Historical Background to NEPA Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution problem Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Advertisements

Bellringer.
The Free Market, Environmental Stewardship, and Rule of Law Lecture 1 of 3: Background Facts on Water as a Resource.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 is housed in the Executive Office of the President. Introduced.
Permits. The Process Plans are developed by an Architect or Engineer and presented to the Municipality – State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) declaration.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT Lecture 2
Chapter 25 Section 1 The Cold War Begins Chapter Section The Environmental Movement Assess the causes and effects of the environmental movement. Analyze.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Why Assess Environmental Impacts?
The National Environmental Policy Act
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
Federal Regulation of Land Use 9/27/11. What is NEPA? NEPA = National Environmental Protection Policy Act – Mandates an environmental assessment of all.
MassDOT P3 Project Overview. MassDOT Project Mobility.
OSU Airport – Overview of Master Plan and Draft Environmental Assessment Purpose of an Airport Environmental Assessment (EA) Identify environmental impacts.
03_00-CS.JPG Ch. 3 Policy and History. 03_01b.JPG.
Carrin Williams.  Purity of Waters Act  To assure supplies of clean drinking water  Clean Streams Law  To protect the streams from pollution.
Buckhorn Mountain EIS Project August Buckhorn Mountain Exploration Project Echo Bay Exploration is seeking federal and state authorization for.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act Presented by Scott Weir, Air Quality Coordinator Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)  Draft year: 1970 to present day  No Amendment Years  National Legislation By: Ayli Tulberg, Period.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
ENVS 101 Environmental science Environmental studies Interdisciplinary!
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Environmental Problems Smog Smog Industrial Pollution Industrial Pollution Acid Rain Acid Rain Nuclear Radiation Nuclear Radiation Cuyahoga River Fire.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Domestic Ocean & Coastal Law Summer School July 18, 2005 Lecture #4 Denise Antolini, Associate Professor Director, Environmental Law Program William S.
Tribal Voices a tale of 3 mines GSA National Conference November 2015 Kendra Zamzow, PhD, CSP2 Ann Maest, PhD, Buka Environmental.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS.
National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Engineer US Army Garrison.
By: Alyssa Kaiser and Celia Rozanski. Before the Act Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental policy Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
CEQA 101  CA Legislature passed CEQA in 1970; signed by Governor Reagan  CEQA statutes are found in Public Resources Code sections et seq.  The.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
Bureau of Land Management Federal Coal Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Meeting Supporting Text.
Objectives Assess the causes and effects of the environmental movement. Analyze why environmental protection became a controversial issue.
The Environmental Movement
Environmental Policy: Making Decision Solving Problems
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Unit 6 NEPA.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Ryo Ishikawa
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
Objectives Assess the causes and effects of the environmental movement. Analyze why environmental protection became a controversial issue.
Objectives Assess the causes and effects of the environmental movement. Analyze why environmental protection became a controversial issue.
Presentation transcript:

Historical Background to NEPA Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution problem Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution problem Cuyahoga River Cuyahoga River Rachel Carson Rachel Carson Earth Day Earth Day Richard Nixon Richard Nixon - Caught fire! “Burn on Cuyahoga” – R. Newman - wrote Silent Spring - Environment became “cool” - Passed most environmental legislation of any president (politically expedient)

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Mandates prediction of environmental effects of Federal actions Mandates prediction of environmental effects of Federal actions Defines Federal actions as those involving an expenditure of Federal money or requiring Federal oversight and approval Defines Federal actions as those involving an expenditure of Federal money or requiring Federal oversight and approval Places authority for NEPA regulation with the Council on Environmental Quality Places authority for NEPA regulation with the Council on Environmental Quality

Picture of something in landscape that can be a Federal project Picture of something in landscape that can be a Federal project

The EIS Process NEPA Regulations Agency announces Intent to Act Agency announces Intent to Act Scoping Scoping [Environmental Assessment (EA)] [Environmental Assessment (EA)] Draft Env. Impact Statement (DEIS) Draft Env. Impact Statement (DEIS) Public comment and public hearings Public comment and public hearings Final EIS issued Final EIS issued

Impacts Evaluated in EA Social – political, cultural Social – political, cultural Economic – cost/benefit Economic – cost/benefit Environmental Environmental Landscape Landscape Biota Biota Note: if the EA suggests there is no clear evidence that significant environmental impacts are likely to occur then an EIS is not usually prepared

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Device to force consideration of planned action on environment Device to force consideration of planned action on environment Full and fair discussion of significant environmental impacts Full and fair discussion of significant environmental impacts Develop reasonable alternatives to action Develop reasonable alternatives to action Supposed to be more than just disclosure Supposed to be more than just disclosure

What are environmental impacts? Short-term – construction impacts Short-term – construction impacts Long-term Long-term – permanent changes – permanent changes - cumulative impacts (combined incremental - cumulative impacts (combined incrementaleffects) Irretrievable losses – exploitation of non- renewable natural resources (eg. oil, coal mining) Irretrievable losses – exploitation of non- renewable natural resources (eg. oil, coal mining) Can be mitigated - restoration Can be mitigated - restoration

What is wrong with the EIS process? Analysis – quantitatively week  2/3 of EISs contain no quantitative predictions Analysis – quantitatively week  2/3 of EISs contain no quantitative predictions Paperwork – 150 page limit now reduces “BS” Paperwork – 150 page limit now reduces “BS” Cost – 1-3% of project budget goes to EIS Cost – 1-3% of project budget goes to EIS Mean > $200,00, 16 months Mean > $200,00, 16 months Litigation – usually decided on process not analysis Litigation – usually decided on process not analysis

How are controls implemented without using an EIS? NPDES permit NPDES permit Air quality permit Air quality permit Army Corps of Engineers wetlands permit Army Corps of Engineers wetlands permit Etc. Etc. Note: permits ask specific questions, if answers are wrong  fines are levied, even if project is underway Permits!

In-stream gravel mining on Crooked Creek, Marion County, AR