WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 1 Strictly Confidential Workpackage 2: Gas Processing Unit KTI Review Meeting,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy- and exergy efficiencies of stationary LT and HT – fuel cell systems Summer school on electrochemical engineering, Palic, Republic of Serbia Prof.
Advertisements

Conversion and Reactor sizing
Outline Introduction Design of catalytic membrane reactor Results
AN OVER VIEW OF FUEL PROCESSOR TECHNOLOGIES FOR FUEL CELL APPLICATIONS K.Venkateshwarlu, T.Krishnudu and K.B.S.Prasad Indian Institute of Chemical Technology.
Methanol Project Design a plant to make methanol from synthesis gas to supply a future market in direct methanol fuel cells.
Adsorptive Desulfurization of Liquid Hydrocarbons: Langmuir Adsorption modeling using COMSOL Ram EGEE 520 Spring 2007.
INGAS 6th Month meeting, Prague, May 2009 Institut für Chemische Verfahrenstechnik D Stuttgart, Böblingerstr. 72 6th month meeting Prague,
Module 5a Incinerators and Adsorbers MCEN 4131/ Preliminaries 1-minute paper: –things you like about class –helpful suggestions to improve your.
Nuclear Energy University Programs NGNP Systems Analysis August 10, 2011 Hans Gougar.
ENERGY CONVERSION ES 832a Eric Savory Lecture 11 – A small-scale power plant worked example Department of Mechanical.
Analysis of Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 0.8 Fe 0.2 O 3-  Stability Enhancement Using a Two Step Reactor Design Jovan Trujillo
Capture of Heat Energy From Diesel Engine After Cooler Circuit (2006 Annual Report) Mark Teitzel Alaska Village Energy Corporation
WP 1: Fuel Cell Development 1 Strictly Confidential NMW Workpackage 1: Fuel Cell Development KTI Review Meeting,
M a t e r i a l s Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich Nonmetallic Materials Brandon E. Bürgler Nonmetallic Inorganic Materials ETH Zürich Single.
WP 3: Thermal System Strictly Confidential 1 Workpackage 3: Thermal System Meeting, February 2, 2006 at EPFL NTB INTERSTAATLICHE HOCHSCHULE FÜR TECHNIK.
WP 3: Thermal System Strictly Confidential 1 Workpackage 3: Thermal System Project Meeting, May 11, 2006.
Electro- chemical Process Engineering Rheinländer SR_NG Chemical Process + Heat Integration Steam Reforming of Natural Gas for PEM Fuel Cells Center for.
Scoping Study of He-cooled Porous Media for ARIES-CS Divertor Presented by John Pulsifer Major contributor: René Raffray University of California, San.
1 Strictly Confidential NMW KTI Review Meeting: KTI Review Meeting, December 16, 2005 Anja Bieberle-Hütter,
Direct Oxidation of Methane to Methanol
Group 6: Jacob Hebert, Michael McCutchen, Eric Powell, Jacob Reinhart
SOFC PFD. Fuel Preparation Desulfurizer (DS-101) 2 ppm H 2 S in natural gas feed H 2 S removed in DS-101 with disposable carbon filters 10% of CH 4 fed.
Current uses and facts. Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells were developed by General Electric in the 1960s Current Fuel Cells use Hydrogen gas and Oxygen.
Institute of Chemical Engineering page 1 Achema 2012 Chemical Process Engineering Research Group Zero Emission Technologies Contact: Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Tobias.
Integrated MicroPower GeneratorProgram Review, October 18, 2002 Single-Chamber Fuel Cell Models D. G. Goodwin, Caltech Develop validated physics-based.
Andrew Carrier 1, Dominik Wechsler 1, Philip Jessop 1, Boyd Davis 2 1 Department of Chemistry 2 Queen’s-RMC Fuel Cell Research Centre Queen’s University.
Numerical and Experimental Study on Bed-to-Wall Heat Transfer in Conical Fluidized Bed Reactor 17 th International Conference on Mechatronics, Electrical.
NTB INTERSTATE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES OF TECHNOLOGY BUCHS MNT INSTITUTE FOR MICRO AND NANOTECHNOLOGY Patrik Müller, Andres Bolleter, Aziz Ibzazene.
Production Of Syngas and Ethanol Group#4 Sara Al-Quhaim Mona Al-Khalaf Noura Al Dousari Sara Al Safi.
INGAS “18 Months Meeting ”, “GDF-SUEZ Paris, France”, “20-21 May 2010” INGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain 1 INGAS 18 months meeting GDF-SUEZ, Paris - France.
Hydrogen from Renewable Fuels by Autothermal Reforming: Alcohols, Carbohydrates, and Biodiesel Lanny D. Schmidt Department of Chemical Engineering and.
Purification of Exhaust Gases Removal of pollutants from exhaust Removal of pollutants from exhaust gas after they leave the engine cylinder can be done.
CREA 2008IL FUTURO E’ VERTICALE ICI Caldaie Celle a combustibile per la micro generazione Alberto Zerbinato.
Thermal Model of MEMS Thruster Apurva Varia Propulsion Branch Code 597.
1 Modeling and validation of coal combustion in a circulating fluidized bed using Eulerian-Lagrangian approach U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy.
WP 5: Project Management & Industrial Liaison 1 Strictly Confidential NMW Workpackage 5: Project Management.
Table of Content Introduction of heat exchanger. Design of Coolers.
1 Self-Optimizing Control HDA case study S. Skogestad, May 2006 Thanks to Antonio Araújo.
01/04/2014 / Page 1 (Disclosure or reproduction without prior permission of FERRET is prohibited). A Flexible natural gas membrane Reformer for m- CHP.
Integrated Micropower Generator Sossina M. Haile, Zongping Shao, Chan Kwak, Peter Babilo California Institute of Technology, Materials Science Micro- SOFC.
INGAS “General Assembly Meeting ”, “Prague, Czech Republic”, “25-26 May 2009” INGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain 1 InGAS General Assembly Meeting Prague -
INGAS 6 month meeting, Prague, May 2009 INGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain 1 Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Energia Research activity from Nov.
Operation, Modeling and Analysis of the Reverse Water Gas Shift Process Jonathan Whitlow Florida Institute of Technology NASA/ASEE Summer Faculty Program.
Inovace bakalářského studijního oboru Aplikovaná chemie Reg. č.: CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
Supervisor by :Prof. Dr. Malek Al-Ahmad Name : Ali Hassan Al-Godrani
Chemical/Polymer Reactor Design
USING SOLAR ENERGY CONTINUOUSLY THROUGH DAY AND NIGHT FOR METHANE REFORMING – AN EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION J. L. Lapp, M. Lange, M. Roeb, C. Sattler ECCE10.
Integrated Micropower Generator Sossina Haile, David Goodwin, Caltech Steve Visco, Lutgard de Jonghe, Craig Jacobson, LBNL Scott Barnett, Northwestern.
Technology for a better society CO 2 separation and utilization via dual-phase high-temperature membranes Wen Xing 1, Thijs Peters 1, Marie-Laure Fontaine.
Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane to Syngas and the DME Synthesis
1 Vacuum chambers for LHC LSS TS Workshop 2004 Pedro Costa Pinto TS department, MME group Surface Characterization & Coatings Section.
TESTING/PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CATALYSTS
An Experimental Study of Carbon Dioxide Desorption from a Calcium Oxide Based Synthetic Sorbent Using Zonal Radio-Frequency Heating E. Pradhan, Dr. J.
Integrated Energy Production Using a Fuel Cell System for a Crewed Space Base Station EERC Energy & Environmental Research Center ®
Aachen Status Report: CO 2 Cooling for the CMS Tracker at SLHC Lutz Feld, Waclaw Karpinski, Jennifer Merz and Michael Wlochal RWTH Aachen University, 1.
Dr. Owen Clarkin School of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering Summary of Energy Topics Chapter 1: Thermodynamics / Energy Introduction Chapter 2: Systems.
A.N.Zagoruiko. Anaerobic catalytic oxidation of hydrocarbons in moving heat waves. Case simulation: propane oxidative dehydrogenation in a packed adiabatic.
2005 Joint Propulsion Conference Tucson, AZ July 10-13, 2005 Candidate Near-Term Fuel Options for Conventional and Bimodal NTR Engines J. A. Halfinger.
S. Vassiliadis1, Z. Ziaka2, M. Tsimpa1
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis,
Ventilation Air Methane – Converting a Greenhouse Gas into Energy
Integrated Micropower Generator
Integrated Micropower Generator Catalyst Optimization
Aachen Status Report: CO2 Cooling for the CMS Tracker at SLHC
INTEGRATED CATALYTIC MEMBRANE REACTOR PROCESS FOR CO2 REFORMING OF METHANE by Ifeyinwa Orakwe Supervisor: Prof Edward.
Chemical Reaction Engineering Reactor Design
Kick-Off Meeting “One BAT” KTI Nr DCPP-NM
in Fixed-bed Tubular Reactor
Preventing Thermal Runaways of LENR Reactors
Aspen Reactors Amanda Hamilton, Jonathan Kalman, Harrison Kraus, Jenny Lam, Sophie Levy, Jacob Salem.
Presentation transcript:

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 1 Strictly Confidential Workpackage 2: Gas Processing Unit KTI Review Meeting, May 11, 2005 M. Stutz, N. Hotz, Dr. N. Bieri, and Prof. D. Poulikakos NTB INTERSTAATLICHE HOCHSCHULE FÜR TECHNIK BUCHS

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 2 Strictly Confidential Contributions to WP 2 NTB NMW Butane Reforming Post CombustionIntegration and Testing Inlet conditionsCompatibility with FC Heat exchange Feed / Exhaust Micromachining Coating NTB NMW Coating Micromachining Coating

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 3 Strictly Confidential Project Management Thermal System Fuel Cell Gas Processing WP 2: Year 1 Milestones performance 200 mW/cm 550°C external electrical connections butane conversion rate > 90% post-combustor with gas oxidation > 98% battery expert industrial partner thermal insulation concept with T inside 550°C, T outside 50°C, <10 cm 3 structures for validation critical points thermal system demonstrator with simulated 2 W heat source

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 4 Strictly Confidential Main Achievement after 12 Months Optimized butane reforming performance at 600˚C! Hydrogen Yield: month 12 Month 6

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 5 Strictly Confidential Overview Our Main Task in this Project WP 2.1: Reformer WP 2.2: Post-Combustor WP 2.3: Integration and Testing Validation of Milestones Next Steps

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 6 Strictly Confidential Our Main Task in this Project FC System: Reformer: Post Combustor (PC):

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 7 Strictly Confidential Overview Our Main Task in this Project WP 2.1: Reformer WP 2.2: Post-Combustor WP 2.3: Integration and Testing Validation of Milestones Next Steps

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 8 Strictly Confidential WP 2.1: Reformer Main Tasks: Understanding the butane reforming at low temperature (600˚C)? –Experiments with packed bed reformer influence of plugs is significant activation/deactivation of catalyst Reforming with the disk reactor: –Coating of the disk reactor –Influence of sealing –Activation/deactivation of catalyst New challenge –Modified product specification (from 1 W to 2.5 W power output) →Build-up of modified test rig

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 9 Strictly Confidential Month 12: Milestones (MS) month 12: reformer demonstrator with significant butane conversion 600°C and stable for feeds of 0.02 to 0.5 g/h butane incl. gas chromatography (fabrication: NTB, testing: LTNT) –Optimized experiments: packed bed reformer –Modified design in progress (disk reactor) 

