The SENTRY antimicrobial resistance surveillance program is designed to track antimicrobial resistance trends nationally and internationally through a.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Advertisements

Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Glove Use to Prevent Infections in Preterm Infants Kaufman DA, Blackman A, Conaway.
Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus on the Door Handles of Assisted Living versus Independent Living Resident’s Rooms in a Retirement Facility Benson,
Recent Trends in Gonorrhea in the United States Lori M. Newman, MD Division of STD Prevention CDC Jacksonville, FL May 9, 2006.
Antibiogram in Washoe County Nevada – Know the Local Data, Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Lei Chen, Ph.D., Senior Epidemiologist, Washoe County.
Comparison of Bacterial Etiology of Infectious Corneal Ulcers in Contact Lens Wearers and Non-Contact Lens Wearers at the University of Chicago Shuchi.
Enoch Omonge University of Nairobi
Role of the laboratory in disease surveillance
Seasonal Variation in the Prevalence of Coagulase-Positive Staphylococcus aureus Among College Students ( ) Megan Branche Dr. Carolyn Mathur, Mentor.
1. Fung-Tomc J, Minassian B, Kloek B, et al. (2000). Antibacterial spectrum of a novel des-Fluoro (6) quinolone, BMS Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
المضادات الحيوية.....الى أين؟ اليوم العلمي Presented by: Dalia qishawi Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens Isolated.
ABSTRACT Background: BMS (BMSQ) is a novel des-fluoro(6)-quinolone with antimicrobial activity similar to recently developed fluoroquinolones. The.
Prevalence of Self-Reported Obesity Among U.S. Adults by State and Territory Definitions  Obesity: Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher.  Body Mass.
Staphylococcal Bacteremia and Endocarditis: Epidemiological Considerations March 6, 2006 John Edwards, Jr., M.D Professor of Medicine UCLA School of Medicine.
CHOICE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN THE VIEW OF DEVELOPING ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE Dr. Jolanta Miciulevičienė Vilnius City Clinical Hospital National Public Health.
NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS Phase 1: Testing the efficacy of Nano-Mg (OH) 2 Dorothea A. Dillman PhD, RN, CCRN, LNC.
Methods Revised Abstract Methods Results TP-271 is a Potent, Broad-Spectrum Fluorocycline with Activity Against Community-Acquired Bacterial Respiratory.
Desirable Surveillance Network National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center Locations Regularly Performing.
Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance at Sihanouk Hospital Center of HOPE ( ) Phe Thong, MD; Erika Vlieghe, MD PhD; Lim Kruy, MD; Veng Chhunheng,
PAHO Pan American Health Organization Pan American Sanitary Bureau Regional Office for the Americas for the World Health Organization.
1 Significant pairwise comparisons based on a Bonferroni overall significance level of α = Parameter estimates for the interactions were examined.
Antibiotic & Antibacterial Resistance of Skin Bacteria from Users & Non- Users of Antibacterial Wash Products Eugene C. Cole, DrPH Brigham Young University.
Vesicle-Mediated Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance Between Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens Ondraya Espenshade Department of Biological Sciences,
E. faecalis continues to be the most prevalent enterococcal species (56-76% by region) followed by E. faecium, Table 1. Table 2 shows the generally stable.
Adham Abu Taha, PhD Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine Antimicrobial resistance.
E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis accounted for more than 25% of all bacterial samples isolated from the Asian-Pacific region. The ESBL phenotype.
NCCLS (1997) Approved standard M27-A. Rex JH et al. Clin Infect Dis (1997) 24: Pfaller M. A., et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis (1999); 35:19-25.
Aims of study This surveillance study was performed to determine the in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and.
Comparison of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome between Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Pseudomonas aeruginosa Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections.
ABSTRACT Background: BMS (BMS) is a novel des-F(6)-quinolone with activity against many Enterobacteriaceae, non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli,
JT Kirby, DJ Biedenbach, RN Jones, SENTRY Participants Group Univ of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; The JONES Group/JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA Poster #
Welcome To Journal Club Presented by: Dr. Aminul Islam Lecturer of Microbiology, MMC.
Division of Public Health CRE Surveillance and Prevention of Transmission in Healthcare Settings Gwen Borlaug, CIC, MPH Coordinator, Healthcare-Associated.
ECDC-EMEA Joint Technical Report Part I: Trends and burden of antimicrobial resistance in the European Union Zsuzsanna Jakab, Director European Centre.
