Incubation in Israel: Model and Performance. Extent  24 incubators  About 10 projects per incubator Typically between 8-12 projects  Grant of $175000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Business Incubation at IIT Bombay- A journey Sushanto Mitra Chief Executive Officer Society for Innovation & Entrepreneurship Indian Institute of Technology.
Advertisements

Phase 0 Pilot Program Jay Robinson Manager, Capital Programs (407)
Creation of Pilot IP Fund Liis Käosaar-Sasi Dorel Tamm.
The Right Issues Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Needs Improvement N/A 1. The Board focuses on activities that will help the Company maximize shareholder.
Department of Computer Science Faculty of Science Research Methods Supervision.
The Industry-University Cooperative Research Program ( IUCRP ) University of California 1996 – 2010 Lovell Jarvis University of California, Davis.
The Higher Council for Science and Technology
Entrepreneurship youth
Mapping the Israeli high tech industry Project: IFISE Work package 7 Arie Sadovski.
Medical Device The Israeli Case. Objectives Drawing a general “profile” of the Israeli entrepreneur and to draw lessons on the following issues: 1. The.
Ministry of Economy Institute for Public Sector Enterprises 1.
Technology Incubator Program’s draft model Valdis Avotins, LIDA.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt Ericsson Nikola Tesla’s view of collaboration between academic communities and enterprises Gordana Kovačević,
Stockholder Rights and Corporate Governance Stockholders Corporate Governance Executive Compensation: A Special Issue Shareholder Activism Government.
Biotechnology The Israeli Case Definition Using living organisms, cells or biological agents, to produce goods and services. Modern biotechnology arose.
TECHNION – ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY THE SAMUEL NEAMAN INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROJECT IFISE An Evaluation of the.
3rd session: Corporate Governance
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Business Careers & Practices Week 1 Careers and Jobs in Accounting and Management Work Functions of Accounting and Management Technicians Business Functions.
Trentino plus 10 Foresight Workshop July 2003 (Trento) Financing and organising applied research in Germany - the model of Fraunhofer Society PD.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Background on Nonprofit Boards A Primer. Nonprofit Organizations Revenue generated by a nonprofit organization (through donations, grants or corporate.
1 The Code of Best Practices and the Board of Directors Professor Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes Yale University School of Management International Institute.
1 Participation of RUSNANO in Investment Funds of Nanotechnologies May 26 th, 2010.
TECHNOLOGICAL INCUBATORS PROGRAM
September 5, 2013 Growing Missouri’s Economy Through Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
Lakshman Wijeyewardena Director General Industrial Services Bureau Role of Business Development Service Providers – Implementation of Technology.
A presentation by ASHOK KUMAR, C.E.O INDIAN HIGH SCHOOL, DUBAI STRUCTURED GOVERNANCE.
States and Government Companies Murilo Barella Brasília – 12 Março 2013.
Organizational Structure of RAO UES Executive Administration During Reform Period 22 March 2004.
Florin Banateanu October 2011 EU funds for private sector in Romania – opportunities and practical features.
Governance & Organizational Structure Paula Autry President, Mount Carmel East Mount Carmel Health System.
Governance & Organizational Structure
Corporate Structure & Companies
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
3 November2000 Sience/Technology Parks and Incubators: Models and Criteria 1 Science/Technology Parks and Incubators in ESCWA Member Countries: Models.
The Bologna process and post- graduate education in Belarus (on the example of the Grodno State Medical University) Head of the Department of General Hygiene.
1. Outline Financing Innovation Policy The Instruments Some Results Israel & Bulgaria Compared Conclusions for Bulgaria 2.
DMITREY MEDVEDEV PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: «Land must be made to serve residential construction». VLADIMIR PUTIN THE PRIME MINISTER OF THE.
Merchant Banking A set of financial institutions that are engaged in providing specialist services, which generally include the acceptance of bills of.
2.3. RIS3 governance. Starting a RIS3 it is necessary to define the decision making and management structures. Demand-side perspectives, from innovation-user.
Corporate Governance.  According to King III, the board should: ◦ be responsible for the strategic direction and control of the company; ◦ set the values.
Danish experiences with Performance and Results Rikke Ginnerup, Ministry of Finance & Niels Refslund, Agency for Governmental Management Presentation to.
ASA Board Membership Board Members: (vote) Four Paraguayan Citizens Four U.S. Citizens One Third-country National Ex-Officio Members: (voice but no vote)
„ Innovations and role of state : „ Innovations and role of state : the Polish experience” Krzysztof Gulda Chairman of Team of experts on innovations and.
1 Department of Education Presentation to Standing Committee on Appropriations: Expenditure and Budget Implementation for the First Quarter of 2009/10.
Committees. Executive Committee Terms of Reference Committee Type – standing Purpose -. Manage the business and technical affairs of Open Health Tools.
The Role of a Financial Manager Corporations Roles and Titles of Financial Managers Principal-Agent Problems Presentation – Dennis Spice.
Introduction to SEPA The Scottish Environment Agency For CaSPr Waste Workshop Glasgow 19 October 2006 Claudette Hudes NetRegs Team Leader.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Banking and Financial Institutions
Department of "Accounting and Auditing" Department address: av. al-Farabi, 71, Building MEC-3 2nd floor, 229 room Phone: 8(727) , internal:
May 2010 Company Due Diligence Process The University of Texas at Austin.
HISTORY With the establishment of Karabük University at 2007, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences has started its education life with 8 graduate.
Prepared by : RMIE Coordination Unit Morocco Incubation and Spin-off Network International Winter School Alexandria, Egypt November 2010.
Organization  As a member of the Strategy & Business Development team, this position will support the development and execution of Corporate, Sector,
Katowice – the capital city of the Silesia region: Highly urbanized The highest population density in Poland – 4,64 mln people 12 cities with population.
International Trends in Governance Reforms Jamil Salmi Global Tertiary Education Expert Sofia, 19 March 2012.
Lecture Outline 12 Other ways of obtaining systems IS Department in a Business Organization The Future of IS.
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology TURKISH INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY DOCUMENT (TOWARDS EU MEMBERSHIP) 2 May 2012.
«ACADEMIC BUSINESS INCUBATOR
The ATTRACT initiative and IC
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
Introduction to Business (MRK 151)
STATE LAW OFFICE AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Department of "Accounting and Auditing"
MTECH Technology Entrepreneurship Activities
ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP, TECHNOLOGY INCUBATORS AND R&D ENTERPRISES
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
TGFS- Venture Capital Fonds for Saxony
Presentation transcript:

