Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design - In Search of Better Investment Decisions - Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration Executive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B/C Ratio Engr. Faisal-ur-Rehman CED N-W.F.P UET P.
Advertisements

A Primer on Benefit-Cost Analysis Presented to: The Reclaimed Water Technical Committee June 2, 2006 By Bruce Flory, Ph. D. Seattle Public Utilities.
Executive Session Office of Asset Management
AD/AB - LCCA 2 nd Session Wednesday, January 29th.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions Presented by: Hank Bonstedt Executive Director Prestressed.
Chapter 10 Project Cash Flows and Risk
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
1 Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Life Cycle Cost Analysis Virginia Concrete Conference March 6-7, 2014.
Value for Money Edward Farquharson 12 May Agenda Development of the UK’s approach to ex ante VfM assessment Ex post VfM assessment Some observations.
February Offerred by: C.E. Brockway Brockway Engineering Jim Brannon Leonard Rice Engineers, Inc John Koreny HDR Inc Willem Schreuder Principia.
Castellanza, 20 th October and 3 rd November, 2010 FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION. Corporate Finance.
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding Virginia Concrete Conference Richmond, VA March 6, 2014.
FHWA Life Cycle Costs Analysis and Pavement Type Selection Guidance Maryland Concrete 2014 Conference March 18, 2014.
Steve Krebs, Bob Arndorfer, and Jed Peters – DTSD-Bureau of Technical Services April 29, 2013.
Evaluating Decision Support Systems Projects. Who Evaluates Technical Managers  Chief Information Officer,  Corporate IT professionals,  Database administrators,
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
MIT Research: Effects of Inflation and Volatility on Construction Alternatives.
MIT Research: Effects of Inflation and Volatility on Construction Alternatives.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Chapter 14 Risk and Uncertainty Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today’s Decision Makers, 4/e By Paul Keat and Philip Young.
Value Engineering. Definition Value Engineering (VE) is defined as a systematic process of review and analysis of a project, during the concept and design.
Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL.
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
Choosing Statistical Procedures
Benefit Cost Analysis Nathaniel D. Coley Jr
Benjamin Krom, PE Michigan Department of Transportation.
Using Value for Money Analysis to Evaluate Highway Public-Private Partnership Projects ARTBA P3 Conference Washington, DC, July 15-17, 2015 Patrick DeCorla-Souza,
© Harry Campbell & Richard Brown School of Economics The University of Queensland BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets.
Chapter 7 Project Cash Flows and Risk © 2005 Thomson/South-Western.
RTI,Chennai Learning Objective Given the concepts of Decision Analysis, Option Pricing and Investment Decisions, the trainee will be able to audit the.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
Managing Organizations Informed decision making as a prerequisite for success Action Vision Mission Organizational Context Policies, Goals, and Objectives.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions.
Transportation Asset Management Presented by: Eric Gabler Economist, Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.
Life Cycle Cost Model Update Preliminary Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee January 4, 2007 Stephanie Hoffman and Keenan Konopaski.
Evaluating Investments in Information Technology Shannon Crump December 9, 2002 ISM 6021.
Risk Assessment and Management. Objective To enable an organisation mission accomplishment, by better securing the IT systems that store, process, or.
Portfolio Management Unit – II Session No. 13 Topic: Introduction to Asset Allocation Unit – II Session No. 13 Topic: Introduction to Asset Allocation.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
1 Managerial Economics Fundamental Economic Concepts Marginal analysis: Analyse the additional (marginal) benefit of any decision and compare it with additional.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
2013 NWHA CONFERENCE FERC’S RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING Doug Johnson – Regional Engineer - Portland From PFMA to Risk Assessment.
AMERICA’S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Mort Anvari 1 Cost Risk and Uncertainty Analysis MORS Special Meeting | September.
Welcome to Session 3 – Project Management Process Overview
Chapter 14: Using the Scalable Decision Process on Large Projects The process outlined is meant to be scaleable. Individual steps can be removed, changed,
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Capital Budgeting 13.
Ch 10 - Risk Management Learning Objectives You should be able to: List and describe risk management processes, inputs, outputs, and tools List and describe.
Inferential Statistics A Closer Look. Analyze Phase2 Nature of Inference in·fer·ence (n.) “The act or process of deriving logical conclusions from premises.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Project quality management. Introduction Project quality management includes the process required to ensure that the project satisfies the needs for which.
Capital Expenditure Decisions Chapter 16 Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA)
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) of Buildings
Risk Analysis in Capital Budgeting. Nature of Risk Risk exists because of the inability of the decision-maker to make perfect forecasts. the risk associated.
BLOCK 4 SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Pavement Data Collection Project evaluation Select feasible alternatives Reconstruction Restoration Recycling.
Software Project Management
Using Discounted Cash Flow Analysis to Make Investment Decisions Project Analysis By : Else Fernanda, SE.Ak., M.Sc. ICFI.
PAVEMENT TYPE SELECTION Hesham Mahgoub, PhD, PE. South Dakota State University South Dakota Department of Transportation, Office of Road Design.
Approaches to quantifying uncertainty-related risk There are three approaches to dealing with financial and economic risk in benefit-cost analysis: = expected.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Program Evaluation- Measuring Performance or Performance Measurements? Dr. Thomason Unit 3 Kaplan University.
Part I Project Initiation.
Life-Cycle Costing for Innovative Pavement Preservation Treatments
Project risk management
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding
Presentation transcript:

Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design - In Search of Better Investment Decisions - Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration Executive Session

FHWA LCCA Methodology Steps 1.Establish Design Alternatives 2.Determine Activity Timing 3.Estimate Agency and User Costs 4.Compute Life-Cycle Costs 5.Analyze the Results

Inputs are discrete or point values Initial costs are $11M The discount rate is 4% Outputs are discrete Alternative “A” total cost = $20.5M Alternative “B” total cost = $26.0M Deterministic Approach

Deterministic Limitations n Doesn’t Address: l Statistical Significance l Variability n Subject to Manipulation n Lacks Credibility

 Captures the uncertainty in the inputs,  Carries that uncertainty through the computation process to generate a  Probability distribution of result (a range of possible outcomes along with their likely hood of occurrence). Probabilistic Approach

$ % Inputs Net Present Value Results MODELMODEL Simulation Modeling

Deterministic Approach Project cost estimate is $12 million Probabilistic Approach 75 percent chance the project will cost $12 million or less. LCCA Results

 Accounting for variability in inputs: Activity timing, costs, discount rate  Quantitatively determines risk in alternative strategy selection  Elevates the decision from questioning the inputs to discussing the merits of each alternative Role of Probability in LCCA

Agency NPV B A Frequency Net Present Value

Advantages  More Informed Decisions Evaluate all possible outcomes Expose areas of uncertainty...Quantify risk Determine significance of difference between alternatives Examine influence of underlying variables on final results Provide those vested with appropriate authority the opportunity to make decisions about risk taking

Benefits of LCCA Software  Performs LCCA as per FHWA best practice  Requires same data inputs as manual process  Better, faster & cheaper analysis  Automates user cost process

Software Data Input

Software Outputs

4. Why Use LCCA  Requirements  FHWA’s Philosophy  Benefits of LCCA

LCCA Requirements NHS Designation Act (1995) Required States to conduct LCCA of each NHS high cost ($25M or more) useable project segment. TEA-21 (1998) Eliminated this requirement.

FHWA Philosophy LCCA:  Decision support tool  Results are not decisions  Rigorous analytical process can be as important as the results

Benefits of LCCA  Better information for decisions  Improved rehabilitation strategies  Consideration of user costs  Support for overcoming the “first cost” limitations

FHWA LCCA Guidance n LCCA Software n LCCA Primer, Technical Bulletin DP-115 l

5. Management’s Role  Management Support for Development and Application of LCCA.  Develop LCCA Guidelines including Recommendations on Input Values

Management Support n Requires “buy-in” of risk management by senior executives n Technical Champion n Top management support

Developing Guidelines n Analysis Periods n Type of Dollars…Treatment of Inflation n Type and Value of Discount Rates n Treatment of User Cost n Value assigned to user delay time n Choice of Economic indicator n Remaining service Life n Ignore Sunk Cost

Developing Guidelines n Analysis Periods n Type of Dollars…Treatment of Inflation n Type and Value of Discount Rates n Treatment of User Cost n Value assigned to user delay time n Choice of Economic indicator n Remaining service Life n Ignore Sunk Cost

FHWA Recommends Real dollars and a real discount rate - do not account for inflation A real discount rate range of 3% to 5% Never mix real and nominal (inflation adjusted) costs and discount rate Discounting … a mechanism for quantifying the time value of money Developing Guidelines

Observations : n Traffic grows over time n Queuing cost dominate n Hourly distributions key n $ Value of time has a major influence n Normal VOC between alternatives negligible Developing Guidelines User Costs are calculated through a capacity analysis.

Passenger Vehicle $10 - $13 Single Unit Truck $17 - $19 Combo Truck $21 - $24 Value of Time Recommendations... Developing Guidelines 1996 Dollars

Things to Remember n LCCA Decision Support Tool n NHS LCCA Requirements n Document Inputs n Dispose of all Issues n Provide Confidence Information