Field layouts  Common-offset & Zero-offset  Common-midpoint method  Up-dip and down-dip shooting  Spread types  Singlefold / Multifold recording 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Seismic Method Lecture 5 SLIDE 1
Advertisements

Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Reflection Seismic Processing
Using 3D Seismic Imaging for Mine and Mineral Exploration G. Schuster University of Utah.
Processing: zero-offset gathers
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Seismic refraction and reflection projects and the traditional field camp Bob Bauer and Eric Sandvol University of Missouri Branson Field Lab.
Fundamentals Introduction Seismic waves: Propagation Velocity and Amplitudes Seismogram Measurement systems Sources, receivers, Acquisition strategies.
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Reflection Field Methods
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Seismic refraction surveys
GG 450 April 16, 2008 Seismic Reflection 1.
SOEE2102 – Geophysical Field Trip and Tutorials Malham Tarn (North Yorkshire) October 2009 Refraction Analysis Sebastian Rost University of Leeds 2009.
Land and Marine Seismic Acquisition from 2D to 3D
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
L to J Non graded quizzes Steve Bahrij St. Mary’s High School O’Neill, Nebraska
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
The ray parameter and the travel-time curves P flat and P radial are the slopes of the travel time curves T-versus-X and T-versus- , respectively. While.
Turbulence forecasting goals Completely automated – no human-in-the-loop “Operational”, i.e., 24x7 Rapid updates Easy to understand output for airline.
Searching for blind faults: the Haiti subsurface imaging project ERAY KOCEL ERAY KOCEL with with Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, Robert R. Stewart, Paul.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Part 4: Sound in the Ocean
Introduction to Seismology
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Reflection seismograms
L to J Non graded quizzes Steve Bahrij St. Mary’s High School O’Neill, Nebraska
Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging References: J.M. Reynolds, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons,
FIELD GEOMETRY FOR MULTICHANNEL SEISMIC (MCS) PROFILES Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging: Pt 2.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics Last time: The Refraction Method Cont’d Multiple Horizontal Layers: Using Snell’s law, generalizes simply to: Dipping.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 Vertical Seismic Profiling– Nov 2, 2015
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 10 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d Dix Equations for multiple layers:
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Efficient modeling and imaging of pegleg multiples Morgan Brown and Antoine Guitton Stanford University, Department of Geophysics Multiples can be bad…
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
Geology 490M 3D Seismic Workshop tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Demo, Wave.
Seismic Refraction Interpretation
llll llll llll llll lll llllllllll llllllll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Reflection Seismic Method
Land and Marine Seismic Acquisition from 2D to 3D
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
SEISMIC DATA ANALYSIS AND FIELD QC SYSTEM
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Marine Reflection Seismology - Geometry
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
The Wave Equation Modeled
Figure 1 (from Fowler p 120 The configuration for the 110N 36 channel active source refraction survey: Long survey: Source is at x=0, geophone #1 is.
3D Seismic Processing Eric Verschuur AES 1530.
Example of how OFFREG method compares to Geometry and standard MGEOM
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Discussion of problems & Common midpoint gathers
Position of first shot= 300 m to the west of the first geophone
Presentation transcript:

Field layouts  Common-offset & Zero-offset  Common-midpoint method  Up-dip and down-dip shooting  Spread types  Singlefold / Multifold recording  Crooked line method  Determining field parameters

X Source and Receiver have always the same distance Moveout must be taken into account or corrected for Common-Offset

X Source and receiver are at the same location (i.e. the offset is zero -> “zero offset”) => No Move-out Zero-Offset

CMP = CDP CMP  CDP CMP = common mid point CDP = common depth point CMP - “ Common Mid Point”

+ llllllll + llllllll Down-dip shooting Up-dip shooting Down-dip and Up-dip shooting Remember the refraction measurement where both shooting directions were needed to estimate the velocity of the lower layer

(Top view) + lllllllll single ended (end on) split spreadfan shooting single ended (inline offset) + lllllllll + llllllllllll + llllll llllll + l l l l l l l l l Common field layouts

+ llllllllllllllllll lllllllll + lllllllll lllllllll + lllllllll active not-active active more Geophones in the Field than active channels Geometry of Geophones relative to the source remains the same roll along

“roll along acquisition” llllllllllllllll active not-active llllllll llllllll llllllll llllllll llllllll llllllll lllllll llllll lllll llll lll llllllll lllll llll lll ll l l l

Crooked line method Sources and receivers on a roadResulting line From Sheriff, 1995

Shot-receiver coordinate system From Reynolds, 1997

Midpoint-offset coordinate system X o =(X s -X r )/2X m =(X s +X r )/2 From Reynolds, 1997

+ llll + llll + llll + llll + llll + llll + llll + llll No. geophones: 4, distance geoph: 1, distance source: 2, No. geophones: 4, distance geoph: 1, distance source: 1, Fold: 2 Fold: 1

l lllllllllll llllllllll ll llllllllllll llllllllllll llllllllllll llllllllllll

Number of traces per CMP Coverage (“fold”)

Raypaths for a given bin From Reynolds, 1997

Determining field parameters  Maximum offset  Depth deepest zone of interest  Minimum offset  Not greater than shallowest section of interest  Maximum array length is determined by the minimum apparent velocity of reflections  Charge size determined by ambient noise late on the record  Line orientation (up-dip, down-dip)