PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrologic Modeling with HEC-HMS
Advertisements

Application of the FEWS Stream Flow (SF) Model to the Limpopo Basin, Mozambique Final Report Tanya Hoogerwerf.
Module 5: Storage Concepts Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI October 2013.
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
Hydrologic Analysis Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
By Jennifer VerWest. Differences between Flat and Average/Steep Terrain Flat Terrain Steep/Average Terrain.
PREPRO2004 BY ASHISH AGRAWAL. PREPRO2004 Why we need this tool? Why we need this tool? Inputs, Outputs and How it works? Inputs, Outputs and How it works?
DEM-Based Stream and Watershed Delineation
CRWR-PrePro Francisco “Paco” Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera 1998 ESRI User Conference.
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
Concept Course on Spatial Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Application of GIS in Watershed Analysis Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Institute of Water and Flood.
GIS Modeling Venkatesh Merwade, University of Texas at Austin Interdisciplinary aquatic modeling workshop, July 21, 2005.
CRWR-PrePro: A System of GIS Tools for HEC-HMS Modeling Support
Hydrologic Model Integration
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Hands on training on surface hydrologic analysis using GIS Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Watershed and Stream Delineation Tool for ArcGIS 8.1 By Milver A. Valenzuela TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY.
Use of GIS in Determination of the Probable Maximum Flood at Nuclear Plant Sites Presented by: Monica Anderson, GISP Tennessee Valley Authority Carrie.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
Watershed Management Water Budget, Hydrograph Analysis
Introduction to HEC-HMS
A Cell to Cell Routing Model A Cell to Cell Routing Model By : Rajeev Raina CVEN 689 Civil Engineering Applications of GIS Instructor : Dr. Francisco Olivera.
HEC-HMS Simulation Adding a detention pond at the outlet
1 GIS in Hydrology Watershed management Definitions Algorithms Watershed delineation Automatically delineating watersheds Flow length Raster to vector.
Topographic Maps vs DEM. Topographic Map 1:24,000 Scale 20 ft contour 100 ft contour Stream Center Line.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation.
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Watershed Modeling using HEC-HMS and EPA-SWMM ©T. G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 10 July 2012 Lesson 2.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
The Effects of Vegetation Loss on the Two Elk Creek Watershed as a Result of the Proposed Vail Category III Ski Area Development CE 394 K.2 By Dave Anderson.
WMS Investigation: Travel Time Variability with Method, Area, and Slope Ryan Murdock May 1, 2001.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
Long Valley Creek: A Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Story Rob Thompson Hydrologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
The Effect of Urbanization to the surface-water runoff The comparison between the urbanized and undeveloped zones.
CRWR-PrePro Stream and Watershed Delineation Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
Waller Creek Sub-basin HMS Review Original project idea scrapped Difficult to find adequate GIS data No measured flow data to validate model results.
The Effects of Impervious Cover on a Hydrologic System BRUSHY CREEK WATERSHED By Ruth Haberman.
HEC-PrePro Workshop GIS Research Group Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 Workshop.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
BUILDING AND RUNNING THE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
HEC-HMS Simulation Adding a detention pond at the outlet
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
Hydrologic River Routing
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Hydrologic Analysis of the Hyrum Reservoir watershed
Elaine B. Darby GIS – Fall 2005
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Rainfall Runoff in the Guadalupe River Basin
CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters
Development of a Hydrologic Model for the Wichita Falls District
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005

Hydrologic Modeling  The use of physical or mathematical techniques to simulate the hydrologic cycle and its effects on a watershed  Most commonly used to simulate stormwater runoff in a watershed

HEC-HMS  US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Modeling System  Used to electronically simulate precipitation-runoff processes of dendritic watershed systems  Outputs include peak flows and runoff hydrographs  Outputs used directly or in conjunction with other programs

3 Components of HMS 1.Basin Model Watershed Parameters 2.Meteorologic Model Precipitation and Evapo-transpiration Parameters 3.Control Specifications Start and End Date/Time of Simulation

Basin Model  Watershed parameters: sub- basins, reachs, junctions, sources, sinks, and reservoirs  Commonly data is derived from contour maps (USGS or survey data), land use maps, and soil maps  Tedious and time consuming

Sub-basins

Reach Parameters

PrePro2004  A GIS pre-processor which extracts hydrologic information from spatial data for HMS modeling  Add-in tool in Arc-GIS interface  Much faster than conventional methods for calculating basin model parameters

Study Area  College Station, Texas  Castlegate Subdivision  Spring Creek, before confluence with Lick Creek

Study Area

PrePro2004 Basic Steps 1.Gather data 2.Fill sinks, create FDIR grid, create FACC grid 3.Construct stream network 4.Add inlet, outlet, and/or reservoir 5.Delineate watershed 6.Extract HMS elements 7.Calculate parameters 8.Calculate curve numbers 9.Export data to IDM 10.Export IDM to HMS 11.Setup HMS project

1. Gather Data  DEM, stream vector data, mask grid, soils vector or grid data, land use vector or grid data  DEM source: USGS seamless  Soils and land use (zoning) from COCS  Stream vector data from US EPA Lower Brazos arc data

2. Fill sinks, create FDIR grid, create FACC grid  Fill: Cell elevation raised to lowest surrounding cell elevation  FDIR: Flow direction grid  FACC: Flow accumulation grid

3. Construct Stream Network Chose cell threshold = stream drainage area

4. Add Inlet/Outlet/Reservoir

5. Delineate Watershed

6. Extract HMS Elements  Under Vectorization tab in Watershed Delineation tool  Creates shapefiles to be directly imported to a target geodatabase  Elements include watershed, reach, junction, source, and reservoirs  Following element extraction can merge basins, but this was not selected in this project

7. Calculate Parameters  Generates longest flow path for each sub-basin, HMSCode, and extracts slope and elevation data from DEM  Data stored in ‘watershed’ and ‘reach’ layers

8. Calculate Curve No. Need soils data, land use data, watershed data (previously created), and CN lookup table

Curve No. Continued Vector data was used, but raster data could be used if available Soils data was given by individual HSG, not a % of each Zoning was used for land use, then equated to the NLCD land use codes manually After calculating CN and impervious cover are stored in the ‘watershed’ layer

9. Export Data to IDM Prior to this step gage weights can be calculated, a frequency storm is used in this project so gage weighting was skipped Exports data from previous steps to project and basin geodatabases (preferably empty) Following this step time of concentration for each subbasin is calculated (Calculate Parameters)

10. IDM to HMS Creates input files for HMS from data stored in basin geodatabase –Basin file –Meteorologic file (if gage data is used) Must propogate fields with chosen methods for loss rate, transform, and routing

11. Import to HMS Import basin and meteorologic files into HMS Import background map and grid data

Results

Basin Comparison

Comments The sub-basins would have been more similar had I added more user defined outlets Time savings is huge Good for large scale projects, but difficult to accurately define watersheds with tool on small scale (development scale)

Questions?