Copyright Law Boston College Law School March 25, 2003 Infringement - Direct - 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matteson AP Lit. Literary Analysis Mattesons Guide For Writing The Perfect Paper.
Advertisements

V. COPPER INNOVATIONS GROUP ALPEX COMPUTER CORPORATION Rachel Skifton & Tara Miles.
Executive Perspective for Scientists & Engineers (EPSE) A Real World Look at IP Infringement Randall K. Broberg, Esq. April 8, 2013.
Data Analytics – A Policy Perspective Benjamin White, Head of Intellectual Property British Library.
What’s Yours In Mine: Intellectual Property and Copyright For the Magazine Media Publisher Jim Sawtelle Partner and Co-leader, Media, Publishing and Marketing.
COPYRIGHT BASICS Ketchum Innovation Center November 13, 2014 Allison Parker
DRAMA Drama is life with the dull bits cut out. ~Alfred Hitchcock.
Copyright Infringement I Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Tuesday, January 21, 2014 Review Copyright Basics and Fair Use (for test) Share “Case Research”
Copyright Infringement II Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Avoiding legal pitfalls. What is copyright? Copyright is a property right, similar to owning a car. –It gives individuals control over the use of their.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Copyright – Rights – Reproduction.
Neha Kapoor Sarah Weingarten Daymanuel Sampson Christina Miller.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 12, 2007 Copyright – Fixation, Exclusions.
Copyright Infringement Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 25, 2008 Copyright – Rights – Other.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 24, 2007 Copyright – Rights – Other.
Copyright Law Boston College Law School January 14, 2003 Requirements - Originality.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 11, 2008 Copyright – Fixation, Exclusions.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 29, 2009 Copyright – Exclusive Rights.
Copyright vs. trademark
Software Protection & Scope of the Right holder Options for Developing Countries Presentation by: Dr. Ahmed El Saghir Judge at the Council of State Courts.
WHEN INSPIRATION BECOMES INFRINGEMENT The Protection of Copyrights in the Arts Robert S. Meitus Meitus Gelbert Rose LLP.
Persuasive Writing Writing whose Purpose is to CHANGE MINDS and BRING ABOUT ACTION.
Subject Matter I  Software Copyright Oren Bracha, Summer 2015.
CAHSEE BOOTCAMP Distinguishing different essay styles ~Ms. Gieser Biographical Narrative Biographical Narrative Expository Essay Expository Essay Response.
Parts with Explanations
Copyright Law 2003 Class of March Professor Fischer.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 22 Infringement November 3, 2008.
Objectives: - To define and apply vocabulary needed for Unit 4.
Class Seven: Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights.
Infringement Claims and Defenses Professor Todd Bruno.
Copyright and Fair Use. Topics The Copyright Quiz Intellectual Property What is Copyright? What is Fair Use? Common Violations Guidelines.
Copyright and Fair Use. Topics Intellectual Property What is Copyright? What is Fair Use? Common Violations Guidelines TEACH Act 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2001 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 20 (MARCH 27, 2002)
Litigating Copyright Infringement Claims Related to Competing Software Applications Presented by Robert J. Scott Managing Partner Scott & Scott, LLP
“Research is formalized curiosity. It is poking and prying with purpose.” - Zora Neale Hurston.
INTRO Q & A.  Proofread for spelling, mechanical, or grammatical errors.  If a sentence doesn’t make sense or is unclear, tell them so!  Look at the.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 23 November 5, 2008.
What it is all supposed to mean
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer April 3, 2002.
Major Art Modality Utilized: Drama & Movement / Artistic Language Multiple Intelligences Addressed: Linguistic, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal Lesson Abstract:
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 22 November 6, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 21 Infringement November 1, 2006.
Copyright Law Ronald W. Staudt Class Class 16 March 23, 2009.
Fair Use Guidelines for Students Liz Robb Jamie Grauel Melissa Borger Sam Westbrook Liz Robb Jamie Grauel Melissa Borger Sam Westbrook.
Copyright III Class Notes: January 29, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Identifying Theme You thought you knew, but you have no idea…
Formal Literary Analysis Essay Let’s hope this is all review…
 College requires critical reading and writing skills. This tutorial is designed to get you started by teaching you to attend to critical features of.
Slide Set Eleven: Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights 1.
Copyright Issues for Faculty Cheryl Kirschner and Ross Petty Babson College.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer April 8, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March 24, 2004.
Do Now: KWL & Think/Pair/Share. Objective: SWBAT evaluate 2 milk ads from the past and present campaigns at 80% mastery by creating a Venn diagram through.
Copyright Tips for Presenting at SOA Meetings & Webinars January 2016.
ADAPT. Morphogenesis 2016 Entry Code DESIGN WHOSE IMPLICATIONS EXTEND BEYOND JUST THE PHYSICAL ©Morphogenesis The following 10 slides are a guideline to.
C ES C reative E ducation S olutions Teach First-Time Students About What Constitutes Plagiarism.
 1. optional (check to see if your college requires it)  2. Test Length: 50 min  3. Nature of Prompt: Analyze an argument  4. Prompt is virtually.
COPYRIGHT FAIR USE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSING CHARLOTTE ROH, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION RESIDENT LIBRARIAN UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST MARCH 13, 2015.
Mr. Verlin South Philadelphia High School April 27 and 28, 2015.
Have you ever wanted to trade places with someone? Who would you trade places with and why? “The Prince and the Pauper” Bell work #1.
How should BFO classify films?
Legal Aspects of Originality
Principal Deputy County Counsel
Bell Ringer August 20, 2014 On a clean sheet of paper in the writing section of your binder, write the heading above. Then, take a few minutes to examine.
Socratic Questions.
MEST2: The Evaluation.
4/15-4/18.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright Law Boston College Law School March 25, 2003 Infringement - Direct - 1

