ISA5428: 普及計算 Autonomic Computing 金仲達教授 清華大學資訊系統與應用研究所 九十一學年度第二學期 (Slides are taken from the presentations by Alan Ganek, Alfred Spector, Jeff Kephart.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tivoli Software from IBM Storage Resource Management Webcast
Advertisements

Dynamic Systems Initiative (DSI) Model- and Policy-Based Systems Management Kirill Tatarinov
Autonomic Computing © 2006 IBM Corporation ICAC The 3 rd IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing Dublin, Ireland June 2006 David Bartlett.
AMUSE Autonomic Management of Ubiquitous Systems for e-Health Prof. J. Sventek University of Glasgow In collaboration.
IBM SMB Software Group ® ibm.com/software/smb Maintain Hardware Platform Health An IT Services Management Infrastructure Solution.
Multi-level SLA Management for Service-Oriented Infrastructures Wolfgang Theilmann, Ramin Yahyapour, Joe Butler, Patrik Spiess consortium / SAP.
KAIS T The Vision of Autonomic Computing Jeffrey O. Kephart, David M Chess IBM Watson research Center IEEE Computer, Jan 발표자 : 이승학.
Welcome to DEAS 2005 Design and Evolution of Autonomic Application Software David Garlan, CMU Marin Litoiu, IBM CAS Hausi A. Müller, UVic John Mylopoulos,
Software Modeling SWE5441 Lecture 3 Eng. Mohammed Timraz
Autonomic Systems Justin Moles, Winter 2006 Security in an Autonomic Computing Environment Paper by: D. M. Chess, C. C. Palmer S. R. White Presentation.
Fabián E. Bustamante, Winter 2006 Autonomic Computing The vision of autonomic computing, J. Kephart and D. Chess, IEEE Computer, Jan Also - A.G.
SmartER Semantic Cloud Sevices Karuna P Joshi University of Maryland, Baltimore County Advisors: Dr. Tim Finin, Dr. Yelena Yesha.
Network Management Overview IACT 918 July 2004 Gene Awyzio SITACS University of Wollongong.
ISA5428: 普及計算 Pervasive Computing Course Outline 金仲達教授 清華大學資訊系統與應用研究所 九十三學年度第一學期 (Slides are taken from the presentations by Prof. Friedemann Mattern of.
Autonomic Computing Shafay Shamail Malik Jahan Khan.
Managing IT with Tivoli. 2 Tivoli Value Proposition - Customer need driven Deliver higher availability, performance, security, asset utilization Manage.
Introduction to the new mainframe: Large-Scale Commercial Computing © Copyright IBM Corp., All rights reserved. Chapter 8: Autonomic computing.
(Slides are taken from the presentations by Alan Ganek, Alfred Spector, Jeff Kephart of IBM)
1 FM Overview of Adaptation. 2 FM RAPIDware: Component-Based Design of Adaptive and Dependable Middleware Project Investigators: Philip McKinley, Kurt.
26th May, Middleware or Simulator for Autonomic Communications Yang Qiu Networking Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology
Demonstrating IT Relevance to Business Aligning IT and Business Goals with On Demand Automation Solutions Robert LeBlanc General Manager Tivoli Software.
Private Cloud: Application Transformation Business Priorities Presentation.
SOA – Development Organization Yogish Pai. 2 IT organization are structured to meet the business needs LOB-IT Aligned to a particular business unit for.
A Concise Introduction to Autonomic Computing
© 2009 IBM Corporation Delivering Quality Service with IBM Service Management April 13 th, 2009.
BMC Software confidential. BMC Performance Manager Will Brown.
SOA, BPM, BPEL, jBPM.
IBM Software Group - IBM Systems Group © 2006 IBM Corporation IBM Software Group | IBM Systems Grouppage 1 Team Collaboration Software Selling Strategy.
1 Autonomic Computing An Introduction Guenter Kickinger.
 Cloud computing  Workflow  Workflow lifecycle  Workflow design  Workflow tools : xcp, eucalyptus, open nebula.
WELCOME. AUTONOMIC COMPUTING PRESENTED BY: NIKHIL P S7 IT ROLL NO: 33.
Cluster Reliability Project ISIS Vanderbilt University.
material assembled from the web pages at
ASG - Towards the Adaptive Semantic Services Enterprise Harald Meyer WWW Service Composition with Semantic Web Services
Service Transition & Planning Service Validation & Testing
Systems Design Approaches The Waterfall vs. Iterative Methodologies.
Management for IP-based Applications Mike Fisher BTexaCT Research
Middleware for FIs Apeego House 4B, Tardeo Rd. Mumbai Tel: Fax:
Chapter 10 Analysis and Design Discipline. 2 Purpose The purpose is to translate the requirements into a specification that describes how to implement.
© 2005 IBM Corporation IBM Business-Centric SOA Event SOA on your terms and our expertise Operational Efficiency Achieved through People and SOA Martin.
9 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
Cracow Grid Workshop ‘06 17 October 2006 Execution Management and SLA Enforcement in Akogrimo Antonios Litke Antonios Litke, Kleopatra Konstanteli, Vassiliki.
Distribution and components. 2 What is the problem? Enterprise computing is Large scale & complex: It supports large scale and complex organisations Spanning.
THE VISION OF AUTONOMIC COMPUTING. WHAT IS AUTONOMIC COMPUTING ? “ Autonomic Computing refers to computing infrastructure that adapts (automatically)
LegendCorp What is System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM)? SCVMM at a glance Features and Benefits Components / Topology /
SQL Server 2008 R2 Manageability. Challenges facing database administrators today: Scaling management to multiple data centers Proactively monitoring.
Creating SmartArt 1.Create a slide and select Insert > SmartArt. 2.Choose a SmartArt design and type your text. (Choose any format to start. You can change.
20409A 7: Installing and Configuring System Center 2012 R2 Virtual Machine Manager Module 7 Installing and Configuring System Center 2012 R2 Virtual.
© 2004 IBM Corporation ICSOC2004 Panel Discussion: Grid Systems: What is needed from web service standards? Jeffrey Frey IBM.
The Vision of Autonomic Computing Self-Management Unit 7-2 Managing the Digital Enterprise Kephart, and Chess.
Jorke Odolphi Product Technology Specialist WebCentral Using Microsoft Operations Manager To Monitor And Maintain Your Farm.
Cyberinfrastructure Overview of Demos Townsville, AU 28 – 31 March 2006 CREON/GLEON.
AUTONOMIC COMPUTING B.Akhila Priya 06211A0504. Present-day IT environments are complex, heterogeneous in terms of software and hardware from multiple.
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
Self Healing and Dynamic Construction Framework:
Distribution and components
Solution Summary Business Service Management Solution on AIX® 6.1.
Introduction.
Management of Virtual Execution Environments 3 June 2008
Database Management System (DBMS)
20409A 7: Installing and Configuring System Center 2012 R2 Virtual Machine Manager Module 7 Installing and Configuring System Center 2012 R2 Virtual.
Chapter 1 Database Systems
Research Challenges of Autonomic Computing
The Vision of Autonomic Computing
Chapter 1 Database Systems
The Anatomy and The Physiology of the Grid
Presentation transcript:

ISA5428: 普及計算 Autonomic Computing 金仲達教授 清華大學資訊系統與應用研究所 九十一學年度第二學期 (Slides are taken from the presentations by Alan Ganek, Alfred Spector, Jeff Kephart of IBM)

1 Trillions of heterogeneous computing devices connected to the Internet Dream of Pervasive Computing … or Nightmare!

2 Core of the Problem Complexity in systems themselves and in the operating environment –As systems become more interconnected and diverse, architects are less able to anticipate and design interactions among components push to runtime, late binding e.g., hot-plug, JVM, JIT compilation, service discovery, mobile agents, … Complexity management human intervention and IT costs

3 Need Complexity Management But complexity is beyond that human can handle Human out of the control loop  autonomic Even though we are moving along this direction, is there any systematic way of addressing this issue? Autonomic Computing

4 Alan G. Ganek Vice President IBM Autonomic Computing Autonomic Computing

5 Complex Heterogeneous Infrastructures Are a Reality!

6 Industry Trends Administration of systems is increasingly difficult –100s of configuration, tuning parameters for DB2 Heterogeneous systems are increasingly connected –Integration becoming ever more difficult Architects can't plan interactions among components –Increasingly dynamic; frequently with unanticipated components More burden must be assumed at run time –But human administrators can't assume the burden 6:1 cost ratio between storage admin and storage 40% outages due to operator error Need self-managing computing systems –Behavior specified by sys admins via high-level policies –System and its components figure out how to carry out policies

