The presence of the South Pole Air Shower Experiment (SPASE) on the surface provides a set of externally tagged muon bundles that can be measured by AMANDA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AGASA Results Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration at 3 rd Int. Workshop on UHECR, Univ. Leeds.
Advertisements

Anisotropy in Cosmic Ray Arrival Directions Using IceCube and IceTop Frank McNally ISCRA.
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
JNM Dec Annecy, France The High Resolution Fly’s Eye John Matthews University of Utah Department of Physics and High Energy Astrophysics Institute.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Design Study the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers construction.
Use of floating surface detector stations for the calibration of a deep-sea neutrino telescope G. Bourlis, N. A. B. Gizani, A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis,
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
AGASA update M. Teshima ICRR, U of CfCP mini workshop Oct
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
TAUP 2005: Zaragoza Observations of Ultra-high Energy Cosmic Rays Alan Watson University of Leeds Spokesperson for Pierre Auger Observatory
Chiba, July 29, 2003Tom Gaisser Comments on atmospheric muon and neutrino backgrounds in neutrino telescopes Use semi-analytic estimates to display some.
South Pole Summer Wednesday Science Lectures January 22, :00 PM Upper Galley Serap Tilav Bartol Research Institute University of Delaware SPASE:
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Search for point sources of cosmic neutrinos with ANTARES J. P. Gómez-González IFIC (CSIC-Universitat de València) The ANTARES.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara for the IceCube collaboration Chiba University.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
TAUP Conference, Sendai September The primary spectrum in the transition region between direct and indirect measurements (10 TeV – 10 PeV)
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
Contributions of the University of Bucharest to the study of high energy cosmic rays in the framework of the KASCADE-Grande experiment Octavian Sima Faculty.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
AMANDA. Latest Results of AMANDA Wolfgang Rhode Universität Dortmund Universität Wuppertal for the AMANDA Collaboration.
1 Cosmic Rays in IceCube: Composition-Sensitive Observables Chihwa Song a, Peter Niessen b, Katherine Rawlins c for the IceCube collaboration a University.
AMANDA Per Olof Hulth The Wierdest wonder Is it good or is it bad?
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic kilometer detector at the geographic South Pole. We give an overview of searches for time-variable neutrino.
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration
Determination of True Attenuation Lengths using SPASE-AMANDA Coincidence Data Tim Miller JHU/APL.
Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.
Data collected during the year 2006 by the first 9 strings of IceCube can be used to measure the energy spectrum of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux.
The AMANDA-II Telescope - Status and First Results - Ralf Wischnewski / DESY-Zeuthen for the AMANDA Collaboration TAUP2001, September.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
“The Cosmic Ray composition in the knee region and the hadronic interaction models” G. Navarra INFN and University, Torino, Italy For the EAS-TOP Collaboration.
Nov 30, 2003Tom Gaisser The IceTop component of IceCube Perspective from the South Pole.
Physical Description of IceTop 3 Nov IceTop Internal Review Madison, November 3-4, 2010 Physical Description of IceTop Paul Evenson, University.
RICE: ICRC 2001, Aug 13, Recent Results from RICE Analysis of August 2000 Data See also: HE228: Ice Properties (contribution) HE241: Shower Simulation.
The KASCADE-Grande Experiment: an Overview Andrea Chiavassa Universita’ di Torino for the KASCADE-Grande Collaboration.
South Pole Astro April 4, 2011 Tom Gaisser1 125 m Cosmic-ray physics with IceCube IceTop is the surface component of IceCube as a three-dimensional cosmic-ray.
Nearly vertical muons from the lower hemisphere in the Baikal neutrino experiment Zh. Dzhilkibaev - INR (Moscow) for the Baikal Collaboration ( Uppsala,
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
Search for a Diffuse Flux of TeV to PeV Muon Neutrinos with AMANDA-II Detecting Neutrinos with AMANDA / IceCube Backgrounds for the Diffuse Analysis Why.
Tunka-133: Primary Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum in the energy range 6·10 15 – eV L.A.Kuzmichev (SINP MSU) On behalf on the Tunka Collaboration 32th.
Search for UHE Neutrinos with AMANDA Stephan Hundertmark University of California, Irvine Methodical Aspects of Underwater/Ice Neutrino Telescopes Hamburg,
AMANDA Per Olof Hulth The Wierdest wonder Is it good or is it bad?
Cosmic Ray Composition from the 40-string IceCube/IceTop Detectors For the IceCube Collaboration: Katherine Rawlins University of Alaska Anchorage Karen.
Muon Energy reconstruction in IceCube and neutrino flux measurement Dmitry Chirkin, University of Wisconsin at Madison, U.S.A., MANTS meeting, fall 2009.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara Chiba University.
First All-Sky Measurement of Muon Flux with IceCube IceCube REU Summer 2008 Kristin Rosenau Advisor: Teresa Montaruli.
