OEB 192 – 09.10.28 Mobile genetic elements and adaptive mutation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANALYSIS OF MULTI-SPECIES ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS
Advertisements

AP Biology Prep. General Information. Test Date: Monday, May 14, :00AM to 12:00 Noon Two Sections: Section I – 60% of Final Grade Multiple Choice.
Playing Evolution Games in the Classroom Colin Garvey GK-12 Fellow.
OEB 100 – Evolution in Action (OEB 100) Instructor: Christopher Marx Teaching fellow: Dipti Nayak Weekly meeting: NW B127 Time: Mondays 4 – 5:30.
On the Genetic Evolution of a Perfect Tic-Tac-Toe Strategy
SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Royal Holloway University of London SCHOOL SEMINARS
1 July 10, 2008 Vancomycin  and Evolutionary Dynamics” A.Iwamoto 1.Typical Feature of Vancomycin  (revisited) 2.Why and how the ratio of    and.
Killer Yeast vs. Sensitive Yeast Data from experiments in a chemostat undertaken by Nick McClure, a former PhD student in the department Killer yeasts.
Review Session # 2 “The Characteristics of Cells”
Evolution by Natural Selection
Maynard Smith Revisited: Spatial Mobility and Limited Resources Shaping Population Dynamics and Evolutionary Stable Strategies Pedro Ribeiro de Andrade.
Evolution in action: The fitness effects of beneficial mutations in alternative environments Taylor M. Warren and Vaughn S. Cooper* University of New Hampshire,
OEB 192 – Tradeoffs, specialization & pleiotropy.
BIOS E-127– Evolution of pathogens (Grenfell et al., 2004)
OEB 192 – Genetic & physiological basis of adaptation (Goddard et al., Nature) (Cooper, PLoS Biol.)
BIOS E-127 – Evolution of digital organisms.
Miki Lee / OEB 192 – Mobile genetic elements and adaptive mutation.
OEB 192 – Tradeoffs, specialization & pleiotropy.
1. Elements of the Genetic Algorithm  Genome: A finite dynamical system model as a set of d polynomials over  2 (finite field of 2 elements)  Fitness.
OEB 192 – Mutation rate & population size II.
Evolutionary Games The solution concepts that we have discussed in some detail include strategically dominant solutions equilibrium solutions Pareto optimal.
OEB 192 – Phenotypic diversity & epigenetics.
A Game-theoretical Approach to the Analysis of Microbial Metabolic Pathways Conclusions Microbes can be trapped in Prisoner‘s Dilemma w.r.t. use of inefficient.
Detecting HGT: discordant phylogenies OEB 192 –
OEB 192 – Mutation rate & population size I.
MCB Further conservation Induction of GAL genes by galactose is only half the story. The GAL genes are also severely repressed by glucose.
Altruism A Simulated Investigation COM SCI 194 Honors Research Fall 2007 ~ Spring 2008 Alexander Liu and Eric Chang Professor Amit Sahai.
Simulation Models as a Research Method Professor Alexander Settles.
Genetic exchange in bacteria/archaea OEB 192 –
BIOS E-127 – Evolution of microbes. An example story BIOS E-127 – (Nature 394:69-72)
BIOS E-127 – Diversification & co-evolution.
Evolutionary Games The solution concepts that we have discussed in some detail include strategically dominant solutions equilibrium solutions Pareto optimal.
Animal BehaviorBIO 432 Spring 2014 Dr. T. Caraco Office: Biology 253 Hours: PM, Thursday Lectures, Assignments,
Genetic exchange Mutations Genetic exchange: three mechanisms
Phenotypes at the Saccharomyces Genome Database
5. Alternative Approaches. Strategic Bahavior in Business and Econ 1. Introduction 2. Individual Decision Making 3. Basic Topics in Game Theory 4. The.
Evolution/Molecules/energy Photo and Cell Respiration.
Schuster et al., J Biol Phys 34:1–17 (2008) Hadas Zur Computational Game Theory Project 2012.
Hosted by Mr. Murdoch Living Environment Life Processes Experimental Design Cells Biochemistry
Social interactions and cheating in the microbial world
IAPS 2004 Eman El-Nachar, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Architecture Faculty of Fine Arts Cairo, Egypt Rethinking Qualities of Children’s Play.
The differences between plant and animal cells What are the differences between them? Animal cells Plant cells.
The Structure, Function, and Evolution of Vascular Systems Instructor: Van Savage Spring 2010 Quarter 3/30/2010.
LOGO Isolation and characterization of regulators of oxidative stress induced apoptosis in yeast Yaron Fireizen, Christine Crozier and Julie Anderson Biology.
Cellular Activities Movements through Membranes. Structure Phospholipid bilayer Proteins Glycoproteins Cholesterol.
3.2 Cell Organelles LEQ: How does the cytoplasm and cytoskeleton support cell function? Reading 3.2, 12.4 (evolution of mitochondria, chloroplasts only)
Steering Evolution and Biological Adaptation Strategically: Computational Game Theory and Opponent Exploitation for Treatment Planning, Drug Design, and.
The Evolution of Specialisation in Groups – Tags (again!) David Hales Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.
Topics of AP Biology Adapted from The College Board,
A Cellular Automata Model on HIV Infection (2) Shiwu Zhang Based on [Pandey et al’s work]
Stochastic models of evolution driven by Spatial Heterogeneity R H, Utrecht University, Department of Biology, Theoretical Biology Group.
Microbial Models I: Genetics of Viruses and Bacteria 8 November, 2004 Text Chapter 18.
Objectives: 1)Describe how natural variation is used in artificial selection. 2)Explain how natural selection is related to species’ fitness. 3)Identify.
Chapter 5: Experimental Evolutionary Domestication Pedro Semōes, Josiane Santos, Margarida Matos Presentation by Priya Singha, UC, Irvine.
MOLECULES OF LIFE: THERE ARE FOUR MAIN CLASSES OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ESSENTIAL TO LIFE.
March 1, 2016Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Lecture 11: Machine Evolution 1 Let’s look at… Machine Evolution.
1 Chemistry of Life : Organic Molecules. 2 Elements found in living organisms = –Carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, & sulfur Organic Molecules.
Virus Basics - part I Viruses are genetic parasites that are smaller than living cells. They are much more complex than molecules, but clearly not alive,
Mapping variation in growth in response to glucose concentration
Public good diffusion limits microbial mutualism
Characteristics of Life
2.1 Cells &Simple Transport
Darwin’s Theory.
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Lecture 11: Machine Evolution
Evolution of human cooperation without reciprocity
Populations Change Over Time through Natural Selection
Sociovirology: Conflict, Cooperation, and Communication among Viruses
Optimality principles in adaptive evolution.
Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology
Emmanuel Lorenzo de los Santos Presentation October 10, 2008
Presentation transcript:

OEB 192 – Mobile genetic elements and adaptive mutation

(Cho et al., 2007)

(Miki Lee, David Robinson et al., in prep.)

(Miki Lee)

(Lee et al., 2009; Lee & Marx, unpublished)

Mutation Luria–Delbrück experimentCairns–Foster system

Monday (11/4): Physiological basis of fitness

the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics presents: “Games microbes play: Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast.” by Professor Jeffrey Gore (MIT Department of Physics): Abstract: The origin of cooperation is a central challenge to our understanding of evolution. Microbial interactions can be manipulated in ways that animal interactions cannot, thus leading to growing interest in microbial models of cooperation and competition. In order for the budding yeast S. cerevisiae to grow on sucrose, the disaccharide must first be hydrolyzed by the enzyme invertase. This hydrolysis reaction is performed outside of the cytoplasm in the periplasmic space between the plasma membrane and the cell wall. Here we demonstrate that the vast majority (~99%) of the monosaccharides created by sucrose hydrolysis diffuse away before they can be imported into the cell, thus making invertase production and secretion a cooperative behavior [1]. A mutant cheater strain that does not produce invertase is able to take advantage of and invade a population of wildtype cooperator cells. However, over a wide range of conditions, the wildtype cooperator can also invade a population of cheater cells. Therefore, we observe coexistence between the two strains in well-mixed culture at steady state resulting from the fact that rare strategies outperform common strategies—the defining features of what game theorists call the snowdrift game. A simple model of the cooperative interaction incorporating nonlinear benefits explains the origin of this coexistence. Glucose repression of invertase expression in wildtype cells produces a strategy which is optimal for the snowdrift game—wildtype cells cooperate only when competing against cheater cells. In disagreement with recent theory [2], we find that spatial structure always aids the evolution of cooperation in our experimental snowdrift game. references: [1] Gore, J., Youk, H. & van Oudenaarden, A., Nature 459, 253 – 256 (2009). [2] Hauert, C. & Doebeli, M., Nature 428, 643 – 646 (2004). when: 3:00pm Friday 30 October 2009 where: 1 Brattle Square 6 th floor map: PED seminar series: for more information please contact: