2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ1 Training Session, Tucson The Pan-STARRS Moving Object Processing System

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ2 Thanks LSSTC

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ3 Introductions

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ4 Policies Tuesday –No cell phones, laptops, etc. Wednesday, Thursday, Friday –Whatever Parking Passes

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ5 Schedule Tuesday Morning –MOPS Overview Tuesday Afternoon –MOPS Simulation Training Wednesday, Thursday, Friday –MOPS Simulation running

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ6 MOPS Collaborating Institutions Institute for Astronomy (IfA) Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) University of Pisa Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) Carnegie Mellon University, Robotics Institute AUTON Laboratory Minor Planet Center (MPC) Spacewatch University of Helsinki

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ7 MOUs (existent) JPL Differential Orbit Determination & Ephemeris Generation LSST Two year software engineer (Pierfederici) NEODys IOD and 2-night linking Spacewatch Targeted follow-up of interesting objects

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ8 MOUs (in negotiations) MRO Targeted follow-up of interesting objects

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ9 The MOPS Team (IfA) Robert Jedicke MOPS Manager, IfA Specialist Joe Masiero Graduate Student Tommy Grav Junior Scientific Researcher Larry Denneau Senior Software Engineer now at JHU

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ10 The MOPS Team (IfA) Jim Heasley Senior Professor David Tholen Senior Professor Richard Wainscoat Specialist, UH Telescope Support, Associate Chair

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ11 The MOPS Team (extended) Francesco Pierfederici LSST Software Engineer Daniel Chang UH ICS Graduate Student

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ12 The MOPS Team (External) Andrea Milani University of Pisa Mikko Kaasalainen University of Helsinki Jeremy Kubica Carnegie Mellon Robotics Institute Steven Chesley Jet Propulson Laboratory

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ13 MOPS Workload Pan-STARRS Management

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ14 Pan-STARRS Solar System

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ15 PS4 will find as many asteroids in one lunation as have been identified since the discovery of Ceres in 1801 Asteroids

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ16 PS4 & NEOs Tens of thousands of NEOs

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ17 10,000,000 MB objects in ten years PS4 & the Main Belt

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ18 PS4 & Comets Pan-STARRS will find ~10X as many comets per year as all existing surveys 1,000’s of comets in ten years operation INTERSTELLAR ! ! !

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ19 PS4 & TNOs ~20,000 TNOs

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ20 PS4 & Distant Planets Jewitt 2003, ‘Project Pan-STARRS and the Outer Solar System,’ EMP New Plutos 320AU New Earths 620AU (50AU) New Neptunes 1230AU (130AU) New Jupiters 2140AU (340AU)

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ21 PS4 Minor Planet Summary 1 10,000,000 1,000, ,000 10,000 1, Known PS 1 Year PS 10 Years NEO / PHO Main Belt Jovian Trojans Other Trojans Centaurs Comets TNOs Wide TNO Binaries Companions Interstellar Visitors

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ22 MOPS Overview Identify known objects Discover new objects Derive observable parameters Catalogue objects Enable solar system science

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ23 Terminology Review: Single Occurrence Transient = SOT –A detection that is not at the same position as any other known stationary object in the past 30 (TBR) days High S/N (HSD) Detection –A detection that has a high probability of being a real object (~>5  ) Low S/N (LSD) Detection –A detection that has a low probability of being a real object (~>3  ) Data Collection = DC = DB = Database –A generalized database

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ24 Terminology Review: Observing Cycle = OC –Integer number 0 UT on day closest to full moon Synthetic Object –An artificial object with orbital and shape parameters Derived Object –A synthetic or real object and its parameters derived from observations

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ25 Terminology Review: Detection (not an SOT) –A statistically significant collection of pixels after image convolution with a shape kernel Tracklet –A set of  2 detections that may be observations of the same object Track –A set of  2 tracklets that may be observations of the same object Orbit –A six parameter representation of the heliocentric path of an object

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ26 Terminology Review:

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ27 Terminology Review: Evening Sweet Spot Morning Sweet SpotOpposition

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ28 MOPS Top Level Design Seamlessly combine existing software into an operational system.

