B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 1/36 Muon (g-2) Past, Present and Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Hertzog / Experiment DOE Intensity Frontier Review The g-2 Experimental Essentials David Hertzog University of Illinois  University of Washington Beam.

Advertisements

(g – 2)  B. Lee Roberts e + e - collisions  to  : Novosibirsk 1 March p. 1/30 Muon (g-2) to 0.2 ppm B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston.

IKON7, Instrument clip session, September 2014, ESS Headquarters and Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden A cold neutron beamline for Particle

B. Lee Roberts, SPIN2004 –Trieste -11 September p. 1/54 New Results on Muon (g-2) Past, Present and Future Experiments B. Lee Roberts Department.

Muon g-2 experimental results & theoretical developments

DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,

Measurement of the muon anomaly to high and even higher precision David Hertzog* University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign * Representing the E821 Collaboration:

B. Lee Roberts, College of William and Mary, 24 March p. 1/61 The Muon: A Laboratory for Particle Physics Everything you always wanted to know about.

Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.

B. Lee Roberts, BNL PAC 9 September p. 1/29 Muon (g-2) to 0.20 ppm P969 B. Lee Roberts Representing the new g-2 collaboration: Boston, BNL, BINP,

 B. Lee Roberts, Heidelberg – 11 June p. 154 The Magnetic and Electric Dipole Moments of the Muon Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University.

B. Lee Roberts, Welcome and Overview – Lepton Moments June p. 1/19 Welcome to Lepton Moments 2006! B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics.

B. Lee Roberts, Oxford University, 19 October p. 1/55 The Muon: A Laboratory for Particle Physics Everything you always wanted to know about the.

WG4:  physics B. Lee Roberts, on behalf of the Intense Muon Physics Working Group - p. 1/48 WG4 Summary and Future Plans The muon trio and more B. Lee.

B. Lee Roberts, PANIC05, Santa Fe, 27 October, p. 1/35 Muon (g-2) Status and Plans for the Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University.

B. Lee Roberts, Fermilab – 9 November p. 1/28 The Physics Case for a Dedicated Muon EDM Experiment in the Project X Era Lee Roberts BU (in collaboration.

B. Lee Roberts, HIFW04, Isola d’Elba, 6 June p. 1/39 Future Muon Dipole Moment Measurements at a high intensity muon source B. Lee Roberts Department.

A new method of measuring the muon g-2 Francis J.M. Farley Trinity College Dublin.

1 g-2 phase study from GEANT simulation Qinzeng Peng Advisor: James Miller Boston University Sep 28, 2004 Muon g-2 collaboration at BU: Lee Roberts, Rober.

Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.

Muon and electron g-2 A charged particle which has spin angular momentum s will have also a magnetic moment m. The ratio of the magnetic to angular moments.

Measurement of the Positive Muon Lifetime to 1 ppm David Webber Preliminary Examination March 31, 2005.

Conveneers: M. Grassi (INFN, Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN), Y. Semertzidis (BNL) Summary of WG4, Part Two. Yannis Semertzidis, BNL 1 August, 2004 Most muon.

Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05.

25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.

(g – 2)  B. Lee Roberts, Dipole Moments In Storage Rings AGS/RHIC Workshop,7 June p. 1/36 Muon (g-2): Past, Present and Future B. Lee Roberts On.

Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermilab, Liang Li, SPCS 2013 June 5 th, Shanghai Particle Physics and Cosmology Symposium - SPCS2013 The (new) muon g-2.

Muon (g-2) Experiments Matthew Wright Luo Ouyang.

Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 

David M. Webber University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign For the MuLan Collaboration A new determination of the positive muon lifetime to part per million.

Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.How is neutrino beam produced? 2.Physics.

G-2 accelerator and cryo needs Mary Convery Muon Campus Review 1/23/13.

1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 5. 2 Contents Top quark mass measurements at Tevatron Electroweak Measurements at low energy: –Neutral Currents at low momentum.

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 1/39 Muon Physics at the Front End of a  Factory An introduction B. Lee Roberts Boston University.

June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Strategy to reduce uncertainty on a  to < 0.25 ppm David Hertzog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign n Present data.

Initial State Radiation and Inclusive Hadron Production at B A B AR Fabio Anulli University of Perugia, INFN – Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf.

Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.

Klaus P. Jungmann, Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen, NL Arbeitstreffen „Hadronen und Kerne“, Pommersfelden, 26 September 2001 Standard Model.

Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004 Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US Andreas Jansson Fermilab.

 B. Lee Roberts, KEK – 21 March p. 1/27 The Magnetic and Electric Dipole Moments of the Muon Lee Roberts for the muon g-2 collaboration Department.

Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory Fundamental Interactions Trento/Italy, June 2004 Theoretical and Experimental Considerations.

Brian Plimley Physics 129 November Outline  What is the anomalous magnetic moment?  Why does it matter?  Measurements of a µ  : CERN.

