The Future for Energy Crops. Diverse drivers impact on land use Policy Drivers Climate change Energy security Ecosystem Services Rural livelihoods Food.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Can We Best Support Smallholder Farmers for Poverty Reduction? Discussion at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace April 8, 2009.
Advertisements

Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
Pathways for the Provision of Bio- Energy in Sub-Saharan Africa: The COMPETE Project Charles B.L. Jumbe, PhD University of Malawi, Bunda College, P.O.
 Challenge technofix, scientific economic response  Real issues are about principles and ethics of development and trade  Need a framework of gender.
Bioenergy-related analysis: Focus on land use aspects
Bioenergy Biodiversity and Land use Expert meeting on biodiversity standards and strategies for sustainable cultivation of biomass for non-food purposes.
Land use for bioenergy production – assessing the production potentials and the assumptions of EU bioenergy policy Trends and Future of Sustainable Development.
Arno Becker Institute for Food and Resource Economics (ILR), University of Bonn ImpactsMarket development Policy measures Policy objectives Leading to.
SRC willow and Miscanthus Two contrasting regions (SW England and E-Midlands) Existing data & generated new data to fill knowledge gaps 1. GIS-based suitability.
The economics of forest plantations and on-farm planting as a rural income-generating activity Claire Coote Issues for the Sustainable Use of Biomass Resources.
The role of bioenergy in the European Union Giulio Volpi Renewable Energy and Carbon Capture and Storage Policy DG Energy, European Commission.
Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
The Value of Native Ecosystems
Food Security 14 November 2011 Chair: Professor Tim Jones Panel: Professor Elizabeth Dowler Dr Rosemary Collier Dr Ben Richardson Professor Laura Green.
WELFARE TRADEOFFS OF BIOFUELS INVESTMENTS: A RAPID DECISION SUPPORT TOOL. Preliminary results from a case study in Tanzania. Giacomo Branca 1, Luca Cacchiarelli.
Current Research and Emerging Economic and Environmental Issues on Biofuels Madhu Khanna University of Illinois.
A business case to reduce rural poverty through targeted investments in water in sub-Saharan Africa WWF5 Session How can food market measures boost.
The challenge of sustainable
Renewable energy – EU policy update Mihail DUMITRU European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture.
Perspective of Bioenergy and Jatropha in Uganda William Kyamuhangire, PhD. Associate Professor Faculty of Agriculture Makerere University Uganda.
Climate change, agriculture and food security. A food-insecure (or hungry) world.
1 Water for Bioenergy or and Food? 5th World Water Forum March 2009 Istanbul, Turkey Vineet Raswant.
The NFU champions British farming and provides professional representation and services to its farmer and grower members Sustainable Intensification The.
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid Optimal Supply.
Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo: Research Priorities and Interest in China Lin Gan SINCIERE Member Workshop October 19,
Time for Action: Shaping Biofuel Production and Trade for the Common Good Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Scientific Symposium: Food and Fuel: Biofuels, Development,
Panel on Water, Food and Energy Overview of the Water & Energy issues and their linkages with food Richard Taylor, Executive Director, International Hydropower.
SCOPE Biofuels: Rapid Assessment Process Workshop 22 – 25 September, Gummersbach/Germany Bioenergy: risks and opportunities Martina Otto Head Policy Unit,
Sustainability Overview Laura McCann, on behalf of Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010.
Bio-energy Initiatives and Collaboration in New Brunswick Climate Change Hub Advisory Committee Meeting February 5, 2009 By: Bryan Pelkey Department of.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Illustration of the implementation of Wood-energy projects in Latvia Ilze Strēle State projects agency “Environmental projects” Vilnius 12/13 September,
New Knowledge for Sustainable Bioenergy Bioenergy Development in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges Dr. Ben Muok African Centre for Technology Studies.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ENERGY PRODUCTION: EVALUATION OF BIOCHAR APPLICATION ON TAIWANESE SET-ASIDE LAND Chih-Chun Kung November 2012 Austin, Texas.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte The Politics of Food Conference.
GECAFS Regional research Regional GECAFS projects GEC and the Indo-Gangetic Plain food system GECAFS Scenario science developing “comprehensive” natural/social.
Rural Development Plan for England (RDPE) – improving the environment through agri-environment Rosie Simpson, Natural England.
AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife.
Datum - Titel der Veranstaltung, Ort Chair: Marco Bindi Rapporteur: Jørgen E. Olesen Working session B Agriculture.
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, th January.
Agriculture’s Dual Challenge of Delivering Food While Protecting the Environment Tamsin Cooper A Future for a Strong CAP – European Symposium.
1 Bio-energy cropping systems Agro-environmental issues Madrid, 9/10 February 2006.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
Climate Change and Energy Impacts on Water and Food Scarcity Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division High-level Panel.
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
Supply chains for the UK to 2050 A. Bauen (*), R. Slade, S. Jablonski and C. Panoutsou The context The aim of this work is to explore the potential for.
Can Biofuels be Sustainable in an Unsustainable Agriculture? Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel Chad M. Hellwinckel American Chemical Society.
What factors might affect ELBs businesses? What will these do to my chances of getting a job?
Biofuels: Impacts on Land, Food, and Prices Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division AAAS Annual Meeting “Session on Biofuels,
Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration in the Sahel Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration in the Sahel A. Kalinganire, M. Larwanou & J. Bayala World Agroforestry.
Defra Bioenergy Crops R&D Programme Bruno Viegas Sustainable Farming and Food Science Division.
Potential Biodiversity and Environmental Impacts of Commercial Willow SRC Production in the UK. Rebecca L. Rowe 1, Nathaniel R. Street 1, Michael E. Hanley.
Mohamed Bakarr Senior Environmental Specialist GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 GEF Strategies, Activities and Accomplishment:
Wisconsin Biomass as a Sustainable Energy Resource Green Innovations Symposium 2009 Joe Kramer.
International Consultation on Pro-Poor Jatropha Development
1 The role of biomass in the UK energy system TSEC-BIOSYS: A whole systems approach to bioenergy demand and supply Ausilio Bauen.
RATING-SRC Reducing Environmental Impacts of Short- Rotation Coppice (SRC) Through Evidence-Based Integrated Decision Support Tools Dimitriou I. a*, Bolte.
Phase 2 Research Questions Theme 1: Nutrition, food safety and value addition 1)Which combinations of technology packages can reduce household vulnerability.
The Biofuels Market: Current Situation and Alternative Scenarios Simonetta Zarrilli United Nations Conference on Trade and Development - UNCTAD Bali, 12.
The Role of Transportation in the Competitive Advantage of Industrial Sugar David Ripplinger Transportation Research Forum Annual Forum March 21, 2013.
Biofuels CENV 110. Topics The Technology Current status around the world – Supply and trends in production Impact Benefits Costs – Carbon balance – Net.
Climate Smart Agriculture to Foster Food Production by Dyborn Chibonga, NASFAM CEO Prepared for WFO Annual General Assembly in Livingstone, Zambia -
Jeremy Rix NORTH ENERGY ASSOCIATES LTD Life Cycle Assessment for AB Systems Wetland Biomass to Bioenergy.
Integrated policy frameworks
Food and Nutrition Security and Agriculture
Makala: the necessary evil
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications
What are the characteristics of these two fields?
Session 4: Biofuels: How Feasible Are Large-Scale Goals for Biofuel Penetration in the US and Canada? Ken Andrasko, EPA Session Objectives: Gauge.
Presentation transcript:

The Future for Energy Crops

Diverse drivers impact on land use Policy Drivers Climate change Energy security Ecosystem Services Rural livelihoods Food Security Market Forces Rising food prices Rising energy prices Food Bioenergy Biofuel Fossil fuels Fuel Electricity Heat Transport fuels Petrochemicals Bio- materials

Biomass crops are being encouraged High energy savings and GHG reductions Non-food crop Recycle their nutrients No annual cultivation All of the plant is used as feedstock Longer growing season High yields per hectare Miscanthus Willow

Land use under biomass crops is expected to expand from ≤ 10,000 up to 500 to 1 million ha Perennial Biomass crops are: In the ground for circa 25 yrs Harvested in winter/spring Dense, tall crops Potential implications for: Landscape Tourist income Farm income Water Biodiversity Soil

Basic approach of RELU-Biomass project Both SRC willow and Miscanthus studied Two contrasting regions used (SW England and E-Midlands) Utilised existing data & generated new data to fill knowledge gaps 1. GIS-based suitability mapping and landscape visualisations 2. Public surveys(n=490), stakeholder and focus groups 3. Biodiversity assessments (24 fields of each crop) 4. Water use assessments (over the year in both crops) 5. Economic assessment from farm to wider scale 6. Developed integrative tools to help decision-makers

Biomass crops in the landscape Most people were unconcerned –thought crops would fit in well More concerns over lorry movements and where the power stations would be Wider margins and smaller, scattered fields were slightly more favoured

Biomass crops and water use SRC willow and Miscanthus roots grow no deeper than deep rooting annual crops. SRC willow water use is similar to that of a cereal crop, higher than permanent grass and lower than that of mature woodlands Miscanthus water-use approaches that of woodlands.

Biomass crops and biodiversity Compared to arable crops: More butterflies in the field margins of both energy crops SRC has positive effect on farmland and woodland birds Miscanthus more variable More weed biomass and invertebrates in SRC than Miscanthus Certain important species may be negatively affected Plantation design and management are important

Impacts on alternative land-use Yield map for all soils except organic (~ 11 M ha) Yield map for 9 absolute eco- environmental constraints (<8 M ha) Yield map for 2 more secondary, constraints (<5 M ha) Yield map for all constraints plus ALC 3 & 4 (~ 3 M ha)

Decision-making frameworks Advantages of Sustainability Appraisal Opportunity for a comprehensive look at biomass alternatives/scenarios economic objectives social objectives environmental objectives Opportunity for stakeholders to define the key sustainability issues and objectives for their part of the country Mechanism for managing (or reducing) conflict Mechanism for generating interest and enthusiasm

Sustainability appraisal is a reiterative process Generated sustainability objectives (for SW and EM) Framework with indicators and targets for each Region Checked against Regional Spatial Strategies Completed Framework was agreed Framework is being used to test scenarios (different energy end-use, planting scales and management)

Implications and impact Many positive benefits could be gained from growing biomass crops if planting is integrated with other land-use functions Recommendations on the management of the crops and the sizes of fields (and margins) will encourage landscape compatibility and help ensure that the positive benefits on biodiversity are realised These results are being discussed with government departments to: update recommendations for planting and management that will ensure environmental benefits are gained explore whether these benefits could be used as the basis of grants/awards to farmers as part of a revised ECS.

Acknowledgements Andrew Lovett Alan Bond Trudie Dockerty Katy Appleton Gisela Sünnenberg Martin Turner Jon Finch Rufus Sage Mark Cunningham David Bohan Alison Haughton Andrew Riche Thanks to the Growers and Stakeholders