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 10 Strictly Confidential Experimental Results Comparison: Packed bed reactor –Empty tube –Reformer with plugs 'O' (Al 2 O 3 /SiO 2, old) –Reformer with plugs 'N' (SiO 2, new) –Thermodynamic equilibrium

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 11 Strictly Confidential Reactor Performance Butane conversion for T > 450 °C: →high η for 'plugs N' for T < 450 °C: →high η for 'plugs O' η of empty tube is low →effect of catalyst at T = 600 °C: →η = 69.2 % for 'plugs O' →η = 93.0 % for 'plugs N' POX TOX Total Oxidation (TOX):C 4 H O 2 →5 H 2 O + 4 CO 2 Partial Oxidation (POX):C 4 H O 2 →5 H CO

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 12 Strictly Confidential Reactor Performance Hydrogen Yield for T > 450 °C: →high ψ for 'plugs N' for T < 450 °C: →high ψ for 'plugs O' ψ is higher than equilibrium at T = 600 °C: →ψ = 45.5 % for 'plugs O' →ψ = 86.6 % for 'plugs N' POX TOX TOX: C 4 H O 2 →5 H 2 O + 4 CO 2 POX: C 4 H O 2 →5 H CO

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 13 Strictly Confidential Outlet composition Reformer with plugs 'N' (SiO 2, new) Outlet composition: at T = 600 °C: –X H2O = 4.6% –X H2 = 23.0% –X CO = 13.2% →Enhanced FC performance if X H2O ≈ 5% POX TOX → Inlet conditions of FC to NMW / EPFL

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 14 Strictly Confidential Disk reactor Experimental results of Disk reactor –Coating: Rh (sputtered by NTB) –T = 600°C, d disk = 8 mm, GSV = 25 s -1 PBR DR PBR DR Reason: Sealing? Coating? Butane Conversion: Hydrogen Yield: Alternative: Filling disk space with catalyst particles (packed bed)

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 15 Strictly Confidential Overview Our Main Task in this Project WP 2.1: Reformer WP 2.2: Post-Combustor WP 2.3: Integration and Testing Validation of Milestones Next Steps

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 16 Strictly Confidential WP 2.2: Post Combustor (PC) Purpose of PC: Catalytic oxidation of (toxic, flammable) exhaust gases –e.g. C 4 H O 2 → 4 CO H 2 O –e.g. CO O 2 → CO 2 Several studies in literature –Choice of catalyst and support: (Pt Ce 0.5 Zr 0.5 O 2 ) PC design similar to reformer (constraints: stack integration) Composition of gas at inlet? Modified product specification

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 17 Strictly Confidential Milestones (MS) month 12: first preliminary post-combustor demonstrator aiming for significant oxidation 600°C and stable for feeds of 0.02 to 0.5 g/h butane (fabrication: NTB, testing: LTNT) –Modified product specification (from 1 W to 2.5 W power output → Modified test rig) –Inlet gas composition not known (CO, CH 4, C 4 H 10 conversion in Fuel Cell?) –Reforming with disk reactor not yet satisfied –Catalyst particles are active (and already produced by LTNT) W. J. Stark, J. D. Grunwaldt, M. Maciejewski, S. E. Pratsinis, A. Baiker, "Flame-made Pt/ceria/zirconia for low- temperature oxygen exchange", Chem. Mater., 17 (13) (2005).  ongoing

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 18 Strictly Confidential Overview Our Main Task in this Project WP 2.1: Reformer WP 2.2: Post-Combustor WP 2.3: Integration and Testing Validation of Milestones Next Steps

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 19 Strictly Confidential WP 2.3: Integration and Testing month 12: delivery of first reformer and post-combustor designs aiming for compatibility with heat exchanger and hot module processing (LTNT) –Final design: disk reactor –Initial specifications: dimensions determined –Altered Specifications: Dimensions to be determined   ongoing 

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 20 Strictly Confidential Overview Our Main Task in this Project WP 2.1: Reformer WP 2.2: Post-Combustor WP 2.3: Integration and Testing Validation of Milestones Next Steps

