Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 1 THE ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI ISO 9001:2000 and AUTH Research Committee Christina Besta,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemawawin Cree Nation. Community Planning Change, Expectations and Performance Some Observations Chief Clarence Easter Chemawawin Cree Nation Aboriginal.
Advertisements

Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
October 21-22, 2011 Tempus QATMI Project Final Conference 1 Strategic Planning & Internationalization Strategies at Yerevan State University (YSU) Strategic.
Strategic Management & Planning
History and Basis of formation of Student Organizations in Armenia Traditions of Komsomol (Young Communist League) Democratic changes and Independence.
TATIONpRÆSEN AARHUS UNIVERSITET 1 AARHUS UNIVERSITET Aarhus University - The new administration.
Bic river basin management plan and involvement of local authorities in the implementation of the program of measures Dumitru Drumea, Executive Director,
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
Training Institute of Public Administration Tirana, ALBANIA
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI Mobility Centre.
SEM Planning Model.
LEADER -The acronym ‘LEADER' derives from the French words "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économique Rurale“ which means, ‘Links between.
Research Issues & Projects On behalf of the Research Team 17 March 2005.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Financial Management and Control Arrangements in Practice Monika Kos, Ministry of Finance, the Republic of Poland.
University East Saraejvo Introduction  In accordance with the Law on Higher Education Republic of Srpska, the University of East Sarajevo organizes.
The evaluation of research units at HCERES
African Health Leadership and Management Network (AHLMN) Plenary Overview of Business Plan.
Strategic Planning. Definitions & Concepts Planning: is a scientific approach for decision making. Planning: is a scientific approach for decision making.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
ResCom AUTH Research Committee - 1 Secretariat of Research Committee Aristotle University of Thessaloniki IT Department Project Management and Monitoring.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Information Society 3rd Community Support Framework for Greece June 2001.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Quality Assurance in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President Former Rector Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Project:“Support to the Internationalization of Kosova Higher Education System through establishment of the Kosova Students’ Union” Status Quo on Student.
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
Strategic Planning Process in the Labor Administration _________________________________________ Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare (MTPS) El Salvador.
The Unit of Academic Accreditation Coordinator of the Male Section: Dr. Adel Saker Al-Khasawnah EXT.....
1 Asian Regional Workshop on “Capacity Development for the Clean Development Mechanism” October 2005 AIT, Bangkok, Thailand Institutional Building:
The State Procurement Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan Welcomes the participants of the 9 th Public Procurement Exchange Platform “Efficient Implementation.
1 Introduction of Research and Development Project Evaluation System at NEDO Momoko OKADA New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization(NEDO)
MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS BILL September LEGISLATION n Municipal Demarcation Act, 1998 n Municipal Structures Act, 1998 n Municipal Systems Bill (1999)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Research Committee Research Activities and Strategy 1.
1 REVIMP From review to improvement Dr. Adrie Visscher Faculty of Behavioural Sciences The Netherlands.
Regulations of Scientific Research Chairs in Almajma'ah University.
Action for – Enhancing Attractiveness Co-ordinators Meeting February WELCOME!
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
THE SPANISH EDUCATION SYSTEM Inspectorate in CASTILLA-LA MANCHA September 2011.
Quality Assurance Systems: QMS: The UEF’s experience Yohama Puentes HEI ICI project: End seminar
Belgian Technical Cooperation Internal audit presentation.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
The Lead Agency Council Sports Trust (Sport Otago) Cluster of clubs Interested parties / other.
ERDF for Education and Science th March 2011.
1 Loula Sigala Administrative Director NHRF Head of International Relations NHRF National Contact Point PEOPLE FP7 EURAXESS Services’ Centre The National.
2016 – 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN Ministry of Business Guyana Means Business.
Strategic Formation Process
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
Budgeting Process University of Applied Science FH Campus Wien
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Audit & Risk Management
INTRODUCTION OF PROPERTY MARKETING
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Sybi Hida ALBANIA February, 2005
Institutul Bancar Român ROMANIAN BANKING INSTITUTE
Sybi Hida ALBANIA February, 2005
years of existence.
Introduction to the training
Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development
Human resource and Work flow of the Research Office, RUPP
Research Issues & Projects Sadiq M. Sait
Power point presentation DR.Shareef Mahgoub
IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION OF THE RESTITUTION PROGRAMME
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
Presentation transcript:

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 1 THE ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI ISO 9001:2000 and AUTH Research Committee Christina Besta, Chief Executive Officer of Research Committee Nikolas Georgiadis, Manager of quality assurance

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 2 THE ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI The largest University in Greece  Students  Academic staff (teaching – research)  Technical and administrative staff  42 Departments into 12 Faculties

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 3  Carries out  Research and Technological Development RTD Projects  In the scientific areas of: environmentinformaticstelecommunications technologies for industry transportbiotechnology biomedicine and health agriculture, forestry and fisheries education and languages history and archaeology social and economic sciences THE ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 4 The research funding

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 5 The Human Potential  out of members of the teaching and research staff participate in RTD projects  external co-operators, scientists and technicians have been employed in the last 3 years

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 6 What is the Research Committee (RC)? It is an academic institution for the management of research and related activities within the University

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 7 The mission of the Research Committee The Research Committee serves all specific needs of the research activities produced within and by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, by:  Designing and implementing research policies  Allocating and managing external funding  Facilitating synergy between research and teaching

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 8  A funded project is a well-planned scientific activity, characterized by:  a specific discipline  a well defined objective  a set timetable  a certain methodology  a cost break down  an expected result What is a funded project?