7 Autonomic Computing Vision “Intelligent” open systems that… –Manage complexity –“Know” themselves –Continuously tune themselves –Adapt to unpredictable conditions –Prevent and recover from failures –Provide a safe environment Self-management: –free administrators from details of operations –provide peak performance 24/7 –Concentrate on high-level decisions and policies

8 Increase Responsiveness Adapt to dynamically changing environments Business Resiliency Discover, diagnose, and act to prevent disruptions Operational Efficiency Tune resources and balance workloads to maximize use of IT resources Secure Information and Resources Anticipate, detect, identify, and protect against attacks Self-managing Systems That … Aware/Proactive

9 Self-Configuring Example: DB2 Configuration Advisor

10 Self-Healing Example: IBM Electronic Service Agent

11 Self-tuning, end-to-end performance management  Dynamic allocation of network resources  Workload balancing & routing  Cross platform reporting  Policy-based for various classes of users & applications Heterogeneous, distributed components working together Self Optimizing: Enterprise Workload Management

12 Rapid / automated analysis of complex situations Self-Protecting Example: IBM Tivoli Risk Manager

13 Evolving towards Self-management TodayThe Autonomic Future Self-configure Corporate data centers are multi-vendor, multi-platform. Installing, configuring, integrating systems is time- consuming, error-prone. Automated configuration of components, systems according to high-level policies; rest of system adjusts automatically. Seamless, like adding new cell to body or new individual to population. Self-heal Problem determination in large, complex systems can take a team of programmers weeks Automated detection, diagnosis, and repair of localized software/hardware problems. Self-optimize WebSphere, DB2 have hundreds of nonlinear tuning parameters; many new ones with each release. Components and systems will continually seek opportunities to improve their own performance and efficiency. Self-protect Manual detection and recovery from attacks and cascading failures. Automated defense against malicious attacks or cascading failures; use early warning to anticipate and prevent system-wide failures.

14 Manual Autonomic Benefits Skills Characteristics Managed Level 2 Predictive Level 3 Adaptive Level 4 Autonomic Level 5 Basic Level 1 Multiple sources of system generated data Requires extensive, highly skilled IT staff Basic Requirements Met Evolving to Autonomic Computing

15 Manual Autonomic Benefits Skills Characteristics Basic Level 1 Predictive Level 3 Adaptive Level 4 Autonomic Level 5 Multiple sources of system generated data Requires extensive, highly skilled IT staff Basic Requirements Met Managed Level 2 Consolidation of data and actions through management tools IT staff analyzes and takes actions Greater system awareness Improved productivity Evolving to Autonomic Computing

16 Manual Autonomic Benefits Skills Characteristics Basic Level 1 Managed Level 2 Adaptive Level 4 Autonomic Level 5 Multiple sources of system generated data Requires extensive, highly skilled IT staff Basic Requirements Met Consolidation of data and actions through management tools IT staff analyzes and takes actions Greater system awareness Improved productivity Predictive Level 3 System monitors, correlates and recommends actions IT staff approves and initiates actions Reduced dependency on deep skills Faster/better decision making Evolving to Autonomic Computing

17 Manual Autonomic Benefits Skills Characteristics Basic Level 1 Managed Level 2 Predictive Level 3 Autonomic Level 5 Evolving to Autonomic Computing Multiple sources of system generated data Requires extensive, highly skilled IT staff Basic Requirements Met Consolidation of data and actions through management tools IT staff analyzes and takes actions Greater system awareness Improved productivity System monitors, correlates and recommends actions IT staff approves and initiates actions Reduced dependency on deep skills Faster/better decision making Adaptive Level 4 System monitors, correlates and takes action IT staff manages performance against SLAs Balanced human/system interaction IT agility and resiliency

18 Manual Autonomic Benefits Skills Characteristics Basic Level 1 Managed Level 2 Predictive Level 3 Adaptive Level 4 Multiple sources of system generated data Requires extensive, highly skilled IT staff Basic Requirements Met Consolidation of data and actions through management tools IT staff analyzes and takes actions Greater system awareness Improved productivity System monitors, correlates and recommends actions IT staff approves and initiates actions Reduced dependency on deep skills Faster/better decision making System monitors, correlates and takes action IT staff manages performance against SLAs Balanced human/system interaction IT agility and resiliency Autonomic Level 5 Integrated components dynamically managed by business rules/policies IT staff focuses on enabling business needs Business policy drives IT management Business agility and resiliency Evolving to Autonomic Computing