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ29 Attribution Intra-night Linking Orbit Determination Inter-night Linking Identification Precovery Transient Detections Synthetic Solar System Meta-data Database Published Objects GUI Users Impact Risk Analysis MPC MOPS Top Level Design Two-Night Linking

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ30 Transient Detection (IPP) Combined 4 Telescopes Static Transients Stationary Moving

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ31 Intra-Night Linking (Tracklets) First exposure Second exposure 250 real detections / deg false detections / deg 2

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ32 Attributions Legend Tracklets Known Objects

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ33 Inter-Night Tracklet Linking (tracks) First Night Second Night Third Night Fourth Night Fifth Night Legend

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ34 Multiple Hypothesis Testing O(n 2 )

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ35 kd-tree solution O(n log n)

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ36 Initial Orbit Determination Legend First Night Third Night Second Night Good IOD Bad IOD

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ37 Differential Orbit Determination Legend First Night Third Night Second Night IOD OD

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ38 Orbit Identification

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ39 PS1 Review: DRM Surveys DRM = PS1Design Reference Mission

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ40 PS1 Review: DRM Surveys  >61% of time amenable to discovery of solar system objects. Some of the other surveys can also identify solar system objects.

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ41 PS1 Review: Filters gri zy

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ42 PS1 Review: w filter gri w~g+r+i

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ43 PS1 Review: Bandpasses

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ44 PS1 Review: Sensitivities The trailed NEO single exposure sensitivity is equivalent to V=23 in g, r, and i bands. The discovery of ‘tracklets’ is equivalent to a 5 sigma limiting magnitude of V=22.8

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ45 PS1 Review: Sky-Plane Tesselation Outside view of the celestial sky tesselated into 6252 fields. Of these fields, 5464 have boresight centers > - 30° Declination. The 3° field of view of PS1 with an inscribed hexagon of 5.84 square degrees. The twenty percent overlap from a single tesselation due to the circular field of view.

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ46 PS1 Review: Sky-Plane Tesselation Outside view of the celestial sky tesselated into 6252 fields. Of these fields, 5464 have boresight centers > - 30° Declination. The 3° field of view of PS1 with an inscribed hexagon of 5.84 square degrees. The twenty percent overlap from a single tesselation due to the circular field of view.

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ47 PS1 Review: Sky-Plane Tesselation Outside view of the celestial sky tesselated into 6252 fields. Of these fields, 5464 have boresight centers > - 30° Declination. The 3° field of view of PS1 with an inscribed hexagon of 5.84 square degrees. The twenty percent overlap from a single tesselation due to the circular field of view.

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ48 Observing Strategy Every survey mode obtains at least two images at each location separated by a Transient Time Interval (15-30 minutes)  serendipitous positions & colours Solar system survey re-visits each location after 3-6 days  obtain 3-4 nights/month  ~12 day arc

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ49 PS1 Review: 3  Survey -30 dec +90 dec Equator Opposition 15 deg = 1 hr 210 deg = 14 hrs

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ50 PS1 Review: 3  Survey

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ51 PS1 Review: 3  Survey

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ52 PS1 Review: 3  Survey

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ53 PS1 Review: 3  Survey

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ54 PS1 Review: 3  Survey

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ55 PS1 Review: 3  Survey

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ56 PS1 Review: 3  Survey

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ57 PS1 Review: 3  Survey Annual

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ58 PS1 Review: Solar System Survey multiple filters 60°×120° 3  survey 61% solar system surveying (g+r+i) 5% sweet spot surveying (w?) Dark and grey time All photometric + non-photometric nights P&A & SweetSpots w/ TTI paired images NICE BALANCE BETWEEN SCIENCE SURVEYS

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ59 MOPS TAO Survey Simulations Evening/Morning sweet-spots 84 fields each ~550 deg 2 each Opposition 660 fields ~4,360 deg 2 TOTAL 828 fields ~5,460 deg 2 Ecliptic Longitude w.r.t. Opposition Ecliptic Latitude

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ60 Next Generation Solar System Survey Simulation NEO rates of motion

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ61 Next Generation Solar System Survey Simulation NEO longitudinal rates: +0.65˚/day in sweet-spots -0.30˚/day at edge of opp.

