1 Event selection / characterization software package (OpCarac) Alessandro Bertolin (INFN - Padova) Ngoc-Tiem Tran (IN2P3 - Lyon) Special thanks section:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oct. Coll Meet Late Activity Cuts Without Bias Thomas H. Osiecki University of Texas at Austin.
Advertisements

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
New results from the CHORUS Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Pasquale Migliozzi CERN XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics UBC, Vancouver,
April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.
N. Saoulidou Fermilab 1 Update on track reconstruction in the Near Detector N. Saoulidou, Fermilab
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
Muon Identification Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de l’ Accelerateur Lineaire OPERA Collaboration Meeting in Frascatti Physics coordination meeting. October.
Emulsion scanning: present status and plans for the coming run Giovanni De Lellis.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
CC analysis progress This talk: –A first attempt at calculating CC energy sensitivity using the Far Mock data MC files with full reconstruction. –Quite.
Non-oscillation physics Report of the WG M. Sioli, OPERA Collaboration Meeting, Mizunami, 21/01/2009.
Brick Finding Ankara CM 2/4/2009 Dario Autiero. A large effort was put in the last months by a team of people in order to recover the events pending due.
MINOS Feb Antineutrino running Pedro Ochoa Caltech.
Status of MC software S.Dusini – INFN Padova 2/4/2009Stefano Dusini1.
Report of the Oscillation Working Group and status of Charm study 1 F. Juget – D. Duchesneau Ankara, April 1rst 2009.
SpillServer and FD neutrino events As part of my CC analysis studies, I have been attempting to isolate beam neutrino candidates in the FD using both scanning.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Studies Andy Blake Cambridge University Saturday February 24 th 2007.
Background Understanding and Suppression in Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments with Water Cherenkov Detector Chiaki Yanagisawa Stony Brook.
CC/NC SEPARATION STUDY Andy Blake Cambridge University Friday February 23 rd 2007.
April 1, Beam measurement with -Update - David Jaffe & Pedro Ochoa 1)Reminder of proposed technique 2)Use of horn-off data 3)Use of horn2-off data?
FD event selection and data/MC comparisons Motivation of this study –Look at FD events (with blinding scheme imposed) to determine Whether we observe neutrino.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Study Andy Blake Cambridge University Thursday December 7 th 2006.
Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
1 Status of the ‘Oscillation Physics’ WG Recall of the organisation and activities of the group –Main subjects and general approach –Starting steps and.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
EM shower reconstruction and located neutrino event analysis Ciro Pistillo (Bern LHEP) on behalf of the Swiss OPERA groups.
Status of the Software and MC production Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de L’accélérateur Linéaire.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
November 6, 2004Carl Bromberg, FNAL LAr Exp. Workshop Nov. 4-6, Particle ID, energy resolution, neutrino flavor tagging, efficiencies, backgrounds,
1 RUN 2008 OPERA events: Status Report M. Ieva on behalf of Bari Emulsion Lab OPERA Collaboration Meeting, April 1st - 5th, 2009.
Monitoring of background events in 2010 run Giuseppe Zito 06/11/2015 PFG/MIG Topical meeting on beam background.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, MINOS Collaboration Meeting N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, ND/CC Parallel Session, MINOS Collaboration Meeting R1.18.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
P. Vahle, Oxford Jan F/N Ratio and the Effect of Systematics on the 1e20 POT CC Analysis J. Thomas, P. Vahle University College London Feburary.
Optimization of Analysis Cuts for Oscillation Parameters Andrew Culling, Cambridge University HEP Group.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, Oct. 05 Data/MC Comparisons and Estimating the ND Flux with QE Events ● Update on QE event selection.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Soberi UMichigan-CERN Semester Program Thursday, 12 th February.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
A different cc/nc oscillation analysis Peter Litchfield  The Idea:  Translate near detector events to the far detector event-by-event, incorporating.
MINOS Coll Meet. Oxford, Jan CC/NC Data Cross Checks Thomas Osiecki University of Texas at Austin.
Status of OpRec Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de l’ Accelerateur Lineaire OPERA Collaboration Meeting in Frascatti Physics coordination meeting. October 28.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS ANL Meeting March 05 Dr. Quasi-Elastic (or... How I learned to stop worrying and love the Hough transform) Mark Dorman ● Update.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
A PID based approach for antineutrino selection
Status of the OPERA experiment
Results from OPERA Pablo del Amo Sánchez for the OPERA collaboration
SuperB LNF meeting March 21st 2012 Marcello Piccolo
OPERETTE TEST BEAM EXPERIMENT :
Summary of dE/dx studies in silicon and MS in muon system
Presentation transcript:

