The Perils of IP in a digital age. Seanchaí.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do the anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright (DMCA) Act further or harm public interests?
Advertisements

ON-LINE INFRINGEMENT OF MUSICAL COPYRIGHT: THE UK LEGAL PERSPECTIVE Presentation to British Computer Society Seminar on “IT’s Music Industry” on 18 October.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Questions and Critical Observations Max Vilimpoc Washington Internship for Students of Engineering.
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
Intellectual Property Image: William J. Wynn.
(c) Jakob Iversen, 2003 Online Music Industry 311: Fall 2003.
Copyright or Copywrong. What is a copyright and what can be copyrighted? What is “Fair Use” and what four factors determine “Fair Use”? What are the two.
Robin Hood and the 40 Million Thieves David Evans
1 2 CPTWG MEETING #106 September 19, 2007 Legislative/Litigation Update Jim Burger CPTWG MEETING #106 September 19, 2007 Legislative/Litigation.
Digital Rights Management and International DRM Enforcement September 20, 2004.
Copyright Infringement Present by: Shao-Chuan Fang Jaime McDermott Emily Nagin Michael Piston Fan Yang Carnegie Mellon Group Presentation Date:
Changing the Network Infrastructure– Threats and Possibilities Alex Alben Nobember 6, 2003.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye1 A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 4: Intellectual Property.
Copyrights1 By Saud Al-Harbi & AbdulAziz Al-Shamrani.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 4, 2009 Copyright – Indirect, Digital Issues.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 1, 2008 Copyright – Digital Issues.
Copyright and P2P Edward W. Felten Dept. of Computer Science Princeton University.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 1, 2007 Copyright – Digital Issues.
Grokster Bart Wagner. Shut Down Grokster, which lost in the Supreme Court a lawsuit filed by Hollywood to stop illegal file sharing on peer-to-peer networks,
1 Introduction to Software Engineering Lecture 38 – Intellectual Property.
1 Issues in Digital Audio. 2 Intellectual Property  Non-tangible property that is the result of creativity:  Patents – products, processes etc.  Copyright.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Claire Stewart MM450 February 14, 2006.
Intellectual Property
Social and Economic Impacts of IT Professor Matt Thatcher.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 7 Intellectual Property and Internet Law Chapter 7 Intellectual Property.
Supporting Further and Higher Education JISC Legal Information Service 21 January 2003 Introduction to Copyright John Kelly JISC Legal.
Andrew, Lachlan and Han ONLINE PIRACY.  Copyright infringement, or ‘piracy’, is the unauthorized use of works under copyright, infringing the copyright.
Intellectual property rights concern the legal ownership and use of intellectual property such as software, music, movies, data, and information. Intellectual.
Surveys of Media Access and Consumer Attitudes on Copyright Mike Palmedo & Jimmy Koo March 2011 Photo (cc) Irish Typepad (bit.ly/huMnIf)
Intellectual Property Rights Online File Sharing Brett Colbert Wendi Jardin Victor Cortez Brett Colbert Wendi Jardin Victor Cortez.
© Folens 2008 Cultural changes in music Brought about by ICT.
1 Intellectual Property “Gift of Fire”. 2 Intellectual Property - Have you ever give a CD to a friend that contained a copy of a computer game or a programs?
Intellectual Property Issues Professor Matt Thatcher, MIS 748.
Economic and Human Rights Benefits of Safe Harbors for Online Service Providers Associate Prof. Hannibal Travis, FIU College of Law, Dec
CSE/ISE 312 Intellectual Property (part 2). Outline Responses to copyright infringement – Defensive and aggressive responses – DMCA – Evolving business.
Group 2 Derrick Lowe Quintin King Caroline Hawes Aaron Phillips.
© 2008 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 BUSINESS LAW TODAY Essentials 8 th Ed. Roger LeRoy Miller - Institute for University.
Legal issues. Computer Misuse Act 1990 Deals with misuse of ICT systems.
IFRRO Legal Issues Forum Brussels – 9 June 2011 Martin Delaney Legal Director.
Intellectual Property in Peer-to-Peer Networks Artsiom Yautsiukhin Natallia Kokash Intellectual Property Law, 18 October 2005.
Who owns the Bits? Digital copyright issues are continually evolving. IP address do not map to a single person – hard to trace user Music and movie industry.
1 Wizards of OS 3 The Future of the Digital Commons Berlin - June 10 to 12, 2004 International Copyright in the Digital Era Geidy Lung WIPO Copyright Law.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Intellectual Property.
Why the Data Protection Act was brought in  The 1998 Data Protection Act was passed by Parliament to control the way information is handled and to give.
What is Copyright? Copyright is often viewed as something complicated and hard to understand Copyright starts out simple, but gets more complex as exceptions.
Digital Audio. Analog versus Digital Analog Sound waves “similar” or “copy” Electrical impedance creates noise Digital Sound encoded in binary form Sampled.
EIFL-IP Advocacy for Access to Knowledge New Tools for the Dissemination of Knowledge Bibliotheca Alexandrina Session 4 Proposal for a Treaty on Access.
Should media copyright laws be more strictly enforced? Compose and copyright CD, Produce instrumentals, Film Music Video By: La’Vell Williams.
Copyright and Intellectual Property Right 1. 2 Use and Protection of Intellectual Property in Online Business Intellectual property (general term) includes:
COPYRIGHT © 2006 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye1 A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 4: Intellectual Property.
Legal issues. Computer Misuse Act 1990 Deals with misuses of ICT systems.
Compsci 82, Fall Digital Millennium Copyright Act,DMCA l Copyright law of United States  Passed in 1998, general industry support  Controversial.
Chapter Four Intellectual Property in Cyberspace.
Digital Rights Management Zach Milko. Overview Definition Why it exists DRM Today  Fairplay Opponents of DRM  DefectiveByDesign.org Future Conclusion.
Economic Vitality and Intellectual Property Rights Discussion at Hanyang University May 26, 2005.
Purchasing Rights on line Domenico Sindico Turin Master of Law in Intellectual Property WIPO / UNIVERSITY OF TURIN.
Westminster eForum: IP and the Future of Copyright UK Copyright: How it compares internationally and who are the winners and losers March 2008 Ray Corrigan.
©2005 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Fundamentals of Business Law 6 th Edition Chapter 5 Intellectual Property and Internet.
Chapter 10 Intellectual Property and Internet Law.
Copyright Computer crime and cyber security.
Chapter 9: Internet Law, Social Media, and Privacy
MarkScan Digital Content Protection & Advisory Introduction Document
Who owns the Bits? Digital copyright issues are continually evolving.
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
By: Justin, Juan, Jian, and Jazlin
Intellectual Property ITGS - Mr. Crossman
By Jake Schmitt, Seth Raleigh, Neil McLain
Computer ethics in computer science curriculum
Who owns the Bits? Digital copyright issues are continually evolving.
Presentation transcript:

The Perils of IP in a digital age

Seanchaí

Blackboard Patent 2006 No. 6,988,138 “Internet based education support systems and methods”

Desire2Learn Blackboard HQ Lufkin, Texas

Blackboard patent Bollywood style

Lessig

Stanford

Boyle

Duke

Lessig

Innovation revolution

Commerce Counter-revolution

Law

Technology

Concentrated control of knowledge resources

Boyle

Second Enclosure

Commons of the mind

Silence is [golden] profitable

DMCA 1998 EUCD 2001

DeCSS 1999 DVD Jon Universal v Corley

Sklyarov 2001

Felten

SunnComm MediaMax CD3 & Haldermann’s shift key 2003

Blackboard Hoffman & Griffith

Adobe in Wonderland

RealNetworks v Apple 2004

P2P Napster, Grokster Universal v Sony

The United States Supreme Court unanimously confirmed that using this service to trade copyrighted material is illegal. Copying copyrighted motion picture and music files using unauthorized peer-to- peer services is illegal and is prosecuted by copyright owners. There are legal services for downloading music and movies. This service is not one of them. YOUR IP ADDRESS IS AND HAS BEEN LOGGED. Don't think you can't get caught. You are not anonymous. In the meantime, please visit and to learn more about copyright.

Copyright Clearance Center – Blackboard 2005 Automated clearance tool From ‘fair use’ to ‘fared use’

Gowers Review UK 2006 IP enforcement IP enforcement IP crime – police and trading standards IP crime – police and trading standards 10 years jail 10 years jail Reform of copyright Reform of copyright Balance – fair dealing & exceptions for private format shifting Balance – fair dealing & exceptions for private format shifting Libraries, archives, education Libraries, archives, education No term extension on sound recordings - economics No term extension on sound recordings - economics Patent Office → IPO Patent Office → IPO Advisory Board on IP Policy Advisory Board on IP Policy

Gene patents Software patents Trusted computing Network architectures WIPO, TRIPS, IPRED Policy laundering ACTA

Music industry > 30k individual lawsuits Jammie Thomas $222,

UK individual lawsuits Isabela Barwinska £16,000 August 2008

E-commerce directive Notice & takedown

ISPs ID suspects?

Three strikes

Promusicae v Telefonica

Diamond v Chakrabarty 1980 Moore v Regents of University of California 1990 State Street Bank 1998 Amazon 1-click BT v Prodigy (hypertext linking case) Sony v Owen 2002 Eldred v Ashcroft 2003 MercExchange v eBay RIM v NTP (Blackberry case) Microsoft v Eolas (plug ins and applets) Microsoft v Alcatel MP3 case Universal v Sharman Networks (KaZaa) International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP) 2007 Acacia v Red Hat & Novell Viacom v YouTube LG Electronics v Quanta Computer

Microsoft

Boyle 7 Ways to Ruin a Technological Revolution

Second enclosure movement

Lessig

Counter-revolution succeeding

Stakeholders (winners & losers) Public (Consumers) Creators Agents* * Business e.g. Music, film, software, media companies, publishers

Creators Z depends on i) term ii) scope iii) penalties iv) case law v)enforcement

Consumers Societal welfare equals (weighted) sum of consumers, creators & agents

Agents of creators Music, film, software, media companies and publishers Music, film, software, media companies and publishers Za > Zc

Lined up Possibly Z a > Z c > Z consumers

Evidence Optimal strength varies for creators, agents and consumers Optimal strength varies for creators, agents and consumers Possibly Z a > Z c > Z consumers Possibly Z a > Z c > Z consumers We don’t know We don’t know Very little empirical evidence Very little empirical evidence Case study of specific firms Case study of specific firms Surveys of creators, firms, lawyers, etc Surveys of creators, firms, lawyers, etc Data & econometrics Data & econometrics National or sector trends/comparisons National or sector trends/comparisons Sales of CDs, films, etc Sales of CDs, films, etc Collecting society data Collecting society data Legal cases matched to firm-level data Legal cases matched to firm-level data

Recent proposed changes 3 strikes 3 strikes Winners - agents & creators Winners - agents & creators Losers - agents & creators & public Losers - agents & creators & public Term extension Term extension Winners - agents & creators Winners - agents & creators Losers - agents & creators & public Losers - agents & creators & public 4% > 20 years old available 4% > 20 years old available 96% locked up 96% locked up ACTA ACTA ????????????? ????????????? Public Creators Agents

Thanks and Qs