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 9 Project Types  Research & Technological  Educational  Training  Consulting and provision of scientific services

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 10 The RC Project Management cycle  The stages  Project planning - compose the proposal – submission  Evaluation of the proposal - approval by the funding agency or organization  Implementation of the project  Evaluation of the results - suggestions for their exploitation

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 11 Administrative structure  It is the authority responsible for mapping out the research policy of the University as well as other relevant activities a. The Research Committee b. The Secretariat  It is the authority responsible for the approval and allocation of the funds for the implementation of the research projects  It is the authority qualified to draw up the annual financial and scientific planning and reports  It is the authority in charge to safeguard the operation and the development of the special account  Supervision of the accounting and management turnover of the special account  Implementation and administrative processing of the Research Committee’s decisions  Suggestions and cooperation on issues relative to the operation and development of the special account The legal framework for managing research in Greek Universities (Called “The Special Account of Research Funds”, a.k.a. “Special Account”)

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 12 Administrative structure  It is the authority responsible for mapping out the research policy of the University as well as other relevant activities a. The Research Committee b. The Secretariat  It is the authority responsible for the approval and allocation of the funds for the implementation of the research projects  It is the authority qualified to draw up the annual financial and scientific planning and reports  It is the authority in charge to assure the right operation and the development of the Special Account  Supervision of the accounting and management turnover of the special account  Implementation of the Research Committee’s decisions  Proposals Submission relative to the operation and development of the Special Account

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 13 Organizational chart of the Secretariat of the Research Committee

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 14 The Business Plan  Planning the targets and actions of the next three years for the implementation of the research strategy VISION STRATEGY BUSINESS PLAN

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 15 Synthesis and selection of a strategy Strategy Strengths (+) Threats (-) Weaknesses (-) Opportunities (+) Internal environment External environment

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 16 What is the research strategy?  The major strategic objective is  Excellence  At the core of the research strategy lies the promotion of Quality of the research activity

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 17 A Strategy for Quality of the RC  The Research Committee succeed to receive the ISO 9001:2000 Certificate in November 2002  16 research laboratories are in the process of obtaining an ISO quality certificate

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 18 The development of the Quality Management System was based on: 1. Mapping the current situation 2. Identifying the weaknesses 3. Establishing the Quality policy 4. Setting the objective goals of Quality, and 5. Identifying the processes that rule the operation of the organization and the proper evaluation of these processes. The quality management system in RC

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 19 The major ideas behind the Quality Policy of the Research Committee are:  The creation of an attraction point for Funding Agencies or Institutions  The deployment of new activities in the field of research and  exploitation of research results RC Quality Policy

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 20 RC’s Quality Policy implemented at three parallel levels:  1 st level: Operational improvement  2 nd level: Customer satisfaction  3 rd level: expanding our activities

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 21 The Quality Objectives promote the “three year” business objectives, as stated in the Business Plan that materializes the research strategy RC Quality Objectives

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 22 The quality operation of the Research Committee Quality management system Transaction system Information system Administrative-financial- accounting management system Customer management system Integration, flexibility and quality assurance in research management activities Assuring quality in management service One stop service Legal base in management service Customer Satisfaction Providing services anytime & anywhere The systems and their targets

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 23 Towards our Quality Policy We confronted the mentality of the traditional public sector; therefore:

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 24 Towards our Quality Policy  We gave emphasis on human resources  Staff training  Staff evaluation  Work delegation  We gave emphasis on the work environment and the use of technology

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 25 Towards our Quality Policy  We gave emphasis on developing a system of procedures and guidelines, covering all organizational tasks  We gave emphasis on the demands, problems and needs of our  Customers and  Collaborators

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 26 Towards our Quality Policy  We paid special attention upon:  Creating the final link of every procedure chain, thus assuring production of results  Appointing owners to every procedure  Measuring every task, according to its linked objective  Establishing performance indices, that where ranked in a mechanism that measures the total performance of the Quality Management System

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 27 What did we achieve through ISO ?  Transforming traditional work culture into a culture of quality  Obtaining a constantly evolving Organization; strength against external changes

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 28 Future Objectives  Measuring the added value of the Quality Management System’s operation, and comparing it with the old system

Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 29 Thank you for your attention