The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities At Glasgow High School.
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Team Teaching Section 2: Traditional Team Teaching.
PROJECT SPELL Sustainable Practices for English Language Learners Western Oregon University with Salem-Keizer School District & Woodburn School District.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Mathematics Developmental Education in Texas Institutions of Higher Education Survey of Best Practices Adoption January 2003 Texas Higher Education Coordinating.
Group Seminar Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of.
Connect and Collaborate: A Career Continuum Approach Utah Mentor Academy Sydnee Dickson Director, Teaching and Learning USOE.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Facilitator Training Program
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Agenda Overview Problems of Practice – (same triads) – Break School Visits – Personal reflection – Partner share Research overview On PLCs and the connection.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
Embedding Experiential Learning at Lorain County Community College Ohio Means Internships and Co-ops CLAUDIA A. LUBASKI, CPA, CMA, CFE ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR.
Copyright © 2004 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education 1 Community College Pathways to Improved Teacher.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Building Capacity in Chinese and Arabic Pam Delfosse World Languages Education Consultant Claire Kotenbeutel Critical Language Fellows Project Consultant.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
ASSESSING CANDIDATE PERFORMANCE William Sharpton Richard Hall University of New Orleans Project Directors’ Meeting July 2007.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Klein Independent School District Technology Integration Mentor Program Moving from learning to use technology...to using technology to learn Ann McMullan,
2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Learnings from Classroom Connections Findings and Conclusions from Two Studies on the Statewide Laptop Initiative Dr. Wade Pogany – South Dakota DOE –
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
LA LEADS Summer Conference July 25, Discussion Topics GLEEM Overview Preview of Modules Region I Spotlight Training Schedule Questions and.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
PROF190 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES. Questions to consider: 1. What is a professional learning community?
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.
Copyright © 2005 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education 1 Stevens-NJ Community College Strategic Partnership.
+ Copyright © 2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Smaldino, Lowther, and Russell Instructional Technology and Media for Learning, 10e.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
Gain an interdisciplinary perspective on how faculty from other units approach teaching and learning Expand knowledge of teaching strategies Acquire the.
Learning Sciences International Develops and provides the 21 st Century Teaching & Learning Series for the CFF initiative. Provides the e MBEDDED L EARNING.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
A 5-year Continuous Improvement Plan for RFHS. 73% CTAE enrollment (82% for Henry County) 8 CTAE clusters, plus WBL Considering closing Family Consumer.
Pathways Project Evaluation Objective #1: To change classroom pedagogy and improve the ability of faculty to effectively integrate Internet-based tools.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Recent Graduate Interviews: Preliminary Feedback on Teacher Preparation Programs What’s Works/Best Practices Hayley M Cavino, Evaluation Coordinator Office.
Welcome Back to Day Two Q and A Professional Learning Communities SMART Goals Mission Statement for improving parent-school relations Book Study “ The.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Learning Management System (LMS) /Course Management System (CMS) & Digital Portfolio.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Presentation transcript:

The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY (PT 3 ) Evaluation Findings

Professional Learning Communities Integrating Technology into Local Research Problems Project CAT Project PATTHS Project CROAK Project Sumo Robot

CWU Professional Learning Community Characteristics “Just in time” technology learning Assessment of progress Reflectivepractice Integrated curricula CWU content faculty members Mentor teachers Yearlong interns Community partners Community -based research problem

Evaluation Activities  Annual interviews with participants, focus groups  Annual site visits  Faculty, teacher, and yearlong intern surveys gathered data on attitudes toward teaching and technology as well as use of digital tools  Syllabi review (pre-post PT3 implementation)  Pre-post survey for students in first year of e- portfolio use  Interview study with Ed. Tech. faculty members

Findings on Development of PLCs  Created high interest in integrating curricula – Novel and challenging at high school level  Teams mostly integrated 2 content areas –Faced challenges of time necessary to develop integrated lessons and curricula  Technology integration raised interest levels for students and teachers –Recognized learning new technologies also requires time for training and practice

Reported Value of the K-12—CWU Collaboration  Mentor teachers strengthened: –Content knowledge –Technology skills –Relationships with other teachers –Connections with CWU faculty members  Provided mentors and interns with: –Time to reflect on practice –Time to learn and integrate technology into teaching –Greater access to and use of digital tools

K-12—CWU Collaboration  CWU Faculty members: –Gained a better understanding of the K- 12 contexts –Folded K-12 experience at PLCs into course and field work (site visits, assignments, practica) –Strengthened ties with other CWU faculty members –Increased attention to integrating technology into coursework

Intern Benefits of the Yearlong Placement and PLC Involvement  Yearlong Interns: –Increased confidence in the classroom and with technology use –Gained greater familiarity with students, scope of a year’s content, and school/classroom procedures –Learned strategies mentor teachers use to teach specific content through the year –Built professional relationships beyond their mentor teacher

Additional Benefits of PLC Involvement  Mentor teachers: –PT 3 project brought more technology into their classrooms –Increased interest in using technology and content integration to conduct project-based research –Built professional relationships with community partners and university colleagues –Raised interest in securing funding to sustain work

PLC to University Coursework Translation  Most PT 3 professors gained proficiency in PLC-related IT tools (74% reported gains in tech. skills through grant)  Increased number of student assignments that were interdisciplinary, authentic, and required technology components  50% added student field components directly involving work with PLC sites  Increased use of technology in campus course instruction (63% increase of instructor use of technology in teaching)  Increased expectations for student technology use in coursework  Facilitated interdisciplinary collaboration among faculty members among faculty members

Syllabi Analysis of Change in Matched Sets Time 1-Time 2

Faculty Survey Findings  Technologically savvy group who gained additional skills  Capable of serving as tech. problem solvers for self and others  High knowledge and skill levels using a variety of IT tools

University Faculty Survey Results for Learning Community-related Subscales

University Faculty Survey Results for Technology-related Subscales

Facilitating Conditions  Good match between yearlong interns, teacher mentors, and project goals  Proximity of school to participants  Time to work within PLCs during the summer session  Administrative, school board, and community support at the K-12 schools  Communication of clear expectations between all participants  Leveraging resources  Selective process for project involvement  Common digital tools at K-12 schools and CWU

Effective Strategies Used to Expand Project Impact on Campus  Involved more colleagues and students through introduction of e-portfolios on campus  Carved out time to work on project activities and integrate project work into teaching through project retreats and release time  Regular meetings to communicate expectations, activities, successes  Applied technology skills as quickly as possible after training (just in time)  Learned from each other, shared effective strategies

Overall Impact 4 PLCs on local research problems created with high potential for continued collaboration 4 PLCs on local research problems created with high potential for continued collaboration PT 3 faculty members redesigned curricula, increased IT skills, and collaborated with PLC sites PT 3 faculty members redesigned curricula, increased IT skills, and collaborated with PLC sites Year-long interns integrated content and technology, and became confident technology learners Year-long interns integrated content and technology, and became confident technology learners Increased IT integration in teacher preparation through e-portfolios Increased IT integration in teacher preparation through e-portfolios

For additional information contact: Phyllis Campbell Ault