PULSE REPETITION RATE OPTMIZATION IN SLR STATIONS TO PROVIDE MINIMUM SYSTEMATIC ERROR OF RANGING M.A. Sadovnikov M.A. Sadovnikov Institute for Precision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Errors and Uncertainties in Biology
Advertisements

Gage R&R Estimating measurement components
Chunyi Peng, Guobin Shen, Yongguang Zhang, Yanlin Li, Kun Tan BeepBeep: A High Accuracy Acoustic Ranging System using COTS Mobile Devices.
4/16/ Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Variable of interest Time Series Analysis.
Repeatability & Reproducibility
ELECTRONIC GUIDING CANE FINAL PRESENTATION Students : David Eyal Tayar Yosi Instructor : Miki Itzkovitz Technion – Israel Institute Of Technology Electrical.
Multiplexed vs. Simultaneous Data Acquisition Using USB Devices Presented by: Rene Messier Company: Data Translation Company: Data Translation.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Results The optical frequencies of the D 1 and D 2 components were measured using a single FLFC component. Typical spectra are shown in the Figure below.
Space-time positioning at the quantum limit with optical frequency combs Workshop OHP September 2013 Valérian THIEL, Pu JIAN, Jonathan ROSLUND, Roman SCHMEISSNER,
Preliminary Results of Laser Ranging to Un-cooperative Targets at Shanghai SLR Station Yang FuMin, Zhang ZhongPing, Chen JuPing, Chen WanZhen, Wu ZhiBo,
Errors and Uncertainties in Biology Accuracy Accuracy indicates how close a measurement is to the accepted value. For example, we'd expect a balance.
KHz Single Photon Ranging: A Precise Tool to Retrieve Optical Response of Satellites Toshimichi Otsubo Hitotsubashi University 16th International Workshop.
Technical and engineering provision of operating 100 MeV linac LUE-40 and beam testing of dielectric materials Arrangement of installation at electron.
Ground Target kHz Laser Ranging with Submillimeter Precision Lukas Kral, Karel Hamal, Ivan Prochazka (1) Georg Kirchner, Franz Koidl (2) presented at kHz.
1 Development of Any Frequency Fire Rate SLR Control System Cunbo FAN, Xue DONG, Xingwei HAN, You ZHAO Changchun Observatory, , China.
16 years of LAGEOS-2 Spin Data from launch to present Daniel Kucharski, Georg Kirchner, Franz Koidl Space Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences.
TOR TanDEM-X 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, October 2008 ILRS Support for TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X - Status and Future Prospects.
Purdue University Femtosecond CARS Spectroscopy of Gas-Phase Transitions: Theory and Experiments Prof. Robert P. Lucht School of Mechanical Engineering.
CE 428 LAB IV Error Analysis (Analysis of Uncertainty) Almost no scientific quantities are known exactly –there is almost always some degree of uncertainty.
Yu. Artyukh, V. Bespal’ko, E. Boole, V. Vedin Institute of Electronics and Computer Science Riga, LATVIA 16th International Workshop on Laser.
Chapter 5: Signals and Noise
Chemometrics Method comparison
Software PACE detect with ADS1292 Tony Calabria Texas Instruments.
Topic 1 different attributes that characterize sensors ETEC 6405.
Error Analysis Accuracy Closeness to the true value Measurement Accuracy – determines the closeness of the measured value to the true value Instrument.
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.6Beats Beats (SB p. 50) Interference What is the effect of the superposition of two sound waves of slightly different.
ERRORS AND SIGNIFICANT FIGURES. ERRORS Mistakes - result of carelessness, easily detected Errors - fall into two types, systematic or random.
Define Problem Select Appropriate Methods Obtain and store sample Pre-treat sample Perform required measurements Compare results with standards Apply necessary.
Physics 270 – Experimental Physics. Standard Deviation of the Mean (Standard Error) When we report the average value of n measurements, the uncertainty.
LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING LABORATORY I.
Instrument Components Signal Generator (Energy Source) Analytical Signal Transducer Signal Processor Display Can you identify these components in the following.
MOBA Mobile Automation AG Kapellenstr Limburg / Germany Telefon: Telefax:
System Operations Eastbourne, October 2005 Towards the 1-mm: -A realistic goal ? -A vision ? -A myth ? -???
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
Aldo Dell'Oro INAF- Observatory of Turin Detailed analysis of the signal from asteroids by GAIA and their size estimation Besançon November 6-7, 2003.
Lecture I Sensors.
Sources of noise in instrumental analysis
On the Role of Electric Field Changes when Calculating Thunderstorm Currents Yu.V. Shlugaev, V.V. Klimenko, E.A. Mareev Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
1 Exercise 7: Accuracy and precision. 2 Origin of the error : Accuracy and precision Systematic (not random) –bias –impossible to be corrected  accuracy.
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Attenuation measurement with all 4 frozen-in SPATS strings Justin Vandenbroucke Freija Descamps IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Utrecht, Netherlands September.
SIAM M. Despeisse / 29 th January Toward a Gigatracker Front-end - Performance of the NINO LCO and HCO Matthieu Despeisse F. Osmic, S. Tiuraniemi,
KHz SLR Station Graz Graz kHz LIDAR Georg Kirchner, Franz Koidl, Daniel Kucharski Institute for Space Research SLR Station Graz / Austria Poznan, Oct.
Model Fusion and its Use in Earth Sciences R. Romero, O. Ochoa, A. A. Velasco, and V. Kreinovich Joint Annual Meeting NSF Division of Human Resource Development.
1.4 UNDERSTANDING MEASUREMENTS.  Determination of the actual value for particular physical quantity.
Chem. 133 – 2/9 Lecture. Announcements Return Q1 + HW 1.1 This week’s seminar: on aerosol air pollution in Asia Lab –Sign up for term project instruments.
Uncertainty and error in measurement. Error Uncertainty in a measurement Limit to the precision or accuracy Limit to the reliability An error is not a.
I.Prochazka, Tech.Univ.Munich, Germany.October 27, 2008 Gaining confidence – Breadboard demo, Prague n The entire Time transfer experiment may be carried.
Chapter 1: Introduction 1. Type of instrumental methods Radiation Electrical method Thermal properties Others 2. Instruments for analysis Non-electrical.
Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
Theoretical Centre-of-mass Corrections for LAGEOS, ETALON and AJISAI Toshimichi OTSUBO Communications Research Laboratory, Kashima, Japan Graham M APPLEBY.
Uncertainty in Measurement How would you measure 9 ml most precisely? What is the volume being measured here? What is the uncertainty measurement? For.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Chapter 5: Signals and Noise
Signal Processing Session
Signals and Noise Signal to Noise Ratio Types of Noise
Day 32 Range Sensor Models 11/13/2018.
Gage R&R Estimating measurement components
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
Introduction to Instrumentation Engineering
Distance Sensor Models
10.5 Fourier Transform NMR Instrumentation
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry
Measurement, Error, & Uncertainty
Errors and Uncertainties
Lab Accuracy/Precision Lab
Figure 2.1 Generalized measurement system.
Presentation transcript:

PULSE REPETITION RATE OPTMIZATION IN SLR STATIONS TO PROVIDE MINIMUM SYSTEMATIC ERROR OF RANGING M.A. Sadovnikov M.A. Sadovnikov Institute for Precision Instrument Engineering Moscow Moscow 16 th International Laser Ranging Workshop Poznan 2008

Active 300 Hz SLR stations. What next ?

INITIAL THESES 1.In single-photon SLR, the random and systematic errors of return signal arrival time depend on the number of photoelectrons in the return signal pulse n se. 2.With n se >1, the one-shot precision increases, but simultaneously the systematic error of measurement also increases; the error is caused by variations of the moment of detection of the first photoelectron in the return pulse, as well as by variations of the signal transit time in the avalanche photodiode. 3.To eliminate the systematic error, it is necessary to provide n se <<1 in combination with a high repetition rate of radiated laser pulses. 4.Using a simple analytical model of detection of return pulses with a fluctuating number of photoelectrons, it is possible to estimate the n se value and corresponding repetition rate F required for a given (sufficiently low) systematic error level.

ANALYSIS RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 1.The effect of signal intensity fluctuations on the systematic error of range measurements decreases with reduced average number of photoelectrons in the return signal pulse. With n se <0.05, the intensity fluctuations actually do not affect the measurement accuracy. 2.With n se <0.02, the systematic error of range measurements does not exceed 0.3 mm, with return signal pulsewidth less than 400 ps. 3.With n se <0.05, the systematic error of range measurements does not exceed 0.6 mm, with return signal pulsewidth less than 400 ps. 4.To eliminate the systematic error, the laser pulse repetition rate should meet the requirement F>f se /n se, where f se is the mean value of return signal photoelectron generation frequency in the SLR station receiver. 5.To obtain f se values typical for state-of-the-art SLR stations, the laser pulse repetition frequency should be in the tens of kHz range.