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 21 Strictly Confidential Validation of Milestones and Deliverables  WP 2.3: Integration and Testing Month 12:delivery of first reformer and post-combustor designs aiming for compatibility with heat exchanger and hot module processing (LTNT) WP 2.2: Post-combustor Month 12:first preliminary post-combustor demonstrator aiming for significant oxidation 600°C and stable for feeds of 0.02 to 0.5 g/h butane (fabrication: NTB, testing: LTNT) WP 2.1: Reformer Month 12:reformer demonstrator with significant butane conversion 600°C and stable for feeds of 0.02 to 0.5 g/h butane incl. gas chromatography (fabrication: NTB, testing: LTNT)   ongoing Previous Milestones and Deliverables: all fullfilled 

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 22 Strictly Confidential Summary of Results Optimized butane reforming at low temperatures (PBR) Ongoing butane reforming experiments with DR Active catalyst particles for Post-Combustor DR design for integration into hot module

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 23 Strictly Confidential Overview Our Main Task in this Project WP 2.1: Reformer WP 2.2: Post-Combustor WP 2.3: Integration and Testing Validation of Milestones Next Steps

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 24 Strictly Confidential Next steps (Year 2) WP 2.1: High performance of disk reactor at T = 600°C: Butane conversion > 80%, hydrogen selectivity > 60% –(Coating in collaboration with NTB and NMW) WP 2.1: Long-term stability tests of reformer at T = 600°C: Butane conversion loss < 10% (after 10 h steady state) WP 2.2: Improved performance of post combustor: exhaust gas oxidation > 98% at T = 600°C and 0.7 g/h butane feed –(Inlet conditions for PC from NMW and EPFL) WP 2.3: Integration of reformer and PC into hot module –(Constructal constraints from NTB and ZHW) NMW NTB NMW NTB

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 25 Strictly Confidential Next steps (Year 3 / Year 4) WP 2.1: Optimized performance of disk reactor at T = 550°C: Butane conversion > 90%, hydrogen selectivity > 75% –(Inlet gas composition to NMW / EPFL) WP 2.1: Start-up stability tests of reformer: Butane conversion loss < 10% (after 5 cycles from 25°C to 600°C) WP 2.2: Optimized performance of PC at T = 550°C: CO conc. < 25 ppm (TLV, ACGIH). –(Operation parameters from NMW / EPFL, ZHW / NTB) WP 2.2: Start-up stability tests of PC: CO conc. < 25 ppm (after 5 cycles from 25°C to 600°C) NMW NTB

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 26 Strictly Confidential Questions ? Optimized butane reforming performance at 600˚C! Hydrogen Yield: month 12 Month 6

WP 2: Gas Processing Unit 27 Strictly Confidential Validation of Milestones and Deliverables   WP 2.1: Reformer Month 3:first reformer design available (LTNT) Month 6:modelled and evaluated reformer based on 0.3 g/h butane in 2 cm 3 with T max difference 50°C (reformer modelled for methane): effect of thermal conductivity of the reformer walls on the reformer process, microchannels coated with catalyst vs. porous catalyst (LTNT)   WP 2.2: Post-combustor Month 3:first preliminary post-combustor design available Month 6:improved designs of post-combustors aiming for 0.3 g/h butane feed, fully oxidized in 1 cm 600°C and max. pressure drop of 3 Pa (LTNT)   WP 2.3: Integration and Testing Month 3:design of test rig available (LTNT) Month 6:test rig for reformer and post-combustor for GPU performance incl. gas chromatograph (LTNT) Deliverables: Month 3: reformer design from LTNT  NTB for evaluation Month 6: final reformer design from LTNT  NTB for fabrication Deliverables: Month 6:designs of post-combustor from LTNT  NTB for fabrication Deliverables: Month 3: design from LTNT  NTB Month 6:NTB samples  LTNT (P. Müller checks whether possible in month 6)     