LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO - G R 1 HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI David Ottaway November 2005 LIGO-G Z.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
LIGO-G M LIGO - The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory Vibration and Facility Considerations (incomplete) Dennis Coyne TMT Vibration.
LIGO-G D Quiet Hydraulics Board: Purpose, Scope, Charter and Plans Dennis Coyne Kick-off Stanford, 16 Oct 2003.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
LIGO-G D Detector Installation and Commissioning Stan Whitcomb NSF Annual Review 30 April 2001 Caltech.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
G R LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer LIGO Advanced R&D Review M. Zucker 8 October, 2002.
LIGO-G D Evaluation of EPI Approaches Dennis Coyne 18 April 2003 EPI Design Review #2.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
Dennis Coyne Excomm Jan 26, 2004
LIGO-G M LIGO1 Hydraulic External Pre-Isolator (HEPI) Overall Installation Plan/Schedule Dennis Coyne HEPI Installation Readiness Review Feb 11,
Status of the LIGO Project
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO Magnetic External Pre-Isolator Richard Mittleman, David Ottaway & Gregg Harry April 18, 2003.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G W Raab: Searching for Gravitational Waves w/ LIGO1 Why Has Duty Cycle Been Lower in Livingston.
Nov ’01, page 1 Current Work on Hydraulics for LIGO 1 and Advanced LIGO Rich Abbott, Graham Allen, Daniel DeBra, Joe Giaime, Giles Hammond, Marcel Hammond,
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
LIGO-G M 1 Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Dennis Coyne LIGO Seminar March 29, 2002.
LIGO-G D 1 MEPI electroMagnetic External Pre-Isolator Backup alternative to the Hydraulic actuator approach Goal: maximum commonality with HEPI.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
Advanced LIGO Commissioning Overview Stanford LVC Meeting, August 27, 2014 Peter Fritschel.
G R Advanced LIGO Seismic Isolation R&D Dennis Coyne 8 Oct 2002.
LIGO-G D Commissioning PAC11, 2001 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G v1 The LIGO Vacuum System and plans for LIGO-Australia Stan Whitcomb IndIGO - ACIGA meeting on LIGO-Australia 9 February 2011.
LIGO-G D Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 14 June 2001 Caltech.
ILIAS GW Meeting Mallorca - October 23-24, 2005Luca Taffarello Status of the commissioning of the AURIGA detector Luca Taffarello (INFN Sezione di Padova)
Status of LIGO Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala LIGO-G D Commissioning and detector improvements for S4.
LIGO-G W Commissioning and Performance of the LIGO Interferometers Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
G Consideration of HAM SAS for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker LIGO Excomm 30 April 07.
LIGO-G D Commissioning, Part II PAC 12, June 2002 Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT.
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
LIGO Commissioning Status
LIGO-G D Commissioning and Detector Plans Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 6 June 2003 Caltech.
LIGO-G D LIGO Detector Performance Michael E. Zucker LIGO Livingston Observatory NSF Review of the LIGO Laboratory 17 November, 2003 at LIGO Livingston.
1 LESSONS FROM VIRGO+ May 17th 2010 E. Calloni for the Virgo collaboration.
LIGO-G W LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
LIGO-G D Detector Installation and Commissioning Stan Whitcomb NSF Operations Review 26 February 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
23/7/2003LIGO Document G C1 LIGO S2 Overview Philip Charlton California Institute of Technology On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
G R Interferometer Sensing & Control P Fritschel 8 Oct 02.
LIGO-G M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
LIGO-G D Commissioning P Fritschel LIGO NSF review, 23 October 2002 M.I.T.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
BSC HEPI Pier Amplification
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Way to many People to List
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
LIGO Detector Commissioning
LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory2 Problem l Ground motion at LLO with the initial LIGO seismic isolation system makes it impossible to hold the interferometers locked reliably during the day » Steady-state ambient noise is higher due to anthropogenic sources » Transients, particularly from logging l Wind induced seismic noise at LHO: » exceeds locking threshold at ~25 mph, or 10% of the time » Expect that up-conversion is a problem at significantly lower wind speeds & a large fraction of the time l Upgrade is required to allow both reliable locking and to allow better noise performance while locked » Need 90% duty cycle & lock durations > 40 hours » Need to reduce noise in the control band (< 40 Hz) to permit a smaller suspension actuator authority & lower noise » Suppression in the 1-3 Hz band is most important due to excitation of the lower stack modes (Q ~ 30)

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory3 Scope Interim solution with Fine Actuation Systems on Test Mass chambers at LLO »known as PEPI, Peizo-electric External Pre-Isolation Design for a retrofit to the installed seismic isolation systems »BSC & HAM chambers »Focused on solution for the LLO environment Number of retrofit systems: »All chambers with suspended optics at LLO (8 systems) »Addition of PEPI systems to Test Mass and Mode Cleaner chambers at LHO (6 systems)

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory4 External Pre-Isolator performance requirements Basic tenets: »The pre-isolator must not increase the present noise in the GW- band, and »Must bring the day LLO environment to the level of the LHO night environment.

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory5 Daily variability – and requirement Stuff

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory6 Initial Vibration Isolation Systems HAM Chamber BSC Chamber »Reduce in-band seismic motion by orders of magnitude »Little or no attenuation below 10Hz; amplification at stack mode resonances »Large range actuation for initial alignment and drift compensation »Quiet actuation to correct for Earth tides and microseism at 0.15 Hz during observation

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory7 Seismic System Performance Horizontal Vertical HAM stack in air BSC stack in vacuum

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory8 Planned Initial Detector Modifications HAM BSC

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory9 Piezo-electric External Pre-Isolator (PEPI) Single (longituidinal) degree of freedom isolation Employs Fine Actuation System on End Test Mass Chambers (also used for Tidal and Microseismic control) Added to Input Test Masses at LLO for the S1 Run Baseline approach for LHO for S3 Performance plot

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory10 Hydraulic External Pre-Isolators (HEPI) Working fluid is low-viscosity mineral oil Bellows hydraulic pistons apply force without sliding friction, moving seals Laminar-flow differential valves control forces Stabilized “power supply” is remote hydraulic pump with fluid-equivalent “RC” pressure filtering Technology adapted from precision machine tool applications K. Mason, MIT

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory11 MEPI Installed on HAM at LASTI Uses commercial voice-coil actuator ‘Pin-compatible’ mechanically Simpler electronics ‘Soft’ mechanical back impedance

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory12 Technical Risks Interaction of HAM structural support modes with the control system may limit gain/bandwidth and performance, or cause us to consider structural modifications/additions »Initial MEPI/HAM Chamber results are promising; Hope to demonstrate control to required performance in the next 2 months Compliance of the BSC pier may likewise limit gain /bandwidth and performance »Initial test results are expected by the end of November

LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory13 Status, Milestones & Decision Points MEPI »Installed at LASTI & under Test HEPI »Installation at LASTI to start in 2 weeks Design Review & Long-Lead Procurement Review, Jan, 2003 »After prototype installation & some preliminary experience will decide whether to go forward with the hydraulic actuator or the electro-magnetic actuator »Commissioning will continue to improve performance and transition from D-space to VME based controllers Installation start at LLO, April, 2003 »Following the S2 run