Direct Infringement Elements of claim –Ownership of valid copyright –Infringement (1) Actual copying –(i) Access –(ii) Similarity (2) Improper appropriation –Substantial similarity

Bright Tunes v. Harrisongs

Actual Copying Access Similarity Yes No Striking Similarity No Similarity Arnstein Webber BeeGees Harrison Ty

Ty v. GMA

Hypo Facts –Plaintiff is a ventriloquist, performs w/ dummy –Dummy uses phrase “You Got the Right One, Uh-Huh” –Has been performing since 1984 –Elementary schools, job corp camps, 1984 World’s Fair –Mails info packets to corporate executives, including a Pepsi exec –In 1991, Pepsi launches massive ad campaign –Featuring Ray Charles, singing “You Got the Right one Baby, Uh- huh” Questions –Sufficient evidence of actual copying? –Sufficient to get before a jury?

Actual Copying Procedural issues –Issue of fact: for the jury –Expert testimony is often permitted –Reviewed on appeal for clear error

Improper Appropriation –Standard: “substantial similarity” –Perspective: intended audience Types of cases –Fragmented literal similarity Literal copying of portions of original –Comprehensive nonliteral similarity Non-literal copying of ideas, structure, plot, characters, etc.

Nichols v. Universal Learned Hand: –“Upon any work, … a great number of patterns of increasing generality will fit equally well, as more and more of the incident is left out. The last may perhaps be no more than the most general statement of what the play is about, and at times might consist only of its title; but there is a point in this series of abstractions where they are no longer protected, since otherwise the playwright could prevent the use of his ‘ideas,’ to which, apart from their expression, his property is never extended. Nobody has ever been able to fix that boundary, and nobody ever can.”

Abstractions Test Idea Plot Outline Subplots, Characters Specific Scenes Text Not Protected Protected

Nichols v. Universal Idea Plot Outline Subplots, Characters Scenes Text Abie’s Irish RoseThe Cohens and the Kellys No copying No copying of protectible material Not protectible

Shakespeare v. Laurents Idea Plot Outline Subplots, Characters Scenes Text Romeo & JulietWest Side Story ?

Improper Appropriation Different Approaches –Subtractive Approach –Totality Approach “Total concept and feel” Extrinsic and intrinsic tests Procedural Aspects –Issue of fact for jury –Expert testimony generally not allowed –Generally reviewed on appeal for clear error

Assignment for Next Class Start VII.A. - Infringement –Read through Steinberg