Huaizhang Deng Yale University Precise measurement of (g-2)  University of Pennsylvania.

Muon g-2 and Electric Dipole Moments in Storage Rings: Powerful Probes of Physics Beyond the SM Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Lab “Muon g-2.

Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,

Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment --a harbinger of new physics Chang Liu Physics 564.

T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.

Priscilla Cushman University of Minnesota ICHEP Aug 16-22, 2004 Beijjing, China The g-2 Collaboration Boston University, Brookhaven National Laboratory,

Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.

(g – 2)  James Miller CERN Workshop October p. 1/27 Muon (g-2) to 0.25 ppm James Miller (For the new Muon (g-2) Collaboration, E969) Department.

First results from CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 collider Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia September 2011 E.Solodov (for.

The Muon g-2 Experiment – Investigating how the spin of a muon is affected as it moves through a magnetic field Astrid Rodrigues.

Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.

Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.

Measurement of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.7 ppm Results from the Data of 2000 Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Lab Muon g-2 Collaboration.

1) Status of the Muon g-2 Experiment 2) EDM Searches in Storage Rings Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Lab Muon g-2 Collaboration and EDM Collaboration.

L. Nemenov, EXA05 Using  -  and  -K atoms for the experimental check of low-energy QCD L. Nemenov (CERN, Switzerland) Presented by L. Tauscher Basel.

Part I: Muon g-2 theory update / motivation Part II: Possibilities for FNAL experiment at 0.1 ppm David Hertzog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

B. Lee Roberts, PHIPSI 2009, Beijing – 14 October p. 1/30 Status of the (g - 2)  Fermilab Project Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University.

Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory HEP Seminar SLAC, 27 April 2004 Muon g-2: Powerful Probe of Physics Beyond the SM. Present Status.

E989 Muon (g-2) EMG Lee Roberts for the E989 Collaboration B. Lee Roberts - EMG- 13 February

Near Detector Tasks EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Paul Soler.

1 Muon g-2 Experiment at BNL Presented by Masahiko Iwasaki (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Akira Yamamoto (KEK) for E821 g-2 Collaboration: Boston, BNL,

Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory New opportunities at CERN CERN, 12 May 2009 Storage Ring EDM Experiments The storage ring method can.

G4beamline Spin Tracking Tom Roberts, Muons, Inc. In G4beamline 2.12, the tracking of muon and electron spins is introduced: – decay of pions into polarized.

– + + – Search for the μEDM using a compact storage ring A. Adelmann 1, K. Kirch 1, C.J.G. Onderwater 2, T. Schietinger 1, A. Streun 1 1 Paul Scherrer.

The Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment of the Muon

Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa CERN - 29 apr 2004

electric dipole moments (EDM)

Based on material presented at various meetings

Presentation transcript:

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 1/36 Muon (g-2) Past, Present and Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 2/36 (in modern language) 673 (1924)

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 3/36 Dirac + Pauli moment Schwinger term

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 4/36 The Muon Trio: Lepton Flavor Violation Muon MDM (g-2) chiral changing Muon EDM

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 5/36 Muon (g-2) : Four Past Experiments CERN s –SC  precessed in a gradient field CERN s –Dedicated Storage Ring, p  = 1.28 GeV/c protons from PS injected into the storage ring CERN s –Dedicated Storage Ring used  injection +  →  decay to give the kick, The “magic”  p   3.09 GeV/c, BNL E821 –Superconducting “superferric” storage ring magic , direct muon injection, fast non-ferric kicker

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 6/36 Spin Precession Frequencies:  in B field spin difference frequency =  s -  c

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 7/36 Use an E field for vertical focusing spin difference frequency =  s -  c 0

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 8/36 Spin Precession Frequencies:  in B field with both an MDM and EDM The EDM causes the spin to precess out of plane. The motional E - field, β X B, is much stronger than laboratory electric fields.

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 9/36 Muon (g-2): Store  ± in a storage ring magnetic field averaged over azumuth in the storage ring

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 10/36 Muon (g-2) Present precision: ± 0.5 ppm

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 11/36 Theory and Experiment Using these hadronic contributions K. Hagiwara, et al., Phys. Rev. D69, (2004) M. Davier et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 31, 503 (2003), A Höcker, hep-ph/

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 12/36  a  with standard model ~2.7  With this discrepancy, a compelling case can be made to do better, and resolve whether this “discrepancy” is significant or not.

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 13/36 Can we do a more precise measurement? Yes –E969 at BNL has scientific approval to reach 0.2ppm –At a more intense muon facility we could do better. Will Theory Improve? Yes First, let’s look at the pieces which might contribute to a potential discrepancy.

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 14/36 Why might this be interesting? what sources of new physics are there?

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 15/36 a μ is sensitive to a wide range of new physics muon substructure anomalous couplings SUSY (with large tanβ ) many other things (extra dimensions, etc.)

