LIGO-G020169-00-M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO - G R 1 HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI David Ottaway November 2005 LIGO-G Z.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
LIGO-G M LIGO - The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory Vibration and Facility Considerations (incomplete) Dennis Coyne TMT Vibration.
LIGO-G D Detector Installation and Commissioning Stan Whitcomb NSF Annual Review 30 April 2001 Caltech.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Update: the View from Caltech Phil Willems LIGO/Caltech Livingston LSC Meeting March 17-20, 2003.
Payload design methods versus modeling E. Majorana.
LIGO-G D Evaluation of EPI Approaches Dennis Coyne 18 April 2003 EPI Design Review #2.
1 S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O John Worden, Richard McCarthy, Doug Cook, Hugh Radkins, LHO Josh Dalrymple, SU I.Pre-S4 “fixes”
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
Dennis Coyne Excomm Jan 26, 2004
Status of the LIGO Project
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
F. Frasconi I.N.F.N. Pisa for the Virgo Collaboration TAUP2007 Sendai, September 11-15, 2007 VIRGO EXPERIMENT VIRGO: a large interferometer for Gravitational.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G W Raab: Searching for Gravitational Waves w/ LIGO1 Why Has Duty Cycle Been Lower in Livingston.
S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O I.Pre-S4 “fixes” II.Some S4 veto issues III. Early coupling results from S4 PEM injections.
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
Nov ’01, page 1 Current Work on Hydraulics for LIGO 1 and Advanced LIGO Rich Abbott, Graham Allen, Daniel DeBra, Joe Giaime, Giles Hammond, Marcel Hammond,
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
Investigation of the influence of suspended optic’s motion on LIGO detector sensitivity Sanichiro Yoshida Southeastern Louisiana University.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO1 Mass Limits & Balancing Dennis Coyne Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication Bidder’s.
LIGO-G M 1 Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Dennis Coyne LIGO Seminar March 29, 2002.
LIGO-G D 1 MEPI electroMagnetic External Pre-Isolator Backup alternative to the Hydraulic actuator approach Goal: maximum commonality with HEPI.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
Advanced LIGO Commissioning Overview Stanford LVC Meeting, August 27, 2014 Peter Fritschel.
LIGO-G D Commissioning PAC11, 2001 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G v1 The LIGO Vacuum System and plans for LIGO-Australia Stan Whitcomb IndIGO - ACIGA meeting on LIGO-Australia 9 February 2011.
LIGO-G D Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 14 June 2001 Caltech.
ILIAS GW Meeting Mallorca - October 23-24, 2005Luca Taffarello Status of the commissioning of the AURIGA detector Luca Taffarello (INFN Sezione di Padova)
LIGO-G W Commissioning and Performance of the LIGO Interferometers Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
SUSPENSIONS Pisa S.Braccini C.Bradaschia R.Cavalieri G.Cella V.Dattilo A.Di Virgilio F.Fidecaro F.Frasconi A.Gennai G.Gennaro A.Giazotto L.Holloway F.Paoletti.
LIGO-G D Commissioning, Part II PAC 12, June 2002 Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT.
Minimizing the Resonant Frequency of MGAS Springs for Seismic Attenuation System in Low Frequency Gravitational Waves Interferometers Maddalena Mantovani,
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
LIGO Commissioning Status
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
LIGO-G D Commissioning and Detector Plans Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 6 June 2003 Caltech.
LIGO-G W LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
The control of the Virgo Superattenuator: present and future Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze/Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G D Detector Installation and Commissioning Stan Whitcomb NSF Operations Review 26 February 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
23/7/2003LIGO Document G C1 LIGO S2 Overview Philip Charlton California Institute of Technology On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
LIGO-G D Commissioning P Fritschel LIGO NSF review, 23 October 2002 M.I.T.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Vibration issues at Linear Colliders:
Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
LCGT Seismic Attenuation System LCGT-SAS
BSC HEPI Pier Amplification
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
LIGO Detector Commissioning
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002

LIGO-G M 2 Problem l Ground motion at LLO with the initial LIGO seismic isolation system makes it impossible to hold the interferometers locked reliably during the day » Steady-state ambient noise is higher due to anthropogenic sources » Transients, particularly from logging l Wind induced seismic noise at LHO: » exceeds locking threshold at ~25 mph, or 10% of the time » Expect that up-conversion is a problem at significantly lower wind speeds & a large fraction of the time l Upgrade is required to allow both reliable locking and to allow better noise performance while locked » Need 90% duty cycle & lock durations > 40 hours » Need to reduce noise in the control band (< 40 Hz) to permit a smaller suspension actuator authority & lower noise » Suppression in the 1-3 Hz band is most important due to excitation of the lower stack modes (Q ~ 30)

LIGO-G M 3 Scope Includes interim solution with Fine Actuation Systems on TM chambers at LLO (known as PEPI) Conceptual design for a retrofit to the installed seismic isolation systems »BSC & HAM chambers »Focused on solution for the LLO environment Decision on number/scope of retrofitted systems at LLO is dependent on further study »baseline assumption is implementation of full solution on all chambers with suspended optics Decision on the number/scope of retrofitted systems at LHO is dependent on further study »Could adopt same solution for LHO »Baseline assumption is the addition of Fine Actuation Systems (FAS) & the PEPI system to TM and MC chambers

LIGO-G M 4 Initial Vibration Isolation Systems HAM Chamber BSC Chamber »Reduce in-band seismic motion by orders of magnitude »Little or no attenuation below 10Hz; amplification at stack mode resonances »Large range actuation for initial alignment and drift compensation »Quiet actuation to correct for Earth tides and microseism at 0.15 Hz during observation

LIGO-G M 5 Seismic System Performance Horizontal Vertical HAM stack in air BSC stack in vacuum

LIGO-G M 6 Active External Pre-Isolation (EPI) & Active Internal Damping (AID)

LIGO-G M 7 Alternate Approaches

LIGO-G M 8 Planned Initial Detector Modifications HAM BSC

LIGO-G M 9 Active Internal Damping (AID) System Layout Passive isolation stacks are above the support table AID support is Isolated by the EPI system