19 IBM’s Architecture Model Intelligent control loop: –Implementing self-managing attributes involves an intelligent control loop

20 Control Loops Delivered in 2 Ways Combinations of Management Tools Recourse Provider

21 3 Layers of Control Loop Management Composite resources tied to business decision-making Composite resources decision-making, e.g., cluster servers Resource elements managing themselves

22 Autonomic Element - Structure Fundamental atom of the architecture –Managed element(s) Database, storage –Autonomic manager Responsible for: –Providing its service –Managing own behavior in accordance with policies –Interacting with other autonomic elements An Autonomic Element Monitor Analyze Sensors Execute Plan Effectors Knowledge Autonomic Manager Managed Element SensorsEffectors

23 Alerts, events & problem analysis request interface SLA/Policy interface, interprets & translates into "control logic" Plan Policy Transforms Plan Generators Policy Interpreter Analyze Execute Service Dispatcher Distribution Engine Scheduler Engine Workflow Engine Monitor Metric Managers Filters Simple Correlators Knowledge Policy CalendarTopology Recent Activity Log SensorsEffectors Rules Engines Analysis Engines Policy Validations Policy Resolution Autonomic Manager Substructure

24 Autonomic Elements - Interaction Relationships –Dynamic, ephemeral –Formed by agreement May be negotiated –Full spectrum Peer-to-peer Hierarchical –Subject to policies

25 Multiple Contexts for Autonomic Behavior System Elements (Intra-element self-management) Groups of Elements (Inter-element self- management) Business Solutions (Business Policies, Processes, Contracts) Server Farm Enterprise Network Storage Pool Customer Relationship Management Enterprise Resource Planning ServersStorage Network Devices Middleware Database Applications

26 Mapping to IT Processes

27 Levels of Maturity

28 Enabled capabilities Core technologies Administrative Console Policy Infrastructure Data Collection (Logging/Tracing) Infrastructure Provisioning Install/Dependency Management Heterogeneous Workload Management Solution Management Policy-based Management End-to-end Problem Determination Automated Root Cause Analysis Auto-Update Identity/Security Management Auto-Detection Dynamic Provisioning Autonomic Computing Requires Core Technologies

29 Integrated Solutions Console for Common System Administration Value: –One consistent interface across product portfolio –Common runtime infrastructure and development tools based on industry standards, component reuse –Provides a presentation framework for other autonomic core technologies Customer pain point: Complexity of operations Standards-based: J2EE, JSR168

30 Log and Trace Tool for Problem Determination Value: –Introduces standard interfaces and formats for logging and tracing –Central point of interaction with multiple data sources –Correlated views of data –Reduced time spent in problem analysis Customer pain point: Difficulty in analyzing problems in multi- component systems Standards-based: JSR47, Apache

31 Install/Config Package for Solution Install Value: –One consistent software installation technology across all products –Consistent and up-to-date configuration and dependency data, key to building self-configuring autonomic systems –Reduced deployment time with less errors –Reduced software maintenance time, improved analysis of failed system components –Component-based install for IBM and non- IBM products Customer pain point: Difficulty of deployment in complex systems Standards-based: OGSA, Web Services Partnering with InstallShield

32 Policy Tools for Policy-based Management Value: –Uniform cross-product policy definition and management infrastructure, needed for delivering system-wide self- management capabilities –Simplifies management of multiple products; reduced TCO –Easier to dynamically change configuration in on-demand environment Customer pain point: Complexity of product and systems management Standards-based: DMTF, OASIS, OGSA Adaptation Definition Validation Local Reposito ry Distribution Enforcement Point Push or pull Activate Implement M O N I T O R Facts Analysis Resource … … Enforcement Point Resource

33 Technologies for Implementing Autonomic Managers Value: Components to simplify the incorporation of autonomic functions into applications –Building blocks for self-management –Monitoring, analysis, planning and execution components –Including autonomic computing technologies, grid tools, and services Pluggable –Defines interfaces and provides implementations for each major toolkit component Customer pain point: How to implement end-to-end autonomic solutions Standards-based: OGSA, W3C

34 Summary of Autonomic Computing Architecture Based on a distributed, service-oriented architectural approach, e.g., OGSA –Every component provides or consumes services –Policy-based management Autonomic elements –Make every component resilient, robust, self-managing –Behavior is specified and driven by policies Relationships between autonomic elements –Based on agreements established and maintained by autonomic elements –Governed by policies –Give rise to resiliency, robustness, self-management of system

35 Summary