Database entry of irradiation data PROBLEMS New form of DB data One set of data may de-qualify whole batch of sensors  composite of composite action:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Veterinary example Martin Boerma Seoul – June 9th 2011.

Advertisements

ICIS-NPDES Plugin Design Preview Webinar ICIS-NPDES Full Batch OpenNode2 Plugin Project Presented by Bill Rensmith Windsor Solutions, Inc. 3/15/2012.

Database Dev Idea. Reasoning: Much of the simple work can be done by Gii We don't want to start the complex work until Gii has generated the simple stuff.

Quality Assurance of Silicon Strip Detectors and Monitoring of Manufacturing Process Thomas Bergauer Institute f. High Energy Physics HEPHY, Vienna SiLC.

IAP-PAI 25/05/20051 CMS Si Rad. Hardness Introduction Damage in Si Neutron tests => Beam => Irrad. Setup.

Probestation 1: 6“ (200mm * 300mm + 360° rotation + 15mm Z) QTC Instruments: HP4274A (LCR), K6517 (electrometer), HP6614C (voltage supply), K595 (quasistatic.

128 September, 2005 Silicon Sensor for the CMS Tracker The Silicon Sensors for the Inner Tracker of CMS CMS Tracker and it‘s Silicon Strip Sensors Radiation.

Frank Hartmann Module Construction Meeting1 Analysis on TEC Expressline II modules Two different topics: Strip defects (3 modules) Global IV (2.

Sensor meetingF. Hartmann 1 Status report St & HPK plus add. Scratch tests. IEKP – University of Karlsruhe Frank Hartmann.

CMS week – December 8-12, TOB sensor quality Regina Demina University of Rochester.

Slide 1 Anthony Affolder US Module LT meeting June 17, 2004 UCSB Module LT Testing.

October 2001Module Construction meeting IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 1 Discussions on validation of irradiated MODULES W. de Boer, F. Hartmann.

Workshop on CMS irradiation sensor Qualification&Assurance 1 Final set of measurement for the irradiation quality assurance. What test do we need? EFFICIENT.

Slide 1CMS Database Issues-Derek BargeDOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database Issues Derek Barge.

Sensor meetingA. Furgeri 1 Status report IEKP – University of Karlsruhe Alexander Furgeri.

Irradiation Workshop - KarlsruheA. Dierlamm, IEKP 1 Irradiation with Protons - IQC Karlsruhe IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH)

6/22/2015Tracker Week April 2002IEKP 1 Summary of IQC-workshop IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH)

General Tracker meetingA. Furgeri 1 Irradiation results and Annealing scenarios for HPK IEKP – University of Karlsruhe Alexander Furgeri

October 2001Module Construction meeting IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 1 Discussions on validation of irradiated MODULES W. de Boer, F. Hartmann.

CMU’s TTO3 Tasks Analyze annotation manuals and annotated samples from all TTO3 teams –Status: Formal UML models have been constructed and merged together.

Manuel FahrerCMS Week TB Meeting /6 1-Shot Test Beam CERN CMS: M.Huhtinen, R.Hammarstrom, A.Macpherson CERN ATLAS, PS, Karlsruhe CMS  Overview.

DPG 2001 Frank Hartmann (IEKP) P-irradiated-oxygenated Non-irradiated-oxygenated Non-irradiated-non-oxygenated P-irradiated-non-oxygenated sensors put.

First Proton Irradiation of CMS Sensors W. de Boer, A. Dierlamm, A. Furgeri, E. Grigoriev, F. Hartmann, F. Hauler, L. Jungermann, Ch. Piasecki.

1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.

Sensor meetingA. Furgeri 1 Status report IEKP – University of Karlsruhe Alexander Furgeri.

Status of the Tracker DB System Tk week april 03 D. Contardo Developments Applications.

March 17, 2003 Catania, Meeting ST - CMS CMS Sensor Quality Frank Hartmann – University of Karlsruhe 1 Summary of Sensor Quality Tests List of Problems.

Database entry of irradiation data PROBLEMS New form of DB data 1. One set of data may de-qualify whole batch of sensors  composite of composite action:

The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.

CVSQL 2 The Design. System Overview System Components CVSQL Server –Three network interfaces –Modular data source provider framework –Decoupled SQL parsing.

Label production Solution with Label Gallery programs Label Gallery is used for general label design and print GalleryForm is used to create data entry.

October 2001General Tracker Meeting IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 1 Results on proton irradiation tests in Karlsruhe F. Hartmann IEKP - Universität.

Status, Data Transfer and Processing Vilas Mandlekar, Nada Hamadeh and Yuri Dikhanov ICP Regional Coordinators Meeting 7-11 March 2005, Washington DC ICP.

Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.

The trkNavigator plugin 22/10/ CERN - DataBase meeting Simone Paoletti INFN - Sez. Firenze.

Frank Lehner U Zurich Proposal to use the Atlas SCT database for Run IIb  Why to switch now? u existing database (db) at UIC incomplete and unlikely to.

22 Oct 2002Tracker Week - Bonding WGSalvatore Costa - Catania Status of Database Interface for Bonding Data Salvatore Costa University and INFN – Catania.