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 16/36 SUSY connection between a , D μ, μ → e

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 17/36 SUSY, dark matter, (g-2)   CMSSM

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 18/36  E969 =  now

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 19/36  E969 

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 20/36 SM value dominated by hadronic issues: Lowest order hadronic contribution ( ~ 60 ppm) Hadronic light-by-light contribution ( ~ 1 ppm) The error on these two contributions will ultimately limit the interpretation of a more precise muon (g-2) measurement.

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 21/36 Lowest Order Hadronic contribution from e + e - annihilation

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 22/36 Magnitude of the errors present hadronic uncertainty ~0.6 ppm present experimental uncertainty 0.5 ppm theory: better R measurements –KLOE –BaBar –SND and CMD2 at Novosibirsk –More work on the strong interaction experiment: BNL or elsewhere How could we do better?

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 23/36 Recent News from Novosibirsk SND has just released their results for the cross section e + e - →  +  - over the . –Error on dispersion integral 50% higher than CMD2 –Good agreement with CMD2 –Completely independent from CMD2 Preprint should be on the web soon

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 24/36 How much could the theory improve? In their “Annual Reviews” articleDavier and Marciano guess a factor of 2 or so for argument let’s assume theory uncertainty will get to – 0.3 to 0.1 ppm Experiment –E969 at BNL (if it runs) could achieve a factor of 2.5 for a total error of 0.2 ppm –future experiment could reach 0.06 ppm How much could experiment improve?

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 25/36 E969 at BNL Scientific approval in September 2004 –at present: no funds for construction or running Goal: total error = 0.2 ppm –lower systematic errors –more beam

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 26/36 Strategy of the improved experiment More muons – E821 was statistics limited  stat = 0.46 ppm,  syst = 0.3 ppm –Backward-decay, higher-transmission beamline –Double the quadrupoles in the  decay line –New, open-end inflector –Upgrade detectors, electronics, DAQ Improve knowledge of magnetic field B –Improve calibration, field monitoring and measurement Reduce systematic errors on ω a –Improve the electronics and detectors –New parallel “ integration ” method of analysis

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 27/36 Improved transmission into the ring Inflector Inflector aperture Storage ring aperture E821 Closed EndP969 Proposed Open End

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 28/36 Pedestal vs. Time Near sideFar side E821: forward decay beam GeV/c Decay GeV/c This baseline limits how early we can fit data

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 29/36 E969: backward decay beam 5.32 GeV/c Decay GeV/c No hadron-induced prompt flash Approximately the same muon flux is realized x 1 more muons Expect for both sides

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 30/36 E969: Systematic Error Goal Field improvements will involve better trolley calibrations, better tracking of the field with time, temperature stability of room, improvements in the hardware Precession improvements will involve new scraping scheme, lower thresholds, more complete digitization periods, better energy calibration Systematic uncertainty (ppm) E969 Goal Magnetic field –  p Anomalous precession –  a

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 31/36 Beyond E969? It’s not clear how far we can push the present technique. To get to 0.06 ppm presents many challenges. Perhaps a new storage ring design, and a smaller aperture. –detectors for another factor of 4 will be very challenging. At a neutrino factory we certainly we can get more muons

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 32/36 A new idea (F.J.M. Farley) Sector focused storage ring, which uses polarized protons to measure ∫ B. dℓ No need to know   /  p Need to know ∫B. dℓ to 20 ppb!!!!! (while E821 already achieved: Can run well above the magic , so that there are more (g-2) cycles per lifetime. Many details to be worked out.

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 33/36 As always, there are questions … Will E969 be funded and reach 0.2 ppm? How far can theory be improved? a observation from history....

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 34/36 Where we came from:

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 35/36 Today with e + e - based theory: All E821 results were obtained with a “blind” analysis. world average

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 36/36 Summary (g-2)  provides a precise check of the standard model, and accesses new physics in a way complementary to other probes. (g-2)  is dependent on a standard model value, part of which must be taken from data (e + e - → hadrons ) The hadronic contribution will eventually set the limit on useful precision, but substantial improvement can be made beyond the present situation.

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 37/36

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 38/36 Fourier Transform: residuals to 5-parameter fit beam motion across a scintillating fiber – ~15 turn period

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 39/36 Effects of the CBO on e - spectrum CBO causes modulation of N, amplitude ~0.01 CBO causes modulation of observed energy distribution which in turn causes oscillation in A ( E ),  (E), with amplitudes ~0.001, ~1 mrad.

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 40/36 Functional form of the time spectrum A 1 and A 2 → artificial shifts in  a up to 4 ppm in individual detectors when not accounted for.

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 41/36 Other Systematic Effects:  a muon losses gain changes and pedistal shifts pulse pileup

B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 42/36 E821: Systematic Errors Systematic uncertainty (ppm) Spin precession –  a Systematic uncertainty (ppm) Magnetic field –  p Muon spin precession Magnetic field