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ62 Next Generation Solar System Survey Simulation RA Declination First night Second night Third night +0.65˚/day Sweet-Spot

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ63 Next Generation Solar System Survey Simulation RA Declination First night Second night Third night -0.3˚/day Opposition

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ64 Next Generation Solar System Survey Simulation

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ65 Next Generation Solar System Survey Simulation Region Scheduling Efficiency

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ66 MOPS Synthetic Solar System 250,000Near Earth Objects (w/ IEOs, H<25) 10,000,000Main Belt 320,000Trojans (Jupiter) 100,000Trojans (Mars,Saturn,Uranus) 60,000Centaurs 72,000Trans-Neptunian Objects 20,000Scattered Disk Objects Jupiter Family Comets Halley Family Comets 10,000Long Period Comets 0Xtreme Objects 10,842,000TOTAL 10,000

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ67 NEO Sky-Plane Density

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ68 Sweet-Spot Motion Vectors

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ69 Attribution Intra-night Linking Orbit Determination Inter-night Linking Identification Precovery Transient Detections Synthetic Solar System Meta-data Database Published Objects GUI Users Impact Risk Analysis MPC MOPS Sub-System Efficiency >99%>98%>90% ?? % Two-Night Linking ?? %

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ70 Attribution Intra-night Linking Orbit Determination Inter-night Linking Identification Precovery Transient Detections Synthetic Solar System Meta-data Database Published Objects GUI Users Impact Risk Analysis MPC MOPS Sub-System Inter-communication working designed Follow-up In design, MOU Two-Night Linking

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ71 MOPS Data Collection Interface Synthetic or Real Data MB/100 + everything else realistic survey pattern astrometric error photometric error light curves false detections

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ72 MOPS Data Collection Interface

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ73 MOPS Data Collection Interface

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ74 MOPS Data Collection Interface

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ75 MOPS Data Collection Interface

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ76 Spacewatch Data

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ77 Spacewatch Data

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ78 MOPS Software Documentation ;)

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ79 MOPS Unit & Simulation Testing ;)

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ80 MOPS Wiki ( )

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ81 MOPS Timeline Operational Readiness Review (ORR) in six months? PS1 ORR in eight months?

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ82 MOPS Documentation Critical Systems Engineering Documentation  Complete & Evolving PSDC : System Concept Definition PSDC : Software Requirement Specification PSDC : Algorithm Design Description PSDC : Software Design Description PSDC : MOPS-IPP Interface Control Document PSDC : MOPS-PSPS Interface Control Document PSDC : MOPS-PSPS Interface Requirement Specification  Not started o Software Version Description o Sub-system Test Plan o Sub-system Maintenance Plan o Software User Manual

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ83 MOPS: Documentation Supplementary Documentation  PSDC Orbit Determination Ephemeris Software  PSDC Solar System Survey Simulation  PSDC – Revised Solar System Survey Simulation  PSDC Solar System Model  PSDC Sour Spots  PSDC-NNN-MMM - Efficiency Determinator Desirements  PSDC-NNN-MMM - Efficiency Determinator Design  PSDC-NNN-MMM - Installation  PSDC-NNN-MMM - Rare Objects  PSDC-NNN-MMM - Trail Fitting  PSDC-NNN-MMM - Unit and Simulation Testing  PSDC-NNN-MMM - Comet Fitting  PSDC-NNN-MMM – Data Exchange Standard

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ84 MOPS Publications: Published

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ85 MOPS Publications: In Prep

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ86 MOPS Publications: Future  Pan-STARRS Moving Object Processing System

2008 March 11-14MOPS Training Session, Tucson, AZ87 Thanks!