Light Propagation in the South Pole Ice
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
IceCube Collaboration Meeting
completed in austral season South Pole completed in austral season.
Direct Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Spectrum with IceCube
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
Results on the Spectrum and Composition of Cosmic Rays
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Charge Ratio by Using a Cosmic Ray Telescope Soheila Abdollahi (Imam Khomeini International University, Sharif University.
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
MUPAGE: A fast muon generator
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
Hadronic Interaction Model Analysis Air Shower Development
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
Amanda Heffner-Wong Wichita State University Wichita, KS
The Aperture and Precision of the Auger Observatory
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Presentation transcript:

The presence of the South Pole Air Shower Experiment (SPASE) on the surface provides a set of externally tagged muon bundles that can be measured by AMANDA. Such measurements allow a study of the response of AMANDA that is complementary to studies of the deep detector with atmospheric muons and neutrinos, internal calibration sources and Monte Carlo simulations. The possibility of independent confirmation of the absolute pointing of the neutrino telescope with a surface array is a unique advantage of AMANDA. Method Determine direction of each event at surface with SPASE Compare the direction determined by AMANDA Measure response of each AMANDA OM to muon bundles as a function of impact parameter as determined by SPASE References E. Andres et al., Nature 410 (22 March 2001) J. Beaman et al., Phys. Rev. D48:4495 (1993) J.E. Dickinson et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A440:95 (2000) P.B. Price, et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 27:2129 (2000) N.J.T. Smith et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A276:622 (1989) J. van Stekelenborg et al., Phys. Rev. D48:4504 (1993) Muon survey is performed by examining the distribution of signals in each OM as a function of impact parameter of the muon bundle as determined by the direction assigned to each coincident event by the surface detector. Muon survey plots show the zenith and azimuth of each AMANDA-B10 module as seen by SPASE-1 and SPASE-2. The 10 strings are clearly distinguishable, with the bottom of each string at small zenith angles. The muon survey confirms the absolute positions of the OMs as determined by drill logging plus laser calibration to within 0.5 o (~3m absolute). The corresponding confirmation of the absolute pointing of the telescope is ~1.5 o. AMANDA-B10 seen from SPASE-2 AMANDA-B10 seen from SPASE-1 X. Bai 1, R. Engel 1, T.K. Gaisser 1, J.A. Hinton 2, A. Karle 3, M. Kowalski 4, D. Martello 5, T. Miller 6, K. Rawlins 3, K. Rochester 2, G.M. Spiczak 1, Todor Stanev 1, S. Tilav 7, A.A. Watson 2 and the AMANDA Collaboration 1 Bartol Research Institute, Univ. of Delaware; 2 Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Leeds; 3 Dept. Of Physics, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison; 4 DESY-Zeuthen; 5 INFN, Lecce; 6 APL; 7 NAPL, Oxford Table of Shower Properties S 30 E 0 (PeV) (p) (Fe) (p)(Fe) Muons with energy of 350 GeV at the surface reach the top of AMANDA, while muons with 550 GeV can penetrate through it. About half the muons in the bundle range out inside AMANDA Size of muon bundles at AMANDA is comparable to the string spacing The difference between muon bundles and single, neutrino-induced muons must be taken into account when using SPASE-AMANDA coincidences to check AMANDA track reconstruction For large events the lateral distribution of the signal generated by the muon bundle can be measured by AMANDA and used in coincidence with the surface signals as a measure of primary cosmic ray composition in the region of the knee of the spectrum. Lateral distribution of 6 events as measured by AMANDA-B10. The corresponding energies are in the PeV range as indicated by S 30. Integral lateral distributions of muons at the depth of AMANDA for simulated proton (dashed) and iron (dotted) showers. The plot shows the average number of muons at distances larger that a given radius (R) for 4 bins of shower size. S 30 is the particle density on the surface at 30 m core distance. Hit probability per OM as a function of impact parameter is fit by an exponential. The attenuation length determined in this way is a convolution of the attenuation length of the ice and the angular resolution of SPASE. It is therefore larger than the intrinsic effective attenuation length of the ice. Depth dependence determined by this method provides an independent look at ice properties. Depths of relatively short attenuation lengths correspond to dust layers as in Price et al. (2000). SPASE-1 (Smith et al., 1989; Beaman et al., 1993; van Stekelenborg et al., 1993) operated from 1988 through 1997 SPASE-2 (Dickinson et al., 2000) began operation in unique for stereo view of AMANDA-B10 (Andres et al., 2001) from surface Map shows the locations of SPASE-1 and SPASE-2 relative to AMANDA-B10 strings at the surface. The origin of the coordinate system is near the center of B10. The positive Y-direction is grid-north. Azimuth is measured counterclockwise from grid-east. Thus the center of SPASE-2 is at 247 o and the center of SPASE 1 at 327 o. XXVII ICRC, 7-15 August 2001, Hamburg, Germany Poster Session HE2.01 Poster Board Number HE208