Sergey Korjenevski KSU DØ Run2b Silicon meeting, Oct 10, Preliminary testing results of Elma and HPK sensors Sergey Korjenevski Kansas State University.

Anna Macchiolo, Status of Process Qualification Centers, Sensor Meeting, 31st Oct 2001 Status of Process Qualification Centers Florence, Strasbourg, Vienna.

10 April 2003Salvatore Costa, INFN Catania1 CMS Tracker Week CERN, 10 Apr 2003 Entering Bonding Data in TrackerDB.

Luca Latronico - INFN Pisa DB requirements relevant info for subsystems integration implementation: custom or available products GLAST Ground Software.

CODIF Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Space Science Center UNH July 6-8, 2005 Paris, France.

Silicon Meeting July 10, 2003 Module and Stave Production Status James Fast Fermilab.

Data Management Seminar, 9-12th July 2007, Hamburg WinW3S - Introduction.

8. February 2012 Thomas Bergauer (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Construction Database SVD-PXD meeting.

Data Management Seminar, 8-11th July 2008, Hamburg WinW3S - Introduction.

Update of CMS Process Quality Control Sensor Meeting, CMS TK Week, , CERN Florence Anna Macchiolo Carlo Civinini Mirko Brianzi Strasbourg Jean-Charles.

Joachim Erfle Summary of measurements after first irradiation of HPK samples 19 th RD50 Workshop November 2011 CERN Joachim.

Multiplication Facts Table of Contents 0’s 1’s 2’s 3’s 4’s 5’s 6’s 7’s 8’s 9’s 10’s.

Querying and Maintaining Ordered XML Data using Relational Databases Anil Rawat Wei Pan Chang chen Kelly Yu.

02 | Data Flow – Extract Data Richard Currey | Senior Technical Trainer–New Horizons United George Squillace | Senior Technical Trainer–New Horizons Great.

CERN, 16/9/2003 S. Paoletti: trkNavigator 1 trkNavigator: A Java client for the Tracker DB 16/9/ CERN - mod. Prod meeting Simone Paoletti INFN -

Pixel power R&D in Spain F. Arteche Phase II days Phase 2 pixel electronics meeting CERN - May 2015.

Correlator GUI Sonja Vrcic Socorro, April 3, 2006.

Introducing SMILER 1. Why SMILER? Monitoring as the ‘poor relation’ Disconnect between proposal and report contents Projects just not delivering Limited.

1 How to move test data from existing files into a satellite database Jacek Wojcieszuk Jacek Wojcieszuk Warsaw University of Technology.

1 Integration of the LCP Reporting Into the E-PRTR Current status and Technical proposal August 4th.

IETF61 (November 2004) SIMPLE1 Data model and RPID Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University.

INFN and University of Florence Test Beam Meeting Tracker Week

Karlsruhe probe equipment and QA proposals/expertise

consumed pre-prints on the sales invoice of the in-print

Status of PQC Florence, Strasbourg, Vienna

INFN and University of Florence Test Beam Meeting Tracker Week

News from CMS Process Quality Control

Software Engineering Lecture #14.

Status, Data Transfer and Processing

Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University

IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH)

Online data analysis Franco J. Mangiarotti CERN – TE-MSC-TF

Manufacture Part Search Template Overview

Presentation transcript:

Database entry of irradiation data PROBLEMS New form of DB data One set of data may de-qualify whole batch of sensors  composite of composite action: NEW Tests are done on teststructures  TS is NOT a database object  Even worse: diodes and minisensors on TS   how to name? WHERE to register?  in addition there will be modules to be irradiated. FACT: The PQC centers will face the same problem

Steps to go, and possible solution 1.The composite of composite action has to be introduced in the DB scheme 2.IQC and also PQC tables could be inserted in the QTC existing DB objects Addition of new tables Optional, since only a fraction will be irradiated M200 and pre-series is approaching fast! Many pre-series sensors are delivered and tested

Preliminary Irrad tables already exist in XML Tables are done and already underwent one iteration between Karlsruhe and Louvain We will have 3 simple tables: –diode minisensor sensor –Tables show the results from the agreed measurements: ONE Ramp, difference of values before and after

DB content (for sensor & minissensor) ENV: Date,Time;Irrad_Date;Comment;Humidity,Temp Duration; operator; location; status GLOBAL: I_ TOT, V_ dep ; C_ TOT ; alpha (before and after irrad) IRRAD-SPECS: fluence(p,n); dose(p,n); energy(p,n) STRIP-PARAMETERS: X* [ R poly ;C int ;I leak ;R int (CAC standard =400V Delta of all strip parameters before and after irrad  Raw Data: IV,CV, ONE RAMP { R poly ;C int ;I leak ;R int (CAC optional)} vs. Voltage

Tables for diode Tables for sensors and minisensors are similar but more extensive.

Addition for sensor and minisensor

Pending Actions Agreement how to label tables for diode, sensor, minisensor!?! Is the diode, the irrad. Sensor and the minisensor a component of the sensor (same ID) ? YES!!!!!! Are they seperate objects; where will they be registered ? people implementation of the „composite of composites“ Implementation of the agreed! Tables into the DB (discussion underway) Labview vi for the XML output (will be done by KA) FINAL OK: MANUALLY (proposal from software)