Electron Beam MicroAnalysis- Theory and Application Electron Probe MicroAnalysis - (EPMA) X-ray Production: Ionization and Absorption UofO- Geology 619.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instrumental Chemistry
Advertisements

Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology Chapter 15: Interaction of Photons and Charged Particles with Matter Professor Yasser M. Kadah Web:
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
X-Ray Astronomy Lab X-rays Why look for X-rays? –High temperatures –Atomic lines –Non-thermal processes X-ray detectors X-ray telescopes The Lab.
Ch6 X-ray Producing X-ray Moseley formula X-ray diffraction
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
Saeedeh Ghaffari Nanofabrication Fall 2011 April 15 1.
Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom
X-ray Diffraction. X-ray Generation X-ray tube (sealed) Pure metal target (Cu) Electrons remover inner-shell electrons from target. Other electrons “fall”
Electron Beam Analysis (EPMA, SEM-EDS) Warren Straszheim, PhD EPMA, Ames Lab, 227 Wilhelm SEM-EDS, MARL, 23 Town Engineering
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
X-radiation. X-rays are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. X-radiation (composed of X-rays) is a form of electromagnetic radiation. X- rays have a.
First of all, do you know any methods to check chemical composition? Or how you know what is what? First of all, do you know any methods to check chemical.
Electron probe microanalysis Electron - Specimen Interaction Revised 1/19/13 UW- Madison Geoscience 777.
Atomic X-Ray Spectroscopy Chapter 12 X-ray range  Å to 100 Å Used  0.1Å to 25 Å.
BME 560 Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
Nature and origin of X-rays Interaction of X-rays with atoms
Types of Radiation Interactions All or Nothing Many Small There is a finite probability per unit length that the radiation is absorbed. If not, there is.
Beam – Specimen Interactions Electron optical system controls: beam voltage (1-40 kV) beam current (pA – μA) beam diameter (5nm – 1μm) divergence angle.
The Origins of X-Rays. The X-Ray Spectrum The X-Ray Spectrum (Changes in Voltage) The characteristic lines are a result of electrons ejecting orbital.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Particle Interactions
W.N. Catford/P.H. Regan 1AMQ 83 Characteristic X-rays and Selection Rules. Characteristic X-rays: are emitted by atoms when electrons make transitions.
Corpuscular induced and X-ray or γ -ray induced fluorescence NON DESTRUCTIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS Notes by: Dr Ivan Gržetić, professor University of Belgrade.
Interaction of Gamma-Rays - General Considerations uncharged transfer of energy creation of fast electrons.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
3. PROTON INDUCED X-RAY EMISSION Procedure of Spectrum Analysis
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Lecture 11b Atomic Physics & Nuclear Reactions Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Theory and Practice of Electron Microprobe Analysis Geoc 575 Nelia Dunbar Bureau Office B-101 x5783 office x5155 lab.
Electron Microscopes Used to count individual atoms What can electron microscopes tell us? Morphology – Size and shape Topography – Surface features (roughness,
Chapter 10: Modern atomic theory Chemistry 1020: Interpretive chemistry Andy Aspaas, Instructor.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
X-Ray Diffraction Dr. T. Ramlochan March 2010.
1 Ch 4 Electron Energies. 2 Electromagnetic Spectrum Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that exhibits wave-like behavior as it travels though.
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis in the TEM Anthony J. Garratt-Reed Neil Rowlands.
Chapter 7 The Quantum-Mechanical Model of the Atom
Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom Quantum Numbers & Electron Configurations.
Reminders for this week Homework #4 Due Wednesday (5/20) Lithography Lab Due Thursday (5/21) Quiz #3 on Thursday (5/21) – In Classroom –Covers Lithography,
Medical Imaging Radiation I. Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century (Paperback)by Bettyann Kevles Bettyann Kevles E=mc2: A Biography.
2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles.
Electron probe microanalysis Electron - Specimen Interaction Revised 9/10/2003 UW- Madison Geology 777.
1 Photons: X-rays, γ- rays; electrons, positrons Lecture 2 Shell structure of the atoms. Notion of the cross section of the interaction.
Historically, scientists have used their knowledge of atomic properties to develop and refine atomic models. Today, this knowledge is applied to various.
SEM- Schematic Overview. Electron Detection Tungsten Filament Electron Source.
08/03/09 SEM signal generation
Chapter 7 Lecture Lecture Presentation Chapter 7 The Quantum- Mechanical Model of the Atom Sherril Soman Grand Valley State University © 2014 Pearson Education,
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Chapter 28:Atomic Physics
Chapter 7 The Quantum- Mechanical Model of the Atom.
The Bohr Model; Wave Mechanics and Orbitals. Attempt to explain H line emission spectrum Why lines? Why the particular pattern of lines? Emission lines.
Chapter 61 Electronic Structure of Atoms Chapter 6.
INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER. twCshttp:// twCs
ATOMIC STRUCTURE Presented by Naveed Nawaz. Outline Schrodinger Model of the Atom Schrodinger Model of the Atom Quantum Numbers Quantum Numbers Periodic.
Atomic Physics Quantum Physics 2002 Recommended Reading: Harris Chapter 7.
Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Interaction of Radiation with Matter
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
Electron probe microanalysis
What value of wavelength is associated with the Lyman series for {image} {image} 1. {image}
Electron probe microanalysis
Electron probe microanalysis
Chapter 7 The Quantum-Mechanical Model of the Atom
Electron probe microanalysis
Electron probe microanalysis
Electron Probe Microanalysis and Scanning Electron Microscopy
Presentation transcript:

Electron Beam MicroAnalysis- Theory and Application Electron Probe MicroAnalysis - (EPMA) X-ray Production: Ionization and Absorption UofO- Geology 619

Schrödinger Model:

EM Spectrum Lines Produced by Electron Shell Ionization

Inner-shell ionization: Production of X-ray or Auger e- (Goldstein et al, 1992, p 120) Incident electron knocks inner shell (K here) electron out of its orbit (time=1). This is an unstable configuration, and an electron from a higher energy orbital (L here) ‘falls in’ to fill the void (time=2). There is an excess of energy present and this is released internally as a photon. The photon has 2 ways to exit the atom (time=3), either by ejecting another outer shell electron as an Auger electron (L here, thus a KLL transition), or as X-ray (KL transition). K shell L shell (=photoelectron) Blue Lines indicate subsequent times: 1 to 2, then 3 where there are 2 alternate outcomes Time 1 2 3

X-ray Lines - K, L, M K  X-ray is produced due to removal of K shell electron, with L shell electron taking its place. K  occurs in the case where K shell electron is replaced by electron from the M shell. L  X-ray is produced due to removal of L shell electron, replaced by M shell electron. M  X-ray is produced due to removal of M shell electron, replaced by N shell electron.

Ionization of Electron Shells (Originally Woldseth, 1973, reprinted in Goldstein et al, 1992, p 125)

X-ray Lines with initial + final levels (Reed, 1993)

Nomenclature of X-rays (Reed, 1993) X-rays are described, from the traditional Siegbahn notation (e.g. K  1 ) to the the IUPAC (K-L 3 ). (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry). This table is from their 1991 recommendation.

n = principal quantum number and indicates the electron shell or orbit (n=1=K, n=2=L, n=3=M, n=4=N) of the Bohr model. Number of electrons per shell = 2n 2 l = orbital quantum number of each shell, or orbital angular momentum, values from 0 to n –1 Electrons have spin denoted by the letter s, angular momentum axis spin, restricted to +/- ½ due to magnetic coupling between spin and orbital angular momentum, the total angular momentum is described by j = l + s In a magnetic field the angular momentum takes on specific directions denoted by the quantum number m <= ABS(j) or m = -l… -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 … +l Rules for Allowable Combinations of Quantum Numbers:  The three quantum numbers (n, l, and m) that describe an orbital must be integers.  "n" cannot be zero. "n" = 1, 2, 3, 4...  "l" can be any integer between zero and (n-1), e.g. If n = 4, l can be 0, 1, 2, or 3.  "m" can be any integer between -l and +l. e.g. If l = 2, m can be -2, -1, 0, 1, or 2.  "s" is arbitrarily assigned as +1/2 or –1/2, but for any one subshell (n, l, m combination), there can only be one of each. (1 photon = 1 unit of angular momentum and must be conserved, that is no ½ units, hence “forbidden transitions) No two electrons in an atom can have the same exact set of quantum numbers and therefore the same energy. (Of course if they did, we couldn’t observably differentiate them but that’s how the model works.) One slide Schrödinger Model of the Atom

Fluorescence yield Fluorescence yield (  ) is fraction of ionizations that yield characteristic X-ray versus Auger yield (  ) within a particular family of X-rays.  +  =1

Absorption Edge Energy Example: Pt (Z=78) X-ray line energies and associated critical excitation (absorption edge) energies, in keV Edge or Critical ionization energy: minimum energy required to remove an electron from a particular shell. Also known as critical excitation energy, X-ray absorption energy, or absorption edge energy. It is higher than the associated characteristic (line) X- ray energy; the characteristic energy is value measured by our X-ray detector.

Overvoltage Overvoltage is the ratio of accelerating (gun) voltage to critical excitation energy for particular line*. U = E 0 /E c Maximum efficiency (cross-section) is at 2-3x critical excitation energy. Example of Overvoltage for Pt: for efficient excitation of this line, would be (minimally) thisß accelerating voltage La keV Ma -- 4 keV Example: Pt (Z=78) X-ray line energies and associated critical excitation (absorption edge) energies, in keV * recall: E 0 =gun accelerating voltage; E c =critical excitation energy

Continuum X-rays HV beam electrons can decelerate in the Coulombic field of the atom (+ field of nucleus screened by surrounding e-). The loss in energy as the electron brakes is emitted as a photon, the bremsstrahlung (“braking radiation”). The energy emitted in this random process varies up from 0 eV to the maximum, E 0. On an EDS plot of X-ray intensity vs energy, the continuum intensity decreases as energy increases. The high energy value where the continuum goes to zero is known as the Duane-Hunt limit. Duane-Hunt Limit

EDS spectrum showing absorption edge

Continuum and Atomic Number At a given energy (or ), the intensity of the continuum increases directly with Z (atomic number) of the material. This is of critical importance for minor or trace element analysis, and also lends itself to a timesaving technique (Mean Atomic Number,“MAN”). MAN plot (Z-bar = average Z = MAN) Continuum intensity around the Si Ka peak, varying with Z: Mo (42), Ti (22), B (5). X axis is sin theta position units.

