI’s software version 2.5 captures time in queue, service duration, the entire virtual reference transaction (which can be to the user at the end), and presents a user satisfaction survey at the end of every query. SOURCE: login at or try the live demonstration while you are here at VRD and at

Richardson/DIS 2002 Wait Queues Waiting time or time in queue can be measured as the number of seconds the user waits before the reference librarian joins the chat. Average values can be determined for all users, by types of library, or for a specific library Outliers equal more than 900 seconds (ie, 15 minutes) Negative values and missing values dropped from calculations

Richardson/DIS 2002 Service Standard for Queues Call centers, including bank and telephone companies, have adopted varying service standards Ranging from thirty (N=30) seconds to as little as ten (N=10) seconds; the first standard requires less staff, the other more…

Richardson/DIS 2002 More on Queuing Standards Most common standard is eighty (N=80) percent answered within twenty (N=20) seconds; stated as 80/20 or even easier standard of 80/30 seconds WHY? Because it is thought that decreasing wait times result in higher user satisfaction Standard deviation (SD) is a measure of how closely the data clusters around the mean…think of it as centrality or dispersion

Richardson/DIS 2002 Time in Queue by Library All Types Lib 41.8 seconds Academic Lib A 41.5 seconds Consortia C 53.7 seconds The goal is 30 seconds or even the more demanding 20 seconds! SD /30: 76%; 80/20: 63% SD /30: 72%; 80/20: 57% SD /30:65%; 80/20: 52% What if the goal were 100% of all questions?

Richardson/DIS 2002 Staffing Considerations Once one knows the queuing time, one can allocation staffing to the virtual reference center Using Erlang C or Pollaczek-Khintchine formulas Thereby helping to set user expectations because otherwise a certain percentage of users will not be satisfied…

Richardson/DIS 2002 Dr. Jon Anton at Purdue University “Our entire database across all industries indicated that US call centers answer 80% of all calls in an average of 42 seconds.” SOURCE:

Richardson/DIS 2002 So, What?… It appears, based on nearly 20,000 real transactions that libraries, of any type, are not staffing virtual reference service adequately, even if one wishes to adopt a relative easier standard, e.g., the 80/30 rule… On the other hand, libraries are doing slightly better than the average of all industries, according to Purdue University’s database

Richardson/DIS 2002 Service Duration Service duration can be defined as the amount of time, in seconds, spent in a chat with a user’s query. Average values can be determined for all users, by types of library, or for a specific library Outliers equal more than 3600 seconds (i.e., 1 hour) Negative values and missing values dropped from calculations

Richardson/DIS 2002 Service Duration Standards Willingness to answer the query… Librarian satisfaction, not significant Client satisfaction, not significant Answering success, weak association SOURCE: Whitlatch (1990); only one study, though…

Richardson/DIS 2002 More Duration Standards The research literature suggests average time spent on live, face-to-face reference transactions in public libraries ranges from twenty (N=20) to forty (N=40) minutes Academic library users may spend ten (N=10) to twenty (N=20) minutes with reference librarians SOURCE: Mary De Jong (1926); Herbert Goldhor (1967); Charles Bunge (1969; 1990); Whitlatch (1990); John Stalker (1996)

Richardson/DIS 2002 Service Duration by Library All libraries 11.2 minutes Acad Lib A 8.9 minutes Acad Lib B 14.1 minutes Cons. C 12.3 minutes SD 10.8 minutes SD 9.1 minutes SD 14.2 minutes SD 11.1 minutes

Richardson/DIS 2002 User Satisfaction Based on a thorough review of more than 1,000 citations ( Matthew Schall (Vice President, Unifocus) and John Richardson have developed: PaSS ™, Patron Satisfaction Survey SOURCE:

Richardson/DIS 2002 PaSS ™, Patron Satisfaction Survey 7-point Likert scale ranging from very … to average to very …: Comprehension of the question Friendliness (i.e., very friendly, average, very unfriendly) Helpfulness Promptness Self-reported satisfaction with the process SOURCE:

Richardson/DIS 2002 Further Readings Matthew Saxton and John Richardson, Understanding Reference Transactions: Transforming an Art into A Science (New York: Academic Press, 2002) 1,000 citations at Matthew Schall and John Richardson, "What LSSI has Done to Measure Satisfaction with the Virtual Reference Tool Kit," by Dr. Matthew Schall, Unifocus and John V. Richardson Jr., Presidential Scholar, LSSI; Germantown, MD: Library Systems and Services LLC, 17 April 2002.