Antimicrobial Resistance patterns among nosocomial gram negative bacilli by E-test and disc diffusion methods in Sina and Imam Hospital.
김의종(집필대표), 강정옥, 김미나, 김민중, 김성일, 이경원, 이도현, 이장호, 이남용, 이창규, 신종희, 장철훈, 최혜심
WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE 1 Analysis and Comparison of Cumulative Statewide Antibiograms for Wisconsin, 2006 and 2008 Christina M. Carlson.
Listing Antimicrobial Resistant Pathogens of Public Health Importance Implications for Drug Development Listing Antimicrobial Resistant Pathogens of Public.
Figure 1 shows the 10 most frequently isolated blood pathogens in these hospitals from 1997 through These species represent about 85% of blood isolates.
References Summary Background Quality Control Parameters for Omadacycline Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Susceptibility Tests Using Fresh Media.
Antimicrobial Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae Implications for Prescription Drug Labeling John H. Powers, MD Lead Medical Officer Antimicrobial.
Clinical and bacterial characteristics in Danish adults with pleural empyema Karin Armbruster, Christian Niels Meyer, Michael Kemp, Trine Rolighed Thomsen,
Points for Discussion Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting March 5, 2003.
EARS-Net data on Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland, Q3 2015
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research March 6, 2005 Bacteremia and Endocarditis: Products and Guidance Janice Soreth, MD Director Division of Anti-Infective.
MICROBIOLOGICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY OF RESPIRATORY SPECIMENS IN ICU PATIENTS Dr Farooq Cheema, Dr Waseem Tariq, Dr Raja Ishtiaq, Dr Tabassum Qureshi, Dr Vincent.
EARS-Net data on antimicrobial resistance in Ireland Quarter st March 2016.
REVISED ABSTRACT Background: Omadacycline (OMC) is the first of a new class of tetracyclines, the aminomethylcyclines, and is being developed as a once-daily.
Phage therapy for the treatment for urinary tract infection: Results of in-vitro screenings and in-vivo application using commercially available bacteriophage.
Multi-Resistant Gram Negative Microorganisms St Elisabeth Hospital Curacao.
1 A clinico-microbiological study of diabetic foot ulcers in an Indian tertiary care hospital DIABETES Care; Aug 2006; 29,8 : FM R1 임혜원.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2012;55(6):764–70 Jan Vydra,1 Ryan M. Shanley,2 Ige George,1 Celalettin Ustun,1 Angela R. Smith,4 Daniel J. Weisdorf,1 and.
Using Nursing Home Antibiograms To Improve Antibiotic Prescribing and Delivery Training Slides for Nursing Home Nurses Comprehensive Antibiogram Toolkit.
Changing Epidemiology of Adult Bacterial Meningitis in Southern Taiwan: A Hospital-Based Study Infection 2008; 36: 15–22 W.-N. Chang, C.-H. Lu, C.-R. Huang,
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Polish invasive isolates of Neisseria meningitidis in the years Marcin Kadłubowski 1, Anna Skoczyńska.
Ocular TRUST 3: Ongoing Longitudinal Surveillance of Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Ocular Isolates Penny A. Asbell, MD, FACS, MBA 1 ; Daniel F. Sahm,
Outcomes of Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae Infection and the Impact of Antimicrobial and Adjunctive Therapies Gopi Patel, MD; Shirish Huprikar, MD;
Tapasyapreeti Mukhopadhyay, Vrushali Patwardhan, Sarman Singh
Kiran Ghimire, Baral B., Karna S., Baral M.P. PhD
Etiology of bacteremia in children under 5 years in Southern Mali
The Role of the Microbiology Laboratory in AMS programs
Average susceptibility
ECDC-EMEA Joint Technical Report Part I: Trends and burden of antimicrobial resistance in the European Union Zsuzsanna Jakab, Director European Centre.
CNISP & CIHI MRSA infection rate comparison Preliminary results
Antimicrobial resistance in viridans group streptococci among patients with and without the diagnosis of cancer in the USA, Canada and Latin America 
C th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy October 25-28, Washington, DC Examining Temocillin Activity in Combination.
The need for new antibiotics
Gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance in Ireland, 2010 – 2017 On behalf of the National Forum on Antimicrobial Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae Health.
ANTIMICROBIAL USE AND RESISTANCE SURVEILLANCE PILOT PROJECT – LESSONS FROM THE DURBAN SITE Gray AL, Essack SY, Deedat F, Pillay T, van Maasdyk J, Holloway.