1 Event selection / characterization software package (OpCarac) Alessandro Bertolin (INFN - Padova) Ngoc-Tiem Tran (IN2P3 - Lyon) Special thanks section: A. Cases (OpRelease support) S. Dusini (MC generation, useful feedback) D. Autiero (provides us with his visual inspection results) A. Meregaglia (useful feedback) OPERA Collab. Meeting (2/4/09)

2 event selection / characterization software package: OpCarac MyAna version developed by A. Bertolin, OpMacros version developed by Ngoc-Tiem Tran MyAna version embed in OpRec starting from OpRec 3.1 current OpCarac version: v1r6 purpose: automatically classify the events surviving the Manager (and the OpFilter) cuts in the following classes: CONTAINED, SPECTRO, FRONTMUON, SIDEMUON, UNKNOWN NB:  if an event fails the Manager cuts it is NOT recorded in the OPERA data base and hence it is lost forever  if an event is wrongly classified by OpCarac it is ANYWAY recorded in the OPERA data base and hence it can be recovered at a later time possible applications: electronic detector data analysis, want only the events inside the target: use the CONTAINED class beam monitoring analysis: use the FRONTMUON and SIDEMUON classes brick finding: use the CONTAINED class Introduction

3 usage (inside MyAna): RecoUtils::EventType evttyp; evttyp = m_TDS->EvtHeader().front()->eventType(); if( evttyp==RecoUtils::CONTAINED ){ // CONTAINED events analysis } if( evttyp==RecoUtils::FRONTMUON ){ // FRONTMUON events analysis } Introduction (cont.)

4 OpCarac v1r6 efficiencies on CC PBPL MC events very large efficiency no dependence on Bjorken-y few events lost cluster on the TT outer surface (misidentified as SIDEMUON) Tiem’s algorithm, based on OpMacros, gives very similar results vertex position of the events not identified as CONTAINED Bjorken-y = E(W * ) / E( in  in words:  fractional energy transferred by the  incoming

5 vertex position of the events not identified as CONTAINED Bjorken-y dependence: quick rise with Bjorken-y and then saturation at large efficiency values very large efficiency only when there is a sizable energy transferred by the neutrino (i.e. large y) otherwise very small TT activity … not clear right now if the NC low Bjorken-y events would pass the Manager cuts … more investigations ongoing … Tiem’s algorithm, based on OpMacros, gives similar results OpCarac v1r6 efficiencies on NC PBPL MC events

6 Bjorken-y > 0.5, energy somewhere in the TT should be released, average efficiency is 96 % what’s the wrong event type for the 4 % misidentified PBPL NC MC events ? CONTAINED SPECTRO FRONTMUON SIDEMUON UNKNOWN NC events with a  track close to the TT sides … OpCarac v1r6 efficiencies on NC PBPL MC events (cont.) 2144 / right now at high y the efficiency is 96 % 43 / 2236 = 2 % will be investigated further … unexpected behavior …

7 OpCarac v1r6 efficiencies on tau MC events Stefano kindly processed for me a rather large number of tau MC events in the mu, h and e decay modes, generated in the CC and QE channels, occurring in the PBPL volume up to the digit level I run OpRec 3.1 which embed OpCarac v1r6 (using OpGeom v11r1 to avoid OpRec crashes)  energy  spectrum: non oscillated spectrum: in the MC file the  energy  spectra is set to the  energy spectra oscillated spectrum: each event is weighted according to sin 2 (const.  m 2 L / E( ) ) … in words: high energy neutrinos do not have enough length L to oscillate between the CNGS source and the OPERA cavern … but high energy neutrinos are the ones identified more efficiently … usually efficiency goes down … efficiency of what ? OpCarac efficiency for non oscillated spectrum: n_evts(evttyp==0) / n_evts(no cuts) OpCarac efficiency for oscillated spectrum:  w i if evttyp==0 /  w i no cuts Manager (TT) efficiency for oscillated spectrum:  w i if TTTrig==1 /  w i no cuts OpCarac efficiency w.r.t. Manager (TT):  w i if evttyp==0 && TTTrig==1 /  w i if TTTrig==1