General observations Above atomic number 10, the K family splits into K  and K  pairs Above atomic number 20, the L family becomes generally observable at about 0.2 keV Above atomic number 50, the M family of lines begin to appear When an electron beam has sufficient energy to excite the shell edge (absorption edge), all lines of lower energy for that element will also be excited. This is an important fact to consider when trying to positively identify the presence of an element in a spectra. Therefore if K lines are present, then L and M lines must also be present at their appropriate energies.

X-ray units: A, keV, sin , mm = hc/E 0 where h=Plancks constant, c=speed of light = /E 0 where is is in Å and E 0 in keV also, the 2 main EMPs plot up X-ray positions thusly: Cameca: n = 2d sin  so for n=1 and a given 2d, an X- ray line can be given as a sin value (or 10 5 times sin  ) JEOL: distance (L, in mm) between the sample (beam spot) and the diffracting crystal, i.e. L= R/d, where R is Rowland circle radius (X-ray focusing locus of points) and d is interlayer spacing of crystal.

Electron interaction volumes (Goldstein et al, 1992, p 80) Effect of beam interaction (damage) in plastic (polymethylmethacrylate), from Everhart et al., All specimens received same beam dosage, but were etched for progressively longer times, showing in (a) strongest electron energies, to (g) the region of least energetic electrons. Note teardrop shape in (g). Same scale for all.

Ranges and interaction volumes It is useful to have an understanding of the distance traveled by the beam electrons, or the depth of X-ray generation, i.e. specific ranges. For example: If you had a 1 um thick layer of compound AB atop substrate BC, is EPMA of AB possible?

Electron and X-ray Ranges Several researchers have developed physical/mathematical expressions to approximate electron and X-ray ranges. Two common ones are given below. Electron range. Kanaya and Okayama (1972) developed an expression for the depth of electron penetration: R KO =( A E )/(  Z 0.89 ) X-ray range. Anderson and Hasler (1966) give the depth of X- ray production as: R AH =(0.064)(E E c 1.68 )/  where E c is the absorption edge (critical excitation) energy.

Incident keV & Penetration 5 kV25 kV

Ranges and Interaction Volumes 5 keV, 5 um beam diameter: Contact Lens simulation using a 5 um beam on carbon coated (20 nm) silicon rubber of nominal composition. Electron energy is color coded and red indicated electrons that were backscattered out of the sample. 10 keV, 5 um beam diameter: 20 keV, 5 um beam diameter: 14um Characteristic X-rays 2-5um Secondary electrons ~100A-10nm Backscatter electrons 1-2µm

Ionization cross section (in units of ionizations/e - /(atom/cm 2 ) - Bethe (1930) where:n s is the number of electron in a shell of subshell (e.g., 2 for K shell) b s and c s are constants for a particular shell E c is the critical excitation energy U is the overvoltage

To calculate the number photons generated we need to modify the previous expression to units of photons/e - or n x where:Q is the ionization cross section from above  is the florescent yield (explain later) N O is the Avogadro’s number A is atomic weight  is density t is thickness of the thin foil (which experimentally) minimizes the effect of elastic scattering

For thick targets the thickness is replaced by the infinitesimal path increment ds and so the bulk x-ray yield, I c, is calculated by the integration along the Bethe range (R B ) to the point where the electron energy falls below the critical excitation energy for the x-ray of interest where:dE/ds is the rate of energy loss from inelastic scattering (the Bethe range expression we discussed last week)

“Harper’s Index” of EPMA 1 nA of beam electrons = coulomb/sec 1 electron’s charge = 1.6x coulomb ergo, 1 nA = electrons/sec Probability that an electron will cause an ionization: 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10,000 ergo, 1 nA of electrons in one second will yield 10 6 ionizations/sec Probability that ionization will yield characteristic X-ray (not Auger electron): 1 in 10 to 4 in 10. ergo, our 1 nA of electrons in 1 second will yield 10 5 xrays. Probability of detection: for EDS, solid angle < 0.01 (1 in 100). WDS, <.001 ergo 10 3 X-rays/sec detected by EDS, and 10 2 by WDS. These are for pure elements. For EDS, 10 wt%, 10 2 X-rays; 1 wt% 10 X-rays; 0.1 wt % 1 X-ray/sec. ergo, counting statistics are very important, and we need to get as high count rates as possible within good operating practices. From Lehigh Microscopy Summer School

Phi-Rho-z Distribution: Fig 1: from Bastin and Heijligers, 1992, Present and future of light element analysis with electron beam instruments. Microbeam Analysis, 1,

X-ray Absorption

Mass absorption coefficients