EARS-Net results 2011 Ole Heuer
Presentation transcript:

The SENTRY antimicrobial resistance surveillance program is designed to track antimicrobial resistance trends nationally and internationally through a network of sentinel hospitals. Previous publications from SENTRY have established baseline data regarding the spectrum of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance profiles of organisms causing bloodstream, respiratory tract, wound, and urinary tract infections in North and Latin America. These data demonstrate significant regional differences in antimicrobial susceptibility and confirm the widespread nature and alarming prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in the Western Hemisphere. It is important not only to establish the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance at one point in time, but to provide longitudinal data to track changes over time. The rates of change in resistance by pathogen and region can help set priorities for focused intervention efforts. Bloodstream infections (BSI) cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. In this paper we report the frequencies of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates from the North America medical centers participating in the SENTRY program. The present study included all BSI from January 1997 through December Frequency of occurrence of bloodstream pathogens. During the four year study period, (January 1997 through December 2000), a total of 29,052 BSI were reported by North American SENTRY participants. Table 1 compares the frequencies of occurrence of the 10 most commonly isolated pathogens during each of the four years, These organisms and groups accounted for 91% of all BSI reported from these hospitals during the four year period. The rank order of the top five pathogens was unchanged from 1997 to These five organisms or organism groups (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus spp. and Klebsiella spp.) accounted for over 70% of all BSI during the four sampling periods. Notably, between 1997 and 2000, an increase in the percentage of BSI due to S. aureus ( %) and Enterococcus spp. ( %) was seen, whereas a decrease was observed for E. coli ( %), CoNS ( %) and S. pneumoniae ( %). Change in susceptibility over time for selected antimicrobial-pathogen combinations, by region. In order to follow changes in important antimicrobial resistances, we selected a number of sentinel antimicrobial-organism combinations (adapted from Archibald, et al.(12). A comparison of susceptibility results over the four year period was made for each of these antimicrobial-organism combinations in each region (see Table 2). Oxacillin resistance among Staphylococcus spp. (both S. aureus and CoNS) increased over the four year time period. In 1997, 22.4% of S. aureus BSI isolates were oxacillin-resistant; this increased to 34.4% by Oxacillin-resistance among CoNS increased from 70.1% in 1997 to 76.3% in There was a moderate increase in vancomycin-resistance among the Enterococcus spp. BSI isolates between 1997 and 2000: 11.5% to 14.5%. Among the S. pneumoniae BSI isolates, high level resistance to penicillin (MIC,  2  g/ml) decreased from 9.4% in 1997 to 7.6% in Likewise, ~ 99% of S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin over the four year study period. Among the four most prevalent causes of gram-negative BSI, no increase in resistance to cefepime or the carbapenems was seen between 1997 and Susceptibility to ceftazidime increased by 1 - 6% among isolates of Klebsiella spp., P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp. Ciprofloxacin activity against E. coli BSI decreased slightly from 97.5% susceptible in 1997 to 95.2% in Importantly, ciprofloxacin activity against P. aeruginosa decreased by approximately 10% ( %) between 1997 and M.A. Pfaller 1, R.N. Jones 2, D.J. Diekema 2, and M. Beach 2 SENTRY Participants Group. Univ of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 1 ; The JONES Group/JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA 2 Poster # 78 Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Patients with Blood Stream Infections (BSI) in North America (NA): SENTRY Program, A AMENDED ABSTRACT Background: From January 1997 through December 2000, 29,052 blood stream infections (BSI) bacterial pathogens were reported from 38 SENTRY Program hospitals in North America. Methods: Consecutive BSI isolates were sent to the central monitoring laboratory in Iowa City each month. Identification was confirmed and broth microdilution susceptibility testing was performed using NCCLS recommended methods. Results: S. aureus (SA), E. coli (EC) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were the most common pathogens; 55% of all BSI during the 4-yr period. Among the top 10 pathogens, 63% were Gram-positive (G+) cocci. The rank order of the top 10 BSI pathogens was essentially unchanged; however, some important trends were noted. Between 1997 and 2000, an increase in the % of BSI due to SA ( %) and Enterococcus spp. ( %) was noted, whereas a decrease was observed for EC ( %), CoNS ( %) and S. pneumoniae (SPN; %). 16 key organism-antimicrobial combinations were evaluated (NCCLS MICs) for possible trends in resistance. No significant differences were observed for EC vs ceftazidime (CAZ; %) or cefepime (CPM; %); Klebsiella spp. vs CAZ ( %), CPM ( %), and imipenem (IMP; 100%); Enterobacter spp. vs CPM ( %). Decreased S was noted for SA vs oxacillin ( %); CoNS vs oxacillin ( %); Enterococcus spp. vs vancomycin ( %); P. aeruginosa versus ciprofloxacin ( %) and EC vs ciprofloxacin ( %). In contrast, increased S was noted for SPN versus penicillin; P. aeruginosa vs CPM, CAZ and IMP and Enterobacter spp. vs CAZ. Conclusions: Important changes over time in the spectrum of BSI pathogens in NA were noted and highlight the G+ cocci as increasingly significant causes. Likewise, increasing resistance was observed among staphylococci and enterococci. Ongoing surveillance (SENTRY) remains essential and should be used to enhance efforts to limit the extent of resistance worldwide. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Design The SENTRY Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program was established in January The monitored infections include bacteremia and fungemia, outpatient respiratory tract infections, pneumonia, wound infections, and urinary tract infections. Participating institutions include 30 medical centers in the US, eight in Canada, ten in Latin America, and 24 in Europe. This report will focus on all BSI isolates from the North America. Each participant hospital contributed results (organism identification, date of isolation, and antimicrobial susceptibility profile) on the first 20 consecutive episodes of bacteremia (blood culture isolates from separate patients that were judged to be clinically significant) in each calendar month of each year. All isolates were saved on agar slants and sent on a weekly basis to the University of Iowa (Iowa City) for storage and for further characterization by reference identification and susceptibility testing methods. Organism Identification All blood culture isolates were identified at the participating institution by the routine methods in use at each laboratory. Upon receipt at the University of Iowa, isolates were subcultured to blood agar to ensure viability and purity. Confirmation of species identification was performed with Vitek (bioMerieux Vitek, St. Louis, MO) and API (bioMerieux) products or conventional methods as required. Isolates were frozen at -70  C until needed. Susceptibility Testing Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates was performed by reference broth microdilution methods as described by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Microdilution trays were purchased from Accumed, Inc. (Cleveland, OH). Quality control was performed by testing E. coli ATCC 25922, S. aureus ATCC 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619, and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC Interpretive criteria for each antimicrobial agent tested were those published by NCCLS. The authors wish to thank K. Meyer for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors express their appreciation to all SENTRY site participants. Participants contributing data/isolates to the study included: The Medical Center of Delaware, Wilmington, DE, (L. Steele-Moore); Clarion Health Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, (G. Denys); Henry Ford Hospital, (C. Staley); Summa Health System, Akron, OH (J.R. Dipersio); Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, (M. Saubolle); Denver General Hospital, Denver, CO, (M.L. Wilson); University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, (G.D. Overturf); University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, (P.C. Schreckenberger); University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, (R.N. Jones); Creighton University, Omaha, NE, (S. Cavalieri); Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital-East, Milwaukee, WI, (S. Kehl); Boston VAMC, Boston, MA (S. Brecher); Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY, (P. Della-Latta); Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, (H. Isenberg); Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY, (D. Hardy); Kaiser Regional Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, (J. Fusco); Sacred Heart Medical Center, Spokane, WA, (M. Hoffmann); University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, (S. Swanzy); Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, (P.R. Murray); Parkland Health & Hospital System, Dallas, TX, (P. Southern); The University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, (A. Wanger); University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX (B. Reisner); University of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, KY, (J. Snyder); University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, (J. Humphries); Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, (S. Jenkins); University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, (K. Hazen); University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, CAN,( R. Rennie); Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CAN, ( D. Hoban); Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia,CAN, (K. Forward); Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, CAN, (B. Toye); Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, CAN, (H. Robson); Microbiology Laboratory C.E.M.I.C., This study was supported by a research and educational grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. TABLE 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility in blood stream isolates from SENTRY 1997 through 2000 for selected antimicrobial-pathogen combinations CONCLUSIONS In summary, we have provided longitudinal data on pathogen frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the most important organisms causing BSI in North America from These data demonstrate the increasing prominence of Gram- positive cocci as BSI pathogens. Likewise, increasing resistance was observed among staphylococci and enterococci. In contrast, the activity of ceftazidime, cefepime, and the carbapenems against the Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa appears stable. Resistance to ciprofloxacin among P. aeruginosa increased significantly from 7.5% in 1997 to 17.3% in Ongoing surveillance remains essential and should be used to limit the extent of resistance world-wide. 1.Archibald L, Phillips D, Monnet JE, McGowan JE, Tenover F, and Gaynes R. Antimicrobial resistance in isolates from inpatients and outpatients in the United States: increasing importance of the intensive care unit. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997;24: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A4, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Supplemental tables M100-S8., National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Kugler K, et al. Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with bloodstream infection: Frequencies of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (United States and Canada, 1997). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42: Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Sader HS, Kugler K, Beach M, et al. Survey of bloodstream infections due to Gram-positive cocci: Frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in 1997 in the United States, Canada, and Latin America for the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1999;33: Pittet D, Li N, Woolson RF, and Wenzel RP. Microbiological factors influencing the outcome of nosocomial bloodstream infections: a 6-year validated, population-based model. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997;24: Weinstein MP, Towns ML, Quartey SM, et. al. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990’s: A prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997;21: INTRODUCTION RESULTS SELECTED REFERENCES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE 1. Frequencies of occurrence of bacterial pathogens associated with BSI in participating medical centers in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, North America RankPathogenNo. (%) a 1S. aureus1802 (22.9) 2E. coli1461(18.6) 3CoNS1008(12.8) 4Enterococcus spp.745(9.5) 5Klebsiella spp.592(7.5) 6S. pneumoniae441(5.6) 7P. aeruginosa359(4.6) 8Enterobacter spp.312(4.0) 9  -streptococcus277(3.5) 10viridans group streptococci120(1.5) 1998 RankPathogenNo. (%) b 1S. aureus1683(24.5) 2E. coli1183(17.2) 3CoNS879(12.8) 4Enterococcus spp.721(10.5) 5Klebsiella spp.518(7.5) 6S. pneumoniae345(5.0) 7P. aeruginosa306(4.4) 8  -streptococcus239(3.5) 9Enterobacter spp.230(3.3) 10viridans group streptococci120(1.7) a Percent of 7,854 isolates b Percent of 6,878 isolates 2000 RankPathogenNo. (%) d 1S. aureus1917(28.7) 2E. coli1118(16.7) 3CoNS739(11.1) 4Enterococcus spp.703(10.5) 5Klebsiella spp.494(7.4) 6P. aeruginosa306(4.6) 7S. pneumoniae261(3.9) 8Enterobacter spp.239(3.6) 9  -streptococcus234(3.5) 10Serratia spp.102(1.5) 1999 RankPathogenNo. (%) c 1S. aureus1945(25.5) 2E. coli1315(17.2) 3CoNS935(12.2) 4Enterococcus spp.763(10.0) 5Klebsiella spp.597(7.8) 6S. pneumoniae349(4.6) 7P. aeruginosa335(4.4) 8Enterobacter spp.287(3.8) 9  -streptococcus279(3.7) 10Serratia spp.136(1.8) c Percent of 7,635 isolates d Percent of 6,685 isolates Antimicrobial Agent % Susceptible (No. Tested) Organism 77.6(1802) 29.9(1008) 87.0(745) 65.8(441) 99.3(441) 99.2(1461) 99.9(1461) 97.5(1461) 96.3(592) 98.8(592) 86.9(359) 88.3(359) 87.5(359) 88.9(359) 77.9(312) 100.0(319) Oxacillin Vancomycin Penicillin Levofloxacin Ceftazidime Cefepime Ciprofloxacin Ceftazidime Cefepime Ceftazidime Cefepime Imipenem Ciprofloxacin Ceftazidime Cefepime S. aureus CoNS Enterococcus spp. S. pneumoniae E. coli Klebsiella spp. P. aeruginosa Enterobacter spp. 72.2(1683) 23.2(879) 86.4(721) 81.2(345) 99.7(345) 98.6(1183) 99.7(1183) 97.4(1183) 95.4(518) 99.4(518) 83.0(306) 87.9(306) 91.8(306) 85.9(306) 75.2(230) 99.1(230) 69.3(1945) 25.6(935) 85.4(763) 78.2(349) NA 99.4(1315) 99.8(1315) 95.4(1315) 96.3(597) 98.8(597) 85.1 (335) 88.1 (335) 90.7 (335) 85.4 (335) 77.7 (287) 99.0 (287) 65.6(1917) 23.7(739) 84.2(703) 78.2(261) 100.0(261) 99.0(1118) 100.0(1118) 95.3(1118) 96.4(494) 99.6(494) 88.2(306) 89.5(306) 92.2(306) 78.8(306) 81.2(239) 99.2(239) *Corresponding Author: Michael A. Pfaller, M.D. Medical Microbiology Division, C606 GH, Department of Pathology University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa Phone: (319) Fax: (319)