8 TTTrig is a function that returns 1 if in a MC events the highlighted conditions are fulfilled (courtesy of S. Dusini)

9  spectrum OpCarac v1r6 OpCarac v1r6 Manager (TT) OpCarac v1r6 non oscillated oscillated oscillated w.r.t. to Manager (TT) oscillated tau mu CC in PBPL: 4812 / 5 k ~ 96 % ~ 96 % ~ 100 % ~ 96 % tau mu QE in PBPL: 4760 / 5 k ~ 95 % ~ 94 % ~ 99 % ~ 95 % tau h CC in PBPL: 4799 / 5 k ~ 96 % ~ 96 % ~ 100 % ~ 96 % tau h QE in PBPL: 4623 / 5 k ~ 92 % ~ 89 % ~ 98 % ~ 91 % tau e CC in PBPL: 4784 / 5 k ~ 96 % ~ 95 % ~ 99 % ~ 95 % tau e QE in PBPL: 4356 / 5 k ~ 87 % ~ 80 % ~ 94 % ~ 85 % OpCarac v1r6 efficiencies on tau MC events  m 2 was varied in the range from 2 to 4 eV 2 … very small efficiency changes ! OpCarac was so far tuned mostly on data and tested on NC and CC events … as a first trial the results are encouraging … general behavior: very high efficiency in the presence of a  track in the final state lower efficiency if only little energy deposited in the TT OpCarac v1r6 has a higher efficiency on the events surviving the Manager (TT) cuts … this because events with just a few hits in the TT are removed by the Manager (TT) itself  m 2 = 2.43 E -3 eV 2

10 OpCarac v1r6 efficiencies on NC PBPL MC events: one more remark black: OpCarac efficiency, n_evts(evttyp==0) / n_evts(no cuts) blue: OpCarac efficiency relative to the Manager (TT), n_evts(evttyp==0 && TTTrig==1) / n_evts  TTTrig==1) at low Bjorken-y the “soft” events are removed (and hence lost forever) by the Manager (TT) so on the remaining ones OpCarac is more efficient (in classifying them as CONTAINED)

11 data: 2008 OPERA data MC: sample of contained + external, CC+NC events provided by Stefano OpRec 3.1, which embed OpCarac v1r6, but using OpGeom v11r1 MC p.o.t. normalized (1.762E19 pot) evttyp==RecoUtils::CONTAINED (*iTK)->dimension()>=5 (*iTK)->muonID()>0 first track with these properties evttyp==RecoUtils::CONTAINED (*iTK)->dimension()>=5 (*iTK)->muonID() is never >0 count how many track event by event MC vertex CONTAINED MC vertex NOT CONTAINED overall purity, P = / ( ) = 95 % changed current purity, P[CC] = 1 – 0 / 1232 = 100 % neutral current purity, P[NC] = 1 – 80 / 491 = 84 % (100 % if there is an extra 3d track) OpCarac v1r6 purity

12 OpCarac v1r6 purity (cont.) if we make softer cuts on the NC events, to increase the efficiency at low Bjorken-y, we should pay attention not to spoil too much P[NC] at the MC level, it is of course possible to find out which volume and which interaction, NC / CC, is giving these fake CONTAINED events without any 3d track according to the results of the previous step if should be possible to work out better cuts to improve P[NC]

13 introduction of news classes (Antoine’s suggestion): SPLASH SOFTCONTAINED: in this way brick finding can be run only on the “more energetic” and “cleaner” CONTAINED events hopefully the UNKNOWN class will disappear, ALL events will be UNKNOWN only BEFORE the algorithm is run further investigations: on low Bjorken-y NC events in conjunction with any trigger development (i.e. any change in Manager level cuts) on a few 2008 neutrino interaction events not classified properly, do we have any update to the extracted event list (I got the last from Elisabetta on 09/02/02) ? on the latest OpRec developments due to a > instead of a >= some SPECTRO events occurring in the 1rst SM RPC may be wrongly classified … easy to fix … L. Stanco suggested to release a short OPERA Note describing this work, we would like to make it “public”, in this case it can be used as a support reference in other papers Luca already had a careful reading of the draft, it should be ready for the PTB within one week Conclusions and outlook

14

15 Data vs MC comparisons: charged current candidates evttyp==RecoUtils::CONTAINED (*iTK)->dimension()>=5 (*iTK)->muonID()>0 first track with these properties data: 2008 OPERA data MC: sample of contained + external, CC+NC events provided by Stefano OpRec 3.1, which embed OpCarac v1r6, but using OpGeom v11r1 MC p.o.t. normalized (1.762E19 pot) the charged current data sample is reasonably well reproduced by MC

16 evttyp==RecoUtils::FRONTMUON (*iTK)->dimension()>=5 (*iTK)->muonID()>0 first track with these properties data: 2008 OPERA data MC: sample of contained + external, CC+NC events provided by Stefano OpRec 3.1, which embed OpCarac v1r6, but using OpGeom v11r1 MC p.o.t. normalized (1.762E19 pot) the front muon data sample is reasonably well reproduced by MC Data vs MC comparisons: front muon candidates

17 Data vs MC comparisons: neutral current candidates evttyp==RecoUtils::CONTAINED (*iTK)->dimension()>=5 (*iTK)->muonID() is never >0 count how many track event by event data: 2008 OPERA data MC: sample of contained + external, CC+NC events provided by Stefano OpRec 3.1, which embed OpCarac v1r6, but using OpGeom v11r1 MC p.o.t. normalized (1.762E19 pot)  sharing between no tracks and just one track is 50 – 50 %, both on data and MC  very small fraction of neutral current events with two or more 3d tracks