Incubation in Israel: Model and Performance

Extent  24 incubators  About 10 projects per incubator Typically between 8-12 projects  Grant of $ per year for up two years. After two years a firm graduates  Up to 85% of the approved project budget  Budget half a million per incubator. 40% by the government

The Incubator Finance Sources  Government (OSC) 38%  Projects payments for services 14%  Royalties, Shares and dividends 24.5%  Strategic Partners 20.5%  Local Authorities 3%

Entrepreneurs  Education Degree –63% Doctors (MD or PhD) –21% MA –11% BA  Area of Education –Engineering 40% –Life Sciences 38%  More than 2/3 from either the academia or from R&D department in the Industry

Project Areas  Biotechnology 15.5%  Drugs 11%  Medical instruments 15.5%  Chemicals and new materials 11%  Mechanical Engineering 14%  Optical and exact Instrumens 7%  Energy and Ecology 11%  Computer hardware and software 15%

Steering Committee on Technological Incubators  The Chief Scientist (OSC) of the Ministry of Industry and Trade – Chairman  Public representatives from high-tech industry  Representatives of the incubator "graduates"  The Director for Technological Incubators — Office of the Chief Scientist, Ministry of Industry and. Trade.

Incubator Legal Role  Because the State provides most of the budget during a project's incubator phase, it holds the management of the incubator responsible for sound and efficient professional operation of each project in the incubator, including budget management and commercialization of the product being developed.  The incubator management is the State's trustee in running the incubator projects.

Incubator Functions  1. Assistance in determining the technological and marketing applicability of the idea and drawing up an R&D plan; 2. Assistance in obtaining the financial resources needed to carry out the project; 3. Assistance in forming and organizing an R&D team; 4. Professional and administrative counseling, guidance, and supervision; 5. Secretarial and administrative services, maintenance, procurements, accounting, and legal advice; 6. Assistance in raising capital and preparing for marketing.

Incubator Organization  incubator is an autonomous nonprofit corporation.  It is run and managed by: – a professional salaried director –a policymaking management –a projects committee that selects and monitors projects.

Policy Making and Project Committees  The last two governing institutions, are composed of professionals of the highest caliber from industry, business, and science—corporate and industrial executives, R&D managers in high- tech enterprises, professors, heads of faculty in research institutes, and public figures.  All of them work on a voluntary basis, devoting their time as well as their valuable experience, contacts, and infrastructures of their enterprises and institutions.

Incubator Selection Committee  Membership –The incubator manager –Academic Experts –Industry experts –Businessmen and finance professionals  Size –3-12 members  In 1/3 also an ad hock committee based on the project specialty  Acceptance is strictly based on full consensus

Project Selection Criteria  New Product  Export oriented  Based on R&D  Feasible with available resources

Selection  Idea Probing 100%  Submitted business plan 56%  Selection by the incubator manager 37%  Incubator Selection committee 11%  Selection by Chief Scientist committee 6%  Acceptance of project to the Incubator 5%  In a typical incubator  345 projects are probed and 18 accepted in 3 years

Graduation  In –86% Graduation Rate –78% Gained independent financial support after graduation  Long Term Perspective –By the end of 2002, over 800 projects had left the incubators (in addition to the 240 that remained). –Of these "graduates," 53 percent have continued on their own steam and 47 percent have been discontinued. –Most of the ongoing projects have managed to attract private investments – The total private investment obtained thus far is in excess of US $525 million

Ownership  Initial ownership in the Project Company is as follows:  At least 50 percent— the developer/entrepreneur;  At least 10 percent— key staff members other than developers/entrepreneurs;  Up to 20 percent— the provider of supplementary financing (i.e., additional to the State grant) for project implementation.  Up to 20 percent— the incubator.  Further investment that becomes necessary in the future is worked out in unrestricted business negotiations. These investments dilute the original shareholders ownership in the company proportionately.

Strengths and Weaknesses  Strengths –Ability to accomplish technologically at a high standard –Ability to learn in a sustained way technological developments and trends  Weaknesses (according to incubatees) –Identification and access to capital sources –Marketing planning, access to international distribution channels and strategic partners

Recommendation for Improved Selection  Increased incubator budget  Preparing of a good well supported business plan before acceptance  Evaluation of plan by larger number of experts  Preparation of Strategic business plan for guiding the project from the initial stage  Closer examination of the fitness of the personality of the entrepreneur